Experimental Investigation of a Solar Greenhouse Heating System Equipped with a Parabolic Trough Solar Concentrator and a Double-Purpose Flat Plate Solar Collector

ماشین های کشاورزی

Article 4, Volume 7, Issue 2 - Serial Number 14, 2017, Pages 364-378   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jam.v7i2.56939

Authors

M. Jafari; H. Mortezapour^* ; K. Jafari Naeimi; M. Maharlooei

Department of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Greenhouses provide a suitable environment in which all the parameters required for growing the plants can be controlled throughout the year. Greenhouse heating is one of the most important issues in productivity of a greenhouse. In many countries, heating costs in the greenhouses are very high, having almost 60-80% of the total production costs. In recent years, several studies have attempted to reduce the heating costs of the greenhouses by applying more energy efficient equipment and using the renewable energy sources as alternatives or supplementary to the fossil fuels.
In the present study a novel solar greenhouse heating system equipped with a parabolic trough solar concentrator (PTC) and a flat-plate solar collector has been developed. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to investigate the performance of the proposed heating system at different working conditions.

Materials and Methods
The presented solar greenhouse heating system was comprised of a parabolic trough solar concentrator (PTC), a heat storage tank, a pump and a flat plate solar collector. The PTC was constructed from a polished stainless steel sheet (as the reflector) and a vacuum tube receiver. The PTC was connected to the tank by using insulated tubes and a water pump was utilized to circulate the working fluid trough the PTC and the heat exchanger installed between walls of the tank. The uncovered solar collector was located inside the greenhouse. During the sunshine time, a fraction of the total solar radiation received inside the greenhouse is absorbed by the solar collector. This rises the temperature of the working fluid inside the collector which led to density reduction and natural flow of the fluid. In other words, the collector works as a natural flow flat plate solar collector during the sunshine time. At night, when the greenhouse temperature is lower than tank temperature, the fluid flows in a reverse direction through the solar collector and the stored heat transferred from the collector surface to the greenhouse.
The evaluation tests were conducted at three levels of fluid flow rate through the solar concentrator (0.44, 0.75 and 1.5 Lmin^-1) and two different working modes of the heat exchanger.

Results and Discussion
The variation of thermal efficiency of the PTC at different flow rates has been illustrated in Fig 3. As shown, thermal efficiency increased with flow rate mainly because the fluid convection coefficient enhances with raising the velocity of the fluid inside the tubes.
The heat storing process began from 9 am and the highest amounts of the stored heat during sunshine time occurred between 10 am and 2 pm. Fig 5 showed that the stored energy in the tank enhanced when the flat plate collector was employed beside the PTC. Also, increasing the fluid flow rate from 0.44 to 1.5 Lmin^-1 improved the index of stored heat by 32.14%. Energy consumption during the night time was also significantly changed with flow rate and the mode of heating. Fig 7 indicated that the electrical energy consumption was lower with flat plate solar collector and it is possible to save the electrical energy by 26.67% using the flat plate collector. Bouadila et al., (2014) concluded that the electrical energy consumption reduced by 31% employing a natural convection flat plate solar collector system equipped with phase changed heat storage material for greenhouse heating.
Since increasing the flow rate enhanced the thermal efficiency of the solar concentrator system and led to an improvement in stored thermal energy during the sunshine time, solar fraction increased with raising the flow rate from 0.44 to 1.5 Lmin^-1. A maximum solar fraction of 66% was achieved at the highest flow rate when using the flat plate solar collector beside the PTC.

Conclusion
An experimental comparative study was conducted to investigate the performance of a novel solar greenhouse heating system at the different fluid flow rates and two modes of heating (with and without flat plat solar collector). The results can be summarized as follows:
A maximum thermal efficiency of about 71% was achieved at the flow rate of 1.5 Lmin^-1.
Raising the flow rate from 0.44 to 1.5 Lmin^-1 improved the index of stored heat and solar fraction by 32.14% and 21%, respectively.
The highest value of solar fraction was found to be 66% at the highest flow rate when engaging the flat plate solar collector beside the PTC.

Keywords

Flat plate solar collector; Greenhouse heating; Solar concentrator

References

1. Attar, I., and A. Farhat. 2015. Efficiency evaluation of a solar water heating system applied to the greenhouse climate. Solar Energy 119: 212-224.

2. Bal, L. M., and S. Satya, and S. N. Naik. 2010. Solar dryer with thermal energy storage systems for drying agricultural food products: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14: 2298-2314.

3. Benli, H. 2011. Energetic performance analysis of a ground-source heat pump system with latent heat storage for a greenhouse heating. Energy Conversion and Management 52: 581-589.

4. Benli, H., and A. Durmuş. 2009a. Evaluation of ground-source heat pump combined latent heat storage system performance in greenhouse heating. Energy and Buildings 41: 220-228.

5. Benli, H., and A. Durmuş. 2009b. Performance analysis of a latent heat storage system with phase change material for new designed solar collectors in greenhouse heating. Solar Energy 83: 2109-2119.

6. Bouadila, S., S. Skouri, S. Kooli, M. Lazaar, and A. Farhat. 2014. Solar energy storage application in Tunisian greenhouse by means of phase change materials. Pages 1-4. Composite Materials & Renewable Energy Applications (ICCMREA), 2014 International Conference on: IEEE.

7. Chau, J., T. Sowlati, S. Sokhansanj, F. Preto, S. Melin and X. Bi. 2009. Economic sensitivity of wood biomass utilization for greenhouse heating application. Applied Energy 86: 616-621.

8. Chong, K. K., and K. G. Chay, and K. H. Chin. 2012. Study of a solar water heater using stationary V-trough collector. Renewable Energy 39: 207-215.

