Study of metadata schema for Image, Sound & Video digital resources and selecting appropriate schema

پژوهشنامه کتابداری و اطلاع رسانی

Article 10, Volume 2, Issue 1 - Serial Number 3, June 2012, Pages 201-222   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/riis.v2i2.10422

Authors

Nadjla Hariri¹; Seyedeh Afrouz Hosseini Shokraei^{* 2}

¹Associate Professor, Library and Information Department, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Unit, Tehran

²Master's student in librarianship and information, Islamic Azad University, science and research department

Abstract

Purpose: This research is implemented regarding the examination of metadata schema parameters in digital recourses and identifying an appropriate method. The population consists of 10 metadata schema.

Method: This pattern was extracted by choosing three digital recourses and assemblage of related templates. This research was implemented by descriptive survey method. We examined the similarity of metadata schema to digital resources storage components through a checklist.


Results: Findings show that METS and PREMIS are the most compatible standards for storage and retrieval of images, audio and video digital resources. Also there is no unique metadata for all types of digital resources.regarding to cover the special features of resources. But we can use MARC, Dublin core and MODS in general and PB Core for media and VRA Core for visual asrt. Also we can use MIX for image resources, technical metadata for audio (Audio-MD) for sound resources, technical metadata for video (Video-MD) for video resources and technical metadata for text.

Keywords

Metadata; Metadata schemas; digital resources; digital resource database

References

Beard, M. K.(1996). A Structure for Organizing Metadata Collection. In Proceedings 3rd International Conference on Integrating GIS and Environmental Modeling. Sante Fe, NM. Jan 21-26. Santa Barbara, CA: NCGIA. http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/conf/sante-fe_cd_rom/main.html

Digital library federation. (2001) Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard: Primer and Reference manual. Retrieved from: http://www.loc.gov/standards/mets/METSPrimerRevised.pdf

Dutta, Biswanath.(2003) Cataloging Web Documents using Dublin Core, Marc 21. Retrieved from: http://64.233.169.104/ search?q=cache:5Qvd1QtOnzkJ:https://drtc.isibang.ac.in/bitstream/1849/24/2/C_Webcat_bisu.pdf+marc+%2Bcataloging+%2Bweb+%2Bdocuments&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&lr=lang_en.

El-Sherbini, Magda; Klim, George. (2004) Metadata and cataloging practices. Retrieved from: http://www.emeraldinsight.com.prxy4.ursus.maine.edu/Insight/ViewContentServlet?Filename=/published/emeraldfulltextarticle/pdf/2630220304.pdf

EU-NSF Working Group on Metadata. Metadata for Digital Libraries: a Research Agenda. Retrieved from: http://www.ercim.org/publication/ws-proceedings/EU-NSF/metadata.html

Gorman, Michael. (2004) Authority Control in the Context of Bibliographic Control in the Electronic Environment. Retrieved from: http://www.sba.unifi.it/ac/relazioni/gorman_eng.pdf .

Hunter, Jane and Armstrong, Liz. (1999) A comparison of schemas for video metadata representation. Retrieved from: http://espace.uq.edu.au/eserv/UQ:7838/comparison.html

Library of Congress. (2009) MARC21 format for Bibliographic data. Retrieved from: http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/

Library of Congress. (2009) Design principles for enhancements to MODS and MADS. Retrieved from: http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/design-principles-mods-mads.html

NISO: Information Standards Quarterly. (2010). Digital preservation metadata standards Retrieved from: http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/FE_Dappert_Enders_MetadataStds_isqv22no2.pdf

Taheri, S. M.; Hariri, Nadjla (2012). A Comparative Study on the Indexing and Ranking of the Content Objects Including the MARCXML and Dublin Core's Metadata Elements by General Search Engines. Electronic Library (ISI ranked journal). Vol 30, issue 4

 

منابع مورد استفاده در تهیه سیاهه‌ها

Australian record keeping metadata standard. Retrieved 5 July 2011 from: http://www.naa.gov.au/images/agrkms_final%20edit_16%2007%2008_revised_tcm2-12630.pdf

Bracero history keeping metadata standard Retrieved 3 July 2011 from: http://braceroarchive.org/MetadataDictionary.pdf.

California digital library. (2010). CDL guidelines for digital object. Retrieved 5 July 2011 from: http://www.cdlib.org/services/dsc/contribute/docs/GDO.pdf.

Dappert, Angela (2009). Digital Preservation Metadata.

