Spatial Analysis of the Outcome of the Tenth Presidential Election of Iran in Mashhad

جغرافیاوتوسعه ناحیه ای

Article 1, Volume 16, Issue 1 - Serial Number 30, September 2018, Pages 1-24   

Document Type: scientific-research article

DOI: 10.22067/geography.v16i1.25748

Authors

Seyyed Hadi Zarghani^{* 1}; Seyyed Morteza Razavinezhad²; Salman Hayati¹

¹Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

²University of Tehran

Abstract

Extended Abstract
1. Introduction
Democracy is known as the lawful management of a political society which is executed through the mechanism of transferring the will of population to governance for the administration of countries. Elections are, indeed, considered as the most significant manifestation of democracy. In a democratic society, the right to vote followed by the right to choose or dismiss governments is the most basic civil right. However, it should be noted that the outcome of elections rarely expresses the pure, logical outlook of voters as geography plays a role of utmost importance in this regard. In fact, the outcome of various elections is influenced by spatial and geographical variables at individual and social levels; additionally, there are factors and actors at local, regional, national, and even international levels that affect the outcome of elections. In truth, local factors affect people’s decision-making in elections while the geographical structure of voting systems indicate the outcomes.
2. Theoretical Framework
Geography of election is one of the branches of political geography which focuses on geographical regions as platforms for electing representative at local, regional, and national levels. In fact, geography of election focuses on various geographical aspects of elections, referendums and their organization and results in particular, while considering cultural, economic, and other conditions as influential at various local, regional, and national levels. In terms of the spatial dimension, vote collection patterns are diverse; in geography of election, the citizens’ political behavior patterns derived from diversities in outlooks and demands toward dominant economic, cultural and legal structures can be drawn as a map and examined. 3. Methodology
In terms of nature and method, the present study is considered as a descriptive-analytical research. Data collection was carried out using library and document studies. The main problem of the study revolves around the spatial distribution of the candidates’ votes during the tenth Iranian presidential election in Mashhad. Furthermore, this study seeks to investigate if there is a significant relationship between the number of votes in different regions of Mashhad to candidates and the social-physical features and indices of such regions. The ArcGIS software and Interpolation – IDW tool were used for the examination and spatial analysis of the votes and demonstrating their maps at the analysis level of Mashhad municipal regions. The PASW software was also used for calculations and statistical tests.
4. Results and Discussion
In the process of elections, particularly the Iranian presidential election, there are a number of various factors and variables affecting the final decision of the voters for selecting a candidate among numerous volunteers. In other words, voting patterns for candidate in elections are a function of components such as the candidates’ characteristics and individual features, as well as political, economic, and sociocultural macro variables and finally, the characteristics and personal features of voters. In this framework, variables including age, gender, education, religion and nationality, financial status, sense of belonging, etc., among the voters along with the candidates’ characteristics and personal features such as gender, education, appearance, power of speech, charisma and social base, party affiliation, executive and administrative backgrounds, etc., play an effective role in the number of votes casted to candidates. Ultimately, more general economic, social and political variables such as the governments and other actors’ policies and actions, dominant media discourse, social networks, experts, religious leaders, ethnic and religious figures and authorities, and others are also influential in this area.
5. Conclusion and Suggestions
One of the most important, effective variables on citizens’ political behavior involves their personal characteristics which highly rely on their economic, social, and cultural bases. In this study, the impacts of variables such as economic, welfare, educational and general developments on the citizens’ voting patterns during the tenth Iranian presidential election were analyzed and examined across Mashhad’s 12 districts. The results of the study show that the spatial distribution of candidates’ votes across various regions of Mashhad is a function of economic, social and cultural features and indices in different regions. In detail, the citizens’ election-related behaviors in various regions fit the economic, social, and cultural development indices and levels of those regions; moreover, the common needs, interests, and characteristics of citizens across various regions have caused a difference between voting patterns in the city’s districts. In fact, given an increase in development levels for different variables, the percentage in the number of votes to Mr. Ahmadinejad are reduced whereas such a trend for other three candidates have been inverse, particularly for Mr. Mousavi and Mr. Karoubi.

Keywords

Iran presidential elections; Elections Geography; Spatial Analysis; Metropolis Mashhad

References

1. استانداری خراسان رضوی. (1388). جداول مخصوص انتخابات ریاست جمهوری دورۀ دهم. مشهد: دفتر تقسیمات سیاسی استانداری، پورتال استانداری خراسان رضوی.

