Investigating the Role of Social Identity in Determining the Lifestyle of Youths in Hamedan, Iran

علوم اجتماعی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

Article 4, Volume 14, Issue 1 - Serial Number 29, September 2017, Pages 157-188   

Document Type: Scientific-Research

DOI: 10.22067/jss.v14i1.22265

Authors

Javad Afsharkohan^* ; Maliheh Rezaie Kermajani

Bu-Ali Sina University

Abstract

Extended Abstract
1. Introduction
Asking questions about human instinct and nature and his/her relationship with others has been the very essence of human beings’ thoughts throughout their psychological, intellectual, and civilizational life. In other words, humans have always been passionate about their feelings of personal distinction, personal continuity, and personal independence (Tajik, 2005). On the other hand, lifestyle is also among the concepts in social sciences, which has been in the spotlight during the recent decades, especially, following the works of Pierre Bourdieu and his followers. This concept may be used to gain a better understanding of daily life conditions in large cities. Therefore, considering recent changes in the Iranian society, one could use concepts such as lifestyle and social identity to perceive certain frameworks which reveal the similarities and differences among individuals. The main question of this research is as follows:
• Is there a significant correlation among the dimensions of social identity? Is there a significant correlation between the dimensions of social identity and lifestyle?
2. Theoretical Framework
The theoretical basis of this research is a combination of the theories of Bourdieu, Max Weber, and Anthony Giddens. In today’s world, the culture of consumption provides consumers with a wide range of choices and each choice is an indication of some values, interests, attitudes and tastes which may be peculiar to a certain social group. Hence, lifestyle is connected to social identity. The hypotheses of this study are as follows:
• The lifestyle of youths in Hamedan in terms of their activities varies based on their identity (i.e., religious identity, ethnic identity, family identity, and group identity).
• The lifestyle of youths in terms of their interests varies based on their identity.
• The lifestyle of youths in terms of their attitudes varies based on their identity.
3. Method
The current research was a survey study which was conducted through a questionnaire. The sample population consisted of all the youths between 15 and 29 years of age in Hamedan, Iran. Based on the 2005 national population census, the total number of youths in Hamedan was 164152. Overall, 383 individuals were selected through Cochran’s sample size formula. Sampling was done through multi-stage stratified sampling method. Accordingly, Hamedan was divided into 50 neighborhoods according to the model provided by the Statistical Centre of Iran. Then, random clusters were chosen from each neighborhood and the subjects were selected from the clusters. In order to measure the variables and collect the necessary data and information, two self-structured questionnaires were used. The items of the questionnaires were designed based on the theoretical framework, background of the study, and definitions of the variables and concepts used in the hypotheses.
After designing the items and structuring the questionnaires using the comments of several researchers and university professors, as well as adding and deleting some items, the face validity of the questionnaires were confirmed. Subsequently, factor analysis was conducted on the collected data. Hence, the construct validity of the questionnaire has also been investigated and confirmed in this study.
4. Findings
It may be argued that youths have different lifestyles based on their social identity. The results also indicate that religious identity has a decisive role in the degree of religious activities and interests of youths. On the other hand, group identity has a critical impact on their degree of group and sport activities as well as the sports interests of youths in Hamedan. Group identity also influences the extent to which youths possess modern attitudes to life. The lifestyle of young individuals in terms of activities varies based on their identity (i.e., family identity, group identity, ethnic identity, and religious identity). Also, the degree of modern attitudes in group identity was significantly higher than religious, family, and ethnic identities. However, the degree of modern attitudes did not vary among family, religious, and ethnic identities.
5. Discussion and Conclusions
Religious identity has a decisive role in the degree of religious activities and interests of youths in Hamedan, Iran. In addition, group identity has a critical impact on their degree of group and sport activities as well as the sports interests of youths in Hamedan. Group identity also influences the extent to which youths possess modern attitudes. This finding may be explained through social pressure theories which result from group membership. Another explanation for this finding may be that the young subjects included in the sample strongly need social confirmation in order to enter the world outside their family. Therefore, it may be stated that young individuals, as social groups involved in a competition for controlling specific social fields, use the economic and cultural capitals which they have accumulated in order to reach their desirable symbolic order, so as to control the afore-mentioned fields. On the other hand, it has to be admitted that in a real-life situation, the concept of youth which refers to a distinguished social group is defined and determined by explicit (legal) and implicit (cultural) norms. Consequently, social conditions such as economic, educational, and media-related decisions may influence this procedure. Therefore, future studies in this area have to adopt a more general viewpoint to investigate and analyze the common problems related to the young population of the society.

Keywords

social identity; lifestyle; Youths; Modern attitudes; Group identity

References

1. ابراهیمی، ق.‌ ع. و بهنوئی، ع. (1387). بررسی جامعه‌شناختی گونه‌های هویتی در بین جوانان (مطالعۀ موردی: بابلسر). مطالعات ملی، 9 (1)، 150-127.

2. اشرف، ا. (1346). جامعه‌شناسی طبقات اجتماعی در آمریکا. تهران: نشر دانشگاه تهران.

3. باکاک، ر. (1381). مصرف. (خ. صبوری، مترجم). تهران: نشر شیرازه.

4. بوردیو، پی. (1380). نظریۀ کنش، دلایل عملی و انتخاب عقلانی. (م. مردیها، مترجم). تهران: انتشارات نقش و نگار.

