An Analysis on Development Challenges of Cultural Tourism in Rural Areas (Case Study: Binaloud County)

Journal of Research and Rural Planning

مقاله 5، دوره 5، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 14، آبان 2016، صفحه 111-130   

نوع مقاله: علمی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/jrrp.v5i2.46324

نویسندگان

Hadis Kamranifar¹؛ Maryam Ghasemi^{* 1}؛ Salman Hayati²

¹Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

²Lamerd Branch, Islamic Azad University

چکیده

Extended Abstract
1. INTRODUCTION
Today, tourism compared with other economic sections has many advantages for local communities so that it has been discussed as an economic panacea that lifts viability in remote areas, stimulates revitalization of settlements, improves the living conditions of rural communities, and is the catalyst for economic and social reconstruction of rural areas. Cultural tourism is one of the models of tourism in rural areas. At present, most of rural areas of the country have cultural richness, historical background, and valuable historical and cultural monuments. Specific properties of rural communities such as local habits, customs related to food and clothing, architecture, historical monuments, music, art, and local languages etc. are considered as hidden cultural capacities in rural communities that can benefit them well in tourism. Unfortunately, despite cultural richness and diversity of rural areas of Binalood, this kind of tourism did not have appropriate development. However, Binalood has historical and natural link with Toos and Mashhad and regarding cultural and historical heritage, it is an inseparable part of the old civilization of Toos and Mashhad. Lack of attention sometimes leads to corrosion and decline of cultural properties (theft, use changing, destruction, etc.). In order to improve and develop cultural tourism in rural areas there is an increasing need to identify challenges of cultural tourism in respect to conditions and properties of the province. Thus, this study aims to address the following research question.
Q: What are the main development challenges of cultural tourism in rural areas?"
2- THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Studies show that culture has a distinct role in tourism activities, especially, in rural areas. Customs, habits, and local identity are resources that tourists want to experience. In this kind of tourism, the traditional culture originating from the distant past attracts many tourists in rural areas that still have cultural authenticity. It means that some writers consider culture as the cornerstone of tourism development. In a report by Europe Travel Committee in 2005, two external and internal issues of cultural tourism have been spoken about; internal area includes the first element of cultural tourism and can be divided into two sectors, namely, historical monuments tourism, and art tourism. External area includes the secondary elements of cultural tourism and can be divided into two parts. Lifestyle and creative industries are generally studied in two axes; the first axis of tourism is related to cultural heritage of a place. In this view, the historical dimension of a community is important while in the second axis the present time and current culture of a community is the target.
3- METHODOLOGY
This study is an applied developmental research with a descriptive-analytic method. Data collection is based on documentation and field study. Challenges facing tourism development in rural areas were identified and were prepared in form of questionnaires. They were given to 40 authorities and experts of Cultural Heritage, Handcraft, and Tourism Organization. They were also given to 30 local elites in potential villages to provide perspectives. Due to the high number of identified challenges and unknown relationships between them, in this study we used exploratory factor analysis test which is a mathematical method for data reduction.
4 - DISCUSSION
The aim of this study is to analyze the factors for detecting unobservable factors based on a set of observable variables. In this study, five main unobservable factors were identified from a linear combination of 18 observable variables. Management challenges are the most significant challenges identified in the field of cultural tourism in Binalood. This factor which was detected by 5 observable variables with high correlation coefficient, explains 36% of variance by itself. Marketing and advertising weakness in cultural tourism, concentrating on ecotourism and unimportant role of cultural tourism in tourism development plans, and threatening historical attractions by constructions, etc. are issues of a more fundamental factor called management challenges. Then, 10.9 percent of explained variance are planning challenges, 8.9 percent are regulatory challenges, 6.8 percent are ultra-structural challenges, and finally, 6.8 percent are legislation challenges of explained variance.
5- Conclusion
Today, visiting cultural resources is one of the largest and fastest growing parts of tourism industry. Studies show that the optimal model for tourism development in Iran is cultural tourism due to cultural background and high volume of cultural tourists in the world. The most significant challenges detected in this study are management challenges. In management challenges, weakness in marketing and advertising of cultural tourism and not introducing cultural tourism attractions with a correlation coefficient of 0.82 are two priorities. In planning challenges, the low arrivals of tourists for cultural attractions of the province and the small number of tourists with a correlation coefficient of 0.81, in regulatory challenges, the tendency to mass production of handcraft and not having the control of it by native people and developing by nonnative manufacturers with a correlation coefficient of 0.82, in ultra-structural challenges, inappropriate distribution of tourists during the year and tourists' focus on particular days of the year with a correlation coefficient of 0.81, and in legislation challenges, the weakness of laws and regulations in investment and unclear laws of attracting investment in cultural tourism with a correlation coefficient of 0.81 are the first priorities in each section. Given the detection of main challenges in tourism development, it is possible to make a plan in order to eliminate the existing challenges and pave the way for cultural tourism development. For this purpose, it is necessary to make a comprehensive long term plan of cultural tourism for Binaloud county.

