ارائۀ مدل نظری مؤلفه‌های سازمانی اثرگذار بر توسعۀ کارآفرینی برای سازمان های مردم نهاد فعال در حوزۀ محیط زیست

علوم اجتماعی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

مقاله 6، دوره 16، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 33، شهریور 1398، صفحه 161-186   

نوع مقاله: علمی - پژوهشی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/jss.v16i1.71709

نویسندگان

محمد بیرجندی؛ مریم لاریجانی^* ؛ سید محمد شبیری

دانشگاه پیام نور تهران

چکیده

امروزه، کارآفرینی عامل کلیدی رشد و توسعه شناخته شده است و از آن به‌عنوان مفهومی چندبعدی و دارای ابعاد اقتصادی، اجتماعی، فرهنگی و زیست‌محیطی یاد می‌شود. کارآفرینی زیست‌محیطی به مفهوم اقدام کارآفرینانه‌ای است که به حفظ محیط‌زیست طبیعی کمک می‌کند. بررسی پژوهش‌ها مبین آن است که مشارکت‌های مردمی ازطریق سازمان‌های مردم‌نهاد نقش مهمی در توسعة کارآفرینی برای حفظ زیست‌محیطی ایفا می‌کنند.ﻫـﺪف اصلی اﯾـﻦ پژوهش، شناسایی مؤلفه‌های سازمانی اثرگذار برتوسعۀ کارآفرینی سازمان‌های مردم‌نهاد فعال در حوزۀ محیط‌زیست اﯾﺮان بود. روش پژوهش، تحلیلﮐﯿﻔﯽ بود و جمع‌آوری اطلاعات ازطریق مصاحبۀ نیمه‌ساختاریافته با 12نفر از خبرگانی که درحوزۀ مدیریت سازمان‌های مردم‌نهاد و محیط‌زیست دارای تجربه وتخصص بودند،انجام شد.برای نمونه‌گیری از روش گلوله‌برفی ومصاحبه باخبرگان تا مرحلۀ اشباع نظری استفاده شد.با استفاده از روشﮐﺪﮔﺬاری باز و محوری،11 مؤلفۀ اصلی با زیرمؤلفه‌های محوری مرتبطﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﯾﯽﺷﺪندﮐﻪ بر توسعۀ کارآفرینی سازمان‌های مردم‌نهاد فعال در حوزۀ محیط‌زیست اﯾﺮانﺗﺄﺛﯿﺮﮔﺬار بودند.ﻋﻮاﻣﻞاصلی اثرگذارﻋﺒﺎرت بودند از:اهداف سازمانی، قابلیت‌های مدیریتی، فرهنگ سازمانی، زیرساخت‌های سازمانی، منابع سازمانی، سطح بلوغ فناوری، فرایند سازمانی، ارتباط با شبکه‌های برون‌سازمانی، ساختار سازمانی، راهبردهای سازمانی و مدیریت دانش سازمانی. نتایج این پژوهش برای همة سازمان‌های مردم‌نهاد فعال در حوزۀ محیط‌زیست قابل‌کاربرد هستند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عوامل سازمانی؛ سازمان‌های مردم نهاد؛ کارآفرینی؛ محیط زیست

مراجع

1. Arshed, N., Carter, S., & Mason, C. (2014). The ineffectiveness of entrepreneurship policy: Is policy formulation to blame? Small Business Economics, 43(3), 639–659.

2. Barley, S. R., & Tolbert, P. S. (1997). Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organization Studies, 18(1), 93–117.

3. Bennett, S. (1991). Ecopreneurship: The complete guide to small business opportunities from the environmental revolution. New York, NY: Wiley.

4. Berle, G. (1991). The green entrepreneur: Business opportunities that can save the earth and make you money. Blue Ridge Summit, PA: Liberty Hall Press.

5. Biernacki, P., Waldorf, D. (1981). Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods and Research, 10(2), 141- 163.

6. Blue, J. (1990). Ecopreneuring: Managing for results. London, England: Scott Foresman.

7. Bojica, A. M., & Fuentes, M. D. M. F. (2012). Knowledge acquisition and corporate entrepreneurship: Insights from Spanish SMEs in the ICT sector. Journal of World Business, 47(3), 397-408.

8. Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Li, H. L. (2010). Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: Where are we now and where do we need to move in the future? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3), 421–440.

9. Choi, Y. R., & Phan, P. H. (2006). The influences of economic and technology policy on the dynamics of new firm formation. Small Business Economics, 26(5), 493-503.

10. Dean, T. J., & McMullen, J. S. (2007). Toward a theory of sustainable entrepreneurship: Reducing environmental degradation through entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 50-76

11. Elkington. J., & Burke, T. (1989). The green capitalists. London: Victor Gallancz.

12. Erturgut, R. (2008). The importance of disarmament from the point of view of providing global peace and contribution of ngo’s to this process. International NGO’s Conference Prceedings (pp. 505-513). Çanakkale: UNIDIR. Retrieved from https://www.peacepalacelibrary.nl/ebooks/files/UNIDIR_pdf-art2580.pdf

13. Estrin, S., Mickiewicz, T., & Stephan, U. (2013). Entrepreneurship, social capital, and institutions: Social and commercial entrepreneurship across nations. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(3), 479–504.

14. Friedman, J. & Silberman, J. (2003). University technology transfer: do incentives, management, and location matter? Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), 17–30, 2003.

15. Geels, F. W. (2011). The mulit-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1, 24–40.

16. Gibbs, D. (2009). Sustainability entrepreneurs, ecopreneurs, and the development of a sustainable economy. Greener Management International, 55, 63-78.

17. Heede, R. (2014). Tracing anthropogenic carbon dioxide and methane emissions to fossil fuel and cement producers, 1854–2010. Climatic Change, 122(1–2), 229–241.

18. Horisch, J. (2015). The role of sustainable entrepreneurship in sustainability transitions: A conceptual synthesis against the background of the multi-level perspective. Administrative Sciences, 5, 286–300.

19. Isaak, R. (2002). The making of the ecopreneur. Greener Management International, 38, 81-91.

20. Judge, W. Q., Liu‐Thompkins, Y., Brown, J. L., & Pongpatipat, C. (2015). The impact of home country institutions on corporate technological entrepreneurship via R&D investments and virtual world presence. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(2), 237-266.

21. Kao, R. W. Y., Kao, K. R., & Kao, R. R. (2002). Entrepreneurism: A philosophy and a sensible alternative for the market economy. London: Imperial College Press.

22. Keogh, P. D., & Polonsky. M. J. (1998). Environmental commitment: A basis for environmental entrepreneurship. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 11(1), 38-49.

23. Kirkwood, J., & Walton, S. (2010). What motivates ecopreneurs to start businesses? International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 16(3), 204–228.

24. Koester, E. (2011). Green entrepreneur handbook. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group.

25. Kuratko, D. F., & Hodgets, R. M. (2002). Entrepreneurship: A contemporary approach. Fort Worth, TX: Dryden Press, 5th edition.

26. Kyro, P. (2001). To grow or not to grow: Entrepreneurship and sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 8(1), 15-28.

27. Larson, A. L. (2000). Sustainable innovation through an entrepreneurial lens. Business Strategy and the Environment, 9(5), 304-17.

28. Linnanen, L. (2002). An insider’s experiences with environmental entrepreneurship. Greener Management International, 38, 71-80.

29. Martin-Rojas, R., Garcia-Morales, V. J., & Bolivar-Ramos, M. T. (2013). Influence of technological support, skills and competencies, and learning on corporate entrepreneurship in European technology firms. Technovation, 33(12), 417-430.

30. McMullen, J. S., Bagby, D. R., &Palich, L. E. (2008). Economic freedom and the motivation to engage in entrepreneurial action. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(5), 875–895.

31. Meek, W. R., Pacheco, D. F., & York, J. G. (2010). The impact of social norms on entrepreneurial action: Evidence from the environmental entrepreneurship context. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 493–509.

32. O’Shea, R. P., Chugh, H., & Allen, T. J. (2008). Determinants and consequences of university spinoff activity: a conceptual framework. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(6), 653-666.

33. Pastakia, A. (1998). Assessing ecopreneurship in the context of a developing country: The case for India. Greener Management International, 38, 93-108.

