Investigating the Impact of Economic Structure of Agricultural Products on the Urban-Rural Relationship (Case Study: Central District of Dezful County)

Journal of Research and Rural Planning

مقاله 7، دوره 5، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 14، آبان 2016، صفحه 195-212   

نوع مقاله: علمی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/jrrp.v5i2.51554

نویسندگان

Mostafa Taleshi؛ Reyhaneh Soltani Moghaddas؛ Seyyed Ramin Ghaffari؛ Essmat Karamifar^*

Payam Noor University

چکیده

Extended Abstract
1. INTRODUCTION
The bond between urban and rural areas, the result of their mutual needs in a spatial system, is the basis of urban-rural continuity. One of such bonds is the transfer of agricultural goods from villages to urban market. The structure of production and the flow of agricultural products to urban market could be affected by factors such as access to natural resources, production capital and appropriate infrastructures, which altogether determine villagers benefit from the added value of this flow. Thus, the present research was performed with the goal of analyzing the structure of production and marketing of agricultural products in Dezful region. It aimed to understand whether or not this flow has established a bond and complementary relation between rural settlements and urban areas on a local and national level.
2. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
In many of development theories, urban and rural areas are considered as two isolated entities. However, the balanced land development is fulfilled by urban-rural relationship. Accordingly, Douglas proposes regional network theory with emphasis on urban-rural relationships and refers to the necessity of a balanced spatial strategy and its substitution with a viewpoint isolating cities from villages. The investigation of the flow of agricultural products to urban market is also based on this viewpoint and with emphasis on urban-rural relationship.
3. METHODOLOGY
The present research uses a descriptive method to analyze data derived from documentation and field study. The findings of the field study were obtained via interviews with relevant experts and individuals in crop production. These findings were also gained by a questionnaire about the attitudes of the subjects toward the research subject and variables, which was randomly distributed among the participants. The analysis of data was performed using SPSS software. Topsis model was used to prioritize the sample villages according to village – town capital flow. In order to increase the precision of investigating the flow in the mentioned region (Dezful central area), more than 25% of the total villages in this section consisting of 10 villages were determined as macro sample, and 363 households in the sample villages were chosen as micro sample by using Cochran formula and random sampling method.
The structure of production and flow of agricultural products in the region was investigated in the form of classified flows proposed by Douglas in his theory of regional networks including measures such as population flow, capital flow, product flow (transportation, marketing and their cost) and information flow.
4. DISCUSSION
The study of the structure of production and flow of crops in Dezfulshowed thata combination of different flows including the flow of people, capital, goods and information is producedat the heart of this structure and its flow. In order to supply the work force for agriculture, some have migrated from the city to the rural areas. However, the chi square (sig level) showed that there is a significant difference between the distance from city and local labor supply. The increase of distance leads to the overcoming of labor supply in rural areas. Capital flow is in two major forms: 1. receiving rent of farmlands by urban owners of the lands, 2. borrowing from urban investors to finance agricultural rural businesses. This causes the transfer of agricultural capital to cities. The correlation between the volume of agricultural production and the amount money borrowed from urban investors shows that the increase of production leads to their increase to provide capital. Water supply for agricultural lands and units causes the transfer of a part of the rural capital to city. The correlation coefficient (0.763) between these two majors and the volume of production shows the increase of capital transfer and the rise of production rate. Transportation companies focusing on market crops in the city of Dezful, which is monopolized by urban businessmen (market brokers), has caused the flow of another part of rural capital to the city. A significant level of 0.001 calculated from the Pearson test shows the existence of a significant relationship with an aaverage correlation coefficient between the volume of production and the commission received by the urban brokers. Unfortunately, information flow to get aware of market condition is only the result of interaction between rural farmers, on the one hand, and urban brokers (or farmers), on the other. Topsis model showed that regarding urban-rural relationship, Jateh was ranked the highest, and Ghale Tough was placed on the lowest level from among the sample villages and according to the measures of rural-urban capital transfer. This shows that the transfer of a major part of rural capital to the city happened from the first village in the above ranking.
5. CONCLUSION
The findings showed that the factors influencing the structure of agricultural product flow shape the bond between the settlements of the rural areas like Dezful and other cities on regional and national levels by using more urban areas in this process. Accordingly, commercializing crop production and linking them with foreign markets is an appropriate way to expand agricultural economy with the simultaneous goal of rural and urban development. On the one hand, creating a network of economic and information relationships among individual farmers, and on the other hand, the establishment of such relationships between individual famers and the major producers who are directly in touch with exportation market (to be in touch with global markets) could be a proper means in this regard. These relationships could unfold in the shape of establishing sale and marketing cooperatives; they could strengthen the positive bonds between rural and urban areas and finally they could develop regional development with the goal of modifying state policies, facilitating exportation networks and establishing required infrastructures.

