Second Home Tourism Discourses in Rural Areas: Identifying the Mental Perception of Urban Residents (Case Study: The Countryside Near Sabzevar City)

Journal of Research and Rural Planning

مقاله 9، دوره 8، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 24، خرداد 2019، صفحه 143-167   

نوع مقاله: Scientific Articles

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/jrrp.v8i1.73552

نویسنده

Reza Khosrobeigi Bozchelouie^*

Hakim Sabzevari University

چکیده

Purpose- In this study, the second home tourism discourses are represented to identify the subjective perception of urban residents (rural idyll experiences) in rural areas.
Design/methodology/approach- Qualitative approach and discourse analysis method was used to extract subjective perceptions of urban residents (rural idyll experiences). Accordingly, 38 semi-structured interviews were purposefully conducted with the owners of the second homes. The present study is carried out in the summer in the recreation surrounding of Sabzevar City known as Tabas area which includes Tabas, Sang Sefid, Razghand, Bazghand, and Divandar villages.
Finding- The results showed that the culture of the expansion of second homes is based on rural idyll experiences and the ideal concepts of the rurality which correlates with the common triple discourse in the history of research and empirical studies around the world. The results suggest that the Sabzevar second home landscape is seen as (1) wilderness, (2) life at second homes imitates visions of traditional rural life, and (3) the environment is used for traditional consumptive and leisure activities.
Practical implications- Other components of the village's past, such as agricultural production, contentment, and simplicity in construction, social solidarity, and collective actions should be added to the triple discourse, because they present a unique pattern of rural idyll images and should be considered.
Originality/value- It is argued that the culture of the expansion of second homes is based on post-productivist and consumerist views in order to have fun and leisure time and enjoy the pristine nature and the calm and healthy environment of the village. The theoretical framework of this research includes the redevelopment of the concept of rurality and the various types of rural idyll experiences associated with it derived from the general literature and empirical studies in the field of tourism on second homes. A three-fold image of the second home countryside can be presented such that the second home landscape is seen as wilderness landscape, traditional way life and second home activities.

کلیدواژه‌ها

rural idyll؛ discourses؛ natural and agricultural landscape؛ rural life traditions؛ recreational activity؛ Sabzevar

مراجع

1. Barke, M. (2008). Second homes in the Spanish housing market: One market or two? Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 23(4), 277-295.

2. Baylina, M., & Gunnerud Berg, N. (2010). Selling the countryside: Representations of rurality in Norway and Spain. European Urban and Regional Studies, 17(3), 277-292.

3. Bell, D. (1997). Anti-idyll: rural horror. Contested countryside cultures: Otherness, marginalisation and rurality, United Kingdom, Psychology Press.

4. Bell, D. (2006). Variations on the rural idyll. Handbook of Rural Studies, Newbury Park, California, Sage Publications.

5. Bell, M. M. (2007). The two-ness of rural life and the ends of rural scholarship. Journal of Rural Studies, 23(4), 402-415.

6. Brewer, D. D., Garrett, S. B., & Rinaldi, G. (2002). Free‐listed items are effective cues for eliciting additional items in semantic domains. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16(3), 343-358.

7. Bunce, M. (2003). Reproducing rural idylls. Country Visions, London, Pearson Education.

8. Bunce, M. (2005). The countryside ideal: Anglo-American images of landscape. London, Routledge.

9. Cloke, P. (2003). Knowing ruralities. Country visions, London, Pearson Education.

10. Cloke, P., & Milbourne, P. (1992). Deprivation and lifestyles in rural Wales. —II. Rurality and the cultural dimension. Journal of Rural Studies, 8(4), 359-371.

11. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Newbury Park, California, Sage Publications.

12. Crosta, N., Davies, A., & Maguire, K. (2006). The new rural paradigm: Policies and Governance, Paris, OECD Publications.

13. Daugstad, K. (2008). Negotiating landscape in rural tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 35(2), 402-426.

14. Foucault, M. (1994). An Interview with Michel Foucault. In J. D. Faubion (Ed.), Power (Vol. 3, pp. 239-297). New York: The New Press.

15. Halfacree, K. (2006). Rural space: Constructing a three-fold architecture. Handbook of Rural Studies, Newbury Park, California, Sage Publications.

16. Halfacree, K. (2007). Trial by space for a ‘radical rural’: Introducing alternative localities, representations and lives. Journal of Rural Studies, 23(2), 125-141.