34. OECD. (2008). Eco-innovation policies in the United States. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/unitedstates/44247543.pdf

35. Petti, C., & Zhang, S. (2011). Factors influencing technological entrepren eurship capabilities: Towards an integrated research framework for Chinese enterprises. Journal of Technology Management in China, 6(1), 7-25.

36. Petti, C., & Zhang, S. (2014). Factors influencing technological entrepren eurship in Chinese firms: evidence from Guangdong. International Journal of Technology Management, 65(1-4), 70-95.

37. Quinn, J. B. (1971). Next big industry: Environmental improvement. Harvard Business Review, 49(5), 120-131.

38. Razeghi, N., & Lotfi Khachaki, B. (2018). A sociological analysis on the survival challenges and sustainability of NGOs active in social problems: With an emphasis on their relationship with the state. Sociology of Social Institutions, 5(11), 97-128. doi:10.22080/ssi.2018.1910

39. Schaltegger, S. (2005). The framework and typology of ecopreneurship: Leading bioneers and environmental managers to ecopreneurship. In M. Schaper (Ed.), Making entrepreneurs: Developing sustainable entrepreneurship (pp. 43-60). Hampshire, GU11 3HR: Ashgate Publishing Limited.

40. Schaltegger, S. (2005). The framework and typology of ecopreneurship: Leading bioneers and environmental managers to ecopreneurship. In M. Schaper (ed.), Making Ecopreneurs (pp. 95-114). London, England: Routledge.

41. Schaper, M. (2002). The essence of ecopreneurship. Greener Management International, 38, 26-30.

42. Schaper, M. (2005). Understanding the green entrepreneur. In M. Schaper (Eds.), Making ecopreneurs: developing sustainable entrepreneurship (pp. 3-12). Hampshire, UK: Ashgate Publishing Limited.

43. Schnick, H., Marxen, S., & Freiman, J. (2002). Sustainability issues for startup entrepreneurs. Greener Management International, 38, 59-70.

44. Scott, W. R. (1995). Organization theory: from Chester Barnard to the present and beyond. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

45. Shrivatava, P. (1995). The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. Academy of Management Review, 20, 936–960.

46. Stephan, U., Uhlaner, L. M., & Stride, C. (2015). Institutions and social entrepreneurship: The role of institutional voids, institutional support, and institutional configurations. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(3), 308 –331.

47. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1999). Zaklady kvalitativniho výzkumu: postupy a techniky metody zakotvene teorie.

48. Suh, C. S., Chang, P. Y., & Lim, Y. (2012). Spill-up and spillover of trust: An extended test of cultural and institutional theories of trust in South Korea1. Sociological Forum, 27(2), 504–526.

49. Tadbiri S. R. A. (2005). Managment and Organization. Tehran, Iran: Islamic Azad University Press.

50. Taylor, D. W., & Walley, E. E. (2003). The green entrepreneur: visionary, maverick or opportunist? Retrieved from http:// econwpa. repec. org/ eps/ mic/papers/0307/0307002.pdf

51. Thompson, N., Kiefer, K. and York, J. (2011), Distinctions not dichotomies: Exploring social, sustainable, and environmental entrepreneurship. In G. Lumpkin, & J. Katz (eds.), Social and sustainable entrepreneurship (advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth) (pp. 201-229, Vol. 13). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

52. Tillery, F. (1999). The gap between the environmental attitude and the behavior of small firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 8(4), 238-248.

53. Umam, K. K., Dhewanto, W., & Larso, D. (2008). Higher education institution and technology transfer. Proceedings of the 5th AGSE International Entrepreneurship Research Exchange, Melbourne (pp. 461-474). AGSE

54. Utting, P. (2000). Business responsibility for sustainable development, Retrieved from https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/148835

55. Volery, T. (2002). Ecopreneurship: Rationale, current issues and future challenges. In U. Figlisteraller, H. J. Pietner, T. Volery, & W. Weber. (Eds.), Radical change in the world: Will SMEs soar or crash? (pp. 541-553). St. Gallen: KMU Verlag.

56. Yildirim, A. (2003). Instructional planning in a centralized school system: Lessons of a study among primary school teachers in Turkey. International Review of Education, 49(5), 525-543.

57. Zahra, S. A., Gedajlovic, E., Neubaum, D. O., & Shulman, J. M. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 519-532.