9. Critten, D., and B. Bailey. 2002. A review of greenhouse engineering developments during the 1990s. Agricultural and forest Meteorology 112: 1-22.

10. Esen, M., and T. Yuksel. 2013. Experimental evaluation of using various renewable energy sources for heating a greenhouse. Energy and Buildings 65: 340-351.

11. Fernandez, F., F. G. Camacho, J. Perez, J. Sevilla, and E. M. Grima. 1998. Modeling of biomass productivity in tubular photobioreactors for microalgal cultures: effects of dilution rate, tube diameter, and solar irradiance. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 58: 605-616.

12. Ghosal, M., and G. Tiwari. 2004. Mathematical modeling for greenhouse heating by using thermal curtain and geothermal energy. Solar energy 76: 603-613.

13. Ghosal, M., and G. Tiwari. 2006. Modeling and parametric studies for thermal performance of an earth to air heat exchanger integrated with a greenhouse. Energy conversion and management 47: 1779-1798.

14. Hedayat, M., H. Mortezapour, H. Maghsoudi, and M. Shamsi. 2016. Performance Investigation of a Heat Recovery Assisted Solar Dryer for Mint Drying. Iranian Journal of Biosystem Engineering 46 (4): 379-388. (In Farsi).

15. Imtiaz Hussain, M., and A. Ali ,and G. H. Lee. 2015. Performance and economic analyses of linear and spot Fresnel lens solar collectors used for greenhouse heating in South Korea. Energy 90 (2): 1522-1531.

16. Jaber, J. O. 2002. Prospects of energy savings in residential space heating. Energy and Buildings 34: 311-319.

17. Jakhar, S., R. Misra, V. Bansal, and M. Soni. 2015. Thermal performance investigation of earth air tunnel heat exchanger coupled with a solar air heating duct for northwestern India. Energy and Buildings 87: 360-369.

18. Joudi, K. A., and A. A. Farhan. 2014. Greenhouse heating by solar air heaters on the roof. Renewable Energy 72: 406-414.

19. Kissock, J. K., and C. Eger. 2008. Measuring industrial energy savings. Applied Energy 85: 347-361.

20. Koffi, P. M. E., B. K. Koua, P. Gbaha, and S. Toure. 2014. Thermal performance of a solar water heater with internal exchanger using thermosiphon system in Côte d'Ivoire. Energy 64: 187-199.

21. Kooli, S., S. Bouadila, M. Lazaar, and A. Farhat. 2015. The effect of nocturnal shutter on insulated greenhouse using a solar air heater with latent storage energy. Solar Energy 115: 217-228.

22. Nualboonrueng, T., P. Tuenpusa, Y. Ueda, and A. Akisawa. 2013. The performance of PV‐t systems for residential application in Bangkok. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 21: 1204-1213.

23. Ozgener, O., and A. Hepbasli. 2006. An economical analysis on a solar greenhouse integrated solar assisted geothermal heat pump system. Journal of Energy Resources Technology 128: 28-34.

24. Öztürk, H. H. 2005. Experimental evaluation of energy and exergy efficiency of a seasonal latent heat storage system for greenhouse heating. Energy Conversion and Management 46: 1523-1542.

25. Padilla, R. V., G. Demirkaya, D. Y. Goswami, E. Stefanakos, and M. M. Rahman. 2011. Heat transfer analysis of parabolic trough solar receiver. Applied Energy 88: 5097-5110.

26. Paksoy, M., Ö. Turkman, and M. Direk. 2010. Importance of geothermal water using for greenhouse heating in Turkey. Selcuk Tarim Ve Gida Bilimleri Dergisi 24: 50-53.

27. Razmipour, M., N. Alavi Naeini, H. Mortezapour, and A. Ghazanfari Moghadam. 2015. Performance evaluation of a solar dryer with finny, perforated absorber plate collector equipped with an air temperature control system for dill drying. Journal of Agricultural Machinery 5: 134-142. (In Farsi).

28. Santamouris, M., A. Argiriou, and M. Vallindras. 1994. Design and operation of a low energy consumption passive solar agricultural greenhouse. Solar Energy 52: 371-378.

29. Sethi, V., K. Sumathy, C. Lee, and D. Pal. 2013. Thermal modeling aspects of solar greenhouse microclimate control: A review on heating technologies. Solar Energy 96: 56-82.

30. Taki, M., Y. Ajabshirchi, R. Abdi, and O. Akbarpour. 2012. Analysis of Energy Efficiency for Greenhouse Cucumber Production Using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Technique; Case Study: Shahreza Township. Journal of Agricultural Machinery 2: 28-37. (In Farsi).

31. Teitel, M., I. Segal, A. Shklyar, and M. Barak. 1999. A comparison between pipe and air heating methods for greenhouses. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 72: 259-273.

32. Tiwari, G., and N. Dhiman. 1986. Design and optimization of a winter greenhouse for the Leh-type climate. Energy Conversion and Management 26: 71-78.

33. Xu, J., and A. Buzzatti, and M. Gyulassy. 2014a. Azimuthal jet flavor tomography with CUJET2.0 of nuclear collisions at RHIC and LHC. Journal of High Energy Physics 2014: 1-90.

34. Xu, J., Y. Li, R. Wang, and W. Liu. 2014b. Performance investigation of a solar heating system with underground seasonal energy storage for greenhouse application. Energy 67: 63-73.

35. Zou, B., J. Dong, Y. Yao, and Y. Jiang. 2016. An experimental investigation on a small-sized parabolic trough solar collector for water heating in cold areas. Applied Energy 163: 396-407.