Dubbing Linguistic Taboos of Pulp Fiction into Persian: A Comparative Study of Translations by Students and Professionals

مطالعات زبان و ترجمه

Article 6, Volume 52, Issue 1, April 2019, Pages 109-128   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/lts.v52i1.80700

Authors

Milad Mehdizadkhani^{* 1}; Abdullah Nowruzy²; Farzaneh Shokoohmand²

¹Department of English Applied Linguistics, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary

²Department of English, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Translation training in audiovisual translation has received a lot of attention, but how students tackle the translation of linguistic taboos for dubbing or subtitling has been under-researched. To fill the gap, this descriptive study aims to examine how students’ strategies differ from those of professionals in terms of translating taboos. To do so, a group of fifteen BA students of English was requested to translate Pulp Fiction (Tarantino, 1994) into Persian. The translations made by the students were then compared with the professional translation available for the film. The results of the study indicated that the strategies taken by students in dealing with taboo language is so similar to those of professionals with the exception of decreasing taboo load. The students tended to delete most of linguistic taboos, which is also the commonly used strategy in the professional version of the film. The second frequent strategy employed by students was rendering taboo words into non-taboo words. By contrast, in the professional version, as the second frequent strategy and seemingly in order to retain the taboo load and effect, translators had substituted the taboo words with more culturally accepted taboo or offensive expressions. The results of this paper have some pedagogical implications for translator training classes.

Keywords

Audiovisual Translation; Students’ Translation; Taboo Language; Translation Teaching

References

خوش‌سلیقه، م.، عامری، س، و نوروزی، ع. (۱۳۹۷). ترجمة دیداری‌شنیداری: مفاهیم و اصطلاحات. مشهد: انتشارات دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد.

خوش‌سلیقه، م.، و فاضلی حق‌پناه، ا. (1395). فرایند و ویژگی‌های زیرنویس غیرحرفه‌ای در ایران. مطالعات زبان و ترجمه، 49(2)، 67-95.

رستگارمقدم تفتی، م.، خوش‌سلیقه، م، و پیش‌قدم، ر. (در دست چاپ). بررسی ارتباط آموزش زیرنویس برنامه‌های دیداری‌شنیداری و دیدگاه دانشجویان زبان به مهارت‌های کار تیمی. جستارهای زبانی.

شریفی، ش و دارچینیان، ف (1388). بررسی نمود زبان تابو در ترجمه به فارسی و پیامدهای آن. مجله تخصصی زبان‌شناسی و گویش‌های خراسان، ۱(۱)، 127-141.

شورای تحول و ارتقای علوم انسانی. (1396). برنامة درسی بازنگری‌شدة دوره: کارشناسی پیوسته رشته مترجمی زبان انگلیسی. برگرفته از: http://hes.msrt.ir/uploads/T_Education/1524306471_1.pdf

شورای عالی برنامه‌ریزی. (۱۳۶۹). مشخصات کلی، برنامه و سرفصل دروس دوره کارشناسی پیوسته مترجمی زبان انگلیسی. برگرفته از: http://hes.msrt.ir/uploads/T_Education/Educ_6461_0.pdf

فاضلی حق‌پناه، ا.، و خوش‌سلیقه، م. (۱۳۹۷). انگیزه‌ها و دلایل طرفدارزیرنویسی فیلم‌ها و سریال‌های کره‌ای. مطالعات زبان و ترجمه، ۵۱(۴)، ۱-۲۰.

Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden words: Taboo and the censoring of language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Ameri, S., & Ghazizadeh, K. (2015). A norm-based analysis of swearing rendition in professional dubbing and non-professional subtitling from English into Persian. Iranian Journal of Research in English Language Teaching, 2(2), 78–96.

Ávila-Cabrera, J. J. (2015). An account of the subtitling of offensive and taboo language in Tarantino’s screenplays. Sendebar, 26, 37–56.

