Assessment and Designing the Rural Women Participation in Domestic Occupations, According to Shirley Aniston ladder: Application of Structural Equation

Journal of Research and Rural Planning

مقاله 3، دوره 5، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 15، اسفند 2016، صفحه 39-60   

نوع مقاله: علمی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/jrrp.v5i3.45050

نویسندگان

Nasim Izadi^* ؛ Vahid Aliabadi؛ Heshmatollah Sa'di

Bu-Ali-Sina University

چکیده

Extended Abstract
1. INTRODUCTION
Women are involved in various production activities and play an important role in family and the national-level economic. One of the important aspects of women's economic activity is domestic occupations. Domestic occupation is an occupation that launching with family members in the residential space. It is defined as an important strategy for creating jobs and incomes especially for women, around the world.
2. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
This research draws women participation in domestic occupations according to Sherry Ernestine ladder. In this research, the levels of participation is categorized based on the Sherry Ernestine ladder then past studies and structural equation model has been paid to study the factors affecting women's participation in domestic occupations. According to the Sherry Ernestine ladder of participation, there are eight types of partnership or 8 steps; each step shows the strength of people in decision making. The first step of participation ladder is "Manipulation" and the second step is "Therapy". These two-steps actually represents the lack of participation in decision making The third step of participation ladder is "Informing" and fourth step is called "Consultation" and the fifth step of participation ladder is called "Placation". Step 6 of participation ladder is called "partnership" the participants to be able to negotiate a deal with the government agencies. The seventh step is "Delegated power" and the eighth step is called "control".
3. METHODOLOGY
This research is a quantitative and applied. In this research, descriptive-correlation method was used. The population was formed of rural women around the Kangavar city who used the self-employed loans to set up a domestic occupation. Census method was used based on a sample size. The main tool for research in the field was questionnaire that was made based on theoretical basis. Cronbach's alpha was used to estimate reliability. The rate of this index was 0.82 – 0.93, that shows we have a reliable questionnaire. A total of 168 questionnaires were filled out perfect. After completing the operation coding data, information extraction and transfer it was done on a computer. Statistical analysis (descriptive and inferential) was performed, after the data processing, by using SPSS and AMOS software.
4. DISCUSSION
Ranking of the respondents was performed based on the Friedman test. Finding indicated that therapy, Informing and manipulation were in better condition among the other rural women participation components, while other elements of participation among rural women is declining and risky and women can be vulnerable in this area. The results showed rural women’s views and significant positive relationship between the external components like: socio-cultural, professional individual, institutional management, and economic participation of women in domestic occupations. The independent variables effects indicated that socio-cultural factors have the greatest positive effect in women participation (0.44) and economic factors have the least effect (0.14) on the dependent variable. Moreover, other relationship assessment show that economic and socio-cultural variables with the value of 0.45, have the greatest variance. This indicates that there is a significant positive relationship between the economic power of a person and his attention to social and cultural issues. In addition to the direct effects, the results indicate that socio-cultural and economic factors have a direct impact on the apparent participation rate and institutional - management has the greatest indirect effect (0.41). So, that in total variables involved in the model explained 76% of the participation variance.
5. CONCLUSION
Based on the findings, the current plan is top-down decision without considering the real needs of rural women. Therapy is the first priority. There was a positive significant relationship among independent variables and participation and path analyses results show that economic, socio - cultural, professional and institutional - management components explain a total 76 percent of the women participation in domestic occupations. According to the results some recommendations presented:
1. Based on the findings, authorities and practitioners in the field of agricultural development and rural planners should be pushed to reduce this problem with the right planning and need assessment.
2. Promotion of society culture towards acceptance and expansion of women's participation in the development process of rural economic activities, especially domestic occupations planning, development projects and programs of rural development in the economic sector based on the rural women needs and priorities and encouraging them to participate in economic projects and reduce legal and institutional obstacles for them and legislation supported laws about women's participation in rural economic processes.
3. recommended to understand the real needs of rural women in the field of economics and management and engage them to participate in these programs by purposively needs assessment through focus groups.
4. According to the participation in partnership step, recommended to launch domestic occupations associations in rural communities to produce programs in mass media, particularly for women, in order to meet their technical and technological needs.

