Evaluating Inequality in Healthcare Indices in Khorasan Razavi Towns

جغرافیاوتوسعه ناحیه ای

Article 3, Volume 15, Issue 2 - Serial Number 29, March 2018, Pages 45-70   

Document Type: scientific-research article

DOI: 10.22067/geography.v15i2.49800

Authors

Mohammad Mirehei^* ; Mehdi Pilevar

University of Tehran , College of Farabi

Abstract

Extended Abstract
1. Introduction
The main aim of all schematizations is to reach measurable improvement as well as achieving balance; the principle of social justice is one the fundamental principles in most ideologies. Ideologies of institutions and those of planners' form based on social justice, which is one the principles leading to the fair distribution of achievements among urban and rural citizens. Convenient access to health services plays an important role in improving society's level of health, safety and peace of mind, which is considered as an important index in realization of social justice as well. Regarding the availability of health services to all segments of the society, this is taken into account in underdeveloped and developing countries. Studies reveal substantial inequality among social groups as well as geographic areas in spite of the considerable growth of health indicators in the national average (Vaez Mahdvai, p. 73, 2009). For instance, the published statistics by Ministry of Health about the number of health centers in Khorasan Razavi province reveal that approximately half of the clinics and hospitals are located in the city of Mashhad with the rest in other 26 towns. General condition of healthcare highlights huge gaps in Khorasan Razavi province; what makes this study a necessity is devising provincial plans for healthcare service-provision so that the towns of the province benefit from a steady level public health, which leads to the development of the province's situation in the country.
2. Theoretical Framework
In the general sense of the word, development means improving people’s quality of lives in every aspect, i.e. something more than income, which is continuous education, improving hygiene and nourishment standards, alleviating poverty, better environment as well as economic and social equality in enjoying equipment and opportunities, more personal freedom and richer cultural life (Taheri, p. 34, 2001). Developing healthcare services and its location in improving societies is one of the main aspects of social development. One the most highlighted problems in providing healthcare services is improper distribution in urban and rural areas (Taghvaii & Shahivandi, p. 38, 2010). Proper distribution and benefitting from healthcare services reflects proportionality among some factors, such as the ability to pay as well as the availability of services traditionally with criteria such as the number of doctors and beds in a hospital divided by a unit of population (Karimi et al., p. 52, 2009).
3. Methology
In terms of methodology, the current study is considered to be a descriptive-analytical one whose method of data collection, literature review and field studies is quantitative. In order to survey development of Khorasan Razavi’s towns in terms of having healthcare indicators, 18 criteria are used while the collected data are analyzed through VIKOR model. Furthermore, Excel and ARC MAP 10.1 software are used to analyze data and draw maps. Shannon entropy model is used to determine weight research indices. In order to measure development of towns in Khorasan Razavi based on healthcare indices, the latest data published by Iran’s Bureau of Census (2013) in Khorasan Razavi’s statistical yearbook is used.
4. Results and Discussion
In the first step, decision-making matrix were formed. Accordingly, the required raw data of the study is extracted from Statistical Yearbook of Khorasan Razavi Province in 2013. Afterwards, the acquired data was standardized in relation to the population of each town. Secondly, decision-making matrix data were normalized and thirdly, the amount of efficiency (S) and regret (R) is measured for each option; Shanon entropy model is used to determine the weight of calculations in the third level. After that, ideal positive and negative points are determined for each index with amounts of S and R for each town. Finally, the final VIKOR factor (Q) is measured, according to which ranking of options happened; the best town is the one with minimum Q.
5. Conclusion and Suggestions
The results gained from performing the model in ranking the towns based on healthcare indices show that three towns of Mashhad, Neyshabur and Gonabad enjoy the highest level of development regarding healthcare facilities and services as well as preventive measures, after which are towns of Sabzevar, Torbat Heydarieh, Bardeskan, Bejestan, Kashmar, Dargaz, Sarakhs and Joqatay. Central, religious and tourist position of Mashhad and towns with the high percentage of population, such as Neyshabur, Gonabad and Sabzevar, are effective in attracting healthcare services. Towns of Mahvelat, Khalilabad, Bakharz, Roshtkhar and Zaveh are ranked among the lowest towns in healthcare services and worst health status compared to other towns, which reveals low level and poor access of citizens to health services, coverage, first aids and suitable securing. Totally, presence of spatial equality in healthcare among town in Khorasan Razavi, especially central and border town, reveal that the implemented plans are far from principle of social justice leading to regional health inequalities around the province.

