The Development and Validation of a Creativity-Enhancing Scale for Language Learners in Language Education through Applied ELT by Rasch Rating Scale Model

مطالعات زبان و ترجمه

Article 1, Volume 51, Issue 4, February 2019, Pages 1-27   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/lts.v51i4.61908

Authors

Safoora Navari; Reza Pishghadam^* ; Azar Hosseini Fatemi; Mohammad Reza Hashemi

Department of English, ّFerdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

The present study sought to implement the idea of ELT for life among language education practitioners by challenging and materializing the notion of Applied ELT. In so doing, constructing some novel scales seemed inevitable. Highlighting the premises of Life Syllabus, this study devised and validated a TPCS-ELLTs (Teachers’ Perceptions of Creativity Scale for English Language Learning Textbooks) with 45 items to evaluate the current English language textbooks regarding the level they increase the creativity of language learners. The TPCS-ELLTs was validated through statistical procedures like Rasch rating model and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) which at last provided a model with a 6-point Likert scale. This scale was administered to a group of 164 EFL teachers at private language institutes. After more investigation, it was clear through Rasch model that, those items having infit MNSQ greater than 1.4 deviate from the expected model and degrade the analysis. Therefore, after changing some items, it was concluded that this scale as a unidimensional model, contains a high reliability and also a correct 6-point Likert. In other words, this scale is a precise measurement of the construct and therefore well-targeted for the sample. Furthermore, some recommendations regarding the implication and conclusions of this study in other fields of language teaching have been pointed out.

Keywords

Creativity-Enhancing Scale; Applied ELT; Life Syllabus; TPCS-ELLTs

References

خزاعی‌فر، ع.، پیش‌قدم، ر.، و ضیایی، س. (1387). اهمیت تفکر انتقادی در خواندن. نامة فرهنگستان، 45(12)، 19-37.

Abbott, M. G. & Caccavale, T. S. (2007). Cognitive benefits of learning language. Duke Gifted Letter, 8(1), 134-167.

Albert, A., & Kormos, J. (2004). Creativity and narrative task performance: An exploratory study. Language Learning, 54(2), 27-31.

Beck, J. (1999). How to raise a brighter child. New York, NY: Pocket Books.

Brown, R. T. (1989). Creativity: What are we to measure? In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 1-32). New York, NY: Plenum.

Craft, A. (2005). Creativity in schools: Tensions and dilemmas. London, England: Routledge.

Davies, S. J. (1998). Creative writing. English Teaching Forum, 36(4), 25-26.

Dewaele, J. M. & Furnham, A. (1999). Extraversion: The unloved variable in applied linguistic research. Language Learning, 49(3), 509-544.

Dörnyei, Z. & Kormos, J. (2000). The role of individual and social variables in oral task performance. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 275-300.

Dornyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Freire, P. (1998). Pedagogy of freedom: Ethics, democracy, and civic courage. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

Gardner, R.C. & MacIntyre, P.D. (1992). A student’s contributions to second language learning. Part I: Cognitive variables. Language Teaching, 25(4), 211-220.

Gardner, R.C. & MacIntyre, P.D. (1993). A student’s contributions to second language learning. Part II: Affective variables. Language Teaching, 26(1), 1-11.

Hakuta, K. (1986). Mirror of Language. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Hamachek, D. E. (1988). Evaluating self-concept and ego development within Erikson’s psycho-social framework: a formulation. Journal of Counseling and Development, 66(8), 354- 360.

Linacre, J. M. (1999). Investigating rating scale category utility. Journal of Outcome Measurement, 3(2), 103-122.

Lubart, T. I. (1994). Creativity. In J. R. Sternberg (Ed.), Thinking and problem solving (pp. 289-332). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

National Advisory Committee on Creative and Cultural Education (NACCCE) (1999). All our futures: Creativity, culture and education. London, England: Department for Education and Employment.

Nicholls, J.G. (1972). Creativity in the person who will never produce anything original and useful: The concept of creativity as a normally distributed trait. American Psychologist, 27(8), 717-727.

Nunan, D. (1988). Syllabus design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Oxford, R.L. & Ehrman, M.E. (1993). Second language research on individual differences. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 188-205.

Pishghadam, R. & Ghahari, S. (2012). Like-wise language learning textbooks: Constructing and validation of an emotional abilities scale through Rasch modeling. Issues in Langugae Teaching, 1(1), 1-32.

Pishghadam, R. & Saboori, F. (2011). A Qualitative analysis of ELT in the language institutes of Iran in the light of the theory of ‘World Englishes’. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(3), 569-579.

Pishghadam, R. & Zabihi. R. (2012). Life syllabus: A new research agenda in English language teaching. TESOL Arabia Perspectives, 19(1), 23-27.

Pishghadam, R. (2011). Introducing applied ELT as a new approach in second/foreign language studies. Iranian EFL Journal, 7(2), 8-14.

Pishghadam, R., Baghaei, P, Shams, M. A. & Shamsaee, S. (2011). Construction and validation of a narrative intelligence scale with the Rasch rating scale model. The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment, 8(1), 75-90.

Richards, J. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Runco, M. A. (1999). Implicit theories. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (vol.2, pp. 27-30). San Diego, CA: Academic.

Selvi, K. (2005). Learning and creativity. In A-T. Tymieniecka (ed.), Analecta Husserliana (pp. 351-370). Hanover, German: Springer.

Sharp, C. (2004). Developing young children’s creativity: What can we learn from research? Topic, 32, 5-12.

Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in second language learning. London: Edward Arnold.

Skehan, P. (1991). Individual differences in second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13(2), 275-298.

Standler, R. B. (1998). Creativity in science and engineering. MIT Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. Retrieved from http://cognet.mit.edu/MITECS

Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Creative thinking in the classroom. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(3), 325-338.

Sternberg, R. J. (2005). Creativity or creativities? International Journal of Human- Computer Studies, 63(4-5) 370-382.

Tan, A. G. (2000). A review on the study of creativity in Singapore. Journal of Creative Behavior, 34(4), 259-284.

Wilkins, D.A. (1976). Notional syllabuses. London, England: Oxford University Press.

Williams, M. & Burden, R. (2002). Psychology for language teachers. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Woods, P. (1995). Creative teachers in primary schools. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.