Introducing the “Brainling” Model and Examining its Role in Effective Communication: A Moving Beyond Communicative Competence

مطالعات زبان و ترجمه

Article 1, Volume 53, Issue 3, October 2020, Pages 1-32   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/lts.v53i3.87911

Authors

Reza Pishghadam¹; Shima Ebrahimi^{* 2}

¹Department of English, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

²Department of Persian Language and Literature, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Effective communication can be considered as a social process reflected in lexical chains. In fact, speaking can be considered as a communicative mediator which hinges on the speaker’s linguistic competence, but if the aim of a given dialogue is to have a more effective communication, one should move beyond the speaker’s subliminal intentions. The present study, therefore, tries to examine the influence of “postlocution” as a level beyond communicative competence, and attempts to introduce “brainling” based on brain structures. This model considers language as a tool for behavioral changes and developments, and offers the four concepts of cogling (cognition in language), emoling (emotions in language), cultuling (culture in language), and sensoling (senses in language). The proposed model can be used to portray a different and more comprehensive picture of brain’s macro functions, which is useful for a better and more effective communication. From this perspective, in addition to paying attention to self-oriented language, a dialogue should take other-oriented language into consideration, and individuals should attend to both communicative competence and linguo-therapeutic competence (language for a better life).

Keywords

Communicative Competence; Linguo-Therapeutic Competence; Brainling; Cogling; Emoling; Cultuling; Sensoling

References

اسکندری، ح. (1392). بررسی نقش و اهمیت روش تحلیل گفتمان در قلمرو روان‌شناسی گفتمانی. اندازه‌گیری تربیتی، 4(14)، 65-87.

پیش‌قدم، ر. (1391). معرفی «زباهنگ» به‌عنوان ابزاری تحولگرا در فرهنگ‌کاوی زبان. مطالعات زبان و ترجمه، 4، 47-62.

پیش‌قدم، ر. و ابراهیمی، ش. (1399). معرفی الگوی ارتباطی مؤثرِ تدریس در پرتو آموزش هَیَجامَدمحور. مطالعات زبان و ترجمه، 53(1)، 31-61.

پیش‌قدم، ر.، و ابراهیمی، ش. (زیرچاپ). زباهنگ مطالعه‌ای در ژن‌های فرهنگی ایرانیان. مشهد: انتشارات دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد.

پیش‌قدم، ر.، ابراهیمی، ش.، شعیری، ح. ر.، و درخشان، ع. (زیرچاپ). معرفی زباهیجان به‌عنوان حلقة مفقودة قوم‌نگاری ارتباط: مکمل الگوی SPEAKING هایمز. جستارهای زبانی.

پیش‌قدم، ر.، ابراهیمی، ش.، و طباطبائیان، م. س. (1398). رویکردی نوین به روان‌شناسی آموزش زبان. مشهد: انتشارات دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد.

پیش‌قدم، ر.، طباطبائیان، م. س.، و ابراهیمی، ش. (زیرچاپ). کاربرد دوزبانگی و دوزبانگی کاربردی. تهران: انتشارات بنیاد سعدی.

پیش‌قدم، ر.، طباطبائیان، م. س.، و ناوری، ص. (1392). تحلیل انتقادی و کاربردی نظریه‌های فراگیری زبان اوّل از پیدایش تا تکوین. مشهد: دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد.

زرقانی، س. م.، و اخلاقی، ا. (1391). تحلیل ژانر شطح براساس نظریۀ کنش گفتار. ادبیات عرفانی، 3(6)، 61-80.

شعیری، ح. م. (1385). تجزیه و تحلیل نشانه-معناشناختی گفتمان. تهران: سمت.

طباطبائی‌فارانی، س.، پیش‌قدم، ر.، و مقیمی، س. (1398). معرفی الگوی هَیَجامَد به‌عنوان شیوه‌ای کارآمد برای کاهش اضطراب خواندن در زبان خارجی. مطالعات زبان و ترجمه، 52(2)، 35-63.

محمدزاده، آ.، و خرمی بنارکی، آ. (1392). نظریۀ ذهن در پرتو مطالعات عصب‌شناختی. تازه‌های علوم اعصاب، 50، 28-37.

 

Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Billig, M. (1997). The dialogic unconscious. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36(2), 139-159.

Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47.

Carpendale, J., & Lewis, C. (2006). How children develop social understanding. Oxford, England: Blackwell.

Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes' error and the future of human life. Scientific American, 271(4), 144-144.

Damasio, A. R. (2001). Descartes error revisited. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, 10(2), 192-194.

Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Descartes, R. (1637). Discourse on method and meditations on first philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Hackett.

Dunn, W. (2000). Habit: What’s the brain got to do with it? The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55(6), 608-620.

Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences. London, England: Macmillan.

Galton, F. (1883). Inquiries into human faculty and its development. London, England: Macmillan.

Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. New York, NY: Bantam.

Hymes, D. H. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics selected readings (pp. 269-293). Baltimore, MD: Harmondsworth Penguin.

Isen, A. M., & Shmidt, E. (2007). Positive affect facilitates incidental learning and divided attention while not impairing performance on a focal task. Paper presented at the Emotions Pre-Conference at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Memphis, TN.

Javor, R. (2016). Bilingualism, theory of mind and perspective-taking: The effect of early bilingual exposure. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 5(6), 143-148.

Ji, L. J., Zhang, Z., & Nisbett, R. E. (2004). Is it culture or is it language? Examination of language effects in cross-cultural research on categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(1), 57-65.

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Lombard, A. (2007). Sensory intelligence. Welgemoed, South Africa: Metz.

MacLean, P. D. A. (1978). Mind of three minds: Educating the triune brain. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Ó Siochrú, C. (2018). Psychology and the study of education: Critical perspective on developing theories. New York, NY: Routledge.

O’Connor, J. (2001). NLP workbook: A practical guide book to achieving the results you want. London, England: Harper Collins Publishers.

Ochsner, K. N. (2000). Are affective events richly ‘remembered’ or simply familiar? The experience and process of recognizing feelings past. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 242-261.

Overwalle, F. V. (2009). Social cognition and the brain: A meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 30(3), 829-858.

Pishghadam, R. (2015, October). Emotioncy in language education: From exvolvement to involvement. Paper presented at the 2nd Conference of Interdisciplinary Approaches to Language Teaching, Literature, and Translation Studies. Mashhad, Iran.

Pishghadam, R. (2016, May). Emotioncy, extraversion, and anxiety in willingness to communicate in English. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Language, Education and Innovation. London, England.

Pishghadam, R. (2018, June). An introduction to thin-slice sensory education: Less is more. Paper presented at the International Academic Conference on Economics, Business and Social Sciences, Tbilisi, Georgia.

Pishghadam, R. (2020). 101 educational concepts [101 mafhoom-e amoozeshi]. North Carolina, USA: Lulu Press.

Pishghadam, R., & Shayesteh, S. (2017). Emo-sensory expression at the crossroads of emotion, sense, and language: A case of color-emotion associations. International Journal of Society, Culture and Language, 5(2), 15-24.

Pishghadam, R., Adamson, B., & Shayesteh, S. (2013). Emotion-based language instruction (EBLI) as a new perspective in bilingual education. Multilingual Education, 3(9), 1-16.

Pishghadam, R., Ebrahimi, S., & Derakhashan, A. (in press). Cultuling analysis: A new methodology for discovering cultural memes. International Journal of Society, Culture and Language.

Pishghadam, R., Ebrahimi, S., Naji Meidani, E., & Derakhshan, A. (in press). An introduction to “Cultuling” Analysis (CLA) in light of variational pragmatics: A step towards “Euculturing”. Research in Applied Linguistics.

Pishghadam, R., Jajarmi, H., & Shayesteh, S. (2016). Conceptualizing sensory relativism in light of emotioncy: A movement beyond linguistic relativism. International Journal of Society, Culture and Language, 4(2), 11-21.

Rouby, C., Fournel, A., & Bensafi, M. (2016). The role of senses in emotion. In H. Meiselman (Ed.), Emotion measurement (pp. 65-81). New York, NY: Woodhead.

Thomson, D. M., Crocker, C., & Marketo, C. G. (2010). Linking sensory characteristics to emotions: An example using dark chocolate. Food Quality and Preference, 21(8), 1117-1125.

Völlm, B. A., Taylor, A. N., Richardson, P., Corcoran, R., Stirling, J., McKie, Sh., Deakin, J. F. W., & Elliott, R. (2006). Neuronal correlates of theory of mind and empathy: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study in a nonverbal task. Neuroimage, 29(1), 90-98.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Presidents and Fellows of Harvard College.

Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT.