The Typology of Post-Divorce Life Reconstruction Patterns

علوم اجتماعی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

Article 1, Volume 15, Issue 2 - Serial Number 32, March 2019, Pages 1-32   

Document Type: Scientific-Research

DOI: 10.22067/jss.v15i1.19942

Authors

Soheila Sadeghi Fasaei¹; Maryam Isari^{* 2}

¹University of Tehran

²Tarbiat Modares University

Abstract

Extended Abstract1. Introduction Divorce rate has been growing in recent years in Iran, resulting in an increase in the number of women and men involved with the post-divorce consequences. In the last five years, more than 800,000 divorces have taken place in Iran, meaning more than one and a half million men and women underwent divorce.A brief look at the literature of this field shows that despite the importance of the family system and the damage caused by divorce, there has been little sociological research in Iran on this issue with the adoption of qualitative approaches, and the few existing researches, all of which have used quantitative approaches, generally focus on negative effects of divorce on children, and little research has been conducted on the effects of divorce on the life of divorced men and women. Thus, the study of how divorced subjects encounter the consequences of divorce and the ways in which they rebuild their lives after divorce is a commonly neglected domain in Iranian sociology. The purpose of this study is to investigate the typology of life reconstruction patterns of post-divorce life.2. Theoretical frameworkThe present research is devoid of a predetermined theoretical framework and subsequent hypotheses. But the sensitive theoretical concepts of this research are largely influenced by Bourdieu's theories on the different types of capital, habitus, and hysteresis.3. Method The present study is based on qualitative methodology and case study method. As such, by adopting a qualitative approach and semi-structured in-depth interview technique, we study the ways in which divorced subjects go through post-divorce reconstruction of their lives. This research also seeks the typology of a variety of patterns of reconstructing life after divorce. A type is a set of states or individuals that share at least one feature of the study.4. Results and DiscussionThe results of in-depth interviews with 36 divorced women and men in Tehran revealed four patterns of post-divorce reconstruction based on the subjective and objective specifications of respondents.These patterns include progressive reconstruction, two patterns of dual and transitional reconstruction, and retrograde reconstruction.Based on this, the individuals in the first category have favourable subjective and objective conditions after divorce and consider divorce as an act to improve their quality of life, and by taking an active and progressive approach ahead, they rebuild their lives successfully.But those who manifest the dual rebuilding patterns generally suffer from the hysteresis between the subjective and the external object, and if this incompatibility is resolved, they will be able to move towards either the first or the fourth reconstruction pattern in the future.Eventually, for subjects in the retrograde reconstruction category, the divorce event led to a backward and retrogressive motion due to their disadvantaged mentality and objectivity in dealing with post-divorce life.The findings also show that the subjective barriers to reconstructing life after divorce include: lack of psychological and emotional detachment from the ex-spouse, negative emotions and orientations towards divorce, traditional habitus, being non-religious, negative feedback of divorce among "significant others”.On the other hand, objective obstacles to the reconstruction of life after divorce include: old age at the time of divorce, unemployment, the lack of access to economic, social, and cultural capitals, having a child, long length of the marriage and short length of the post-divorce period.In addition, the subjective facilitators of post-divorce reconstruction include: psychological and emotional detachment from the ex-spouse, positive emotions and orientations towards divorce, modern habitus, being religious, positive feedback of divorce among "significant others”, and objective facilitators of post-divorce reconstruction include: young age at the time of divorce, employment, having access to a variety of economic, social, and cultural capitals, not having a child, short length of the marriage and long length of the post-divorce period.The findings of this study revealed that divorce causes many changes and challenges in various aspects of the life of the actors. Divorce requires emotional, sexual, psychological, economic, and social detachment. Compatibility with such detachments and efforts to create new connections leads to the success of actors in the process of reconstructing life after divorce.5. Conclusion The results of this study showed that divorce can be considered both a threat and an opportunity for the lives of actors, and it depends on the subjective and objective factors that play the role of barriers and facilitating conditions in the process of reconstructing life after divorce.Hence, the actors who have more facilitating conditions are more likely to be in the category of progressive reconstruction than others, and subjects that have barriers and disadvantaged mental and objective conditions generally undergo a passive and retrograde reconstruction.Based on the findings of the present research, it seems that to reduce the divorce traumas and facilitate the reconstruction of post-divorce life, one can use three categories of solutions, including economic, cultural, and social solutions, as well as educational and supportive strategies.It is also important to consider the individual backgrounds of the actants in allocating strategies. For instance, Supportive and educational solutions are more vital for the actors who have divorced recently, or economic strategies are more essential for women and especially those who do not have sufficient economic, social, and cultural capital or have custody of their children. Identification of different types of exposure of the actants during reconstruction, demonstrates the amount and the type of the required support to reduce their trauma. Therefore, this research emphasizes the need for doubled support and empowerment of the individuals involved with the retrograde reconstruction pattern in intervention programs.

Keywords

reconstruction; Typology; qualitative method; objectivity; subjectivity, hysteresis

References

1. اخوان تفتی، م. (1382) پیامدهای طلاق در گذار از مراحل آن. مطالعات زنان، ۱(3)، 125-152.

2. استونز، ر. (1388). متفکران بزرگ جامعه‌شناسی. ترجمة مهرداد میردامادی .تهران: مرکز.

3. بلیکی، ن. (1384). طراحی پژوهش‌های اجتماعی. ترجمة حسن چاوشیان. تهران نی.

