Vulnerability Assessment of Rural Settlements Versus Earthquake by Approach to Crisis Management in Fars Province

Journal of Research and Rural Planning

مقاله 8، دوره 5، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 16، اردیبهشت 2017، صفحه 107-118   

نوع مقاله: علمی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/jrrp.v5i4.53719

نویسندگان

Elahm Sadeghi Jadidi؛ Ali Goli^* ؛ Nader Hatef

Shiraz University

چکیده

Extended abstract
1. INTRODUCTION
Iran is located in the active region of the world in terms of seismicity and according to the scientific documentation information and observations of the twentieth century is considered the riskiest region of the world by powerful earthquake. As a widely-accepted fact that “earthquake does not kill people but the buildings do” we know the overwhelming relevance of this fact. Majority of deaths and injuries in earthquake incidence occur because of the collision and collapse of buildings and other human made structures resulting in the loss of lives, property and social disruption. Therefore, in order to reduce risk, crisis management should go towards to the standardization of building materials, increasing reliability and safety in new construction, guiding urbanization system and development of urban and rural settlements. In this case, the rural communities are very important.
2. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
The vulnerability is a conception that occur according to the physical and natural characteristics of phenomena against natural and unnatural disasters. Determining the amount of vulnerability internal elements of risk of environment is of the requirements to determine risk. One of the most important parts of human life is residential buildings. Vulnerability of buildings is physical vulnerability and the damage to human lives and health is human vulnerability. There are many aspects of vulnerability, arising from various physical, social, economic, and environmental factors. According to research topics, the study approach is physical. Thus, according to this approach and crisis management approach vulnerability assessment of rural housing was done against earthquake.
3. METHODOLOGY
The research method is descriptive and analytical. For data collection, library and documentary method were used, and data that we required were collected by using census data library data, Internet and etc. in this study, statistical population consisted of all rurals in Fars province. Also, analysis unit was the county of Fars. To create a database and mapping, Geographic information system software and Excel were used. In fact, for integration of information, layers in GIS and spatial analysis were used overlay layers and analytic hierarchy process methods. Also, for seismic hazard zonation and creating layers, inverse distance weighted interpolation method (IDW) and proximity function were used.
4. DISCUSSION
About 2026 earthquake happened in Fars province that most earthquakes occurred with 8.3 of magnitude on the Richter scale that frequency of them was 110. In fact, given the frequency of earthquakes, most of them are less than 4 on the Richter scale. Also, according to the region that earthquake happened, the largest earthquake occurred in the Lar county (358 cases). Historical Earthquake Survey shows that most destructive earthquakes occurred in Larestan in the past. Generally, the most earthquakes occurred in Lar, Kazeroun, Jahrom, Qyr & karzyn, Nourabad and Firozabad. Hazard zonation was done using earthquakes, faults and lithology and Fars province was divided into five zones. Then, population, housing and infrastructure of rural settlements were evaluated in these zones. The greatest number of settlements (2,700 settlements rural of 3,273) and more than 290,000 housing of total of 346,814 are in high and too high-risk areas in Fars province. Generally, 47 percent of the total of rural housing have an area less than 100 square meters, 90% of them are non-resistant structures and 6. 91% of them are over 35 years old. These information show necessity of reconstruction, improvements and retrofitting of structures in rural areas.
5. CONCLUSION
The results of this study, same as other studies that were done in other provinces indicate non-resistant and outwear of rural housing. More than 85 percent of the province's areas and more than 85 percent of the rural settlements, the population, housing and infrastructures of them are located in areas with high risk of earthquakes. In fact, most of the rural population in Fars province have lived in areas that not only are disposable the serious risk of earthquakes, but also these residential buildings are non-resistant and outwear. Even if the earthquake does not cause deaths and casualties by itself, these causes will provide by non-resistant and outwear buildings and collapses from these structures. Some of the recommendations of this study are: Putting retrofitting as the most important part of the construction in the high risk areas. Presentation government facilities, loans and non-cash contributions for the reconstruction, improvements and retrofitting housing, and creating the crisis management centers in rural areas in each county.