Day, Michael (1998). Issues and Approaches to Preservation Metadata. Retrieved 4 July 2011 from: http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/presentations/rlg-npo/warwick.html

IFLA (2000). Guidance on the structure, content, and application of metadata records for digital resources and collections. Retrieved 5 July 2011 from: http://www.nla.gov.au/padi/metafiles/resources/8923.html

 Lavoie, Brian & Gartner, Richard (2005). DPC Technology Watch Report on Preservation Metadata. Retrieved 5 July 2011 from: http://www.dpconline.org/docs/reports/dpctw05-01.pdf

Library of congress. (2001) Audio technical metadata extension schema. Retrieved 6 July 2011 from: http://www.loc.gov/rr/mopic/avprot/AMD_020409.xsd

Library of Congress: AV Prototype Project Working Documents (2002). Data dictionary for Administrative metadata for Audio, Image, Text and Video content. Retrieved 10 July 2011 from: http://www.loc.gov/rr/mopic/avprot/extension2.html

Library of Congress, Digital production & provenance metadata. Retrieved 7 July 2011 from: http://www.loc.gov/rr/mopic/avprot/digiProvMD_v8.xsd

Library of congress digital repository development. Core metadata elements. Retrieved 8 July 2011 from: http://www.loc.gov/standards/metadata.html

Library of congress (2001) MODS: Metadata Object Description Schema. Retrieved 8 July 2011 from: http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/mods.xsd

Library of Congress,  Rights metadata. Retrieved 3 July 2011 from: http://www.loc.gov/rr/mopic/avprot/rightsMD_v8.xsd

Library of Congress, Structural Metadata Dictionary for LC Digital Objects. Retrieved 6 July 2011 from: http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/techdocs/repository/attlist.html

Library of congress (2001) video technicalal metadata extension schema. Retrieved 6 July 2011 from: http://memory.loc.gov/mets/Schemas/VMD.xsd

Library of congress (2000) Table of core metadata elements for library of congress digital repository development. Retrieved 5 July 2011 from:  http://www.loc.gov/standards/metable.html

METS: An overview & Tutorial. Retrieved 5 July 2011 from: http://www.loc.gov/standards/mets/METSOverview.v2.html

National Library of New-Zealand (2006). Digitization guidelines specifications for imaging

NCSU libraries. Core 1.0 metadata element set best practices. Retrieved 9 July 2011 from: http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/cataloging/metadata/NCSUcore1.html.

National Library of Newzealand (2003). Metadata Standard Framework-Preservation Metadata. Retrieved 5 July 2010 from: http://www.natlib.govt.nz/catalogues/library-documents/preservation-metadata-revised

National library of New Zealand (2003) .Preservation metadata. Retrieved 9 July 2011 from: http://www.natlib.govt.nz/downloads/metaschema-revised.pdf

New Zealand digital library. Describing digital content. Retrieved 2 July 2011 from: http://makeit.digitalnz.org/guidelines/describing-digital-content.

NISO (2006). Data dictionary-Technical metadata for digital still images. Retrieved 4 July 2011 from: http://www.niso.org/kst/reports/standards/kfile_download?id%3Austring%3Aiso-8859-1=Z39-87-2006.pdf&pt=RkGKiXzW643YeUaYUqZ1BFwDhIG4-24RJbcZBWg8uE4vWdpZsJDs4RjLz0t90_d5_ymGsj_IKVa86hjP37r_hKQ00ioOP35W6Q1wkBOLKanPbfamndQa6zkS6rLL3oIr

OCLC /RLG working group on preservation metadata (2001). Preservation metadata for digital objects”. Retrieved 6 July 2011 from: http://www.oclc.org/research/activities/past/orprojects/pmwg/presmeta_wp.pdf.

Queensland state library. Managing records of online resources and services guideline. Retrieved 5 July 2011 from: www.archives.qld.gov.au/downloads/Policies/OnlineResourcesGuideline.pdf

Rice, Dave (2009). Comparison between PBCore and VMD for technical media metadata. Retrieved 5 July 2011 from: http://www.pbcoreresources.org/article/2009/07/

Sean Daugherty, University of Maryland Administrative Metadata Tag Library. Retrieved 5 July 2011 from: http://www.lib.umd.edu/dcr/publications/taglibrary/umam.html. Accessed July 7 2010

UCLA Digital Library Program (2009). Guidelines for Descriptive Metadata.Retrieved 5 July 2011 from: http://unitproj.library.ucla.edu/cataloging/procedures/DRM_Metadata_guidelines_Version_1withUCLACoreMods.pdf.

University of ILLINOIS at URBANA-Champaign (2010). Best practices for descriptive metadata. Retrieved 5 July 2011 from: http://www.library.illinois.edu/dcc/bestpractices/chapter_08_descriptive_metadata.html.

University of ALABAMA libraries (2010). Retrieved 8 July 2011 from: http://www.lib.ua.edu/wiki/digcoll/index.php/Descriptive_metadata.

University of Virginia (2006). Retrieved 5 July 2011 from: www.lib.virginia.edu/digital/metadata/msgminutes.html.

VRA: Visual Resource Association (2010). Retrieved 5 July 2011 from: http://www.vraweb.org/projects/vracore3/categories.html

Weller, Martin (2002). Metadata. Retrieved 9 July 2011 from: http://kn.open.ac.uk/public/getfile.cfm?documentfileid=4763