4. ریتزر، ج. (1374). نظریة جامعه‌شناسی در دوران معاصر. ترجمة محسن ثلاثی. تهران: علمی.

5. سیف، س. (1383). بررسی مقایسه‌ای میزان پیامدهای طلاق در زنان و مردان مطلقه‌ ایرانی و آمریکایی. خانواده و پژوهش، ۱(۱)، 81-104.

6. صادقی‌فسایی، س.، ایثاری، م. (1394). مطالعه جامعه‌شناختی سنخ‌های طلاق. مسائل اجتماعی ایران، 6(1)، 131- 156.

7. فلیک، ا. (1388). درآمدی بر تحقیق کیفی. ترجمة هادی جلیلی. تهران: نی.

8. قطبی، م.، هلاکویی نایینی، ک.، جزایری، ا.، و رحیمی، ع. (1383). وضعیت طلاق و برخی عوامل مؤثر بر آن در افراد مطلقة ساکن در منطقه دولت‌آباد. فصل‌نامه رفاه اجتماعی، ۳(12)، 403-428.

9. کراسول، ج. (1391)، پویش کیفی و طرح پژوهش: انتخاب از میان پنج رویکرد. ترجمة حسن دانایی فرد و حسین کاظمی. تهران: صفار-اشراقی.

10. کلانتری، ع.، روشتفکر، پ.، و جواهری، ج. (1390). آثار و پیامدهای طلاق: مرور نظام‌مند تحقیقات انجام شده در ایران با تأکید بر ملاحظات جنسیتی (1376-1390). زن در توسعه و سیاست، ۹(۳)، 111-131.

11. کوزر، ل. (1385). زندگی و اندیشة بزرگان جامعه شناسی. ترجمة محسن ثلاثی. تهران: علمی.

12. گرنفل، م. (1388). مفاهیم کلیدی پیر بوردیو. ترجمة محمد مهدی لبیبی. تهران: شرکت نشر نقد افکار.

13. محمدپور، ا. (1390). روش تحقیق کیفی، ضد روش 1، منطق و طرح در روش‌شناسی کیفی. تهران: جامعه‌شناسان.

14. محمدپور، ا. (1390). روش تحقیق کیفی، ضد روش 2، مراحل و رویه‌های عملی در روش‌شناسی کیفی. تهران: جامعه‌شناسان.

15. یزدخواستی، ح.، منصوری، ن.،زاده‌محمدی، ع.، و احمدآبادی، ز. (1387). بررسی احساس تمایل و تقصیر بر استرس، افسردگی و اضطراب متقاضیان طلاق در شهرهای اصفهان و اراک. فصلنامه خانواده پژوهی، 4(15)، 263-275.

16. Aseltine, R. H., & Kessler, R. C. (1993). Marital disruption and depression in a community sample. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 34, 237-251.

17. Booth, A., & Amato, P. (1991). Divorce and psychological stress. Journal of Health & Social Behavior, 32(4), 396-407.

18. DeGarmo, D. S., & Kitson, G. C. (1996). Identity relevance and disruption as predictors of psychological distress for widowed and divorced women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 58(4), 983-997.

19. Gonzalez, L. & Viitanen, T. K. (2009). The effect of divorce laws on divorce rates in Europe, European Economic Review, 53(2), 127-138.

20. Gray, J. D., & Silver, R. C. (1990). Opposite sides of the same coin: Former spouses’ divergent perspectives in coping with their divorce, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1180-1191.

21. Hall, D. R., & Zhao, J. Z. (1995). Cohabitation and divorce in Canada: Testing the selectivity hypothesis . Journal of Marriage & Family, 57(2), 421-427.

22. Hansson, R., Knopt, M.F., Downs, E.A., Monroe, P.R., Stegman, S.E., & Wadeley, D.S., (1984). Femininity, Masculinity, and Adjustment to divorce among Women, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 8(3), 248-260.

23. Johnson, D. R., & Wu, J. (1996, May). An empirical test of crisis, social selection and role explanations of the relationship between marital disruption and psychological distress: A pooled time-series analysis of four-wave panel data. Paper presented at International Conference on Social Stress Research, Paris, France.

24. Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. B. (2008). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed Approaches, (3rd Ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

25. Kitson, G. C. (1992). Portrait of divorce: Adjustment to marital breakdown. New York: Guilford Press.

26. Krumrei, E. J. (2009). A longitudinal analysis of the role of religious appraisals and religious coping in adults’ adjustment to divorce (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Bowling Green State University, Ohio, United States.

27. McDaniel, A.K. & Coleman, M. (2003). Women’s experiences of midlife divorce following long-term marriage. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 38(3-4), 103-128.

28. Mitchell, G.D., (2007). A new dictionary of the social sciences, 2nd(ed), New Jersey: Routledge.

29. Molina, O. (2000). African American women's unique divorce experiences, Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 32(3/4), 93-99.

30. Rich, M., & Ginsburg, K. (1999). The reason and theme of qualitative research: Why, when and who to use qualitative methods in the study of adolescent health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 25, 371–378.

31. Schalkwyk, G.V. (2005). Explorations of post-divorce experiences: Women’s reconstructions of self. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 26(2), 90-97.

32. Thomas, C., & Ryan, M. (2008). Women's perception of the divorce experience: A qualitative study. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 49(3-4), 210-224.