Keywords

Healthcare; Khorasan Razavi province; Vikor model; spatial inequality

References

1. احمدی، ع. (1384). توسعۀ صنعتی و نابرابری‌های منطقه‌ای استان لرستان. سازمان مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی استان لرستان.

2. احمدیان، م. (1385). ویژگی‌های جغرافیایی کشورهای اسلامی. مشهد: انتشارات سخن‌گستر.

3. اختیاری، م. (1391)، معرفی یک روش ویکور توسعه‌یافته برای رتبه‌بندی اعتباری مشتریان بانک‌ها. فصلنامة علمی- پژوهشی مطالعات مدیریت صنعتی، 9(25)‌، 179-161.

4. افتخاری، ع.، و آقا یاری‌میر، م. (1386). سطح‌بندی پایداری توسعۀ روستایی (مطالعۀ موردی: بخش میر). فصلنامۀ پژوهش‌های جغرافیایی، 39(61)، 44-31.

5. امینی، ن.، یدالهی، ح.، و اینانلو، ص. (1385). رتبه‌بندی سلامت استان‌های کشور. فصلنامة رفاه اجتماعی، 5(20)، 48-25.

6. پاپلی یزدی، م. (1382). نظریه‌های شهر و پیرامون. تهران: انتشارات سمت.

7. پاگ، س. (1383). شهرهای پایدار در کشورهای درحال‌توسعه (ن. محمدنژاد، مترجم). تهران: انتشارات مرکز مطالعاتی و تحقیقاتی شهرسازی و معماری.

8. تقوایی، م.، و شاهیوندی، ا. (1389). پراکنش خدمات بهداشتی و درمانی در شهرستان‌های ایران. فصلنامۀ رفاه اجتماعی، ‌10(39)، 54-33.

9. رضویان، م. (1381). برنامه‌ریزی کاربری اراضی. تهران: انتشارات سمت.

10. رفیعیان، م.، و تاجدار، و. (1387). سنجش وضعیت سلامت با رویکرد منطقه‌ای در مجموعۀ شهری مشهد. مجلۀ جغرافیا و توسعۀ ناحیه‌ای، 3(10)، 184-163.

11. زنگی‌آبادی، ع.، طوبی، ا. ع.، و پریزادی، ط. (1391). تحلیل تطبیقی شاخص‌های توسعة خدمات بهداشت و درمان در استان کردستان، فصلنامة جغرافیا،‌ 10(32)، 215-199.

12. سالنامة آماری استان خراسان رضوی 1390 (1393). دفتر آمار و اطلاعات استانداری خراسان رضوی. مشهد: نشر صیانت.

13. شکویی، ح. (1372). جغرافیای اجتماعی شهرها. تهران: انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی.

14. صادقی بازرگانی، ه.، عرشی، ش.، مرتضی‌زاده، ع.، و بشیری، ج. (1384). مطالعۀ وضعیت شاخص‌های بهداشت و سلامت در عشایر استان اردبیل. مجلۀ علمی ـ پژوهشی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اردبیل، 5(2)، 159-150.

15. ضرابی، ا.، محمدی، ج.، و رخشانی‌نسب، ح. م. (1386). تحلیل فضایی شاخص‌های توسعة خدمات بهداشت و درمان، رفاه اجتماعی، 7(27)، 234-213.

16. طاهری، ش. (1380). توسعۀ اقتصادی و برنامه‌ریزی (چاپ سوم). تهران: انتشارات هوای تازه.