کلیدواژه‌ها

Cultural tourism؛ development challenges؛ Factor analysis؛ Binaloud county

مراجع

1. Bachleitner, R., & Zins, A. H. (1999). Cultural tourism in rural communities: The residents’ perspective. Journal of business research, 44(3), 199-209.

2. Brokensha, P., & Guldberg, H. (1992). Cultural tourism in Australia. Australia: Australian Government Publishing Service (AGPS).

3. Carvalho, M. S., Lima, J., & Kastenholz, E. (2014). Cultural creativity-that opportunity for rural destinations?. In PASOS: Revista de Turismo y Patrimonio Cultural, 12(3), 635-648.

4. Condesso, F. (2011). Rural development, cultural heritage and tourism. Cuadernos de desarrollo rural, 8(66), 197-222.

5. Consulting Engineers Urban Fabric. (1381/2002). Tourism plan in Torghabeh and Shandiz. Mashad: Cultural Heritage & Tourism Organization of Khorasan Razavi. [In Persian]

6. Cultural Heritage Organization of Tourism and Crafts of Khorasan Razavi Province. (1393/2014). Tourist attractions, cultural (religious heritage) rural areas Binaloud County. Mashhad: Department of Statistics and Information. [In Persian]

7. Gartner, W. C. (2004). Rural tourism development in the USA. The International Journal of Tourism Research, 6(3), 151-164.

8. Ghasemi, A. (1388/2009). Physical planning in rural tourism Areas. Tehran: Islamic Revolution Housing Foundation press. [In Persian]

9. Ghasemi, M. (1390/2011). Tourism as a System (Case Study: Mashhad). Journal of Geography and Regional Development, 9(17), 1-35. [In Persian]

10. Ghiasvand, A. (1387/2008). The use of statistics and SPSS in data analysis (1st ed.). Tehran: Louyeh press. [In Persian]

11. Gidnez, A. (1382/2003). Sociology. (M. Saboori, Trans.). Tehran: Ney press. [In Persian]

12. Gunn, C. A. (1988). Tourism planning (2nd ed.). Psychology Press.

13. Jomepoor, M., & Ahmadi, S. (1390/2011). The effect of tourism on rural livelihoods (Case study: The village of Yarghan, Savojbolagh County). Rural Research, 2(1), 33-62. [In Persian]

14. Kasimoğlu, M., & Aydin, H. (2012). Strategies for tourism industry–micro and macro perspectives. In Tech Pre Press. ‏

15. MacDonald, R., & Jolliffe, L. (2003). Cultural rural tourism: Evidence from Canada. Annals of Tourism Research, 30(2), 307-322.

16. Mazloom, Z., Mikaeil Tabrizi, A., & Salman Mahini, A. (1393/2014). Enhancing the impacts of development assessment with theory of Dempster-Shafer (Case Study: Binaloud County, Khorasan Razavi). Quarterly Ecology, 40(3), 621-630. [In Persian]

17. McCarthy, B. (2012). From fishing and factories to cultural tourism: The role of social entrepreneurs in the construction of a new institutional field. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 24(3-4), 259-282.

18. McKercher, B., Cros, H. D., & McKercher, R. B. (2002). Cultural tourism: the partnership between tourism and cultural heritage management. Haworth Hospitality Press. ‏

19. Nkwanyana, M. S. (2012). The potential of cultural heritage tourism as a driver of rural development in the Zululand district municipality (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Zululand, South Africa.

