Analytical and Experimental Draft Force Evaluation of Plastic Coated Chisel Tines

ماشین های کشاورزی

Article 13, Volume 7, Issue 2 - Serial Number 14, 2017, Pages 480-490   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jam.v7i2.53445

Authors

M. Barzegar Tabrizi¹; S. J. Hashemi^{* 1}; R. Karimi²

¹Department of Biosystem Engineering; Sari Agricultural Science and Natural Resources University, Sari, Iran

²Department of Polymer Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Improving the efficiency of all agricultural operations has always been important for farmers and engineers. It is well known that the force required for cutting a soil using narrow blades is a function of soil and environmental physical properties, tool shape geometry and the tool’s surface characteristics like soil-tool adhesion and friction. Soil tool adhesion can reduce ploughing efficiency and quality. It may also halt the movement of tillage machines in more severe conditions. Adhesion can also disable some machine abilities, which can result in a significant reduction of machine performance. Adhesion of the soil to seed-bed preparation tools like furrowers can significantly affect the germination rate. Reducing soil tool adhesion of furrowers can reduce draft force and improve ploughing efficiency. Many researchers have worked on methods of reducing draft force by modifying the surface material and/or surface texture of the plough tools. A good prediction on draft force of a tool before producing it has always been important for farmers and engineers. There are some models for predicting the draft force of narrow blades in soil. McKyes-Ali’s model is widely used because of its accuracy and simplicity. Ultra-high molecular weight polythene (UHMW-PE) is a polymer with ultra-high weight and long molecular chains and is well known for its outstanding physical and chemical properties and self-cleaning abilities, which reduce soil-tool adhesion. The aim of this study was to investigate usability of UHMW-PE coated furrower tines for draft force. Analytical and experimental investigations were carried out during the research. A comparison was conducted between the analytical and the experimental method. The results of this comparison can be used to determine reliability of the analytical model for predicting the draft force improvement caused by the surface modification on tines using different surface coatings.
Materials and Methods
Eight tines have been built. Four of them had a thick coating layer of UHMW-PE, and the other four were made of pure mild steel. Each set of the tines have been installed on a four shanked chisel plough chassis and then attached to a tractor. The draft force required for pulling the furrowers attached to the tractor has been measured by a simple load meter mechanism connecting two tractors. Draft force has been measured in two different speeds. Slip ratio of the tractor has been recorded. Each test has been repeated three times.McKyes-Ali’s proposed model for evaluating the draft force of narrow blades has been chosen to predict draft force of the traditional steel furrower tines and the surface coated ones. To drive the model, a computer program has been coded in the script environment of Matlab software. The model required some of the mechanical properties of the soil and the tool to operate. Specific gravity, cohesion and internal friction angle of the soil have been measured by routine laboratory methods. Soil-tool adhesion and friction of the mild steel and the UHMW-PE plates have been measured using the direct shear apparatus.
Results and Discussions
MkKyes-Ali’s model has predicted draft forces with an accuracy of 90%. According to the results of the driven model, applying a UHMW-PE coating layer to the surface of the tines can improve draft force by 13%. The change of tractor speed from 3.5 km h^-1 to 5.5 km h^-1 have no significant effect on the predicted draft forces. The model also predicted different angles of the soil failure zone for coated and uncoated tines. On the other hand, the improvement of the draft force for the UHMW-PE coated tine in the field test was about 27%. According to The results obtained from the field test, the draft force of the furrower tines had significant correlation with the speed.
Conclusion
The UHMW-PE coated tines required significantly less draft force to work in compare with the steel tines. McKyes-Ali’s model predicted a significant improvement (13%) in draft force for the UHMW-PE coated tines. According to the experimental results, the improvement of the draft force was about 27%, which was almost twice as predicted. Although the McKyes-Ali’s model could predict an improvement for draft force of the UHMW-PE coated tine, but the actual improvement was about twice of the prediction. According to analytical and experimental results, applying a layer of UHMW-PE plastic on furrower tines can improve the draft force significantly.

Keywords

Draft force; Polyethylene; Surface Modification; Tillage

References

1. Al-Kheer, A. A., M. G. Kharmanda, A. El Hami, and A. M. Mouazen. 2011. Estimating the variability of tillage forces on a chisel plough shank by modeling the variability of tillage system parameters. Computers and electronics in agriculture 78: 61-70.

