Effect of foliar application of nano and micro iron oxide particles with D.G ADJUVANT and RCP-5 additive material on some physiological traits of green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

پژوهش‌های حبوبات ایران

Article 7, Volume 7, Issue 1, June 2016, Pages 161-173   

Document Type: مقالات پژوهشی

DOI: 10.22067/ijpr.v7i1.34475

Authors

Donya Nozari Rad¹; Mehdi Baradaran Firouzabadi¹; hassan makarian^{* 1}; Naser Farrokhi²; Ahmad Gholami¹

¹Shahrood University

²Shahid Beheshti University

Abstract

Introduction
Iron (Fe) has a crucial biological role in human and plant growth. This micronutrient is a major player in chloroplast photosynthesis and enzymes. Although some enzymes, such as Fe-dependent superoxide dismutase, use molecular Fe as a cofactor directly, most proteins use Fe-containing factors. Various studies were carried out to understand the effect of nanoparticles on the growth of plants. Nano-particles have high reactivity because of the more specific surface area, more density of reactive areas, or increased reactivity of these areas on the particle surfaces. Sheykhbaglou et al. (2012) showed that application of nano-iron oxide particles increased soybean growth and yield than micro iron particles. Iron deficiency can be corrected by foliar application of iron more efficiently than the soil application of iron sources. To achieve maximum nutrient absorption via foliar applications, a fine mist application with spreading and wetting agents is desired. These agents provide quick wetting of plant tissue and more uniform coverage and as a result more absorption of solutions. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the effect of foliar application of nano and micro iron oxide particles with additive material on some physiological traits of green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.).

Materials and Methods
This study was arranged as factorial based on randomized complete block design with three replications to investigate the effects of Fe nano particles (NP) and micro particles (MP) foliar application with additive material on some physiological traits of green bean at the Faculty of Agriculture, Shahrood University of Technology in 2012. Geographically, the site is located in Bastam (36° 29’E, 55° 57’N, 1366 m a.s.l.). The climate of this region is semi-arid. The first factor was foliar application of Fe in five levels (0, 0.25, and 0.5 g L−1; in two forms: NP and MP) and the second factor was additive materials in three levels (0, D.G ADJUVANT and RCP-5). The foliar application was performed 55 days after sowing in the beginning of flowering stage. At harvest, the plant characteristics namely leaf area index, height, pod and leaf iron, chlorophyll, carotenoid and protein were also registered. Statistical analyses of data were performed with statistical software MSTAT-C. Significant differences between means refer to the probability level of 0.05 by LSD test.

Results and Discussion
Results showed that leaf area index was not affected by treatments. The highest Fe level in leaves (311 mg kg-1) and in pods (51.47 mg kg-1) was obtained by application of 0.25 g L-1 Fe MP + D.G ADJUVANT (figures 2 and 3). Bybordi & Mamedov (2010) reported that with spraying of Fe the highest amount of Fe accumulation was obtained in canola leaf. RCP-5+0.5 g L-1 Fe NP treatment showed the highest pod protein content. Monsef Afshar et al., (2012) represented that foliar application of Fe increased protein percentage of leaf compared to the other treatments. Micro-Nutrients such as Fe and zinc participate in the structure of proteins and also in nitrogen metabolism and thereby may also cause to increase the protein amount. Uhlig & Wissemeier (2000) recorded an increased cuticular penetration of calcium containing surfactants. Leaf and stem tissues can inhibit initial nutrient absorption by means of waxy substances in the cuticle. Thus, it seems that D.G ADJUVANT and RCP-5 have improved the effects of Fe on plant characteristics through increasing absorption of iron especially in low concentrations. Similar to our results Singh et al., (1990) reported that application of iron sulphate and iron pyrite decreased chlorosis and increased chlorophyll and carotenoid contents of groundnut leaves significantly.

Conclusion
Based on the results of the present study, using additive materials such as D.G ADJUVANT and RCP-5 can enhance the effects of iron as nano and micro particles on chlorophyll contents and pod protein of green bean through providing quick wetting of plant tissue and more uniform coverage with increased spray retention by reducing the surface tension of the spray droplets.

Keywords

Adjuvants; Leaf Absorption; Legumes; Micronutrients

References

1. Abbas, G., Khan, M.Q., Khan, M.J., Hussain, F., and Hussain, I. 2009. Effect of iron on the growth and yield contributing parameters of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 19(3): 135-139.

2. Aladjadjiyan, A. 2007. The use of physical methods for plant growing stimulation in Bulgaria. Journal of Central European Agriculture 8: 369-380

3. Davrynejad, Gh., Azizi, M., and Akheratee, M. 2010. Effect of foliar nutrition on quality, quantity alternate bearing of Pistachio (Pistacia vera L.). Journal of Horticultural Sciences 23(2): 1-10. (In Persian with English Summary).

4. Edding, J.L., and Brown, A.L. 1967. Absorption and translocation foliar-applied Iron. Plant Physiology 42: 15-19.

5. EcherI F. R., and Rosolem, C. A. 2012. Plant growth regulator losses in cotton as affected by adjuvants and rain. Ciência Rural, Santa Maria 42(12): 2138-2144.

6. Ghaderi, J., and Malakouti, M.J. 2009. Manganese role in enhancing and enriching the grain research organization agricultural extension soil and water research institute. Technical bulletin No 46. (In Persian with English Summary).

7. Harker, F.R., and Ferguson, I.B. 1991. Effect of surfactant on calcium penetration of cuticles from apple fruit. Science of Horticulture 64: 225-233.