5. بوردیو، پی. (1384). شکل‌های سرمایه: سرمایۀ اجتماعی، اعتماد و دموکراسی و توسعه. گردآوری کیان تاجبخش. (ا. پاکباز و ح. پویان، مترجمان). تهران: نشرشیرازه.

6. تاجیک، م. ر. (1384). مجموعه مقالات جهانی‌شدن و هویت (هویت ملی و جهانی شدن). تهران: مؤسسه تحقیقات وتوسعه علوم انسانی.

7. تاجیک، م. ر. (1386). کلمۀ نهائی شکل‌گیری گفتمان‌های هویت در ایران. نامۀ پژوهش، 2 (7)، 48-25.

8. تیموتی، د. (1388). جامعه‌شناسی مصرف، گردش‌گری وخرید. (ع. ا. سعیدی و م. حسین‌آبادی‌، مترجمان). تهران: انتشارات جامعه‌شناسان.

9. جنکینز ر. (1381). هویت اجتماعی. (ت. یاراحمدی، مترجم). تهران: نشر شیرازه.

10. چاوشیان، ح. و اباذری، ی. (1381). از طبقۀ اجتماعی تا سبک زندگی. نامۀ علوم اجتماعی، (30)، 27-3.

11. ربانی، ر. (1388). اوقات فراغت و هویت اجتماعی: بررسی جامعه‌شناختی الگوهای گذران اوقات فراغت جوانان در تهران. تحقیقات فرهنگی ایران، 2 (8)، 242-209.

12. ربانی، ر. و رستگار، ی. (1387). جوان سبک زندگی و فرهنگ مصرفی. ماه‌نامۀ مهندسی فرهنگی، 3 (23 و 24)، 53-44.

13. رحمت‌آبادی، ا. و آقابخشی، ح. (1385). سبک زندگی و هویت اجتماعی جوانان. رفاه اجتماعی، (20)، 255-235.

14. رهبری، م. (1388). معرفت و قدرت معمای هویت. تهران: نشر کویر.

15. شارع‌پور، م. و خوش‌فر، غ. ر. (1381). رابطۀ سرمایۀ فرهنگی با هویت اجتماعی جوانان. نامۀ علوم اجتماعی، (20)، 147-133.

16. شویره، ک. و اولیویه، ف. (1385). واژگان بوردیو. (م. کتبی، مترجم). تهران: نشر نی.

17. فاضلی، م. (1382). مصرف و سبک زندگی. قم: صبح صادق.

18. فاین، بی. (1385). سرمایۀ اجتماعی و نظریۀ اجتماعی. تهران: پژوهشکده مطالعات راهبردی.

19. قادری، م. و قاسمی، و. (1388). تحلیلی بر وضعیت هویت اجتماعی جوانان (مطالعۀ موردی: شهر کرمانشاه). نشریۀ دانشکدۀ علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، 12 (24)، 226-201.

20. کوزر، ال. (1380). زندگی و اندیشۀ بزرگان جامعه‌شناسی. (م. ثلاثی، مترجم). چاپ نهم. تهران: نشر علمی.

21. گل‌محمدی، ا. (1386). جهانی‌شدن، فرهنگ، هویت. تهران: نشر نی.

22. گیدنز، آ. (1380). پیامدهای مدرنیته. (م. ثلاثی، مترجم). چاپ دوم. تهران: نشر مرکز.

23. گیدنز، آ. (1383). چکیدۀ آثار آنتونی گیدنز. (ح. چاوشیان، مترجم). تهران: نشر ققنوس.

24. گیدنز، آ. (1384) چشم‌اندازهای جهانی. (م. جلائی‌پور، مترجم). تهران: طرح نو.

25. گیدنز، آ. (1388). تجدد و تشخص (جامعه و هویت شخصی در عصر جدید). (ن. موفقیان، مترجم). چاپ ششم. تهران: نشر نی.

26. واکووانت، ال. (1379). پیر بوردیو، متفکران بزرگ جامعه‌شناسی. (م. میردامادی، مترجم). چاپ سوم. تهران: نشر مرکز.

27. وبر، ام. (1384). دین، قدرت، جامعه. (ا. تدین، مترجم). جلد دوم. تهران: نشر هرمس.

28. وبلن، تی. (1383). نظریۀ طبقۀ مرفه. (فرهنگ ارشاد، مترجم). تهران: نشر نی.

29. a. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Uk:Rutledge.

30. b.Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction. New York: Rutledge & Kegan Paul.

31. Bovone, L. (2006). Urban style cultures and urban cultural production in Milan postmodern identity and the transformation of fashion.paper in:. ( www. Science direct. Com).

32. Fern, E. F. (2001). Advanced focus group research. London: Sage.

33. Koch, M. (1996). Class and last: Bourdieu’s contribution to the analysis of social structure and social space. International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 33(2), 187-202.

34. Markus, H. (1977). Self – schemata and processing of information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(1), 63-78.

35. Schmidt, D. (2004,09 ). Personal and social Identity of Adolescents and their parents. Paper presented at the 2nd Congress of the European Society on Family Relations (ESFR). Switzerland, Fribourg.

36. Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3), 224-237.

37. Turner, J. C., Michael, A. H., Penelope, J. O., Stephen, D. R., & Wetherill, M. (1987). Rediscover ring the social Group: A self-categorization theory. New York: Basil Black well.

38. Vugt, V. M., & Hart, M. C. (2004). Social Identity as social clue: The origins of group loyalty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(4), 585-598.