Determinate of Factors Influencing Intention to Stay and Reside in Rural among Rural Students

Journal of Research and Rural Planning

مقاله 5، دوره 6، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 19، بهمن 2017، صفحه 105-117   

نوع مقاله: علمی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/jrrp.v6i3.60560

نویسندگان

Maso'ud Yazdanpanah^{* 1}؛ Tahereh Zobeidi²؛ Ziba Bakhtiari¹

¹Ramin University of Agricluture and Natural Resources (Khouzestan)

²Zanjan University

چکیده

Extended abstract
1. INTRODUCTION
Many rural areas of the Iran experienced population decline due to out-migration. rural to urban migration have had consequences on social, economic, and political issue. On the other hand, Mobility rates were found to be highest for people between the ages of 16 and 29 years. Within this age group, the likelihood of leaving home increases as age increases. Also the research's has shown that young people who possess higher levels of formal education tend to move out of rural communities. Therefore, Youth out-migration is a common feature of most rural areas in both developed and developing countries. In other words, ‘Should I stay or should I leave my home region?’ is one of the key life course questions that many young people must address as they grow to maturity. Consistent with the theory of reasoned action, migration intentions have in General been found to be a moderate to strong predictor of actual migration in various societies around the world. Understanding migration intentions is a difficult task, as decisions to migrate often reflect the influence of a range of factors in both origin and destination communities. Therefore, identify the influencing factors on willingness of youth to stay in their rural is important. So this study was designed to Investigate of the factors influencing on youth intention in order to stay in rural.
2. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
According to various studies, several factors influence the intention to stay in a rural. A literature review showed that the Image of Rural, Attitude toward rural areas, the feeling of Belonging to the rural, the Moral and Subjective Norms, Perceived Behavioral Control, Identity, Perceived Value of Life in the rural and Satisfaction are the factors influencing the intention to stay in the rural.
3. METHODOLOGY
This study is an applied research and with the survey method was conducted. Target population of this study consisted of 420 graduated students. Using a simple Quota random sampling method, 200 students were selected for this study. The sample size was determined using the Morgan table. The study site is Ramin agricultural university in the Khuzestan province. Data were collected through a questionnaire based on the conceptual model. The face validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by a panel of experts. The survey was pre-tested and piloted on 30 students from outside the study area. This procedure highlighted any unclear sections of the questionnaire. Cronbach alpha reliability coefficients were calculated for the pilot study and used to refine the questions for the final questionnaire. All scales indicated good-to-excellent reliability, generally 0.70–0.85.
4. DISCUSSION
The results revealed a positive significant relationship between intention to stay and attitude, perceived behavioral control and subjective norm. Moreover, the results revealed that self- identity, Image of rural, Belonging, moral norm, perceived value and satisfaction had negative significant relationship with intention. The regression showed that image of rural, attitude, perceived behavioral control and subjective norm are significant predictors of intention. These four variables predicted 58% of the variance in intention to stay. (sig=0/0001, F= 23/10, R2 Adjust = 0/55). perceived behavioral control is a key predictor of intention. perceived value and belonging were significant predictors of satisfaction. These two variables predicted 52% of the variance in satisfaction (sig=0/0001, F= 58/23, R2 Adjust = 0/51).

5. CONCLUSION
The results revealed that image, attitude, perceived behavior control and subjective norm are having an impact on stay intention. From a practical point of view, the present study provides a justification for using attitude, Image, perceived behaviour control and subjective norm dimensions in policies and programs that intend to decrease young people to migrant from rural area. a positive attitude towards rural living is a good starting point to stimulate willingness to remain in rural area. This relationship has received substantial empirical support (see Yazdanpanah & Zobeidi., 2017; Yazdanpanah et al, 2015; Liao et al., 2007). Furthermore, perceived behavior control refers to the grade to which an individual feel that the performance of behavior is under his/her volitional control. In line with findings of other studies (Liao et al., 2007), the Perceived behavior control was a determinant (main predictor) of intention. Moreover, our study unlike other studies (Yazdanpanah et al, 2015), revealed that moral norms were not a significant predictor of intention. therefore, attempts to encourage young people to stay in rural areas should focus on improving image of rural, attitude, perceived behavioral control and subjective norms.

کلیدواژه‌ها

Desire to stay؛ intent؛ satisfaction of life؛ Satisfaction؛ rural students

مراجع

1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.