کلیدواژه‌ها

Rural Housing؛ Earthquake؛ Crisis Management؛ Fars province؛ Vulnerability؛ Geographical information system

مراجع

1. Abasian, B., & Shahbazi, P. (1383/2004). General principles in design and implementation of rural buildings in earthquake-prone areas. In eleventh conference of civil students across the country (pp. 1-8), University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran. [In Persian]

2. Ahadnejad Roshti, M. (1388/2009). Modeling the vulnerability of cities against earthquake (Case Study: Zanjan). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian]

3. Ahadnejad Roshti, M., Gharakhlo, M., & Ziyari, K. (1389/2010). Modeling structural vulnerability of cities against earthquakes using Analytical Hierarchy Process in GIS (Case study: Zanjan city). Journal of Geography and Development, 19, 171-198. [In Persian]

4. Ainali, J. (1393/2014). Analysis of affecting factors in vulnerability of rural housing against earthquake (Case study: Sajarood- Khodabande, Zanjan province). Journal of Geographic Space, 14(47), 127-144. [In Persian]

5. Amini, J. (1389/2010). Vulnerability analysis of urban housing against earthquakes (Case Study in District 9 of Tehran). Unpublished master's thesis, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian]

6. Bahrami, R. (1387/2008). Analysis of the seismic vulnerability of rural settlements (Case study: Kurdistan Province). Journal of Rural and Development, 11(2), 163-189. [In Persian]

7. Bahrami, R. (1389/2010). Analysis of rural housing in Kermanshah province and approaches for retrofit. Journal of Geography and Regional Planning, 1(2), 63-76. [In Persian]

8. Bolstad, P. (2013). Geographical information system. (1th Ed., H. R. Jafari, Trans.). Tehran: Tehran University press. [In Persian]

9. Bora, K. (2014). Earthquake vulnerability assessment and housing in districts of Himanchal Pradesh and Uttrakhand. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS). 19(5), 35-4.

10. Chen, C., Zhao, N., Yue, T., & Guo, J. (2015). A generalization of inverse distance weighting method via kernel regression and its application to surface modeling. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 8(9), 6623-6633.‏

11. Chen, F. W., & Liu, C. W. (2012). Estimation of the spatial rainfall distribution using inverse distance weighting (IDW) in the middle of Taiwan. Paddy and Water Environment, 10(3), 209-222. ‏

12. Chen, Y., Yu, J., & Khan, S. (2013). The spatial framework for weight sensitivity analysis in AHP-based multi-criteria decision making. Environmental modelling & software, 48, 129-140. ‏

13. ESRI, I. N. C. (2007). What Is GIS Integrate. Retrieved 29 August2015 from http://www.esri.com.

14. Feizizade, B. R., Jankowski, P., & Blaschke, T. (2013). A spatially explicit approach for sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of GIS-multicriteria landslide susceptibility mapping. Proceedings of the GIS- Conference (pp. 157-164), Berlin, Germany.

15. Höfer, T., Sunak, Y., Siddique, H., & Madlener, R. (2016). Wind farm siting using a spatial Analytic Hierarchy Process approach: A case study of the Städteregion Aachen. Applied energy, 163, 222-243. ‏

16. Jalilpour, S. H. (1389/2010). Evaluation of physical vulnerability of cities against earthquake by using GIS (Case study: The old texture of Khoy). Unpublished master's thesis, Zanjan University, Zanjan, Iran. [In Persian]

17. Liu, H., Cui, X., Yuan, D., Wang, Zh., Jin, J., & Wang, M. (2011). Study of earthquake disaster population risk based on GIS, a case study of Wenchuan earthquake region. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 11, 1084 – 1091.

18. Malalgoda, C., Amaratunga. D., & Pathirage, C. (2010). Exploring disaster risk reduction in the built environment. School of the Built Environment. United Kingdom: University of Salford (SOBE), Florida International University.