8. Hiscox, J.D., and Israelstam, G.F. 1978. A method for the extraction of chlorophyll from leaf tissue without maceration. Canadian Journal of Botany 57: 1332-1334.

9. Hochmuth, G. 2011. Iron (Fe) Nutrition of Plants. University of Florida If as Extension. Sl 353. P: 1-8.

10. Kargar, M., Rashed Mohasse, M.H., Nezami, A., and Izedi Darbandi, E. 2014. Optimizing efficacy of clodinafop-propargyl with adjuvants on little seed canary grass (Phalaris minor Retz.) control. Journal of Plant Protection 2(28): 155-163. (In Persian with English Summary).

11. KianiChalmardi, Z., and Abdolzade, A. 2013. Effect of silicon in reduce the Iron deficiency and toxicity stress in hydroponically grown rice plants. Journal of Science and Technology 3(12): 79-88. (In Persian with English Summary).

12. Mahmoudi, H., Ksouri, R., Gharsalli, M., and Lachaal, M. 2005. Differences in responses to iron deficiency between two legumes: lentil (Lens culinaris) and chickpea (Cicer arietinum). Journal of Plant Physiology 162(11): 1237-1245.

13. Mazaherinia, S., Astaraei, A., Fotovat, A.R., and Maneshi, A. 2010. Effect of iron oxide (nano and ordinary) with compost of granular sulfur on iron concentration and growth of wheat crop. Journal of Iranian Agricultural Research 8(5): 855-861.(In Persian)

14. Mohsenzadeh, S., Farrahi-aschtiani, S., Malboobi, M.A., and Ghanati, F. 2003. Effect of drought and chlorocholine chloride on seedling and photosynthesis of two cultivars of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Pajouhesh- va- Sazandegi 60: 56-64. (In Persian)

15. Morales, F., Abadia, A., and Abadia, J. 1998. Photosynthesis, quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence and thermal energy dissipation in iron-deficient sugar beet leaves. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 25: 403-412.

16. Mortvedt, J.J. 1986. Iron sources and management practices for correcting iron chlorosis problem. Journal of Plant Nutrition 9: 691-974.

17. Mousavi, S.R. 2011. Zinc in crop production and interaction with phosphorus. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Science 5(9): 1503-1509.

18. Musavi, S.R., and Rezaei, M. 2011. Nanotechnology in agriculture and food production. Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Science 1(10): 414-419.

19. Parr J.F., and Norman, A.G. 1964. Effects of nonionic surfactants on root growth and cation uptake. Plant physiology 39: 502-507.

20. Penner, D. 2000. Activator adjuvant. Weed Technology 14: 785-791.

21. Peyvandi, M., Kamali Jamakani, Z., and Mirza, M. 2011. Comparison of nano Fe chelat with Fe chelate effect on growth parameters and antioxidant enzymes activity of Satureja hortensis. New Cellular and Molecular Biotechnology Journal 2(5): 25-32. (In Persian with English Summary).

22. Schmitz-Eiberfer, M.A., Haefs, R., and Noga, G.J. 2002. Enhancing biological efficacy and rainfastness of foliar applied calcium chloride solutions by addition of rape seed oil surfactants. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 165(5): 634-639.

23. Shariatmadari, M.H., Zamani, G.R., and Sayari, M.H. 2011. Effect of salinity stress and iron spraying on leaf area index, light absorption and relations with yield in sunflower (Helianthus annuns L.). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 9(2): 285-293. (In Persian with English Summary).

24. Sheykhbaglou, R., Sedghi, M., Tajbaksh Shishevan, M., and Seyed Sharifi, R. 2012. Effect on foliar nano oxide iron mineral elements in soybean. First National Congress on Modern Agricultural Science and Technology. September 19-21, 2012. Zanjan University. (In Persian with English Summary).

25. Soleymani, A., Firouz, M., and Narnjany, l. 2012. Effect of application solution micronutrients on some physiological parameters affecting plant growth and dry matter yield of forage maize. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Research. 9(3): 340-347. (In Persian).

26. Stocking, C.R. 1975. Iron deficiency and the structure and physiology of maize chloroplasts. Plant physiology 55: 626-631.

27. SAS Institute. 1999. SAS/Stat User’s Guide, Version 8.0. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.

28. Tewari, R.K., Kumar, P., and Sharma, P.N. 2005. Sign of oxidative stress in the chlorotic leaves of iron starved plants. Plant Science 169: 1037-1045.

29. Uhlig, B.A., and Wissemeier, A.H. 2000. Reduction of nano-ionic surfactant phytotoxicity by divalent cations. Crop Protection 19: 13-19.

30. Venkateswarlu, B., and Ramesh, K. 1993. Cell membrane stability and biochemical response of cultured cells of ground nut under polyethylene glycol-induced water stress. Plant Science 90: 179-185.

31. Warad, H.C., and Dutta, J. 2006. Nanotechnology for Agriculture and Food Systems-A Review. Asian Institute of Nanotechnology. 496 pp.

32. Whitty, E.N., and Chambliss, C.G. 2005. Fertilization of field and forage crops. Nevada State University Publication. 21 pp.

33. Zhang, L., Hong, F., Lu, S., and Liu, C. 2005. Effect of nano-TiO2 on strength of naturally aged seeds and growth of Spinach Biol. Trace Element Research 105: 83-9.

34. Zayed, B.A., Salem, A.K.M., and El Sharkawy, H.M. 2011. Effect of different micronutrient treatments on rice (Oriza sativa L.) growth and yield under saline soil conditions. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences 7(2): 179-184.