Mechanical property evaluation of apricot fruits under quasi-static and dynamic loading

ماشین های کشاورزی

Article 13, Volume 6, Issue 1 - Serial Number 11, 2016, Pages 139-152   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jam.v6i1.29489

Authors

E. Ahmadi^* ; H. Barikloo

Department of Biosystem Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: Some forces and impacts that occur during transporting and handling can reduce the apricot quality. Bruise damage is a major cause of fruit quality loss. Bruises occur under dynamic and static loading when stress induced in the fruit exceeds the failure stress of the fruit tissue. Needless to say that physical and mechanical properties of fruits in the design and optimization of systems related to production, processing and packaging of the products are important. Harvesting, transport, packaging and transportation of fruits and vegetables, result in their bruising which can cause loss of marketability of the fruit by consumers. The term of ‘absorbed energy’ could be used to express the quantity of damage done on the fruit and the high the absorbed energy, the higher the damage on the fruit. The object of this research was due to the importance of apricot fruit and lack of information about the mechanical behavior.
Materials and Methods: In this study, apricot fruit variety “Ziaolmolki” was examined to determine some physical and mechanical properties. In order avoid any damage, the fruits were carefully harvested from trees and gathered in plastic boxes in a row, to prevent damage to the apricots. For determination of mechanical properties and levels of impact energy used test axial machine and pendulum device, respectively. Dependent variables (acoustics stiffness, radius of curvature, color characteristic a* and b*, Brix percentage, penetration force, penetration work and penetration deformation) and independent variables (impact energy in three levels, temperature and color in 2 levels each) were selected and analyzed by block designs with factorial structure. In the experimental design, the fruits were stored in two temperature levels, 3oC and 25oC. Two areas of any fruit (red and yellow areas) were subjected to 3 impact energy levels. For each of the 8 levels, 8 fruit samples were selected. Overall, 96 fruits {8 (number of fruit per level) × 3 (impact energy level) × 2 (both red and yellow) × 2 (at 25oC and 3oC)} was selected. In this study, using a factorial experiment in a completely randomized design, the effect of different factors (impact energy in 3 levels, temperature in 2 levels 3oC and 25°C and color in 2 levels red and yellow) on acoustic stiffness, radius of curvature, color characteristic a* and b*, precent Brix, penetration force, penetration work and penetration deformation in apricot under the quasi-static forces were studied. In order to conduct this experiment, the universal testing machine of biological materials was used. After the determination of mechanical properties of the products, the SAS statistical program (1.9) was applied to analyze and normalize the resulted data.
Factorial test also was used to determine the effects of independent variables on the dependent variables. Data analyses were performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SAS version 19.0).The variance analysis of the data was conducted in the form of multivariate factorial (2×2×3) design. The data were collected by three controlling factors: two temperature levels (3 and 20°C), two types of colour (Yellow and Red fruits) and three levels of impact energy. The Duncan’s multiple range tests was used to compare the means. The values of reducible sugars were measured by the fruit juice standard - test methods No. 2685 (Institute of Standards and Industrial Research of Iran). The apricots TSS (total soluble solids) for each temperature level by Refractomete (Model: 3820 (PAL-2), Resolution: ± 0.1% Brix) were obtained.
Results and Discussion: Respectively, the main and interaction effects of these variables were examined. The results of analysis of variance showed that,, the radius of curvature, color characteristic, acoustics stiffness, elastic modulus, percent Brix, penetration force and penetration deformation on main and interaction effects were significant at 5% and 1% probability level. According to the analysis of variance table between dependent and independent parameters, a significant effect was observed. Increasing impact energy, the penetration force and penetration deformation at 3°C was higher than at 25°C (Fig.3, 4, 7 and 8). Increasing impact energy, the red zone showed more penetration deformation and penetration force than the yellow zone (Fig.5 and 6). In a constant level of energy the higher the temperature of fruit tissue, the more energy is absorbed, due to this fact that lower temperatures can increase stiffness of the fruit, and leads to transport of absorbed energy to inside the tissue and increase the fruit bruising and final results in less needed penetration force for fruit transformation. Apricot acoustic stiffness in the temperature of 3oC was higher than in the temperature 25oC (Table 3). Fruit stiffness and tissue viscosity increases with increasing temperature. With increasing tissue stiffness, the less impact energy is absorbed and less bruising in fruit tissue is created. Because of more tissue stiffness, in order to create penetration in fruit tissue the more transformation is needed.
Conclusions: The red zone showed a higher bruise susceptibility of ripe apricots. According to the analysis of variance table between dependent and independent parameters, a significant effect was observed. Increasing impact energy, the penetration force and penetration deformation at 3°C was higher than at 25°C. Increasing impact energy, the red zone showed more penetration deformation and penetration force than the yellow zone. Apricot acoustic stiffness in the temperature of 3 oC was higher than in the temperature 25oC.

Keywords

Apricots; Color; Impact energy; Pendulum; temperature

References

1. Ahmadi, E., H. R. Ghassemzadeh, M. Sadeghi, M. Moghadam, and S. Zarif Neshat. 2010. The effect of impact properties and fruit properties on the bruising of peach. Journal of Food Engineering 97: 110-117.

2. Abbott, J. A. 1999. Quality measurement of fruits and vegetables. Postharvest Biology and Technology 15: 207-225.

3. Aydin, C., and M. Ozcan. 2002. Some physico-mechanic properties of terebinth (Pistacia terebinthus L.) fruits. Journal of Food Engineering 53: 97-101.

4. Aydin, C. 2003. Physical properties of almond nut and kernel. Journal of Food Engineering 60: 315-320.

5. Azodanlou, R., C. Darbellay, J. L. Luisier, J. C. Villettaz, and R. Amadò. 2003. Development of a model for quality assessment of tomatoes and apricots. LWT- Food Science and Technology 36: 223-233.

