Effects of drought stress and planting methods on yield and yield components of two chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars

پژوهش‌های حبوبات ایران

Article 5, Volume 5, Issue 1, June 2014, Pages 79-90   

Document Type: Original Articles

DOI: 10.22067/ijpr.v1393i1.46203

Authors

Laleh Abasluo^* ; Seyyed Abdolreza Kazemeini; Mohsen Edalat

Shiraz, Iran

Abstract

In order to evaluate the effects of drought stress and planting method on yield and yield components of two chickpea cultivars (Cicer arietinum L.), an experiment was carried out at the research field of Faculty of Agriculture; Shiraz University, using a split factorial randomized complete block design with four replications. The main factor was irrigation stop at different growth stages of chickpea (two weeks after emergence= I1, flowering= I2 and normal irrigation= I3) and sub-factor involved a combination of two varieties of pea (Arman and Azad) and sowing methods (ridges, furrow and flat planting), respectively. Results showed that the highest and lowest pod number per plant, seeds per plant, two seeded pod percent, grain weight, grain yield and biological yield were obtained from I3 and I1 treatments, respectively, and the trend was contrary in the case of hollow pods. Most of pods per plant, seed per plant, two seeded pod percent, seed weight and seed yield were obtained from planting on ridges. Azad cultivar seed yield was more than (Arman 164 vs 117 g.m-2) and could be recommended in the Bajgah region. Although under drought stress condition seed yield was reduced in both cultivars but, it modification by changing the planting method from flat to ridge in the I1 and I2 treatments, and it can be used as a way of reducing seed yield loss by 26 and 32 percent, respectively.

Keywords

Flowering; Ridge planting; Seed number per plant; Stop irrigation

References

1. Anonymous. 2001. Nitrogen fixing organisms (Diazotrophs). http://www.asahi-et.or.ir./it61-wtnb/BNF.html.

2. Anwar, M.R., Mckenzie, B.A., and Hill, G.D. 2003. The effect of irrigation and sowing date on crop yield and yield component of Kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in a cool-temperate subhumid climate. Journal of Agriculture Science 141: 259-271.

3. Begum, N., Husain, M., and Chowdury, S.I. 1992. Effect of sowing date and plant density on pod borer incidence and grain yield of chickpea in Bangladesh. International Chickpea Newsletter 27: 19-21.

4. Calcagno, F., Gallo, G., Iaian, M., and Raimondo, I. 1988. Effects of plant density on seed yield and it’s components for ten chickpea genotypes grown in Sicily, Italy. International Chickpea Newsletter 18: 29-31.

5. Chaghamirza, K., and Farshadfar, E.A. 2005. Study of relationships between yield and yield components in chickpea. Abstract of 9th Iranian Congress of Crop Science and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, University of Tehran. Karaj, Iran.

6. Eivazi, A., Taghikhani, H., Shiralizadeh, Sh., Rezaei, M., and Mousavi Anzabi, S.H. 2012. Evaluation of response of chickpea genotypes to water deficit at different growth stages by using drought tolerance indices. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research 3(1): 81-92. (In Persian with English Summary).

7. Fahong, W., Xoging, W., and Sayre, K. 2004. Comparison of conventional, flood irrigated, flat planting with furrow irrigated, raised bed planting for winter wheat in China. Field Crop Research 87: 35-42.

8. Fang, X., Turner, N.C., Yan, G., Li, F., and Siddique, K.H.M. 2010. Flower numbers, pod production, pollen viability, and pistil function are reduced and flower and pod abortion increased in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under terminal drought. Journal of Experimental Botany 61: 335-345.

9. FAO. 2012. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.Faostate.fao.org.

10. Farbodnia, T. 1995. Effect of drought stress on germination, growth and some biochemical changes induced by stress in Iranian chickpea lines. MSc. Thesis in Biology, Plant Sciences. Tehran University of Teacher Education, p. 125.

11. Geletu Bejiga, H.A., Van Rheenen, C.A., Jagadish, C.A., and Singh, O. 1991. Correlation between yield and it’s components in segregation population of different generations of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Legume Research 14: 87-91.

12. Goldani, M., and Rezvani Moghaddam, P. 2004. Effect of planting date on yield and yield components of rainfed and irrigated chickpea cultivars in Mashhad. Journal of Agricultural Research 2: 229-239. (In Persian with English Summary).

13. Jalilian, J., Modares Sanavi, S.A.M., and Sabaghpour, S.H. 2005. Effect of plant density and irrigation on yield, yield components and protein content of four varieties of chickpea in rainfed conditions. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources 12: 1-9.

14. Jalota, S.K., Sood, A., and Harman, W.L. 2006. Assessing the response of chickpea (Cicer aeritinum L.) yield to irrigation water on two soils in Punjab (India): A simulation analysis using the CROPMAN model. Agricultural Water Management 79: 312-320.

15. Kanouni, H., Ahmadi, M.K., Sabaghpour, S.H., Malhotra, R.S., and Ketata, H. 2003. Evaluation of spring sowed chickpea varieties for drought tolerance. International Chickpea Conference. Raipur, Chhattisgrah, India.

