Knowledge Management in University Libraries of Iran: Documentation and its Mechanisms

پژوهشنامه کتابداری و اطلاع رسانی

Article 7, Volume 7, Issue 1 - Serial Number 13, September 2017, Pages 129-152   

Document Type: مقالات پژوهشی

DOI: 10.22067/riis.v7i1.58500

Authors

Soleiman Shafiee¹; Mohsen Nowkarizi²; Zahra Jafarzadeh Kermani^{* 1}

¹Imam Reza University

²Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:
Organizational knowledge is fading into oblivion due to various reasons like retirement and relocation of the managers. Documentation is able to prevent the oblivion through recording, evaluation, organization, maintenance, and dissemination of the knowledge along with the experiences of managers. The prerequisite of documentation is specifying its features. This study aimed to identify and rank the documentation mechanisms in Iranian academic libraries. Based on the investigations which have been already conducted, it seems that this research is the first study in the field of academic libraries which aims at presenting ranked mechanisms for knowledge documentation. The results of the study can be an introduction of documentation in the mentioned centers.
METHODOLOGY:
The method of research was survey-analytical approach and regarding to objectives was applied. The statistical population consisted of the Iranian academic libraries managers. 172 community members based on the population size and the sample table of Krejcie and Morgan, 116 people were selected through stratified random. Out of 100 distributed questionnaires 86.2 percent of them were returned. To collect the data, E-researcher-made questionnaire in the form of Likert scale was designed based on several validated questionnaires and the related available literature review. The primary questionnaire was given to the experts to determine the content validity and after necessary reforms and proposed changes by the experts; it's find version was compiled as many as 30 questionnaires was completed by the given community to determine their reliability. The scale reliability was 87.45 based on the reported Cranach's alpha coefficient. Inferential and descriptive statistics were used to describe and analyze the data. In descriptive statistics, mean, exploratory factor analysis, and Friedman Test were used. As the study deals with the viewpoints of the managers, the survey method was applied. However, it is an applied research because the results can be applied to the knowledge documentation in libraries to meet the related problems partially.
FINDINGS:
Necessary mechanisms for documenting knowledge on Dalkir integrated life cycle of organizational knowledge have been found. Accordingly, 11 mechanisms of capture and extraction, 9 mechanisms of assessment/selection, 7 mechanisms of codification, 8 mechanisms of refinement, 9 mechanisms of sharing, 7 mechanisms of access, 7 mechanisms of learning, 8 mechanisms of application, 7 mechanisms of evaluation, and 6 mechanisms of update identified and based on Friedman's non-parametric test and degree of importance, were ranked. It was also the most important sources of tacit and explicit knowledge based on exploratory factor analysis on three factors extraction resources and recording tacit knowledge of managers, extracting explicit knowledge to codification and representation and sources of explicit knowledge for data mining and web mining Summary and were named.
CONCLUSIONS:
Knowledge documentation in Iranian academic libraries does not follow a particular model. This study proposes the required mechanisms to facilitate the documentation execution and solve the issues arising from knowledge documentation at the academic libraries. The mechanisms were identified and ranked based on the managers' viewpoints as they focus on the main features of documentation i.e., extraction, validation, modification, and dissemination of the recorded knowledge. Therefore, the results of the study have the required potentialities to be applied in libraries. Since there are a few studies in the field of knowledge documentation, related Persian and non-Persian literature was lacking in this realm. Some of the respondents had limited knowledge about the study variables. This problem was solved by providing the required definitions at the beginning of the questionnaire as well as in the postscripts. The main suggestions of the study included establishing documentation committee, appointing someone as the knowledge expert, preparing forms for recording knowledge, and formulating the documentation instructions.

Keywords

knowledge management; Knowledge documentation; Universities libraries; Organizational knowledge life cycle; Dalkir model

References

اخوان، پیمان؛ و دهقانی، مریم (1394). مدیریت دانش: اکتساب دانش ضمنی خبرگان. تهران: دانشگاه صنعتی مالک اشتر.

الهی، شعبان؛ بهاری‌فر، علی؛ و صالحی، علی (1383). طراحی ساختار نظام مستندسازی تجربیات سازمان مدیران. فصلنامه پژوهش‌های مدیریت در ایران، 9 (42)، 23-52.

جعفری مقدم، سعید (1389). مستندسازی تجربیات مدیران از دیدگاه مدیریت دانش. تهران: مؤسسه تحقیقات و آموزش مدیریت.