2. Akbarpoor, M., Motiee Langrodi, S. H., Rezvani, M. R., Nornakhsh, S. M. (1393/2014). Explain suitable of Strategies to non-Migration Population in Rural Settlements Case Study Hashtroud County. Journal of Rural Researches, 5(4), 893-910. [In Persian]

3. Arvola, A., Vassallo, M., Dean, M., Lampila, P., Saba, A., Lähteenmäki, L., & Shepherd, R. (2008). Predicting intentions to purchase organic food: The role of affective and moral attitudes in the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Appetite, 50(2), 443-454.

4. Astinfeshan, S., Alibaygi, A., & Gholami, M. (1394/2015). Effect of attachment and satisfaction levels of rural life in Kermanshah city, rural youth participation in agricultural activities. Journal of Rural Researches, 6(2), 411-432. [In Persian]

5. Bajs, I. P. (2015). Tourist perceived value, relationship to satisfaction, and behavioral intentions the example of the Croatian tourist destination Dubrovnik. Journal of Travel Research, 54(1), 122-134.

6. Bamberg, S. (2013). Changing environmentally harmful behaviors: A stage model of self-regulated behavioral change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 151-159.

7. Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of environmental psychology, 27(1), 14-25.

8. Bednařikova, Z., Bavorova, M., & Ponkina, E. V. (2016). Migration motivation of agriculturally educated rural youth: The case of Russian Siberia. Journal of Rural Studies, 45, 99-111.

9. Bjarnason, T., & Thorlindsson, T. (2006). Should I stay or should I go? Migration expectations among youth in Icelandic fishing and farming communities. Journal of Rural Studies, 22(3), 290-300.

10. Cai, H., & Wang, J. (2008). Factors influencing the migration intentions of rural workers in the Pearl River Delta. Social Sciences in China, 29(3), 157-171.

11. Cook, A. J., Kerr, G. N., & Moore, K. (2002). Attitudes and intentions towards purchasing GM food. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23(5), 557-572.

12. Corbett, M. (2007). All kinds of potential: Women and out-migration in an Atlantic Canadian coastal community. Journal of Rural Studies, 23(4), 430-442.

13. Crowe, J. (2010). Community attachment and satisfaction: The role of a community's social network structure. Journal of community psychology, 38(5), 622-644.

14. De Bruijn, G. J. (2010). Understanding college students’ fruit consumption. Integrating habit strength in the theory of planned behavior. Appetite, 54(1), 16-22.

15. De Jong, G. F. (2000). Expectations, gender, and norms in migration decision-making. Population studies, 54(3), 307-319.

16. DeBarr, K. A. (2006). A review of current health education theories. Californian Journal of Health Promotion, 2(1), 74-87.

17. Ellison, S. (2003). Nurses' attitudes toward family presence during resuscitative efforts and invasive procedures. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 29(6), 515-521.

18. Florida, R., Mellander, C., & Stolarick, K. (2009). Should I stay or should I go now? How and why community satisfaction affects Mover–Stayer decisions. Unpublished manuscript, Martin Prosperity Institute, Toronto, Ontario.

19. Garcia, C., & Davidson, T. (2013). Are rural people more anti-immigrant than urban people? A comparison of attitudes toward immigration in the United States. Journal of Rural Social Sciences, 28(1), 80.

20. Ghasemi siani, M (1388/2009). Consequences of Immigration from Village to City of Young Generation of Villager. Semi-Annually Youths, Culture and Society Research, 2, 145- 165. [In Persian]

21. Gubhaju, B., & De Jong, G. F. (2009). Individual versus household migration decision rules: Gender and marital status differences in intentions to migrate in South Africa. International Migration, 47(1), 31-61.

22. Hannscott, L. (2016). Individual and contextual socioeconomic status and community satisfaction. Urban Studies, 53(8), 1727-1744.

23. Kaiser, F. G., & Scheuthle, H. (2003). Two challenges to a moral extension of the theory of planned behavior: moral norms and just world beliefs in conservationism. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(5), 1033-1048.

24. Kim, K. H., & Park, D. B. (2016). Relationships among Perceived Value, Satisfaction, and Loyalty: Community-Based Ecotourism in Korea. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 1-21.