16. Keating, J.D.H., and Cooper, P.J.M. 1983. Kabuli chickpea as a winter-sown crop in northern Syria: moisture relations and crop productivity. Journal of Agricultural Science 100: 667-680.

17. Khan, M.J., and Khattak, R.A. 2000. Influence of sowing methods on the productivity of canola grown in saline soil. Pakistan Journal Biological Science 3: 687-691.

18. Khanna-Chopra, R., and Sinha, S.K. 1987. Chickpea: physiological aspects of growth and yield. In: M.C. Saxena and K.B. Singh (Eds.). The Chickpea. p. 163-189. C.A.B. International, UK.

19. Kumar, A.M. 2010. Plant water relations and photosynthetic activity in three Tunisian chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotype subjected to drought. Turkish Journal Agriculture Forestry 34: 257-264.

20. Leport, L., Turner, N.C., Davies, S.L., and Siddique, K.H.M. 2006. Variation in pod production and abortion among chickpea cultivars under terminal drought. European Journal of Agronomy 24: 236-246.

21. Leport, L., Turner, N.C., French, R.J., Barr, M.D., Duda, R., Davies, S.L., Tennant, D., and Siddique, K.H.M. 1999. Physiological responses of chickpea genotypes to terminal drought in a Mediterranean-type environment. European Journal of Agronomy 11: 279-291.

22. Liu, F., Jensen, C.R., and Andersen, M.N. 2004. Drought stress effect on carbohydrate concentration in soybean leaves and pods during early reproductive development: its implication in altering pod set. Field Crops Research 86: 1-13.

23. Majnoun Hosseini, N., and Hamzeii, R. 2011. Effect of winter and spring planting time on yield and yield components of chickpea at dry land conditions. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research 1(2): 59-68. (In Persian with English Summary).

24. Mohammadi, A., Bihamta, M.R., and Dorri, H. 2011. Effects of factors affecting cooking characteristics and protein content in 15 red bean genotypes (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under normal irrigation and drought stress conditions. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research 1: 143-152. (In Persian with English Summary).

25. Mohammadian, R., Moghaddam, M., Rahimian, H., and Sadeghian, S.Y. 2005. Effect of early season drought stress on growth characteristics of sugar beet genotypes. Turkish Journal of Agriculture 29: 357-368.

26. Nelson, C. 2001. Untapped Potential: Irrigated Chickpea Production. p. 43-55. Proc. Southern Alberta Conserv. Assoc. Dryland and Irrigated Reduced Tillage Conf., 1-2 Dec. 2001, Lethbridge, Canada.

27. Oweis, T., Hachum, A., and Pala, M. 2004. Water use efficiency of winter sown chickpea under supplemental irrigation in a Mediterranean environment. Agriculture Water Management 66: 163-179.

28. Pacucci, G., Troccoli, C., and Leoni, B. 2006. Effects of supplementary irrigation on yield of chickpea genotypes in a Mediterranean climate. Agricultural Engineering International; The CIGRE Journal 3: 1-9.

29. Pala, M., and Mazid, A. 1992. On farm assessment of improved crop production practices in North West Syria. I. Chickpea. Experimental of Agriculture 28: 175-184.

30. Parsa, M., Ganjali, A., Rezaeanzadeh, A., and Nezami, A. 2011. Effect of supplemental irrigation on yield and growth indices of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 9(3): 310-321. (In Persian with English Summary).

31. Rezvani Moghaddam, P., and Sadeghi Samarjan, R. 2008. Effect of different planting dates and different irrigation regimes on morphological characteristics and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) ILC3279 cultivars in the climatic conditions Neyshabur. Journal of Agricultural Research 2: 315-325.

32. Sabaghpour, S.H. 2001. Major diseases of chickpea in Iran. In Proceeding of Symposium on Grain Legumes in the Mediterranean. Agriculture, (LEGUMED), 25-27 October 2001. Rabat, Morocco.

33. Shaikh, A.A., Jadhav, B.D., and Wattam War, M.J. 1994. Effects of planting layouts, mulching and fertilizers on dry matter accumulation and energy relationship in rainfall pearl millet. Journal Maharashtra Agriculture University 19: 421-423.

34. Silim, S.N., Saxana, M.C., and Singh, K.B. 1993. Adaptation of spring-sown chickpea to the Mediterranean basin. II. Factors influencing yield under drought. Field Crops Research 34: 137-141.

35. Singh, D.P., Singh, P., Sharma, H.C., and Turner, N.C. 1987. Influence of water deficit on the water relations, canopy gas exchange and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum). Field Crops Research 16: 231- 241.

36. Soltani, A., Khooie, F.R., Ghassemi-Golezani, K., and Moghaddam, M. 2000. Thresholds for chickpea leaf expansion and transpiration response to soil water deficit. Field Crops Research 68: 205-210.

37. Soltani, A., Khooie, F.R., Ghassemi-Golezani, K., and Moghaddam, M. 2001. A simulation study of chickpea crop response to limited irrigation in a semiarid environment. Agriculture Water Management 49: 225-237.