تحلیل عامل‌های اثرگذار بر پیاده‌ سازی مخازن سازمانی در دانشگاه‌ها و مراکز علمی برپایه نظریه‌های سیستم‌های اطلاعاتی

پژوهشنامه کتابداری و اطلاع رسانی

مقاله 14، دوره 5، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 9، تیر 1394، صفحه 280-300   

نوع مقاله: مقالات پژوهشی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/riis.v5i1.29392

نویسنده

مهدی زاهدی نوقابی^*

دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

چکیده

هدف: این پژوهش درصدد شناسایی معیارهای مدنظر برای طراحی و اجراء سیستمهای مدیریت اطلاعات علمی در دانشگاهها (مخازن سازمانی) برپایه نظریه‌های سیستم‌های اطلاعاتی است.
روش: این پژوهش از نوع کتابخانه‌ای و به صورت تحلیل محتوا انجام شد. از روش تحلیل محتوای مفهومی برای شناسایی مفاهیم در متون استفاده گردید. بازه زمانی مورد بررسی متون در حوزه مخازن سازمانی شامل 10 سال از 2000 تا 2010 است.
یافته‌ها: پژوهش‌های مرتبط با مخازن سازمانی نشان دادند که عامل‌های زیادی در طراحی و موفقیت یک مخزن تأثیرگذار است. عامل‌های ضروری برای یک مخزن سازمانی در دانشگاه‌ها برپایه نظریه فنی- اجتماعی و چارچوب عناصر اثرگذار بر طراحی و توسعه مخزن سازمانی برپایه چارچوب فناوری- سازمان- محیط شناسایی شدند. سیستم مدیریت اطلاعات علمی دانشگاه‌های تحت پوشش وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری را می‌توان برپایه معیارهای مطرح شده در این پژوهش ارزیابی کرد.
از نظریه‌های سیستم‌های اطلاعاتی برای تبیین عامل‌های اثرگذار بر توسعه مخازن سازمانی استفاده شده است

کلیدواژه‌ها

مخزن سازمانی؛ مدیریت اطلاعات علمی؛ دانشگاه‌ها و مراکز علمی؛ طراحی سیستم‌های اطلاعاتی؛ ارزیابی مخازن سازمانی؛ چارچوب فناوری- سازمان- محیط؛ نظریه فنی- اجتماعی

مراجع

Zahedi Nooghabi, M. (2010). A Study of Institutional Repository of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (FUM), and its Compatibility with Scientific Criteria (Master dissertation). Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Faculty of Education and Psychology. (In Persian)

Afshari, F., & Jones, R. (2007). Developing an integrated institutional repository at Imperial College London. Program: electronic library and information systems, 41(4), 338-352.

Amos, H. B., & Ruthven, T. (2008). Becoming the authoritative source: taking repositories to centre stage. Retrieved from http://arrow.unsw.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/unsworks:1?expert=title%3a%22Becoming+the+authoritative+source%3a+taking+repositories+to+centre+stage%22

Baker, J. (2012). The technology–organization–environment framework. In Information Systems Theory (pp. 231–245). Springer. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4419-6108-2_12

Barwick, J. (2007). Building an institutional repository at Loughborough University: some experiences. Program: electronic library and information systems, 41(2), 113-123.

Carr, L., White, W., Miles, S., & Mortimer, B. (2008). Institutional Repository Checklist for Serving Institutional Management. In Third International Conference on Open Repositories (pp. 1-4).

Chan, D. L. (2009). An integrative view of the institutional repositories in Hong Kong: Strategies and challenges. Serials Review, 35(3), 119-124.

Chan, D. L., Kwok, C. S., & Yip, S. K. (2005). Changing roles of reference librarians: the case of the HKUST Institutional Repository. Reference Services Review, 33(3), 268-282.

Cullen, R., & Chawner, B. (2008). Institutional repositories in New Zealand: Comparing institutional strategies for digital preservation and discovery. Digital Discovery: Strategies & Solutions, IATUL, 20-24.

Davis, P. M., & Connolly, M. J. L. (2007). Institutional Repositories Evaluating the reasons for Non-use of Cornell University's installation of DSpace. D-Lib Magazine, 13(3-4). Retrieved from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march07/davis/03davis.html.

Doctor, G., & Ramachandran, S. (2008). Considerations for implementing an institutional repository at a business school in India. International Journal of Information Management, 28(5), 346-354.

Donohue, T. (2008). Using DSpace for your Repository.

Ferreira, M., Rodrigues, E., Baptista, A. A., & Saraiva, R. (2008). Carrots and sticks: some ideas on how to create a successful institutional repository. D-Lib Magazine, 14(1-2). Retrieved from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january08/ferreira/01ferreira.html

Foster, N., & Gibbons, S. (2005). Understanding faculty to improve content recruitment for institutional repositories. D-Lib Magazine, 11(1). Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-14744293790&partnerID=40

Foster, N. F., Gibbons, S., Bell, S., & Lindahl, D. (2007). Institutional Repositories, Policies, and Disruption. Retrieved from https://urresearch.rochester.edu/institutionalPublicationPublicView.action?institutionalItemId=3523&versionNumber=1

Grundmann, A. (2009). Increasing Self-Archiving of Faculty Publications in Institutional Repositories. Open and Libraries Class Journal, 1(2). Retrieved from http://www.infosherpas.com/ojs/index.php/openandlibraries/article/view/35/51

Han, Y. (2004). Digital content management: the search for a content management system. LIBRARY HI TECH, 22, 355-365.

