A comparative study of the skull between Trachylepis vittata (Olivier, 1804) of the family Scincidae and Lacerta media media (Lantz & Cyrén, 1920) of the family Lacertidae

Iranian Journal of Animal Biosystematics

مقاله 10، دوره 13، شماره 2، آبان 2017، صفحه 247-262   

نوع مقاله: Research articles

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/ijab.v13i2.64614

نویسندگان

Razieh Fattahi¹؛ Hamzeh Sajed²؛ Nasrullah Rastegar-Pouyani^{* 2}

¹Razi University

²razi university

چکیده

In this study, the adult cranial osteology of Trachylepis vittata and Lacerta media media collected from Kermanshah Province, western Iran, are described and compared based on seven dry skull preparations. Herein, variation patterns are considered in morphology of the cranial, elements of position in the skull structure and elements of connection together between the skull of two species in order to use in phylogenetic analyses and systematic studies. The skull roof, the palate, the mandible, the teeth within each of these two species discussed and compared. The obvious differences are as follows: A complete loss of any one bone was not discerned in the study of the skull of both species, but a obvious decrease was watched in the postorbital bones in T. vittata. Articulations of the jugal, the squamosal and the palatine in the various regions. The variations in form, size and position in bones such as: The nasal processes of the premaxilla, the parietal, the supraoccipital, otoccipital, the paraoccipital process, prearticular, the dentary.

کلیدواژه‌ها

Osteology؛ postorbital؛ Systematic؛ Western Iran؛ phylogenetic analyses؛ cranial

مراجع

Bell, C.J., Evans, S.E., Maisano, J.A., 2003. “The skull of the gymnophthalmid lizard Neusticurus ecpleopus (Reptilia: Squamata),” Zool. J. Linn. Soc 139, 283–304.

 

Bels, V.L., Chardon, M., Kardong, K., 1994. “Biomechanics of the hyolingual system in squamata”. In: Bels VL, Chardon M, Vandewalle P, editors. Biomechanics of feeding in vertebrates. Berlin: Springer Verlag. p 197–240.

 

Broom, R., 1935. “On the structure of the temporal region in lizard skulls”. Annals of the Transvaal Museum 18, 13–22.

 

Cooper, W., Habegger J., Espinoza, R., 2001. “Responses to prey and plant chemicals by three iguanian lizards: relationships to plant in the diet,” Amphibia–Reptilia 22, 349–361.

 

Faizi, H., Rastegar-Pouyani, N., 2007. “Further studies on the lizard cranial osteology, based on a comparative study of the skull in Trachylepis aurata transcaucasica and Laudakia nupta (Squamata: Sauria),” Russ. J. Herpetol 14, 107–116.

 

Fisher, D. L., Tanner W.W., 1970. “Osteological and myological comparisons of the head and thorax regions of Cnemidophonis tigris scptcntrionalis Burger and Ameiva tindulala parva Barbour and Noble (Family Teiidae)”. Brigham Young Liniversity Science Bulletin. Biological Series I 1(1), 1–41.

 

Herrel, A., Peter, A., Jeannine, F., Frits D., 1999. “Morphology of the feeding system in agamid lizards, ecological correlates,” Anat. Rec 254, 496–507.

 

Herrel, A., Schaerlaeken, V., Meyers, J.J., Metzger, K.A., Ross, C.F., 2007. “The evolution of cranial design and performance in squamates: Consequences of skull-bone reduction on feeding behavior”. Integr Comp Biol 47, 107–117.

 

Huyghe, K., Vanhooydonck, B., Scheers, H., Molina-Borja, M., Vandamme, R. 2005. Morphology, performance and fighting capacity in male lizards, Gallotia galloti. Functional Ecology 19(5),800–807.

 

Kardong, K.V., 2002. “Vertebrates: Comparative Anatomy, Function, Evolution”, McGraw-Hill, New York.

 

Lailvaux, S.P., Herrel, A., Vanhooydonck, B., Meyers, J.J., Irschick, D.J., 2004. “Fighting tactics differ in two distinct male phenotypes in a lizard: heavyweight and lightweight bouts”. Proc R Soc Lond B 271, 2501–8.

 

Lappin, A.K., Husak, J.F., 2005. “Weapon performance, not size, determines mating success and potential reproductive output in the collared lizard (Crotaphytus collaris)”. Am Nat 166, 426–36.

 

Lappin, A.K., Brandt, Y., Husak, J.F., Macedonia, J.M., Kemp, D.J., 2006. “Gaping displays reveal and amplify a mechanically based index of weapon performance”. Am Nat 168, 100–13.

 

McBrayer, L.D., 2004. “The relationship between skull morphology, biting performance and foraging mode in Kalahari lacertid lizards,” Zool. J. Linn. Soc 140, 403–416.

 

Nash, D.F., Tanner, W.W., 1970. “A comparative study of the head and thoracic osteology and myology of the skinks Eumeces gilberti van denburgh and Eumeces skiltonianus (baird and girard)”. Biological series-volume XΙΙ, number 2.

 

Rastegar-Pouyani, N., Afroosheh A., 2011. “Comparative studies on lizards based on the cranial osteology of Lacerta media and Laudakia caucasia (Squamata: Sauria),” Russian Journal of Herpetology 18, 17–28.

 

Romer, A.S., 1956. “Osteology of the reptiles,” Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.

 

Schwenk, K., 2000. “Feeding in lepidosaurians. Feeding,” San Diego: Academic Press. p 175–291.

 

Stayton, T.C., 2005. “Morphological evolution of the lizard skull: A geometric morphometrics survey,” J. Morphol 263(1), 47–59.

 

Taylor, W.R., 1967. “An enzyme method of clearing and staining small vertebrates,” Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus 122, 1–17.

 

Zug, G.R., Crombie, R.I., 1970. “Modifications of the Taylor method of clearing and staining for amphibians and reptiles,” Herpetol. Rev 2, 49–50.