The Effect of Strategic Thinking and Social Capital on Recognition of Entrepreneurial Opportunities among Rural Youths (Case Study: Kangavar County)

Journal of Research and Rural Planning

مقاله 4، دوره 5، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 14، آبان 2016، صفحه 95-110   

نوع مقاله: علمی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/jrrp.v5i2.46072

نویسندگان

Vahid Aliabadi^{* 1}؛ Pouria Ataiee²؛ Reza Movahedi¹

¹Bu-Ali-Sina University

²Tarbiat Modares University

چکیده

Extended Abstract
1. INTRODUCTION
So far, different strategies have been proposed for rural development in different periods of time. Based on international experiences and the current conditions in Iran, this country needs to use a new approach to rural development. In this regard, rural entrepreneurship development strategy can be pointed out. There is a growing consensus that entrepreneurship is the process through which new economic activities and organizations come into existence. Keeping this in mind opportunities are central to this process. The literature about entrepreneurial opportunities has grown rapidly since 2000. Considering the earliest stages of development of new economic activities in villages, this marks bring about redirection of entrepreneurship studies. However, theoretical and empirical issues have been limited to important aspects and dimensions of the role of opportunities and their interaction with actors. But, entrepreneurial opportunity emerges from the nexus of individual aspirations with economic and social conditions perceived as favourable to create a new product or service, either in an existing market or a new one. Entrepreneurs discover, evaluate, and exploit opportunities, and rural areas are full of opportunities for rural youths.
The main purpose of this study was to determine the effect of strategic thinking and social capital on recognition of entrepreneurial opportunities among rural youth. This study also aims to investigate the demographic characteristics of rural youth, identify the situation of recognition entrepreneurial opportunities and their components, identify social capital components condition, and identify situation of strategic thinking components.
2. METHODOLOGY
In this study, a quantitative method of descriptive-correlation was used. Research area was Kangavar County where four villages (Qazvineh, Dehlor, Fash, and Godin) were selected. Data was gathered through a questionnaire distributed between the rural youths whose age ranged between 20 and 35 (N= 9207). The sample size was determined to be 225 using Bartlett Table. In this study, systematic random sampling was used. Research variables were social capital, strategic thinking and identifying entrepreneurial opportunities. Social capital components consisted of social solidarity, socio-cultural values, social participation, social security, social trust, valuing life, acceptance of differences and social communications. Strategic thinking components were systematic thinking, conceptual thinking, cleverly opportunism and futurity. Moreover, indicators of identifying entrepreneurial opportunities were environmental competitive scanning, seeking pioneer opportunities and innovative strategy of creating opportunity. To measure these variables a five-point Likert scale (1= strongly disagree to 5= strongly agree) was used. In this study, data were analyzed using AMOS and SPSS softwares. The validity of instrument was determined by investigating the views of faculty members of Razi University. And the reliability of the questionnaire has been confirmed using pilot test and Cronbach's coefficient alpha.
3. DISCUSSION
The findings showed that rural youths are weak in terms of identifying entrepreneurial opportunities. Results showed that the model fit is appropriate. The results showed that the social capital of rural youths and strategic thinking was moderate. Among the components of strategic thinking, futurism, and among the components of social capital, social participation had the highest priority among rural youths. Having used Amos software, Model fitting results revealed that, social capital and strategic thinking, respectively, predict and explain 54 and 49 percent of changes of entrepreneurial opportunities recognition. In the research, the final model showed that social capital variables and strategic thinking had positive impact on opportunity recognition. Accordingly, reinforcing components of social capital among rural youths can have a strong relationship with strategic thinking and increase this type of thinking. In general, considering that the characteristics of youth entrepreneurship, (including social capital and strategic thinking) will have an impact on youth entrepreneurship intentions, it is expected that rural youth entrepreneurship intentions and their entrepreneurial skills should be improved. Hence, promoting entrepreneurial characteristics of rural youths is very necessary for them to become entrepreneurs in the future and increase the possibility of influencing their productive employment. Based on the findings, it can be offered that different trainings, such as social skills, management skills, expressiveness skill, persuasion, and social adjustment should be available to the rural youths.
4. CONCLUSION
The researchers of the present study found that variables such as appreciating the lives of rural youth, futurism, conceptual thinking and opportunism of rural youth had a direct relationship with entrepreneurial opportunities recognition. Rural researchers and planners can use the findings of this study to boost entrepreneurial activities and ventures among the rural youth. These results must, however, be treated with caution because this study is restricted in terms of subject into entrepreneurial opportunities recognition among rural youths of Kangavar County.

کلیدواژه‌ها

Entrepreneurial opportunity؛ entrepreneurial opportunities recognition؛ rural youth؛ Social capital؛ strategic thinking

مراجع

1. Abraham, S. (2005). Stretching strategic thinking. Strategy & leadership, 33(5), 5-12. ‏

2. Alistair, R. and Claire, J. (2003). Class matters: Human and social capital in the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Socio-Economics, 32(1), 17-36.

3. Alonge, J.A. (2002). Traditional Institutions, social capital and multi-institutional partnerships for agricultural development: implications for anew extension paradigm. AIAEE. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conferences. Durban. South Africa.

4. Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., & Ray, S. (2003). A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(1), 105-123.

5. Barlett, J. E., Kotrlik, J. W., & Higgins, C. C. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Information technology, Learning, & Performance Journal, 19(1), 43. ‏

6. Behnoosh, S. (2012). The relationship between social capital and entrepreneurship in general administration of physical education of Khorasan Province, Iran. World Applied Sciences Journal, 18(3), 317-321.

7. Bhagavatula, S., Elfring, T., Van Tilburg, A. & Van De Bunt, G. G. (2010). How social and human capital influence opportunity recognition and resource mobilization in India's handloom industry. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(3), 245-260.

