An Analysis on Commercialization of Strawberry Cultivation and its Determinants in Marivan County

Journal of Research and Rural Planning

مقاله 4، دوره 5، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 15، اسفند 2016، صفحه 91-105   

نوع مقاله: علمی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/jrrp.v5i3.49248

نویسندگان

Abbas Amini^* ؛ Shalir Feyzi

University of Isfahan

چکیده

Extended Abstract
1. INTRODUCTION
Agricultural development is an important factor in any comprehensive rural development plan and because of its role and stance in the rural economy as the main activity, has a substantial contribution and obligation in rural development, especially in developing countries. It can provide formal and informal employment for those with both adequate and limited education and skill, and has proved to be a sustainable channel for poverty-stricken households in generating income. This potential role of agriculture in reducing poverty is particularly important according to the fact that the incidence of poverty is more evident in rural areas. The size of agriculture within the local economy is sometimes used to define rurality; therefore, any successful rural development strategy will be associated with agricultural development component while they are not a same thing.
2. METHODOLOGY
The present study aims to identify and introduce the commercialization components of strawberry cultivation as the main agricultural product of Marivan Township and evaluate its determinants causally. A stratified random sample including 191 strawberry cultivators have been interviewed to gather the needed data, based on a self-designed and validated questionnaire. The dependent variable of strawberry cropping commercialization has been operationalized considering the area under cultivation, cropping specialization, cropping intensification, under cultivation area addition, crop yield, sale proportion and packing, as its sub criteria. A set of economic, social, technical, and institutional factors, as the independent variables, were operationalized and measured differently using appropriate questions. These variables are the economical and livelihood situation of the family, informal vocational trainings, satisfaction and hopes with the job and its future, facilities and infrastructural possibilities, institutional and governmental supports, awareness and application of updated knowledge, technical factors (machinery, modern irrigation, and waged labor utilization), land quality and management, losses control and product’s security.
3. DISCUSSION
The measurement and evaluation of commercialized strawberry cultivation, as a dependent scale, was done using statistical data processing procedures. By eliminating biased observed variables, the final validated scale measuring crop intensity and crop specialty followed by other components like crop yield, marketed production, and cultivation expansion by the crop’s income. Following the measurement scale of commercialization, statistical regression analysis approach was used to interpret its causal relationships with independent variables. Economical and livelihood situation of the family, technical factors (machinery, modern irrigation, and waged labor utilization), land quality and management, product’s security, informal vocational trainings, satisfaction and hopes with the job and its future, and finally institutional and governmental supports, have been the final sets of significant effective factors in commercialization of strawberry cultivation in the studied area, respectively.
4. CONCLUSIONS
The social and economic viability of many rural communities in developing countries depends ever highly on farming activities and entails its development. Provision and promotion of food security, creation and durability of job and income opportunities, and development of farming as well as non-farming activities are some aspects of mentioned peripheral rural communities’ redemption from their involving integrated poverty. In terms of the process of agricultural development, there is a worldwide trend for agricultural industry to replace the traditional pattern with a commercialized one. Commercialization is essential for agricultural development, which, amongst other things, entails mechanization of agriculture to reduce the cost of production and to increase the yield of crops. In some instances, agricultural commercialization may take place even without mechanization. Agricultural commercialization refers to the shift from subsistence production to an increasingly complex production and consumption system based on the market. Apart from marketing of agricultural outputs, it includes product choice and input use decisions based on the principles of profit maximization. A low degree of commercialization involves production essentially for subsistence purposes, with very little surplus to be sold in the market. In considering commercialization, production is specialized and based on modern technology, and income stabilization and profit making are among the major concerns of farmers rather than such issues as food security. Specialized cropping regards to the different regional and geographical properties is one of the major approaches to optimize the productive potencies of disperse smallholders. Some of the non-compromising requisites are as strengthening of production systems by input (seeds, fertilizers, machines, equipment etc.) and output (products) flows, development of conductive social structures, development of research, education and advisory institutions, development and enhancement of infrastructures such as all-weather roads, power, communication and irrigations systems, transportation, warehousing and marketing facilities, and processing industries.

