Effective Mechanisms to Promote Women Participation in Training Courses in Isfahan County

Journal of Research and Rural Planning

مقاله 1، دوره 5، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 14، آبان 2016، صفحه 1-13   

نوع مقاله: علمی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/jrrp.v5i2.21300

نویسندگان

Seyyed Nahdi Mirdamadi¹؛ Mostafa Teimouri^{* 1}؛ Mahmoud Teimouri²؛ Mohammad Ebrahim Mostafei³

¹Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University

²Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

³Birband Branch, Islamic Azad University

چکیده

Extended Abstract
1. INTRODUCTION
In our country, rural women have a great role in agricultural activities in most of the regions. Today, in national and international development programs, a special place is given to half of society i.e. women. Training as key pillars of development of nations is considered as the key activity in the development of rural women (half of the population). In this context, if agricultural training programs are well anticipated, planned and executed, they could be effective in increasing quantity and quality of agricultural production and finally improving the incomes of rural households. Accordingly, it is important to investigate women participation in training courses in order to achieve sustainable rural development. Therefore, the main question of this study is what are the mechanisms affecting rural women's participation in extension and training courses in Isfahan?
2. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Participation is a process in which members are actively involved with knowledge, freedom and responsibility to achieve a common goal. Regarding the definition of participation, individual and socio-cultural characteristics are among factors affecting participation in activities. Of course participation in voluntary activities and educational and extension activities were also affected by the same factor. Even due to the specific characteristics of participation in such activities, individual and psychological characteristics, personality, and social and economic status of people is more important compared to participating in other activities. Generally, factors affecting participation include: 1) demographic factors such as age, marital status, number of children and age of children, 2) socio-economic status including income, education, social class determined by oneself or others, employment status, home ownership and other physical properties, 3) Physical Social Profile: Gender, ethnicity, physical health and physical abilities, 4) Personal characteristics and capacity, including extroversion, socialization, friendship and social self-esteem, survival, identity, psychological adjustment, satisfaction, happiness, dominance, independence, achievement motivation, effectiveness, flexibility, adaptability and willingness to change the mood.
3. METHODOLOGY
This research uses descriptive survey method. The population of this research includes rural women (93593 = N). Cochran formula was used to make a sample of 195 people (P & Q= 0.5; d=0.7). The survey instrument was a questionnaire whose validity was confirmed by a panel of experts. To determine the reliability of the questionnaire, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used (0.73). The data were analyzed using SPSS software.
4. DISCUSSION
The results showed that the mean age of women was 48.5 years; the youngest woman was 22 years old and the oldest woman was 71 years old. Furthermore, the results of the analysis also showed that the average education level of the respondents' education was 2 years and the level of their education ranged from 0 to 14. In addition, 16.4% of the subjects had low and very low participation, 47.9% had average and 35.7% had good and very good participation.
The findings from correlation analysis demonstrated that rural women's participation in training-promotional courses had significant relationship with age, level of education, husband's level of education, number of children, working with rural communities, attitude towards training courses, view of the villagers' toward women's participation in educational programs, insights about the quality of previous training courses, relationship with urban communities and viewpoints about the usefulness of the previous training courses.
The results of multiple regression analysis showed that variables including husband's level of education, relationship with urban communities, view of the villagers' toward women's participation in educational programs, viewpoints about the usefulness of the previous training courses and attitude towards training courses had a significant impact on the dependent variable of the research, yet the impact of other variables were not significant.
5. CONCLUSION
Due to the low level of education of rural women of Isfahan and its significant relationship with their participation in training -extension courses, it is necessary to plan in order to execute proper educational programs for adults. Therefore, it is suggested that certain measure be taken to increase rural women knowledge through training classes such as the Literacy Movement. As a result of such measures the participation of women will increase in such training- extension courses regarding agriculture and rural life.
Since villagers' viewpoint toward women's participation in educational programs is the most important variable for women's participation in training courses, it is proposed that women's participation be established through the creation of proper local conditions. To achieve this goal, villagers' viewpoint toward women's participation could be enhanced via the implementation of appropriate programs. In this context, the media such as radio and television, which have a lot of audiences in many villages, could be helpful.
Given the negative correlation between the number of children and women's participation in training courses, it is proposed that at least during the designing training programs, certain facilities be provided to take care of young children of these women, thus providing care for the children does not impinge on women's participation in training courses.

کلیدواژه‌ها

Participation؛ training courses؛ Women؛ Isfahan

مراجع

1. Ali beige, A.M. & bani amerian, L. (1388/2009). Demographic factors affecting rural women's participation in promotional programs (Case Study: Songhor and Koliaie County). Journal of Social Studies of women, 7 (2), 115-133. [In Persian]

2. Arnold, M. E., Meinhold, J. L., Skubinna, T. & Ashton, C. (2007). The motivation for and developmental benefits of youth participation in county 4-H fairs: A pilot study. Journal of Extension, 45(6), 1-15.

