Water Resources Management in the Harirud river basin based on game theory

فصلنامه آب و توسعه پایدار

Article 12, Volume 3, Issue 1 - Serial Number 6, September 2016, Pages 115-121   

Document Type: review paper

DOI: 10.22067/jwsd.v3i1.55039

Authors

ahmad Ghandhari^{* 1}; Seyed Mohhamad Reza Alavi Moghaddam¹; hamid omranian khorasani²

¹Islamic Azad University

²tarbiat modares

Abstract

Today, limitations of water availability besides common rights between countries on transboundary rivers causes a competition among them for more water using. Usually, stakeholders prefer to overuse from their water rights because of unreliability, risk aversion and short term approaches. Iran, Afghanistan and Turkmenistan as common congruities on Harirud always try to maximize their benefits from the river. Here, this research likes to map the roads of hydro diplomacy amongst the common countries and show the best future moving pace for all of them according the game theory. Results show that the best approach is full cooperation between the countries and establishing water narket.

Keywords

transboundary rivers; Harirud; Shapley value; cooperative game

References

میان‏آبادی، ح. 1392. مروری بر قوانین بین المللی آب. هفتمین کنگره ملی مهندسی عمران، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان، ایران.

Bahaduri A. and Liebe J. 2013. Cooperation in Transboundary Water Sharing with Issue Linkage: Game-Theoretical Case Study in the Volta Basin. J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000252, 235-245.

Kucukmehmetoglu M. and Guldmann J. M. 2004. International water resources allocation and conflicts: the case of the Euphrates and Tigris. Environment and Planning A, 36(5): 783-802.

Kucukmehmetoglu M. and Guldmann J. 2010. Multiobjective Allocation of Transboundary Water Resources: Case of the Euphrates and Tigris. J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 136(1): 95–105.

Palau R.G. 2011. Afghanistan’s Transboundary Water Resources: Regional Dimensions, CIVIL-MILITARY FUSION CENTRE, available at www.cimicweb.org.

Rogers P. 1969. A game theory approach to the problems of international River Basin. Water Resour. Res. 5 (4): 749–760.

Wu X., and Whittington D. 2006. Incentive compatibility and conflict resolution in international river basins: A case study of the Nile Basin. Water Resources Research, 42(2), W02417. DOI: 10.1029/2005WR004238

Teasley R. L. and D. C. McKinney. 2008. Water Resource Management in a Transboundary River Basin using Cooperative Game Theory: The Rio Grande/Bravo Basin, EWRI World Environmental and Water Resources Conference, Honolulu, HI, May 2008.