Explaining the Landscape Identity Components in the Tourist Villages with Valuable Texture in Iran

Journal of Research and Rural Planning

مقاله 7، دوره 8، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 27، اسفند 2019، صفحه 107-125   

نوع مقاله: Scientific Articles

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/jrrp.v8i4.78964

نویسندگان

Anahita Hosieni¹؛ Morteza Tavakoli^{* 2}؛ Mahdi Pourtaheri³؛ Adorreza Rokoddin Eftekhari¹

¹Tarbiat Modarres University

²Tarbiat Modaress University

³Tarbiat Modaress university of tehran

چکیده

Purpose- Examination and recognition of the processes and mechanisms governing the physical environment of villages and the factors of rural landscape structure have its specific and unique characteristics. These valuable features are applicable in the research process, planning, and plans approaches, as well as in spatial planning to pay for the open environment and rural landscape development. Therefore, the main objective of the research is recognition of the landscape identity components in the tourism villages with valuable texture. These components can be used in the plans and texture restoration of the villages to have a sustainable landscape.
Design/methodology/approach- The research is a descriptive-analytic study with the quantitative method by applying a questionnaire that completed by university’s professors and authorities of organs that are related to valuable textures with this important question: what are the landscape identity components and which one of them is so important? By identifying the components, extracting the items and operating the components, collecting and analyzing the data through the SPSS software, performing the ANOVA test and Tukey's test, the components of landscape was identified. These components are readability, vitality, beauty, security and safety, diversity and variety, belonging, accessibility, cultural history, semantics, visual proportions, and physical quality, social, economic, and environmental. Finally, their significance has been determined relative to each other.
Finding- The main hypothesis was the importance of the economic (functional-activity) and perceptual components that are based on the findings of the research which ultimately have been ranked in the Tukey’s test table based on the importance of ranking. The ten components in the second column of the components are the most important and the three components in the first column are less important components and two common components are in the first and second columns. The results showed that the economic component (performance-activity) was the most important of all with an average value of 2.61. Within the perceptual components; the historical-cultural component with an average value of 2.55 ranked after the economic component (first rank) and social component (second) as the third important component and the average value of social component was obtained 2.55, so it can be said that the hypothesis was confirmed. According to the results, to have a sustainable perspective for the future, all these components should be considered more prominently in the plans and projects than in the past. While the same research has already not been done on landscape identity in villages, then this research can be the beginning of development and applied research in rural regions.

کلیدواژه‌ها

landscape؛ Landscape identity؛ Village landscape؛ Landscape identity components؛ Iran

مراجع

1. Adab, M. (2014). Meaning in the place of studying the effective components in the formation of spatial identity. International Route and Construction Monthly, 88-97.

2. Aghakhani, S., & Baghdadi, A. (1393/2014). Recognizing the theoretical approaches to urban identity and identity preservation. Published at the 6th National Conference on Urban Planning and Management with an emphasis on the components of the Islamic city. [In Persian].

3. Alexander, C. (1965). A city is not a tree. Ekistics, 139, 344-348.‏

4. Briedenhann, J., & Wickens, E. (2004). Tourism routes as a tool for the Economic Development of rural areas - vibrant hope or impossible dream? Tourism Management, 25(1), 71-79.

5. Daneshpour, AS., & Shiri, A. (1394/2015). Elemental-functional elements shaping the identity of the historical Iranian-Islamic urban textures. Journal of Science and Research. (5-1). [In Persian].

6. Ghotbi, A. (1387/2008). Concept of Identity and Architecture of Iran. The Mirror of fancy, (10) 78-83. [In Persian].

7. Hananchi, P., & Kusheshgaran, A.S. (1390/2011). Protection and Development in Valuable Rural Texture. Nasr: Islamic Revolution Housing Foundation. [In Persian].

8. Henning, S. A. (1996). Developing a rural tourism marketing strategy based on visitor profiles. Louisiana Agriculture, 39(1), 8-9.

9. Hosseini, A. (1398/2019). The design of the pattern of landscape identity organization in tourist villages with valuable texture. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian].

10. Jam kasra, M. (1389/2010). The development of a valuable rural tissue is a process of subjectivity and objectivity. Journal of Housing and Rural Environment, 29(131) .61-72. [In Persian].

11. Jurowski, C. (1996). Tourism means more than money to the host community. Parks and Recreation, 31(9), 110-118.

12. Khodadadi, P., & Mohammad Nejad, A. (1393/2014). Role of Valuable Valuable Structures in the Development of Tourism (Case Study: Javaneh Ramezan Village). Geographical Quarterly of Tourism Space, 8 (2), 59-79. [In Persian].

13. Moaiedi, M., Ali Nejad, M., & Navaie, H. (1392/2013). Investigating the role of urban landscape components in improving the sense of security in urban public spaces (Case Study, Evin District of Tehran). Social Security Studies, 35, 159-191[In Persian].

14. Motevali, M. (1389/2010). Assessing the Beauty of Darabad District in Tehran Based on Serial Vision. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 3(5), 123-140. [In Persian].

15. Pakurar, M., & Olah, J. (2008). Definition of rural tourism and its characteristics in the northern great plain region. System, 7, 777-782.

16. Palang, H., Printsmann, A., Gyuro, É. K., Urbanc, M., Skowronek, E., & Woloszyn, W. (2006). The forgotten rural andscapes ofCentral and Easter Europe. Landscape Ecology, 21(3), 347-357.

17. Parvizi, A., Bomanian, M., & Mahdavi Nejad, M. (2016). Identifying the Authentic Cerebration Criteria in the Modern Architecture of Valuable Historical Urban Textures in Order to Improve the Physical Identity of Historic Urban Textures (Case Study: Historic Urban Texture of Imamzade Yahya in Oodlajan). Journal of Iranian Research and Restoration, 1(11), 65-75. [In Persian].

18. Rafiean, M., Taghvaei, A., Khademi, M., & Alipour, R (1391/2012). A Comparative Study of Quality Measurement Approaches in Designing Urban Public Spaces. Journal of Iranian Architecture and Urban Development, 35-43. [In Persian].

19. Rahmani, V., Molai Hashtjin, N., & Amar Shirkiaei, T. (1395/2016). Strategic Analysis of Rural Tourism in the Western Region of Mazandaran for Sustainable Development. Journal of Space Economics and Rural Development, 5 (3) 135-151. [In Persian].

20. Rajab zadeh Qatari, AS., Safari, R., & Memarpour, M. (1393/2014). Statistical Use with SPSS Software. (First Edition). Tehran: Publishing Ghazan Danesh. [In Persian].

21. Shekariarani, R. (1394/2015). Prioritizing and Identifying Indicators of Valuable Rural Village Villages (Case Study: Natanz City). Undergraduate Postgraduate Certificate. Tarbiat Modares University of Tehran. Tehran. Iran. [In Persian].

22. Yiddghaar, A., & Poorrohani M. (1391/2012). Criteria for assessing the quality of rural spaces and settlements. Housing and Village Magazine, 139, 51-66. [In Persian].

23. Zeinali Ghotbabadi, A. (1394/2015). Identifying the Role of Natural Components in Urban Identity (Case Study: Shahrbabak). Quarterly Journal of Urban Landscape Research, 4(2), 7-19. [In Persian].