کلیدواژه‌ها

Domestic occupation؛ Shirley Aniston ladder of participation؛ Rural women؛ AMOS

مراجع

1. Agahi, H., & Hamad al-Haidari, Sh. (1384/2005). The role of cooperatives in improving the status of women in the development process. Proceeding of the 1st Cooperation Conference, Employment & Development (Pp. 1-12). Yazd University, Yazd, Iran. [In Persian]

2. Agahi, H., Mirak-Zadeh, A., & Taghi Beigi, M. (1391/2012). Prioritizing domestic factors affecting the business development of rural women. Journal of Women and Society, 3(3), 181-202. [In Persian]

3. Ahmadvand, M., & Sharif zadeh, M. (1390/2011). Determinants of social participation of rural women (Case study: Boyer Ahmad Twonship). Journal of Women's Studies, 9(3), 139-165. [In Persian]

4. Ali Abadi, V., Mirakzade, A., & Shams, A. (1389/2010). Analysis of barriers to rural women's participation in education and extension programs. Journal of Rural Development, 13(2), 147-165. [In Persian]

5. Ali Begay, A.H., Babayi, M. H., Gholami, M. (1391/2012). Analysis of rural women to participate in educational programs and promotional incentives. Journal of Women and Society, 3(4), 139-160. [In Persian]

6. AliBaygy, A. H., & Golabi, S. (1392/2013). The participation of rural women in the city of Isfahan cooperatives use of Ernestine Rose participation ladder. Journal of Women and society, 4(4), 20-44. [In Persian]

7. Amodeo, N. P. (2001). Be more cooperative to be more competitive. Journal of Rural Cooperation, 29(2), 115-24.

8. Anthopoulou, T. (2010). Rural women in local agrofood production: Between entrepreneurial initiatives and family strategies. A case study in Greece. Journal of Rural Studies, 26(4), 394-403.

9. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of planners, 35(4), 216-224.

10. Azahari, D. H. (2008). Indonesian rural women: The role in agricultural development. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian, 6(1), 1-10.

11. Banks, E. (2000). The Furtherance of Rural Cooperation. University of Wisconsin Center for Cooperatives, pp. 4-6.

12. Bergström, L. (2006). Political participation: A qualitative study of citizens in Hong Kong. Karlstad University.

13. Bozarjomheri, Kh., Shayan, H., & Sadeghi, F. (1391/2012). Determining the participation of rural women in agricultural activities (Case study: Banajoye Sharghi and Shomali Villages of district Bonab Azarbayjan Sharghi). Journal of Arid Regions Geographic Studies, 1(1), 69-86. [In Persian]

14. Breton, R. (1997). Social participation and social capital: Introductory lecture. Proceeding of the 2nd National Metropolis Conference: Immigrants and Civic Participation: Contemporary Policy and Research Issues, Montreal. Retrieved 26 June 2014 from http://canada. Metropolis. net/events/civic/rbreton_e. html.

15. Buvinic, M. (1990). Women and poverty in Latin America and the Caribbean: a primer for policy makers (Revised version). Washington, D.C: International center for research on women. Prepared for the Interamerican Development Bank (ICRW(.

16. Chmieliński, P. (2007). The impact of the CAP on the development of rural entrepreneurship in Poland. Journal of Zemes Ukio Mokslai, 14, 35–40

17. Croxton, S. (1999). Users in control: farmer participation in technology research and development. In Meeting the Challenges of Animal Traction. A resource book of the Animal Traction Network for Eastern and Southern Africa (ATNESA), Harare, Zimbabwe. Intermediate Technology Publications, London (pp. 45-50).