20. Okumus, F., Avci, U., Kilic, I., & Walls, A. R. (2012). Cultural tourism in Turkey: A missed opportunity. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 21(6), 638-658.

21. Organization Mondale du tourism, & union international des organism’s officials de tourism. (2005). City tourism & culture: The European experience. World Tourism Organization. ‏

22. Papoli-e-Yazdi, M. H., & Saghayi, M. (1390/2011). Tourism: Essence and concepts. Tehran: SAMT Press. [In Persian]

23. Poorahmad, A., Hosseini, A., Orooji, H., & Alizadeh, M. (1392/2013). The priority of measuring the strategies for development of cultural tourism in Alamut Qazvin. Human Geography Research, 45(3), 1-17. [In Persian]

24. Pourtaheri, M., Rokneddin-e-Eftekhari, A., & Nikbakht, M. (1390/2011). The effect of cultural changes on the pattern of rural housing (Case study: The central rural of Binaloud County). Journal of Geographical Space, 11(35), 115-134. [In Persian]

25. Rahnamaei, M., Farhoodi, R., Andrians, D., & Ghadami, M. (1387/2008). Study of tolerance capacity of Tourism target with emphasis on host community (Case Study: Kelardasht city). Journal of Human Geography Research, 40(66), 17-33. [In Persian]

26. Ramesht, M. H., Ezzatian, V., Mahboobfar, M., & Ghamari, H. (1390/2011). The role of cultural tourism in sustainable development of Iran. Proceeding of the 1st Tourism and Sustainable Development Conference, Islamic Azad university, Hamadan, Iran. [In Persian]

27. Richards, G. (2007). Cultural Tourism: Global and local perspectives. Routledge, 347

28. Richards, G., & Queiros, C. (2005). ATLAS cultural tourism research project 2004: Survey report. Atlas Press. ‏

29. Richards, G., & van der Ark, L. A. (2013). Dimensions of cultural consumption among tourists: Multiple correspondence analysis. Tourism Management, 37(1), 71-76.

30. Rokneddin-e-Eftekhari, A., & Ghaderi, A. (1381/2002). The role of rural tourism in rural development: Analysis of theoretical frameworks. Journal of Modarres Human Sciences, 6(2), 22-40. [In Persian]

31. Rokneddin-e-Eftekhari, A., & Mahdavi, D. (1389/2010). The process of localization of indicators of sustainable development of rural tourism in Iran. Journal of Rural Researches, 1(4), 1-41. [In Persian]

32. Sarmad, Z., Bazargan, A., & Hejazi, A. (1378/1999). Research Methods in behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Tehran: Ahah press. [In Persian]

33. Sharpley, R. (2000). Tourism and sustainable development: Exploring the theoretical divide. Journal of Sustainable tourism, 8(1), 1-19.

34. Shen, F., Hughey, K. F., & Simmons, D. G. (2008). Connecting the sustainable livelihoods approach and tourism: A review of the literature. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 15(1), 19-31.

35. Simber, R. (1382/2003). Tourism and cultural heritage. Articles of studying policies and plans Conference tourism development in Islamic Republic of Iran, University of Allameh Tabatabaei and Tourism Organization, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian]

36. Smith, M. K. (2009). Issues in cultural tourism studies. Routledge.

37. Statistical Center of Iran. (1390/2011). Certificates of Khorasan Razavi villages. Tehran: Iran Statistics Center. [In Persian]

38. Stebbins, R. A. (1996). Cultural tourism as serious leisure. Annals of tourism research, 23(4), 948-950.

39. Timothy, D. J. (2011). Cultural heritage and tourism. Channel View Publications.

40. Vay Gee, Ch. (1385/2006). Tourism in comprehensive perspective. (A. Parsaeian., & M. A'rabi, Trans.). Tehran: center of cultural researches press. [In Persian]

41. World Tourism Organization (UNWTO). Retrieved 27 September 2016 from http://www.unwto.org/content/data.

42. Ying, T., & Zhou, Y. (2007). Community, governments and external capitals in China's rural cultural tourism: A comparative study of two adjacent villages. Tourism Management, 28(1), 96-107.

43. Ziayi, M. (1388/2009). Tourism Geography. Tehran: PNU Press. [In Persian]