کلیدواژه‌ها

Economic structure؛ urban-rural continuity؛ agricultural product flow؛ Dezful county

مراجع

1. Agricultural Jihad Organization of Dezful (1393/2014). The agriculture section: Estimation of crops in agricultural lands. Dezful: Agricultural Jihad Organization of Dezful. [In Persian]

2. Akkoyunlu, Ş. (2013). The potential of rural–urban linkages for sustainable development and trade (Working Paper No 2013/37). Bern,Switzerland: The National Centres of Competence in Research. Retrieved 27 July 2015 from http://www.nccr-trade.org/fileadmin/user_upload/nccrtrade.ch/wp3/ publications/ed_Rural_Urban_Linkages_13_Final.pdf.

3. Akkoyunlu, S. (2015). The potential of rural-urban linkages for sustainable development and trade. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Policy, 4(2), 20-28. ‏

4. Allen, A. (2003). Environmental planning and management of the peri-urban interface: perspectives on an emerging field. Environment & Urbanization, 15(1), 135-148. ‏

5. Andersson Djurfeldt, A. (2012). Virtuous and vicious cycles in rural–urban linkages: cases from Zimbabwe. Africa Review, 4(2), 136-156. ‏

6. Azizpour, F. (1386/2007). The role of rural-urban links in rural development with emphasis on milk production networks (Case study: area Litkooh Amol). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian]

7. Bah, M., Cisse, S., Diyamett, B., Diallo, G., Lerise, F., Okali, D., & Tacoli, C. (2003). Changing rural–urban linkages in Mali, Nigeria and Tanzania. Environment & Urbanization, 15(1), 13-24. ‏

8. Berdegue, J. A., Carriazo, F., Jara, B., Modrego, F., & Soloaga, I. (2015). Cities, territories, and inclusive growth: Unraveling urban–rural linkages in Chile, Colombia, and Mexico. World Development, 73(1), 56-71. ‏

9. DAX, T. (2014). Shaping rural development research in Europe: Acknowledging the interrelationships between agriculture, regional and ecological development. Studies in Agricultural Economics, 116(2), 59-66.

10. Douglass, M. (1998). A regional network strategy for reciprocal rural-urban linkages: an agenda for policy research with reference to Indonesia. Third World Planning Review, 20(1), 1-15. ‏

11. Douglass, M. (1999). Rural-Urban Integration and Regional Economic Resilience: Strategies for the Rural-Urban Transition in Northeast Thailand. Northeast Demonstration Project on Decentralization of Developmental Planning, University of Hawaii.

12. Magesa, M. M., Michael, K., & Ko, J. (2014). Agricultural Market Information Services in Developing Countries: A Review. Advances in Computer Science: An International Journal, 3(3), 38-47. ‏

13. Mberu, B. U., Ezeh, A. C., Chepngeno-Langat, G., Kimani, J., Oti, S., & Begu, D. (2013). Family ties and urban–rural linkages among older migrants in Nairobi informal settlements. Population, Space and Place, 19(3), 275–293.

