The Role of Government Investments in the Sustainable Quality of Rural Life

Journal of Research and Rural Planning

مقاله 3، دوره 7، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 22، مهر 2018، صفحه 63-77   

نوع مقاله: علمی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/jrrp.v5i4.64169

نویسندگان

Homa Soroushmehr؛ Mousa Aazami^* ؛ Nader Mehregan؛ Ahmad Yaghobi Farani

Bu-Ali Sina University

چکیده

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sustainable rural quality of life index in Iran during the period of 1991-2016 and to measure the effects of various government investments on this index.
Design/methodology/approach: The data were collected from the Statistics Center, the Central Bank and the World Bank. The value of the quality of life indicator was calculated using the software Eviews during the course of the study. The effect of independent research variables including government investment in agriculture, education, health, and rural development using the ARDL model in Microfit software is estimated.
Finding: The results of the model estimation in the short run indicate that every 1 percent increase in government investment in agricultural sectors was 0.55 percent, health and treatment 0.54 percent, education 31.3 percent, increase the quality of life respectively. But investment in rural development does not affect quality of life in the short term but investment in rural life does not affect in the short term. In the long run, every 1% increase in investment in agricultural sectors is 0.65%, health and treatment 0.64%, education 45.0% and 32% in rural development in improving quality of life and its sustainability respectively.
Research limitations/implications: Access to statistics is very difficult and has been obtained through reviewing all budget rules for the research courses.
Practical implications: Strategy for employment to villagers with the support of public policy, based on qualify for investment, jobs, and services in rural areas contributes to the strengthening of agriculture, the changes in agricultural production and natural resources, the creation of jobs in non-farm income and as a result, the increased demand for local agricultural and non-agricultural products.
Originality/value: Considering sustainable factors in evaluating quality of life and the effect of government investment in rural life by the applied method are the advantages of this study that has not been studied in previous studies.

کلیدواژه‌ها

Government investment؛ quality of life؛ sustainablity؛ Iran؛ ARDL

مراجع

1. Aragones, J. I., Amerigo, M., & Perez-Lopez, R. (2017). Residential Satisfaction and Quality of Life. In Handbook of Environmental Psychology and Quality of Life Research (pp. 311-328). Springer, Cham.

2. Auh, S., & Cook, C. (2009). Quality of community life among rural residents: An integrated model. Social Indicator Research, 94(3), 377-389.

3. Babaee Fini, O., Tohidloo, S. A., & Hazrati, M. (1394/2015). Analysis of the social wellbeing status in the rural settlements based on Keyes model, Miringof and QOL (Case study: Zanjan county). Journal of Research and Rural Planning, 4(3), 127-140. [In Persian]

4. Bache, I. (2013). Measuring quality of life for public policy: An idea whose time has come? Agenda-setting dynamics in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(1), 21-38.

5. Banerjee, A., Dolado, J. J., Galbraith, J. W., & Hendry, D. (1993). Co-integration, error correction, and the econometric analysis of non-stationary data. OUP Catalogue.

6. Bień, B., & Bień-Barkowska, K. (2016). Objective drivers of subjective well-being in geriatric inpatients: mobility function and level of education are general predictors of self-evaluated health, feeling of loneliness, and severity of depression symptoms. Quality of life research, 25(12), 3047-3056.

7. Cooke, M., Mitrou, F., Lawrence, D., Guimond, E., & Beavon, D. (2007). Indigenous well-being in four countries: an application of the UNDP'S human development index to indigenous peoples in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States. BMC international health and human rights, 7(1), 9.

8. Costanza, R., Fisher, B., Ali, S., Beer, C., Bond, L., Boumans, R., ... & Gayer, D. E. (2008). An integrative approach to quality of life measurement, research, and policy. SAPI EN. S. Surveys and Perspectives Integrating Environment and Society, (1.1).‏

9. Darban Astane, A. R., & Mahmoudi, M. (1395/2016). Assessment of life quality in New Agropolitans: A case study of Banvareh in Kermanshah province. Geography and Development, 14(42), 199-218. [In Persian]

10. Gheydari Sajjadi, H. (1395/2016). Impact analysis of cash payment subisides on rural family’s QOL Improvement (case study: shirang villages). Parliament and Strategy, 23(85), 107-142. [In Persian]

11. Hogan, M. C., Foreman, K. J., Naghavi, M., Ahn, S. Y., Wang, M., Makela, S. M., ... & Murray, C. J. (2010). Maternal mortality for 181 countries, 1980–2008: A systematic analysis of progress towards millennium development goal 5. The Lancet, 375(9726), 1609-1623.

12. Kashwan, P. (2017). Inequality, democracy, and the environment: A cross-national analysis. Ecological Economics, 131, 139–151.

13. Khorasani, M. A., Hajiloo, M., & Valizade, Z. (1394/2015). Measurement and evaluation of QOL components in villages of Karasf dehestan of Khodabandeh County. Journal of Research and Rural Planning, 3(8), 65-78. [In Persian]

14. King, R., & Vullnetari, J. (2016). From shortage economy to second economy: A historical ethnography of rural life in communist Albania. Journal of Rural Studies, 44, 198-207.

15. Mitchell, G., May, A., & McDonald, A. (1995). PICABUE: A methodological framework for the development of indicators of sustainable development. The International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 2(2), 104-123.

16. Morris, M. D. (1980). The Physical Quality of Life Index (PQLI). Development digest, 18(1), 95. ‏

17. Olivos, P., & Clayton, S. (2017). Self, nature and well-being: Sense of connectedness and environmental identity for quality of life. In Handbook of environmental psychology and quality of life research (pp. 107-126). Springer, Cham.

18. Pesaran, B., & Pesaran, M. H. (2010). Time series econometrics using Microfit 5.0: A user's manual. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

19. Phillips, R., & Pittman, R. (Eds.). (2014). an introduction to community development. Routledge.

20. Rieger, K., Holm, R. H., & Sheridan, H. (2016). Access to groundwater and link to the impact on quality of life: A look at the past, present and future public health needs in Mzimba district, Malawi. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 2, 117-129.

21. Robeyns, I., & Van der Veen, R. J. (2007). Sustainable quality of life: Conceptual analysis for a policy-relevant empirical specification (Research Report No. 550031006). Amsterdam: Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Bilthoven and University of Amsterdam.

22. Rojas, M. (2014). Quality of Life, Conceptualization. In Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research (pp. 5360-5363). Springer Netherlands.

23. Savini, V. (2017). Microcredit and Quality of Life: An Analysis Model. In Recent Trends in Social Systems: Quantitative Theories and Quantitative Models (pp. 43-51). Springer, Cham.

24. Shahrokhi Sardoo, S., & Nooripoor, M. (1393/2014). Ranking of the districts of Jiroft County based on QOL criteria, using TOPSIS model. Journal of Research and Rural Planning, 3(6), 89-102. [In Persian]

25. Torkamani, J., & Jamali Moghadam, E. (1384/2005). The effects of government expenditure on poverty alleviation in rural areas of Iran. Iranian Economic Research, 7(25), 153-174. [In Persian]

26. United Nations Development Programme, & Malik, K. (2014). Human Development Report 2014: Sustaining Human Progress-Reducing Vulnerabilities and Building Resilience. UN.

27. Vera‐Toscano, E., Rodrigues, M., & Costa, P. (2017). Beyond educational attainment: The importance of skills and lifelong learning for social outcomes. Evidence for Europe from PIAAC. European Journal of Education, 52(2), 217-231.

28. Welzel, C. (2010). How selfish are self-expression values? A civicness test. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 41(2), 152–174.