3. Bashardoust, R. (1373/1994). Evaluation of rural women's participation and role of education in promoting rice producers in rice production in Gilan province. Unpublished master’s thesis, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian]

4. Chawla, L. (2001). Evaluating children’s participation: seeking areas of consensus. PLA notes, 42, 9-13.

5. Cole, R. E., Bacdayan, P. & White, B. J. (1993). Quality, participation, and competitiveness. California Management Review, 35(3), 68-81. ‏

6. Cumming Jr, R. W., Swanson, B. E., Hayward, J. A., Pierre, R. E., Postel, S., Puignau, J. P., ... & T Puignau, J. P. (1990). External assistance in agricultural extension: the USAID experience. Report of the global consultation agricultural extension. Global Consultation on Agricultural Extension (No. INVES-ET C20 F686). FAO, Roma (Italia).

7. Dalir, M. (1388/2009). The role of education in achieving the goals of cooperatives. Peak light, 7(4), 44-65. [In Persian]

8. Damisa, M. A. & Yohanna, M. (2007). Role of rural women in farm management decision making process: Ordered probit analysis. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 3(4), 543-546.

9. Farjadi, Gh. (1383/2004). Human resources and labor market characteristics in the Iranian economy. Two Weeks a Culture and Research, 155(1), 18-19. [In Persian]

10. Ghanbari, E., hajarian, A. & kiani, F. (1391/2012). Factors and barriers to rural women's participation in agricultural activities (Case study: Ferydounshahr county). Journal of Research and Rural Planning, 1(2), 71-87. [In Persian]

11. Golmohammadi, F., Karim-e-Motamed, M., & Bina, Gh. (1389/2010). Evaluation of educational programs that promote agriculture in connection with the Rural Women (Case Study of South Khorasan province). Proceeding of the National Conference on sustainable rural development with emphasis on the agricultural sector, (294-312), September 13 and 14, Bojnoord, Iran. [In Persian]

12. Hayati, D., Abadi, B., Movahedi, R. & Heidari, M. (2009). An empirical model of factors affecting farmers' participation in natural resources conservational programs in Iran. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment, 7(1), 201-207.

13. Hoque, M. & Itohara, Y. (2008). Participation and decision making role of rural women in economic activities: A comparative study for members and non-members of the micro-credit organizations in Bangladesh. Journal of Social Sciences, 4(3), 229-236.

14. Khosravipour, R. & Foroushani, N. (1390/2011). Women's participation and sustainable rural development. Monthly Work & Society, 132-133, 56-68. [In Persian]

15. Malekmohammadi, A. & Hosseininia, G. (1379/2000). Motives rural women's participation in education and extension programs in the province. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 31(1), 39-53. [In Persian]

16. Mehrabanian, A. & moazeni, S. (1386/2007). The role of rural women in agriculture (Case study in Asia). Jihad, 278(1), 176-195. [In Persian]

17. Mendoza, C. C. (2006). Factors influencing participation in environmental stewardship programs: a case study of the agricultural and forestry sectors in Louisiana. Doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University.

18. Mirakzade, A., Aliabadi, V. & shams, A. (1389/2010). Analysis of barriers to rural women's participation in educational programs and promotion. Journal of Rural and development, 13(2), 147-165. [In Persian]

19. Safarishali, R. (1387/2008). A study on social and cultural factors related to the participation level of rural women. Journal of Women in Development and Politics, 6(1), 137-159. [In Persian]

20. Samadi-e-Afshar, S. (1381/2002). Factors affecting rural women's participation in education and extension programs in the agricultural sector in West Azerbaijan province. Unpublished master’s thesis, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian]

21. Satio, K.A. (1992). Developing agricultural extension fir women farmers. World Bank Discussion Paper, vol. 156, Washington D.C.

22. Shabanali Fami, H. (2010). Relationship between different characteristics of rural women with their participation in mixed farming activities. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 8(1), 107-117.

23. Shahbazi, A. (1384/2005). Rural development and extension. (1st ed.). Tehran: Tehran University Press. [In Persian]

24. Smith, D. H., & Reddy, R. D. (1973). Improving participation in voluntary action. Journal of Nursing Administration, 3(3), 36-42.

25. UNDP. (1374/1995). Human Development Report 1995, (Gh. H. Salehnasab, Trans.). Tehran: Deputy Promoting and participation of the Ministry of Construction Jihad. [In Persian]

26. Zarafshani, K., Khaledi, kh., & Ghanian, M. (1388/2009). Clarify the role of rural women's participation in educational programs that promote partner participation Ernestine based on the stairs. Journal of Women's Research, 7(3), 107-128. [In Persian]