Hayes, H. (2005). Digital repositories: Helping Universities and Colleges: JISC. Retrieved Jan. 27, 2010, from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/publications/pub_repositories.aspx

Jantz, R. C., & Wilson, M. C. (2008). Institutional Repositories: Faculty Deposits, Marketing, and the Reform of Scholarly Communication. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(3), 186-195.

Joki, S. M. (2007). PEPIA: a Norwegian collaborative effort for institutional repositories. OCLC Systems & Services: International digital library perspectives, 23(2), 204-209.

Kennan, M. A., & Wilson, C. (2006). Institutional repositories: review and an information systems perspective. Library Management, 27(4/5), 236–248.

Kim, H. H., & Ho, Y. K. (2008). Usability study of digital institutional repositories. Electronic Library, 26(6), 863–881.

Kim, J. (2005). Finding documents in a digital institutional repository: DSpace and Eprints. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 42(1).

Kim, J. (2007). Motivating and impeding factors affecting faculty contribution to institutional repositories. Journal of Digital Information, 8(2).

Kim, Y. H., & Kim, H. H. (2008). Development and validation of evaluation indicators for a consortium of institutional repositories: A case study of dcollection. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(8), 1282-1294.

Kircz, J. (2005). Institutional Repositories, a new platform in Higher Education and Research. discussion paper for the CNI-JISC-SURF conference, Amsterdam, 10-11 May. available at: www. surffoundation. nl/smartsite. dws.

Lam, K. T., & Chan, D. L. (2007). Building an institutional repository: sharing experiences at the HKUST Library. perspectives, 23(3), 310–323.

Lawal, I. (2002). Scholarly communication: the use and non-use of e-print archives for the dissemination of scientific information. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 36, 1–16.

Laxminarsaiah, A., & Rajgoli, I. U. (2007). Building institutional repository: an overview. OCLC Systems & Services: International digital library perspectives, 23(3), 278–286.

Lercher, A. (2008). A survey of attitudes about digital repositories among faculty at Louisiana State University at Baton Rouge. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(5), 408-415.

Lynch, C. A., & Lippincott, J. K. (2005). Institutional repository deployment in the United States as of early 2005. D-Lib Magazine, 11(9).

McKay, D. (2007). Institutional repositories and their ‘other’users: Usability beyond authors. Ariadne, 52.

Mercer, H., Rosenblum, B., & Emmett, A. (2007). A multifaceted approach to promote a university repository: The University of Kansas' experience. OCLC Systems &# 38; Services, 23(2), 190-203.

Palmer, C. L., Teffeau, L. C., & Newton, M. P. (2008). Strategies for Institutional Repository Development: A Case Study of Three Evolving Initiatives. LIBRARY TRENDS, 57(2).

Pelizzari, E. (2004). Academic authors and open archives: A survey in the social science field. Libri, 54(2), 113-122.

Probets, S., & Jenkins, C. (2006). Documentation for institutional repositories. Learned Publishing-ALPSP Bulletin, 19(1), 57-72.

Proudman, V. (2008). What can we learn from Europe in our quest for populating our repositories? In: Third International Conference on Open Repositories 2008, 1-4 April 2008, Southampton, United Kingdom.

Rieh, S. Y., Yang, J. Y., Yakel, E., & Markey, K. (2010). Conceptualizing institutional repositories: using co-discovery to uncover mental models. In Proceeding of the third symposium on Information interaction in context (pp. 165-174). New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/1840784.1840809

Siau, K., Chiang, R., & Hardgrave, B. C. (2010). Systems Analysis and Design: People, Processes, and Projects. M.E. Sharpe.

Sutradhar, B. (2006). Design and development of an institutional repository at the Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur. Program: electronic library and information systems, 40(3), 244-255.

Suzie, A. Thura R, M. & Melanie, F. R. (2005). The librarian’s role in institutional repositories: A content analysis of the literature. Reference Services Review, 33(3), 325–336.

Thibodeau, K. (2007). If you build it, will it fly? Criteria for success in a digital repository. Journal of Digital Information, 8(2).

University of California Office of Scholarly Communication, & California Digital Library eScholarship Program. (2007). Faculty Attitudes and Behaviors Regarding Scholarly Communication: Survey Findings From The University of California. Oakland: The University of California.

Vanbentum, M., Brandsma, R., Place, T., & Roes, H. (2001). Reclaiming academic output through university archive servers. Retrieved from http://drcwww.uvt.nl/~roes/articles/arno_art.htm.

van Westrienen, G., & Lynch, C. A. (2005). Academic institutional repositories. D-lib Magazine, 11(9).

Watson, S. (2007). Authors' attitudes to, and awareness and use of, a university institutional repository. Serials: The Journal for the Serials Community, 20(3), 225-230.

Westell, M. (2006). Institutional repositories: proposed indicators of success. Library Hi Tech, 24(2), 211-226.

Wise, M., Spiro, L., Henry, G., & Byrd, S. (2007). Expanding roles for the institutional repository. OCLC Systems & Services: International digital library perspectives, 23(2), 216–223.

Wust, M. G. (2006). Attitudes of education researchers towards publishing: open access and institutional repositories. M.A., university of Alberta.

Yakel, E., Rieh, S. Y., St. Jean, B., Yao, X., & Markey, K. (2009). Secrets of Success: Identifying Success Factors in Institutional Repositories. Presented at the 4th International Conference on Open Repositories, Georgia Institute of Technology. doi:http://hdl.handle.net/1853/28419