19. Management and Planning Organization. (1385/2006). Instructions seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings, Publication No. 360. Technical Department. Tehran, Iran: Management and Planning Organization. [In Persian]

20. Mohammad Khani, M., & Salmanian, M. (1389/2010). Rural planning and crisis management role in reducing natural hazards. The fourth International Conference of Islamic World Geographers (pp. 1-15), Zahedan University, Zahedan, Iran. [In Persian]

21. Panahimani, A., & Hataf, N. (1382/2003). Zoning of earthquake risk in Fars province. The Fourth conference of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (pp. 1-7), Tehran, Iran. [In Persian]

22. Parishan, M., Pourtaheri, M., Rokneddin Eftekhari, A., & Asgari, A. (1390/2011). Ranking and vulnerability assessment of rural settlements against earthquake risk (Case study: Rural areas of Qazvin province). Journal of Spatial Planning. 17(3), 1-26. [In Persian]

23. Poortaheri, M., Parishan, M., Rokneddin Eftekhari, A., & Askari, A. (1390/2011). Assessment and evaluation of basic components of earthquake risk management (Case study: Rural areas of Qazvin county). Journal of Rural Researches, 2(1), 115-150. [In Persian]

24. Rahmawati Hizbaron1, D. Baiquni, M. Sartohadi, J. Rijanta, R., & Coy, M. (2011). Assessing social vulnerability to seismic hazard through spatial multi criteria evaluation in Bantul District, Indonesia. In Conference of Development on the Margin (pp. 5-7), University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

25. Safari, H. (1390/2011). Compare IDW and KRIGING interpolation methods for preparation of zoning map of estate, District 5 of district one. Iranian Journal of Forest, Iran Forestry Association, 3(4), 33-39. [In Persian]

26. Salari, M. (1389/2010). Vulnerability assessment urban texture against earthquakes (Case study: District 7 of Shiraz). Unpublished master's thesis, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran. [In Persian]

27. Shams, M., Masoumpour Samakoush, J., Saeidi, Sh., & Shahbazi, H. (1390/2011). Crisis management assessment of earthquake in old textures of Kermanshah (Case study: Faizabad district). Geographical Journal of Spatial Planning, 13, 41-66. [In Persian]

28. Sharifi, A., Hosaini, S. M., & Asadi, A. (1389/2010). Participatory mechanism analysis in order to rebuild damaged housing in the quake-hit villages of Bam County. Journal of Rural Researches, 1(1), 121-142. [In Persian]

29. Shayan, S., & Zare, Gh. R. (1393/2014). Seismic zoning of occurred earthquakes in Fars province during the years 1900 to 2010 and comparing it with other research findings. Journal of Geographical Researches. 29(1), 89-104. [In Persian]

30. Shieh, A., Habibi, K., & Torabi, K. (1389/2010). Vulnerability assessment cities against earthquake by using reverse analytical hierarchy process (IHWP) and GIS (Case study: District 6 of Tehran municipality). The fourth International Conference of Islamic World Geographers (pp. 1-12), Zahedan University, Zahedan, Iran. [In Persian]

31. Statistical Center of Iran (1390). General census of population and housing 1390. Tehran, Iran: SCI Publication. [In Persian]

32. United Nations. (2009). International strategy for disaster reduction (UNISDR). United Nations: Geneva, Switzerland.

33. Weichsel Gartner, J. (2001). Disaster mitigation: The concept of vulnerability revisited. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Management, 10(2), 85-94.

34. Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Connon, T., & Davis L. (2003). At Risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters (2nd Ed.). London: Routledge.

35. Xiaolu, G. A. O., & Jue, J. I. (2013). Estimation of rural housing structure and its vulnerability in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 23(1), 179-191.

36. Ziyari, K., & Darabkhany, R. (1389/2010). Vulnerability assessment of urban areas against earthquakes (Case study: District 11 of Tehran municipality). Journal of Geographical Research, 99, 25-48. [In Persian]