Ávila-Cabrera, J. J., & Rodriguez Arancon, P. (2018). The OFFTATLED project: Offensive and taboo exchanges subtitled by online university students. Encuentro, 27, 204–219.

Bartrina, F. and E. Espasa (2005). Audiovisual translation. In M. Tennent (Ed.), Training for the new millennium (pp. 83–100). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.

Bucaria, C. (2015). “I didn’t think it was appropriate”: Considerations on taboo humour in the subtitling classroom. In R. Antonini & C. Bucaria (Eds.), Non-professional interpreting and translation in the media (pp. 67–88). Wien, Austria: Peterlang.

Cerezo Merchan, B. (2019). Audiovisual translator training. In L. Perez-Gonzalez (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of audiovisual translation (pp. 468–82). London, England: Routledge.

Chaume, F. (2012). Audiovisual translation: Dubbing. Manchester, England: St. Jerome.

Diaz Cintas, J., & Remael, A. (2007). Audiovisual translation: Subtitling. Abingdon, England: Routledge.

Diaz Cintas, J. (2008a). Teaching and learning to subtitle in an academic environment. In J. Diaz Cintas (Ed.), The didactics of audiovisual translation (pp. 89–103). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.

Diaz Cintas, J. (Ed.). (2008b). The didactics of audiovisual translation. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.

Diaz Cintas, J., & Remael, A. (2007). Audiovisual translation: Subtitling. Manchester: St. Jerome.

Imhauser, C. (2009). The pedagogy of subtitling. In G. C. F. Fong & K. K. L. Au (Eds.), Dubbing and subtitling in a world context (pp. 231-242). Hong Kong, China: The Chinese University Press

Incalcaterra McLoughlin, L. (2012). Subtitling and the didactics of translation. In S. Hubscher-Davidson & M. Borodo (Eds.), Global trends in translator and interpreter training: Mediation and Culture (pp. 127–43). London, England: Continuum Books.

Kenevisi, M. S., Omar, H. C., & Daghigh, A. J. (2016). Manipulation in dubbing: The translation of English-language films into Persian. Altre Modernità, 15, 201-214.

Khoshsaligheh, M., & Ameri, S. (2017, October). Didactics of audiovisual translation in Iran. Paper presented at the First National Conference on Interdisciplinary Approaches to Translation

Education, Tehran, Iran.

Khoshsaligheh, M., & Ameri, S. (2014). Translation of taboos in dubbed American crime movies into Persian. T&I REVIEW, 4, 25–50.

Khoshsaligheh, M., & Ameri, S. (2016). Ideological considerations and practice in official dubbing in Iran. Altre Modernità, 15, 232–250.

Khoshsaligheh, M., Ameri, S. & Mehdizadkhani M. (2018). A socio-cultural study of taboo rendition in Persian fansubbing: An issue of resistance. Language and Intercultural Communication, 18(6), 663–80.

Lertola, J. (2012). The effect of the subtitling task on vocabulary learning. In A. Pym and D. Orrego-Carmona (Eds.), Translation research projects 4 (pp.61–70). Tarragona, Spain: Intercultural Studies Group.

Pedersen, J. (2019). Fansubbing in subtitling land: An investigation into the nature of fansubs in Sweden, Target 31(1), 50–76.

Pedersen, J. (2017). The FAR model: Assessing quality in interlingual subtitling. JoSTrans, (28), 210–229.

Ranzato, I. (2019). Gayspeak in the Translation Classroom. In M. de Marco (Ed.), Gender approaches in the translation classroom (pp. 103-126). Basingstoke, England: Palgrave.

Toury, G. (2012 [1995]). Descriptive translation studies – and beyond (Revised ed.). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.

Talavan, N., & Rodriguez-Arancon, P. (2014). The use of reverse subtitling as an online collaborative language learning tool. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 8(1), 84-101.

Valdeon, R. A. (2015). The (ab)use of taboo lexis in audiovisual translation: Raising awareness of pragmatic variation in English-Spanish. Intercultural Pragmatics, 12(3), 363-85.