تأثیر راهنماهای مبتنی بر مدل واک (VAK) بر میزان رضایت‌مندی اعضای هیئت علمی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد در استفاده از سیستم اطلاعات علمی دانشگاه (ساعد)

پژوهشنامه کتابداری و اطلاع رسانی

مقاله 6، دوره 4، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 7، دی 1393، صفحه 112-130   

نوع مقاله: مقالات پژوهشی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/riis.v4i2.20911

نویسندگان

رضا خسروی^* ؛ مهری پریرخ؛ رحمت الله فتاحی

دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

چکیده

هدف: هدف بررسی میزان رضایت‌مندی اعضای هیئت‌علمی از راهنماها و فیلم آموزشی به هنگام ذخیره آثار در ساعد می‌باشد. درصورتی‌که سامانه استفاده‌پذیر شود اعضای هیئت‌علمی با مشکلات کمتری روبرو می شوند و این امر می‌تواند در کاهش خطاها در هنگام ذخیره تأثیرگذار باشد.
روش: این پژوهش از نظر هدف، کاربردی و از نوع ارزیابانه، و از نظر رویکرد، پژوهش پیمایشی با راهبرد قوم‌نگاری می‌باشد. در این پژوهش از روش "مقایسه جایگزین نمونه اولیه" بهره‌گیری شد .جامعه آماری، اعضای هیئت‌علمی دانشگاه فردوسی هستند که 10 نفر از آن‌ها به‌عنوان نمونه انتخاب شد.
یافته ها : رضایت‌مندی اعضای هیئت‌علمی با دو مفهوم مفید بودن و کارآمدی ارزیابی شد. آزمون آماری t مستقل برای هر دو فرضیه نشان داد که راهنماها و فیلم‌های آموزشی توانسته‌اند نظر اعضای هیئت‌علمی را نسبت به خود جلب کنند. نتایج نشان داد معیارهایی مانند: در دسترس بودن راهنماها، واضح و قابل درک بودن آن‌ها و قرار دادن آموزش‌های مورد نیاز در نقاط مختلف کاربرگه‌ها و معیارهایی چون وضوح بالای صدا، اضافه کردن متن به فیلم‌ها، حرکت مکان‌نما در نقاط در مورد فیلم آموزشی می‌تواند تا حد زیادی میزان رضایت‌مندی کاربران در استفاده از سامانه‌ها را افزایش دهد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

استفاده‌پذیری؛ مدل یادگیری واک؛ راهنماهای پیوسته؛ آموزش‌های رایانه محور؛ سامانه مدیریت اطلاعات؛ سیستم اطلاعات علمی دانشگاه (ساعد)؛ مخازن سازمانی

مراجع

Aliasgari, M., Riahinia, N., & Mojdehavar, F. (2010). Computer-Assisted Instruction & Student Attitudes Towards Learning Mathematics. Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, 3(1), 6-14.

Arroyo, I., Beck, J. E., Beal, C. R.; Wing, R., & Woolf, B. P. (2001). Analyzing Students’ Response to Help Provision in an Elementary Mathematics Intelligent Tutoring System. In R. Luckin (Ed.), Papers of the AIED-2001 Workshop on Help Provision and Help Seeking in Interactive Learning Environments. Available: http://www.hcrc.ed.ac.uk/ aied2001/workshops.html. Access on 20/11/2011.

Bartholom, T., Stahl E. & Bromme R. (2004) Help-Seeking in Interactive Learning Environments: Effectiveness of Help and Learner-Related Factors in a Dyadic Setting. In Y. B.Kafai, W. A.Sandoval, N.Enyedy, A. S.Nixon & F.Herrera (Eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences: Embracing Diversity in the learning sciences Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 81–89.

Bayraktar, S. (2000). A Meta-Analysis on the Effectiveness of Computer-Assisted Instruction in Science Education. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Ohio University, United States – Ohio.

Brajnik. G., Mizzaro. S., Tasso. C. & Venuti. F. (2002). Strategic Help in User Interfaces for Information Retrieval. Journal of American Society for Information Science, 53(5), 343-358.

Bertot, J. C., Snead, J. T., Jaeger, P. T. & McClure, C. R. (2006). Functionality, Usability, and Accessibility: Iterative User-Centered Evaluation Strategies for Digital Libraries. Performance Measurement and Metrics. 7(1): 17-28.

Chan, D. L. H., Kwok, C. S. Y. & Yip, S. K. F. (2005). Changing Roles of Reference Librarians: The Case of the HKUST Institutional Repository. Reference Services Review, 33(3), 268-282.

Corbin, M.(2004). Design Checklists for Online Help. Available:http://www.writersua.com/articles/checklist/index.html). Accessed on 2011/10/23.

Crews, J. M. (2003). Helping Poor Readers: A Case Study of Computer-Assisted Instruction Reading Tutorial. Paper Presented at 9th Americas Conference on Information Systems. August 4-6, 618-629.

Crews. J., Cao. J. (2008). Design Principles for Computer Assisted Instruction (CAI). Proceeding of China Summer Workshop On Information Management. June 29-30. 12-16.

Crow, R. (2002). The Case for Institutional Repositories: A SPARC Position Paper. ARL Bimonthly Report 223.

Dutke, S. & Reimer, T. (2000). Evaluation of Two Types of Online Help for Application Software. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16(4), 307-315.

Ferreira, S. M. & Pithan, D. N. (2005). Usability of Digital Libraries: A Study Based on the Areas of Information Science and Human-Computer Interaction. OCLC Systems & Services, 21(4), 311-323.

Folmer, E., van Gurp, J., & Bosch, J. (2003). A Framework for Capturing the Relationship Between Usability and Software Architecture. Software Process: Improvement and Practice, 8(2), 67-87.

Hess, R. D., & Tenezakis, M. D. (1973). Selected Findings from “The Computer as a Socializing Agent: Some Socioaffective Outcomes of CAI “. Educational Technology Research and Development, 21(3), 311-325.

Hung, D. (2001). Theories of Learning and Computer-Mediated Instructional Technologies. Educational Media International. 38(4): 281-287.

Johnson, S. D., & Aragon, S. R.(2003). An Instructional Strategy Framework for Online Learning Environments. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2003 (100), 31-43.

Kanninen, E. (2008): Learning Styles and E-Learning. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Tampere University of Technology. Finland.

Khosrow-Pour, Mehdi (2005). Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology. (2nd ed.). New York: Information Science Reference.

Kim, H. H., & Kim, Y. H. (2008). Usability Study of Digital Institutional Repositories. The Electronic Library, 26(6), 863-881.

Krull, R., Friauf, J., Brown-Grant, J., & Eaton, A. (2001). Usability Trends in an Online Help System: User Testing on Three Releases of Help for a Visual Programming Language. Paper Presented at the Professional Communication Conference, 2001. IPCC 2001. Proceedings. IEEE International.

Martin, A. P., Ivory, M. Y., Megraw, R., & Slabosky, B. (2005,). How Helpful is Help? Use of and Satisfaction with User Assistance. Paper Presented at the 3rd International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction, Las Vegas, NV. July 22-27.

Mehlenbacher, B. (2002). Assessing the Usability of On-line Instructional Materials. New Directions for Teaching and Learning. 2002 (91): 91-98.

Mills, H. (2010). Why Users Avoid Online Help: A Case Study. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Northern Illinois University. United States- Illinois.

Mohammad Esmaeil, S. (2006). Usability of Iranian industrial University Libraries' Website. National studies on librarianship and information organization, 61 (1), 107-136. (In Persian)

Moodley. S. (2009). The Development and Evaluation of an Online Tutorial to Teach Digitization and Metadata Indexing of Library and Archival Resources. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. University of KwaZulu-Natal. South Africa.

Nagy, N. (2009). Evaluating the Usability of Information Systems in the International Space Station Integration Processes. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Northcentral University, United States .Arizona.

Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering. Academic Press, Boston.

Parirokh, M., & zahedi Nooghabi, M. (2011). A Study of Institutional Repository of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (FUM), and its Compatibility with Scientific Criteria. [Research]. Journal of Information Processing and Management, 26(3), 519-545. (In Persian)

Pearson, J. M., Ann, P., & David, G. (2007). Determining the Importance of Key Criteria in Web Usability. Management Research News, 30(11), 816-828.

Penger, S., & Tekavcic, M. (2009). Testing Dunn & Dunn’s and Honey and Mumford’s Learning Style Theories: The Case of the Slovenian Higher Education System. Journal of Contemporary Management Issues. 14(2): 1-20. Available: http://www. Efst.hr/management/ Vol 14No2-2009/ 1-Penger_Tekavcic. Pdf. Access in 20/10/2011.

Philip. M. K. , Jackson. T. k. & Dave. W. (2011). The Effect of Computer Assisted Instruction on Student’s Attitudes and Achievement in Matrices and Transformations in Secondary Schools in Uasin Gishu District, Kenya. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 1(1), 53– 62. Available: http://www.muk.ac.ke/ijci/pdf. Access in 25/07/2011

Rasila, H., Rothe, P., & Kerosuo, H. (2010). Dimensions of Usability Assessment in Built Environments. Journal of Facilities Management. 8(2): 143-153.

Sayyad Abdi, E (2008). Usability of University Libraries' Website :Case Study of University of Tehran, Tarbiat Modares University & Iran University of Science and Technology. MSc. Thesis on Library and Information Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. (In Persian)

Sreerambhatla, R. (2010). Applications of Usability Concepts on Text Message Formatting. Unpublished Master’s thesis. Texas A&M University - Kingsville, United States. Texas.

Tingting Lu. M. A. (2008). Effects of Multimedia on Motivation, Learning and Performance: The Role of Prior Experience and Task Constraints. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Graduate School of The Ohio State University. United States. Ohio.

Traynor & Patrick L. (2003). Effects of Computer-Assisted-Instruction on Different learners. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 30(2), 137-143.

Tsakonas, G., & Papatheodorou, C. (2008). Exploring Usefulness and Usability in the Evaluation of Open Access Digital Libraries. Information Processing & Management, 44(3), 1234-1250.

Zerehsaz, M., & Fattahi, R. (2009). Factors affecting the process of help users to use user interface in databases. Journal of Library and Information Sciences, 43(3), 71-96. (In Persian)