6. Barikloo, H., and E. Ahmadi. 2013. Dynamic properties of golden delicious and red delicious apple under normal contact force models. Journal of Texture Studies 44: 409-417.

7. Baritelle, A. L., and G. M. Hyde. 2001. Commodity conditioning to reduce impact bruising. Postharvest Biology and Technology 21: 331-339.

8. Barych, E. A. 2000. Strength properties of Avocado pear. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 76: 389-397.

9. Braga, G. C., S. M. Couto, T. Hara, and G. T. P. A. Neto. 1999. Mechanical behavior of macadamia nut under compression loading. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 72: 239-245.

10. Brusewitz, G. H., and J. A. Bartsch. 1989. Impact parameters related to postharvest bruising of apples. Transactions of the ASAE 32: 953-957.

11. Calisir, S., H. Haciseferogullari, M. Ozcan, and D. Arslan. 2004. Some nutritional and technological properties of wild plum (Prunus spp.) fruits in Turkey. Journal of Food Engineering 66: 233-237.

12. Cicco, N., B. Dichio, C. Xiloyannis, A. Sofo, V. Lattanzio, A. R. Ferguson, E. W. Hewett, F. A. Gunson, and C. N. Hale. 2007. Influence of calcium on the activity of enzymes involved in kiwifruit ripening. Acta Horticulture 753: 433-438.

13. Demartino, G., R. Massantini, R. Botondi, and F. Mencarelli. 2002. Temperature affects impact injury on apricot fruit. Postharvest Biology Technology 25: 145-149.

14. Diezma, B., C. Valero, F. J. Garcia-Ramos, and M. Ruiz-Altisent. 2006. Monitoring of firmness evolution of peaches during storage by combining acoustic and impact methods. Journal of Food Engineering 77: 926-935.

15. Duprat, F., M. Grotte, E. Pietri, and D. Loonis. 1997. The acoustic impulse response method for measuring the over‌all firmness of fruit. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 66: 251-259.

16. Fathollahzadeh, H., H. Mobli, B. Beheshti, A. Jafari, and A. M. Borghei. 2008. Effects of moisture content on some physical properties of apricot kernel (CV. Sonnati Salmas). Agricultural Engineering International the CIGR Ejournal 8: 1-14.

17. Fletcher, S. W., N. N. Mohsenin, J. R. Hammerle, and L. D. Tukey. 1965. Mechanical behavior of selected fruits and vegetables under fast rates of loading. Transactions of the ASAE 8: 324-331.

18. Gezer, I., H. Hacıseferogulları, and F. Demir. 2002. Some physical properties of Hacıhaliloglu apricot pit and it’s kernel. Journal of Food Engineering 56: 49-57.

19. Guner, M., E. Dursun, and I. G. Dursun. 2003. Mechanical behavior of hazelnut under compression loading. Biosystem Engineering 85: 485-491.

20. Hacıseferogulları, H., I. Gezer, M. Ozcan, and B. M. Asma. 2007. Postharvest chemical and physical-mechanical properties of some apricot varieties cultivated in Turkey. Journal of Food Engineering 79: 364-373.

21. Hassan Beygi, S. R., S. M. Ghaebi, and A. Arabhosseini. 2009. Some physico-mechanical properties of apricot fruit, pit and kernel of ordubad variety. Agricultural Engineering International: the CIGR Ejournal, Manuscript 1459, 9: 1-13.

22. Jannatizadeh, A., M. Naderi Boldaji, R. Fatahi, M. Ghasemi Varnamkhasti, and A. Tabatabaeefar. 2008. Some postharvest physical properties of Iranian apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) fruit. International Journal of Agrophysics 22: 125-131.

23. Menesatti, P., and G. Paglia. 2001. Development of a drop damage index of fruit resistance to damage. Journal Agricultural Engineering Research 80: 1-12.

24. Mohsenin, N. N. 1986. Physical properties of plant and animal materials. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York.

25. Landahl, S., W. B. Herppich, B. Herold, M. Geyer, and J. De Baerdemaeker. 2004. A comprehensive evaluation of the interactions between produce elasticity and water status. European Journal of Horticultural Science 69: 250-257.

26. Olaniyan, A. M., and K. Oje. 2002. Some aspects of the mechanical properties of Shea nut. Biosystems Engineering 81: 413-420.

27. Petrisor, C., G. L. Radu, V. Balan, and G. Campeanu. 2010. Rapid and non-destructive analytical techniques for measurement of apricot quality. Romanian Biotechnological Letters 15: 5213-5216.

28. Povey, M. J. W., and J. M. Wilkinson. 1980. Application of ultrasonic pulse-echo techniques to egg-albumin quality testing a preliminary report. British Poultry Science 21: 489-495.

29. Van Linden, V., B. Ketelaere, M. Desmet, and J. De Baerdemaeker. 2007. Determination of bruise susceptibility of tomato fruit by means of an instrumented pendulum. Postharvest Biology and Technology 40: 7-14.

30. Van Zeebroeck, M., V. Van linden, P. Darius, B. De Ketelaere, H. Roman, and E. Tijskens. 2007a. The effect of fruit properties on the bruise susceptibility of tomatoes. Postharvest Biology and Technology 45: 168-175.

31. Van Zeebroeck, M., V. Van linden, P. Darius, B. De Ketelaere, H. Roman, and E. Tijskens. 2007b. The effect of fruit factors on the bruise susceptibility of apples. Postharvest Biology and Technology 46: 10-19.

32. Wright, F. S., and W. E. Splinter. 1968. Mechanical behavior of sweet potatoes under slow loading and impact loading. Transactions of the ASAE 12: 765-770.