جمشیدی، گیتی؛ و حیدری، غلامرضا (1394). شناسایی زیرساخت‌ها و سازوکارهای مستندسازی تجارب و دانش در کتابخانه‌های دانشگاهی ایران. فصلنامه تحقیقات کتابداری و اطلاع‌رسانی دانشگاهی، 49 (2)، 191-211.

نظافتی، نوید؛ رشیدی، مهسا؛ و تقوی‌فرد، محمد (1392). مقایسه تکنیک‌های استخراج دانش و ارائه یک متدولوژی ساخت‌یافته به‌منظور مستندسازی دانش. چشم‌انداز مدیریت دانش، (14)، 63-86.

Ahmed, P. K., Lim, K.K., & Loh, A.Y.E. (2002). Learning through knowledge management. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

Alias, D.F. (2016). Knowledge sharing scenario capture: a case study in IT department of public higher education institutional. Journal of Advanced Management Science. 4 (6), 207-510.

Aminga, N.N. (2015). A capture and acquisition mechanisms at Kisii university. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge and Management. 10, 105-116.

Baumard, P. (1999). Tacit knowledge in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage publications.

Bukowitz, W., & Williams, R. (2000). The knowledge management fieldbook. London Prentice Hall.

Colon-Aguirre, M. (2012). Organizational storytelling in academic libraries: roles, addressees and perceptions. A dissertation presented for the doctor of philosophy degree, the university of Tennessee, Knoxville.

Dalkir, K. (2005). Knowledge management in theory & practice, Elsevier. Butterworth-Heinemann.

Dalkir, K (2011). Knowledge management in theory and practice. Second Edition. MIT press.

Denning, S. (2002). History of knowledge management. Accessed in April.

Gaines, B.R. (2013). Knowledge acquisition: past, present and future. International Journal of Humman-Computer Studies, 71, 135-156.

Karadsheh Louay, L., Mansour, E., Alhawari, S., Azar Ghassan, L., & EL-Bathy, N. (2009). A theoretical framework for knowledge management process: toward improving knowledge performance. Communications of the IBIMA, 7, 67-79.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1999). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge university press.

Mackay, D. (1974). The mechanics of tacit knowing, IEEE Transaction on System, Man and Cybernetics, 4 (1), 84-95.

Maponya, P. M. (2004). Knowledge management practices in academic libraries: a case study of the University of Natal. Pietermaritzburg libraries, 1-31.

Meyer, M., & Zack, M.H. (1996). The design and implementation of information products. Slaon Management Review, 37 (3), 45-59.

McElroy, M. (1999). The knowledge life cycle. In ICM Conference on KM, Miami, Fl.

McGraw, K., & Harrison-briggs, K. (1989). Knowledge acquisition: principles and guidelines. Englewood cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Milton, N. R. (2007). Knowledge acquisition in practice: a step-by-step guide. Springer Science & Business Media.

Muse, M. A. (2013). Knowledge acquisition workshop: a remarkable convergence of ideas. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 71, 195-199.

Mutual, S.M., & Mooko, N.P. (2008). Knowledge management, in L.O. aina (eds). Information and knowledge management in the digital age: concept, technologies and African perspectives. Ibadan: third world information services, 267-299.

Nickols, F. (1996). Cooperative development of a classification of knowledge management function. Knowledge praxis. Retrieved My 25, 2016, from http://www.media-access.com/classification.html.

Poulymenakou, A, Cornford, T., & Whitley, E.A. (1992). Knowledge acquisition for organizational problem solving: developing expert systems and beyond, Expert System With Application, 5, 121-130.

Prerau, D.S. (1990). Developing and managing expert systems. ACM press New York, NY, USA.

Raja, W., Ahmad, Z., & Sinha, A. K. (2009, October). Knowledge management and academic libraries in IT Era: Problems and positions. In Poster paper at international conference on academic libraries at University of Delhi, 5th to 8th October.

Stranack, K. (2012). Critical review of knowledge management in theory and practice. Retrieved Nowember 15, 2016, from: stranack.ca/2012/07/16/critical-review-of-knowledge-management-in-theory-and-practice/.

Wiig, K.M. (1993). Knowledge management methods: practical approaches to managing knowledge. Arlington, TX: Schema Press.

Zack, M.H. (1996). Developing a knowledge strategy. California Management Review, 41 (3), 125-145.