17. Halfacree, K. H. (1993). Locality and social representation: space, discourse and alternative definitions of the rural. Journal of Rural Studies, 9(1), 23-37.

18. Halfacree, K. H. (1995). Talking about rurality: Social representations of the rural as expressed by residents of six English parishes. Journal of Rural Studies, 11(1), 1-20.

19. Halfacree, K., & Boyle, P. (1998). Migration, rurality and the post-productivity countryside, London, Wiley.

20. Halliday, J., & Coombes, M. (1995). In search of counter urbanization: Some evidence from Devon on the relationship between patterns of migration and motivation. Journal of Rural Studies, 11(4), 433-446.

21. Hallikainen, V. (1998). The Finnish Wilderness Experience, Finnish Forest Research Institute, Finland, Rovaniemi Research Station.

22. Halseth, G. (1998). Cottage country in transition: A social geography of change and contention in the rural-recreational countryside, Canada, McGill-Queen's University Press.

23. Hoggart, K. (1990). Let's do away with rural. Journal of Rural Studies, 6(3), 245-257.

24. Hugo, G., & Bell, M. (1998). The hypothesis of welfare-led migration to rural areas: The Australian case, United States, John Wiley and Sons.

25. Ilbery, B. (Ed.). (1998). The geography of rural change, London, Routledge.

26. Jones, O. (1995). Lay discourses of the rural: Developments and implications for rural studies. Journal of Rural Studies, 11(1), 35-49.

27. Kneafsey, M. (2003). The New Countryside: Geographic Perspectives on Rural Change, Canada: Brandon University, Rural Development Institute.

28. Levitas, R. (2007). Looking for the blue: The necessity of utopia. Journal of Political Ideologies, 12(3), 289-306.

29. Müller, D. K. (2007). Second homes in the Nordic countries: Between common heritage and exclusive commodity. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 7(3), 193-201.

30. Nimegeer, A., & Farmer, J. (2016). Prioritising rural authenticity: Community members' use of discourse in rural healthcare participation and why it matters. Journal of Rural Studies, 43(1), 94-103.

31. Phillips, M., Fish, R., & Agg, J. (2001). Putting together ruralities: Towards a symbolic analysis of rurality in the British mass media. Journal of Rural Studies, 17(1), 1-27.

32. Rye, J. F. (2011). Conflicts and contestations. Rural populations’ perspectives on the second homes phenomenon. Journal of Rural Studies, 27(3), 263-274.

33. Sharpley, R., & Jepson, D. (2011). Rural tourism: A spiritual experience? Annals of Tourism Research, 38(1), 52-71.

34. Short, B. (Ed.). (1992). The English rural community: Image and analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

35. Shucksmith, M. (1993). Farm household behaviour and the transition to post‐productivism. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 44(3), 466-478.

36. Shucksmith, M., Brown, D. L., Shortall, S., Vergunst, J., & Warner, M. E. (Eds.). (2012). Rural transformations and rural policies in the US and UK, London, Routledge.

37. Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.) (pp. 443-466). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

38. Terluin, I. J. (2003). Differences in economic development in rural regions of advanced countries: An overview and critical analysis of theories. Journal of Rural Studies, 19(3), 327-344.

39. Van Auken, P. M. (2010). Seeing, not participating: Viewscape fetishism in American and Norwegian rural amenity areas. Human Ecology, 38(4), 521-537.

40. Van Auken, P. M., & Fredrik Rye, J. (2011). Amenities, affluence, and ideology: Comparing rural restructuring processes in the US and Norway. Landscape Research, 36(1), 63-84.

41. Vepsäläinen, M., & Pitkänen, K. (2010). Second home countryside. Representations of the rural in Finnish popular discourses. Journal of Rural Studies, 26(2), 194-204.

42. Ward, N., & Ray, C. (2004). Futures analysis, public policy and rural studies. University of Newcastle Upon Tyne: Centre for Rural Economy.

43. Williams, D. R., & Kaltenborn, B. P. (2013). The use and meaning of recreational cottages in Norway and the USA, Colorado, Leisure/tourism geographies: Practices and geographical knowledge.

44. Winchester, H. P., & Rofe, M. W. (2005). Christmas in the ‘Valley of Praise’: Intersections of the rural idyll, heritage and community in Lobethal, South Australia. Journal of Rural Studies, 21(3), 265-279.

45. Woods, M. (2005). Rural geography: Processes, responses and experiences in rural restructuring. London, Sage Publications.

46. Zhou, L. (2014). Online rural destination images: Tourism and rurality. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 3(4), 227-240.