25. Lee, C. K., Yoon, Y. S., & Lee, S. K. (2007). Investigating the relationships among perceived value, satisfaction, and recommendations: The case of the Korean DMZ. Tourism Management, 28(1), 204-214.

26. Loureiro, S. M. C., & Gonzalez, F. J. M. (2008). The importance of quality, satisfaction, trust, and image in relation to rural tourist loyalty. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 25(2), 117-136.

27. Lu, M. (1998). Analyzing migration decision-making: relationships between residential satisfaction, mobility intentions, and moving behavior. Environment and Planning A, 30(8), 1473-1495.

28. McHugh, K. E. (1984). Explaining migration intentions and destination selection. The Professional Geographer, 36(3), 315-325.

29. Noorbakhsh, S. M., Pour Saraskanroud, M. A. (1390/2011). Strategies to deal with rural-urban migration using Swat model: case study Kohsar rural district of Hashtroud county. Journal of Community Development, 3(2), 127-142. [In Persian]

30. Panahi, L., & Pishro, H. (1390/2011). Investigating Factors affecting the migration of rural youth to urban case study: the central rurals of Marvdasht County. Journal of Management System, 1(2), 41-50. [In Persian]

31. Pelling, E. L., & White, K. M. (2009). The theory of planned behavior applied to young people's use of social networking web sites. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 12(6), 755-759.

32. Petrick, J. F., & Backman, S. J. (2002). An examination of the construct of perceived value for the prediction of golf travelers’ intentions to revisit. Journal of Travel Research, 41(1), 38-45.

33. Pretty, G., Bramston, P., Patrick, J., & Pannach, W. (2006). The relevance of community sentiments to Australian rural youths’ intention to stay in their home communities. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(2), 226-240.

34. Rostamalizadeh, V., Ghasemi Ardahaee, A., & Rostami, N. (2013). Factors affecting staying of rural youth in rural areas, case study: Ahar County. Journal of Rural Researches, 3(3), 505-534. [In Persian]

35. Shangoli NajafAbadi, M., Mohammadzadeh, S., Khosravipour, B., & Yazdanpanah, M. (1393/2014). Factors affecting students’ intension toward employment: an application of the extended Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 20(4), 75-93. [In Persian]

36. Shayan, H., & Kohnepushi, S. H. (1392/2013). Analysis of the causes of rural-urban migration (Case study: Khav and Myrabad District, Marivan County). Journal of Research and Rural Planning, 3 (1), 115-141. [In Persian]

37. Şimşekoğlu, Ö., & Lajunen, T. (2008). Social psychology of seat belt use: A comparison of theory of planned behavior and health belief model. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior, 11(3), 181-191.

38. Taherkhani, M. (1381/2002). Recognition of effective factors on rural youth migration (RYM) (theoretical analysis with emphasis on rural youth migration of Qazvin province). Journal of Modarres Human Sciences, 6(2), 41-60. [In Persian]

39. Theodori, A. E., & Theodori, G. L. (2014). Perceptions of community and place and the migration intentions of at-risk youth in rural areas. Journal of Rural Social Sciences, 29(1), 103.

40. Thissen, F., Fortuijn, J. D., Strijker, D., & Haartsen, T. (2010). Migration intentions of rural youth in the Westhoek, Flanders, Belgium and the Veenkoloniën, The Netherlands. Journal of Rural Studies, 26(4), 428-436.

41. Trell, E. M., van Hoven, B., & Huigen, P. (2012). ‘It's good to live in Järva-Jaani but we can't stay here’: Youth and belonging in rural Estonia. Journal of Rural Studies, 28(2), 139-148.

42. Ulrich‐Schad, J. D., Henly, M., & Safford, T. G. (2013). The role of community assessments, place, and the great recession in the migration intentions of rural Americans. Rural Sociology, 78(3), 371-398.

43. Veenhoven, R. (1994). How satisfying is rural life? Fact and value.

44. Woodruff, R. B. (1997). Customer value: the next source for competitive advantage. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(2), 139-153.

45. Yazdanpanah, M., & Zobeidi, T. (2017). Why do they want to migrate from rural areas? A psychological perspective from Iran. International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development, 7(3), 283-292. ‏

46. Yue, Z., Li, S., Feldman, M. W., & Du, H. (2010). Floating choices: a generational perspective on intentions of rural–urban migrants in China. Environment and Planning A, 42(3), 545-562.