2. بایی لاشکی، م. و پیشگاهی فرد، ز. (1388). تحلیل رفتار انتخاباتی ایرانیان (مورد مطالعه: حوزۀ انتخابییۀ نوشهر و چالوس در انتخابات دورة هشتم مجلس شورای اسلامی). فصل‌نامة علمی پژوهشی پژوهش‌های جغرافیای انسانی، 1 (3)، 112-93.

3. پای، ل. (1370). فرهنگ سیاسی و توسعة سیاسی. (م. محمدی، ترجمه). مجلة نامة فرهنگ، 5 و6، 47-37.

4. پرچمی، د. (1386). بررسی مشارکت مردم در نهمین انتخابات ریاست جمهوری. پژوهش‌نامة علوم انسانی (ویژه‌نامة جامعه‌شناسی)، 53 ،62-37.

5. پیشگاهی‌فرد، ز. و شوشتری، ج. (1387). مبانی جغرافیایی خاستگاه آراء مردم در هشتمین دورة انتخابات مجلس شورای اسلامی. فصل‌نامة ژئوپلیتیک، 4 ،130-109.

6. تایلور، پ. ج. (1386). جغرافیای انتخابات. (ز. پشگاهی‌فرد، ترجمه). تهران: نشر قومس.

7. توسلی، غ. ع. (1382). مشارکت اجتماعی در شرایط جامعة آنومیک. تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.

8. حافظ‌نیا، م.ر. و کاویانی، م. (1383). افق‌های جدید در جغرافیای سیاسی. تهران: انتشارات سمت.

9. خاکپور، ب. و باوان پوری، ع. (1388). بررسی و تحلیل نابرابری در سطح توسعه‌یافتگی مناطق شهر مشهد. مجلة علمی- پژوهشی دانش و توسعه. 16 (27)، 202-182.

10. رضی، د. (1380). بررسی تطبیقی عوامل اجتماعی مؤثر بر میزان مشارکت مردم در انتخابات شش دورة ریاست جمهوری ایران. مجلة علوم انسانی دانشگاه الزهرا، 37 و 38 ، 236-193.

11. زرقانی، س.ه.، رضوی‌نژاد، م. (1391). طرح پژوهشی تحلیل فضایی انتخابات ریاست جمهوری دهم. مشهد: معاونت پژوهشی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد.

12. شاهنوشی، ن.، گلریز ضیائی، ز. و باقری، ح. ر. (1386). تعیین سطح توسعه‌یافتگی نواحی شهر مشهد. طرح پژوهشی به سفارش مرکز پژوهش‌های شورای اسلامی شهر مقدس مشهد. مشهد: مرکز پژوهش های شورای اسلامی شهر مشهد.

13. عمید، ح. (1379). فرهنگ عمید. جلد 1. تهران: انتشارات امیرکبیر.

14. قاضی، ا. (1373). حقوق اساسی و نهادهای سیاسی. جلد اول. تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.

15. کاولرد، ک. (1380). تصمیم‌گیری در جغرافیا. (م. توفیقی؛ س. ر. امینی‌نژاد، ترجمه) سبزوار: انتشارات دانشگاه تربیت معلم سبزوار

16. کاویانی‌راد ، م. (1392). جغرافیای انتخابات با تأکید بر انتخابات ریاست جمهوری در ایران. تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه خوارزمی.

17. کاویانی‌راد، م. (1386). جغرافیای انتخابات. فصل‌نامة مطالعات راهبردی،10، 3، (37)، 505-481.

18. کاویانی‌راد، م. ویسی، ه. (1387). بررسی تأثیر همسایگی بر انتخابات ایران. فصل‌نامة ژئوپلیتیک، 13، 20-1.

19. مویر، ر. (1379). درآمدی نو بر جغرافیای سیاسی. (م. ح. دره ؛ س. ی. صفوی، ترجمه). تهران: انتشارات سازمان جغرافیای نیروهای مسلح.

20. Agnew, J. (1996). Democracy and human rights after cold war from: Geographiesof global change; Edit by R.J.Johnston and others, PUB: BLAACKWELL.

21. Alkan Olsson, J. (2009). A goal oriented indicator framework to support integrated assessment of new policies for agri-environmental systems. Environmental Science and Policy, 12(5), 562-572.

22. Dikshit, R. (1995). Political geography. New Delhi: Tata-MCGRAW-HILL.

23. Kavlrd, K. A. (2002). Decision making in geography (M. Tofighi & R. Amininezhad Trans.). Sabzevar: Tarbiat Moallem University of Sabzevar.

24. MuIr, R. (2001). New introduction to political geography (M. H. Doreh & Y. Safavi Tras.). Tehran: Geography Organization of Armed Forces of Iran.

25. Taylor, P. (1979). Geography of election. Holmes & Meier.