2. ASTM, D., 2002. 5321. Standard test method for determining the coefficient of soil and geosynthetic or geosynthetic and geosynthetic friction by the direct shear method. In American Society for Testing and Materials.

3. ASTM, D., 1994. 3080-90: Standard test method for direct shear test of soils under consolidated drained conditions. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 4, pp.290-5.

4. Chandon, K., and R. Kushwaha. 2002. Soil forces on deep tillage tools. The AIC 2002 Meeting CSAE/SCGR program Saskatoon, Saskatchewan.

5. Chen, B., L. Ren, A. Li, and Q. Hu. 1990. Study on the method of collecting the body surface liquid of earthworms. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering 6: 7.

6. Desbiolles, J., R. Godwin, J. Kilgour, and B. Blackmore. 1997. A novel approach to the prediction of tillage tool draught using a standard tine. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 66: 295-309.

7. Godwin, R., and M. O’Dogherty. 2007. Integrated soil tillage force prediction models. Journal of Terramechanics 44: 3-14.

8. Khan, M. A., R. Qaisrani, and J. Q. LI. 2010. The Techniques of Reducing Adhesion and Scouring Soil by Bionic–Review of Literature. Advances in Natural Science 3 (2): 41-50.

9. Kushwaha, R. L., L. Chi, and J. Shen. 1993. Analytical and numerical models for predicting soil forces on narrow tillage tools. Canadian Agricultural Engineering 35 (3): 183.

10. Ma, Y. 2002. Biomimetic anti-wear UHMWPE matrix composites and their tribology of components of agricultural machinery. PhD Dissertation, China, Jilin University.

11. McKyes, E., and O. Ali. 1977. The cutting of soil by narrow blades. Journal of Terramechanics 14: 43-58.

12. Nichols, M. 1931. The dynamic properties of soil II, Soil and metal friction. Journal of Agricultural Engineering 12: 321-324.

13. Onwualu, A., and K. Watts. 1998. Draught and vertical forces obtained from dynamic soil cutting by plane tillage tools. Soil and Tillage Research 48: 239-253.

14. Qaisrani, A. 1987. The effects of compaction on wheat yield in Pakistan. Master of Engineering Thesis.

15. Qaisrani, A., J. Tong, L. Ren, and B. Chen. 1993. The effects of unsmoothed surfaces on soil adhesion and draft of bulldozing plates. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering 9: 7-13.

16. Qian, D., and J. Zhang. 1984. Research on adhesion and friction of soil against metallic materials. Acta Agromechanica 15: 70-78.

17. Reece, A. 1965. The Fundamental Equation of Earth Moving Machinery. Proc. Symp. Earth Moving Machinery, Inst. of Mech. Eng. London.

18. Ren, L., and D. Chen, and J. Hu. 1990. Initial analysis on the law of reducing adhesion of soil animals. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering 6: 15-20.

19. Salokhe, V., and P. Soni. 2005. Physics of soil-tool adhesion: a review of principles involved in reducing adhesive forces. Book review of current problems in agrophysics. Lublin, Poland: Institute of Agro physics PAS: 83-117.

20. Singh, G., and D. Singh. 1986. Optimum energy model for tillage. Soil and Tillage Research 6: 235-245.

21. Soni, P., V. Salokhe, and H. Nakashima. 2007. Modification of a mouldboard plough surface using arrays of polyethylene protuberances. Journal of Terramechanics 44: 411-422.

22. Tong, J., L. Ren, B. Chen, and A. Qaisrani. 1994. Characteristics of adhesion between soil and solid surfaces. Journal of Terramechanics 31: 93-105.

23. Tong, J., L. Ren, J. Yan, Y. Ma and B. Chen. 1999. Adhesion and abrasion of several materials against soil. International Agricultural Engineering Journal 8: 1.

24. Wang, X., N. Ito, K. Kito, and P. Garcia. 1998. Study on use of vibration to reduce soil adhesion. Journal of terramechanics 35: 87-101.

25. Zhang, J., and R. L. Kushwaha. 1995. A modified model to predict soil cutting resistance. Soil & Tillage Res. 34: 157-168.