کلیدواژه‌ها

Rural farming systems؛ commercial cropping؛ specialized cropping؛ Strawberry؛ Marivan

مراجع

1. Abdar, M. (1387/2008). Agricultural transition from traditional to modern systems in Boyerahmad County. (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran. [In Persian]

2. Alizadeh Birjandi, Z., & Aramjoo, A. (1390/2011). The growth of commercial agriculture and its consequences in the second half of Qajar Era (Case study: Ghaenat Velayat). Journal of Cultural History Studies, 7(2), 121-135. [In Persian]

3. Amini Fasakhodi, A. (1389/2010). An analysis of cultural behaviors situations in rural Iran. Journal of Rural Studies, 1(3), 53-82. [In Persian]

4. Anamoradnejad, R. B. (1387/2008). Development rank and situation of Iran’s provinces in agriculture sector. Journal of Village & Development, 11(3), 174-194. [In Persian]

5. Ansari, H. (1375/1996). The role of cooperatives in agricultural transition from subsistence to commercial production. Journal of Agricultural Economics & Development (Special Issue on Iran’s agriculture and global markets), 4(16), 330-345. [In Persian]

6. Ashraf, A. (1361/1982). Peasants, land and revolution, (In: Agah Book collections; Agrarian and peasantry problems) (1st Ed.). Tehran: Agah publication. [In Persian]

7. Azkia, M. (1381/2002). Iran’s rural development and underdevelopment sociology. Tehran: Ettelaat Publication. [In Persian]

8. Darbandi, A. (1378/1999). Transition of traditional agriculture to modern one in rural areas of Aligudarz County (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran. [In Persian]

9. Governance General of Kordestan province. (1390/2011). Statistical 2011 yearbook. Sanandaj: Planning Department, governor of Kordistan. [In Persian]

10. Khosravi, F. (1384/2005). The study effect of stolons and timing of fertilizer on the growth and production of strawberries (Gaviota in Marivan in Kurdistan). Unpublished master's thesis. Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian]

11. Malekan, S. (1382/2003). Commercialization of agriculture in Iran. Journal of Ravand, 38-39, 103-130. [In Persian]

12. Moridi, S. (1375/1976). The necessity of commercialization in small farming holders. Journal of Agricultural Economics & Development, (Special Issue on Iran’s agriculture and global markets), 4(16), 298-329. [In Persian]

13. Najafi, G. (1375/1996). Management in commercial agriculture. Journal of Agricultural Economics & Development, 16, 59-88. [In Persian]

14. Pezeshki, V., & Zarafshani, K. (1387/2009). Application of fuzzy logic in evaluation of agricultural development levels in Kermanshah rural districts. Journal of Village & Development, 11(4), 53-70. [In Persian]

15. Pingali, P. L., & Rosegrant, M. W. (1995). Agricultural commercialization and diversification: processes and policies. Journal of Food Policy, 20(3), 171-185.

16. Pishbahar, E., & Nasiri, A. (1391/2012). Analysis of strawberry growers’ technical efficiency in Sanandaj Township. Journal of Agricultural Knowledge & Sustainable Production, 22(4), 125-134. [In Persian]

17. Rahut, D. B., Castellanos, I. V., & Sahoo, P. (2010). Commercialization of agriculture in the Himalayas. Institute of Developing Economies, IDE Discussion Paper No. 265.

18. Saeidi, A. (1381/2002). Fundamentals of rural geography. Tehran: SAMT Publication. [In Persian]

19. Taherkhani, M., & Rahmani, D. (1385/2006). Specialization of cultivation pattern and its role in rural development (Case study: Strawberry cultivation in Javroud region of Marivan county). Journal of Spatial Planning, 10(1), 81-102. [In Persian]