14. Ojagh, A. (1391/2012). The role of urban-rural linkages in spatial evolutions in Iranian villages with an emphasis on the economy of rural areas (Case study: Songhor area). Unpublished master's thesis, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian]

15. Rezvani, M. R. (1390/2011). Rural development planning in Iran. (4st ed.). Tehran: Ghoms press. [In Persian]

16. Rika, J. (1391/2012). Factors preventing the establishment of rural-urban linkages in Iran (case study: the central district of Kuhdasht). Unpublished master's thesis, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian]

17. Rokhsarzadeh, E., Pourfeikoee, S. A., & Ghorshi Minaabad, M. B. (2014). The analysis of effective factors on rural-urban linkages in Astara city. International Journal of Management and Humanity Sciences, 3(2), 1334-1341.

18. Saeedi, A. (1382/2003). The relationship between city and village and rural-urban linkages: A perceptual study. Journal of Geography, 1(1), 79-90. [In Persian]

19. Saeedi, A., Azizpour, F., Hosseini Hasel, S., Khalifeh, A., & Rika, J. (1391/2012). A comparative study of obstacles to the establishment of rural-urban linkages in Iran (Case study: Marvdasht Fars and Kuhdasht Lurestan) areas. Journal of Geography, 10(33), 7-26. [In Persian]

20. Shaowei, C., & Jinrong, J. (2014). The Relationship of Financial Development, Urbanization and Urban-Rural Income Gap: An Empirical Research Based on Provincial Panel Data in China. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 6, p. 01009). EDP Sciences, Wuhan, China.

21. Siechiping, R., Kago, J., Zhang, X. Q., Augustinus, C., & Tuts, R. (2015, March). Urban-rural linkages and the role of land tenure. Paper presented at The 2015 World Bank Conference On Land And Poverty, Washington, DC, March 23-27.

22. Statistical Centre of Iran. (1390/2011). The population and housing census of Dezful in 2011. Tehran: Statistical Centre of Iran. [In Persian]

23. Tacoli, C. (2003). The links between urban and rural development. Environment & Urbanization, 15(1), 3-12.

24. Tacoli, C. (2004, June). Rural-urban linkages and pro-poor agricultural growth: An overview. In Prepared for OECD DAC POVNET Agriculture and Pro-Poor Growth Task Team Helsinki Workshop (pp. 17-18). ‏

25. Talbot, H., Courtney, P., & Duction, I. (2011, April). Improved urban-rural linkages as a rural development policy measure. In Regional Studies Proceeding of the 1st Association (RSA) Annual International Conference in Newcastle (17th-20th April), Retreived 20 July 2015 from http://www. regionalstudies-assoc. ac. uk/events/2011/april-newcastle/papers/Talbot. pdf. ‏

26. Vatta, K. (2012). Rural urban linkages and rural livelihoods in Punjab: Impact of commuting and outsourcing. In S. Uchikawa (Ed.), The linkage between agriculture and industry in India. IDE;Institue of Developing Economies Japan External Trade Organization.(pp. 51-71). Retreived 15 July 2015 from http://www.ide.go.jp/English/Publish.IDE-JETRO

27. Yang, Z., & Wu, A. M. (2015). The dynamics of the city-managing-county model in China: Implications for rural–urban interaction. Urban Studies, 27(1), 327-342.

28. Zewdu, G. A., & Malek, M. (2010). Implications of land policies for rural-urban linkages and rural transformation in Ethiopia. Ethiopia Development Research Institute, Ethiopia, 15, 1-14.

29. Zewdu, G. A., & Malek, M. (2010). Implications of land policies for rural-urban linkages and rural transformation in Ethiopia (ESSP II Working Paper No. 15). Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute. Retreived 5 July 2015 from http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/ resources/A27216FD6820607E492578000004EF42-Full_Report.pdf