18. Dahl, R. (1374/1995). Modern political analysis (A. Mozafarian, Trans.). Tabriz: Marand Publication. [In Persian]

19. Damisa, M. A., & Yohanna, M. (2007). Role of rural women in farm management decision making process: ordered probit analysis. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 3(4), 543-546.

20. Entzaryan, N., & Tahmasebi, T. (1389/2010). Barriers and strategies for the development of domestic jobs in iran. Magazine & Community Work, 127, 78-98. [In Persian]

21. Galloway, L., & Mochrie, R. (2006). Entrepreneurial motivation, orientation and realization in rural economies: A study of rural Scotland. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 7(3), 173-183.

22. Ghanian, M., Khani, Fh., & Ghadiry Masoum. M. (1387). Role of rural women in exploitation, protection and restoration of natural resources in desert plains. Journal of Women's Research, 6(1), 11-19. [In Persian]

23. Ghavibazu, F. (2004). Gender in cooperatives. Views of the International Labour Organization Cooperactive, (153), 50-55.

24. Gimeno, A., Baulenas, G., & Coma-Cros, J. (2010). Family business models. Proceeding of the 1st Family Business Models (pp. 57-77). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

25. Guinnane, T. W. (2003). Regional organizations in the German cooperative banking system in the late 19th century. Journal of Research in Economics, 51(3), 251-274.

26. Helly, D, (1997). Voluntary and Social Participation by People of Immigrant. Proceeding of the 2nd National Metropolis Conference, 23–25 November, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

27. Hoque, M., & Itohara, Y. (2008). Participation and decision making role of rural women in economic activities: A comparative study for members and non-members of the micro-credit organizations in Bangladesh. Journal of Social Sciences, 4(3), 229-236

28. Hosseini Nia, Gh. H., & Malek Mohammadi, A. (1382/2003). Attitudes towards the idea of actors working in the field of integrated management of sustainable pasture management and analysis of its influencing factors. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 9(3), 169-143. [In Persian]

29. Huntington, S, (1996). Political order in changing societies (M. Salasi. Trans.). Science Publishing Publication.

30. Idrisa, Y. L., Sulumbe, I. M., & Mohammed, S. T. (2007). Socio-economic factors affecting the participation of women in agricultural co-operatives in Gwoza local Government, Borno State, Nigeria. Journal of Agriculture, Food, Environment & Extension, 6(2), 73-80.

31. Khani, F. & Ahmadi, M. (1389/2010). An analytical framework for studying gender inequality. Journal of Women in Development and Politics (Women's Research), 8(3), 7-30. [In Persian]

32. Khani, F., & Ahmadi, M. (1388/2009). Explaining the factors affecting women's participation in socio- economic decisions in rural areas (Case study: rural areas of Zanjan County). Journal of Women in Development and Politics (Women's Research), 7(4), 95-113. [In Persian]

33. Lahsayi zadeh, A. A., Jahanghiri, J., & Khajehnori, B. (1384/2005). Study of rural women's economic participation (Case study: Fars Province). Iranian Journal of Sociology, 6(3), 124-145. [In Persian]

34. Lerner, D. (1958). The dassing of traditional society. Glence, free publication.

35. Lipset, S.M. (1998). Political man. New York, free publication.

36. Liu, A. (2001). Political Participation and Dissatisfaction with Democracy: A Comparative Study of Newand Stable Democracies. RM Institute, Retrieved 26 August 2014 http:// www.Research Methods.org

37. Mehrbanian, A., & Moazeni, S. (1383/2004). The role of rural women in agriculture (Case study: Asia). Jihad, 81, 130-139. [In Persian]

38. Mirtorabi, M., Hejazi, Y., & Hoseini, M. (1389/2010). Communication Factors Influencing Rural Women’s Participation in Post-Harvest Activities of Karaj. Journal of Woman and Society, 1(4), 19-32. [In Persian]