8. Bianon, L. (1999). Gender, psychological perspective, Allan & Bacon, Boston.

9. Chung, K.C. (2004). Entrepreneurial opportunity identification through of dissociative mode of thinking, Unpublished doctoral Dissertation, University of Hong kong.

10. Corbett, A.C. (2007). Learning asymmetries and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 97-118.

11. Dadvar-e-Khani, F., Rezvani, M. R., Imeni-e-Gheshlagh, S., & Bozarjomehri, Kh. (1390/2011). Analyzing the role of tourism in the development of entrepreneurial traits and willingness to entrepreneurship among rural youth (Case study: Kandovan and Skandan villages in Osku County). Human Geography Research Quarterly, 43(78), 169-195. [In Persian]

12. Firkin, M. (2001). Entrepreneurial capital: A resource-based conceptualization of the entrepreneurial process, Labor Market Dynamics Research Programme, Massey University, Auckland.

13. Gholipoor, R., Madhoushi, M., & Jafarian, V. (1387/2008). Analysis of the relationship and effect of social capital on organizational extrepeneurship. Journal of Organizational Culture Management, 17(6), 119-128. [In Persian]

14. Goudarzvand Chegini, M., Alipour, M., & Zamani, A. (2012). The relationship between social capital and inter-organizational entrepreneurship in Rasht Industrial City, Iran. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2(3), 3157- 3164.

15. Hansen, D. J., Shrader, R. & Monllor, J. (2011). Defragmenting definitions of entrepreneurial opportunity. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(2), 283-304.

16. Hashemitabar, M., Akbari, A., Karim, M. H., & Farjamifard, M. (1388/2009). Analyzing the performance and impacts of facilities granted to the fisheries sector in Sistan and Baluchestan Province. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 65(17), 113-122. [In Persian]

17. Heidari, H. & Rostami, F. (2012). Survey of relationship between social capital and organization entrepreneurship (Case study: Agricultural organization of Sonqhur County). Analysis of Biological Research. 3(7), 3192- 3199.

18. Heracleous, L. (1998). Strategic thinking or strategic planning. Journal of Long Range Planning, 31(3), 481-487.

19. Hosseini, S., Khaledi, M., Ghorbani, M., & Hassanpour, E. (1388/2009). Assessing the transaction costs of Bank-e- Keshavarzi credits in Iran's rural areas. Journal of Economics and Agricultural Development, 2(23), 36-45. [In Persian]

20. Liedtka, J. M. (1998(. Strategic thinking: can it be taught? Long Range Planning, 31(1), 120-129.

21. Marvel, M. (2006). Knowledge –based view of the venture creation process. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois.

22. Mintzberg, H. (2004). Managers, not MBAs: a hard look at the soft practice of managing and management development. Berretta-Koehler, pp. 464.

23. Moreno, J.D. (2006). An empirical analysis of Entrepreneurial opportunity identification and their decisive factors: The case of new Spanish firms, Plaza de la Victoria. University of Alcala, 2: 1-43.

24. Muzychenko, O. (2006). Competence based approach to teaching international opportunity identification: Cross cultural aspects. Internationalizing Entrepreneurship Education and Training Conference (IntEnt). Brazil.

25. Nan-Chen, C., Lun-Chung, T., Wei-Ming, O. and Kai-Ti, C. (2007). The relationship among social capital, entrepreneurial orientation, organizational resources and entrepreneurial performance for new ventures. Contemporary Management Research, 3(3). 213- 232.

26. Narayan, D. (2001). Consultations with the poor from a health perspective. World Development, 44(1), 15-21.

27. Onyx, J. and Bullen, P. (2000). Measuving social capital in fire communities. Journal o Applied Behavioral science, 36, 23-42.

28. Ozgen, E. (2003). Entrepreneurial opportunity recognition: Information flow, social, and cognitive perspectives, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New York.

29. Ozgen, E., & Baron, R. A. (2007). Social sources of information in opportunity recognition: Effects of mentors, industry networks, and professional forums. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(2), 174-192.

30. Puhakka, V. (2010). Versatile and flexible use of intellectual capital in entrepreneurial opportunity discovery. Journal of Management Research, 2(1), 3-12.

31. Sarasvathy, S. D., Dew, N., Velamuri, S. R., & Venkataraman, S. (2005). Three views of entrepreneurial opportunity. Handbook of entrepreneurship research.

32. Schenkel, M. (2005). New enterprise opportunity recognition, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, university of Cincinnati.

33. Shafaati Laleh, R. (2012). Study on relationship between social capital entrepreneurship. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2(8), 7719- 7726.

34. Shane, S.A. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship: the individual opportunity nexus, Edward Elgar Pub.

35. Shepherd, D. A., Covin, G, F., & Kuratko F. D. (2008). Project failure from corporate entrepreneurship: Managing the Grief process. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(6), 588-600.

36. Shepherd, D.A., & DeTienne, D.R. (2005). Prior knowledge, potential financial reward and opportunity Identification. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(1), 91-112.

37. Short, J.C., Ketchen Jr, D.J., Shook, C. L. & Ireland, R. D. (2010). The concept of “opportunity” in entrepreneurship research: Past accomplishments and future challenges. Journal of Management, 36(1), 40-65.

38. Tumasjan, A., & Braun, R. (2012). In the eye of the beholder: How regulatory focus and self-efficacy interact in influencing opportunity recognition. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(6), 622-636.

39. Wood, M., & Pearson, J. (2009). Taken on faith? The impact of uncertainty, knowledge relatedness, and richness of information on entrepreneurial opportunity exploitation. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 16(2), 117-130.