17. کرمی، ق.، و لطفی، م. (1387). عدالت اجتماعی در برنامه‌ریزی فضای جغرافیایی، پژوهش‌نامۀ عدالت اجتماعی، 3(26)، 90-71.

18. کریمی، ا.، سالاریان، آ.، و عنبری، ز. (1388) مطالعۀ تطبیقی برخورداری عادلانه از خدمات بهداشتی و درمانی در چند کشور توسعه‌یافته و ارائۀ الگوی مناسب ایران، مجلۀ دانشگاه علوم-پزشکی اراک، 12(49)، 104-92.

19. مرکز آمار ایران.(1392). سالنامۀ آماری استان خراسان شمالی. مرکز آمار ایران.

20. موحدی، م.، حجاری‌زاده ب.، رحیمی، ا. د.‌، آرشین‌چی، م.‌، امیرحسینی خ.‌، مطلق، م. ا.، و حق‌دوست، ع. ا. (1386). روند تغییرات شاخص‌های مهم سلامت و الگوی نابرابری جغرافیایی آن‌ها در جمعیت روستایی کشور. تحقیقات نظام سلامت حکیم، 10(4)10-1.

21. مولایی، م. (1386). مقایسة درجة توسعه‌یافتگی بخش خدمات و رفاه اجتماعی استان‌های ایران طی سال‌های 1373 و 1383. رفاه اجتماعی، 6(24)، 258-241.

22. Apostolache, M. A. (2014). Regional development in Romania – from regulations to practice. Procedia Economics and Finance, 8, 35-41.

23. Bleichrodt, H., & van Doorslaer, E. (2006). A welfare economics foundation for health inequality measurement. Journal of Health Economics, 25(5), 945-957.

24. Bommier, A., & Stecklov, G. (2002). Defining health inequality: Why Rawls succeeds where social welfare theory fails. Journal of Health Economics, 21(3), 497-513.

25. Drezner, T., & Drezner, Z. (2007). The gravity p-median model. European Journal of Operational Research, 179(3), 1239-1251.

26. Fang, P., Dong, S., Xiao, J., Liu, C., Feng, X., & Wang, Y. (2010). Regional inequality in health and its determinants: Evidence from China. Health Policy, 94(1), 14-25.

27. Holt, G. L. (2005, November). Measuring spatial accessibility of primary health care. Paper presented at the 17th Annual Colloquium of the Spatial Information Research Centre, Dunedin, New Zealand.

28. Kawachi, I., Subramanian, S. V., & Almeida-Filho, N. (2002). A glossary for health inequalities. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 56(9), 647-652.

29. Lai, D., Huang, J., Risser, J. M., & Kapadia, A. S. (2008). Statistical properties of generalized Gini coefficient with application to health inequality measurement. Social Indicators Research, 87(2), 249-258.

30. Learmonth, M., & Harding, N. (2006): Evidence‐based management: The very idea. Public administration, 84(2), 245-266.

31. Mark, L., & Nancy, H. (2006). Evidence-based management: The very idea. Public Administration, 84(2), 245-266.

32. Marmot, M., & Wilkinson, R. G. (Eds.). (1998). Social determinants of health: The solid facts. Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization.

33. Opricovic, S. (1998). Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.

34. Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445-455.

35. Pilkington, P. (2002). Social capital and health: Measuring and understanding social capital at a local level could help to tackle health inequalities more effectively. Journal of Public Health, 24(3), 156-159.

36. Rae, M. (2006). Health inequalities- a sustainable development issue. Public Health, 120, 1106-1109.

37. Spork, H. (2006). Building healthy communities. Queensland, Australia: Griffith University Press.

38. World Health Organization (WHO). (1998). Determinants of health: The solid facts. Geneva.

39. Wu, C.-R., Lin, C.-T., & Chen, H.-C. (2007). Optimal selection of location for Taiwanese hospitals to ensure a competitive advantage by using the analytic hierarchy process and sensitivity analysis. Building and Environment, 42(3), 1431-1444.