39. Mirtorabi, M., Hejazi, Y., & Hosseini, D. (1391/2012). Communication factors affecting rural women's participation in post-harvest agricultural activities. Journal of Socio-Psychological Studies of Women (Women's Studies), 10(1), 149-167. [In Persian]

40. Movahed, M., Enayat, H., & pour Nemat, A. (1387/2009). The relationship between social capital and political participation of women. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(1), 161-190. [In Persian]

41. Nejahy, A., & Qasem pour, A. (1389/2010). A review of the current models of domestic businesses and provide an appropriate model for Iran. Proceeding of the 1st National Conference on the Development of Domestic Jobs, Challenges and Solutions (Pp.45-35). 8 December, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian]

42. Noori Zaman Abadi, S. H., & Ali Mohamadi, N. (1388/2009), an analysis of rural women economical activities (Case study: Baraan region Isfahan county). Journal of Geography and Environmental Planning, 20(2), 87-104. [In Persian]

43. Noruzi, F., & Bakhtiari, M. (1388/2009). Social participation and social factors affecting it. Journal of Strategy, 18(53), 269-249. [In Persian]

44. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.

45. Reddy, R. D., Fredonia, S., & smith, D. H. (1973). Who Participates in Voluntary Action?. Journal of Extension, 11(1), 17-23.

46. Richard, E., & Wiliam, P. B. (2009). Labor force participation of women in rural and urban China. Journal of Rural Sociology 56(1), 1-21.

47. Rocher, G. (1377/1998). Sociology of Talcott Parsons (A. Nikgohar, Trans.). Tehran: Tiban Publication. [In Persian]

48. Rogers, E.M., & Shoemaker, F.F. (2001). Communication of Innovation (F. Karami & M. Fanaei, Trans.). Shiraz: Shiraz University Press. [In Persian]

49. Roodgarnezhad, F., & Kyakjori, K. (1389/2010). Home-based business development challenges and obstacles. Proceeding of the 1st National Conference on the Development of Domestic Business Challenges - Solutions (Pp. 135-140), Graduates Employment Solidarity Organization (SID) and the Institute of Labor and Social Security, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian]

50. Safary Shali, R. (1389/2010). Social and cultural factors related to the participation of rural women's and family issues. Journal of women, 3(1), 191 -173. [In Persian]

51. Sari khani, N., & Taha, M. (1382/2003). Participation of women in the rural cooperative companies and factors affecting it (Case study: Kermanshah Province). Cooperative, 5(145), 78-82. [In Persian]

52. Shabanali Fami, H. (2006). Relationship between different characteristics of rural women with their participation in mixed farming activities. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 8(2), 107–117.

53. Shaditalab, N. (1381/2002). Women's development challenges. Tehran: Qatreh press. [In Persian]

54. Sharifzade, A., & Khaje shahkuhi, A. (1393/2014). Pathology of family businesses in rural development in the Glestan province. Journal of Rural Studies, 5(1), 1-24. [In Persian]

55. Shateri, P. (1387/2008). Context, bottlenecks and barriers to women's participation in development. Retrieved 26 July 2014 from http://www.bpdanesh.ir. [In Persian]

56. Shaver, K. G., & Scott, L. R. (1991). Person, process, choice: The psychology of new venture creation. Kournal of Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 16(2), 23-45.

57. Swanson, B. (2001). Agricultural extension (E. Shahbazi & H. Hejazan, Trans.). Tehran: Exaction & Education Organization Publication. [In Persian]

58. Taher khani, M., & Gharani Arani, B. (1384/2005). The study of influential elements of the villager's propensity toward setting up rural cooperatives (Case study: the ghanavat of Qum county). Jouranl of Geographical Researches, 20(3), 81-101. [In Persian].

59. Zarafshani, K., Khaledi, Kh., & Ghanian, M. (1388/2009). Explaining rural women's participation in extension education program based on aronstein's ladder of citizen participation model. Journal of Women's Researches, 7(3). 107-128 [In Persian].