واکنش گیاه ماش (ژنوتیپ VC-1973A) به تاریخ کاشت، تراکم بوته و آبیاری در منطقه گرگان

پژوهش‌های حبوبات ایران

مقاله 8، دوره 8، شماره 1، شهریور 1396، صفحه 180-191   

نوع مقاله: مقالات پژوهشی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/ijpr.v8i1.33490

نویسندگان

جواد فدایی^{* 1}؛ ابوالفضل فرجی²؛ محمد رضا داداشی¹؛ آسیه سیاهمرگویی³

¹آزاد اسلامی واحد گرگان

²مرکز تحقیقات کشاورزی ومنابع طبیعی گلستان

³دانشکده علوم زراعی دانشگاه کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان

چکیده

به‌منظور بررسی تأثیر تاریخ کاشت، تراکم بوته و آبیاری بر عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد ماش (ژنوتیپ VC-1973A) آزمایشی در تابستان 1390 در مزرعه تحقیقاتی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد گرگان انجام شد. در این بررسی از آزمایش فاکتوریل در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی و در سه تکرار استفاده شد. سه تاریخ کاشت 15‌تیر، 30‌تیر و 15‌مرداد و دو تراکم بوته 5/12 و 25‌بوته در متر‌مربع به‌‌صورت فاکتوریل با همدیگر ترکیب شدند. آزمایش در دو شرایط آبیاری (مراحل شروع گلدهی و شروع غلاف‌بندی) و دیم انجام شد. نتایج نشان داد که در هر دو شرایط آبی و دیم، تأثیر تاریخ کاشت بر روی تمامی صفات از نظر آماری معنی‌دار بود. تاریخ کاشت 15‌تیر در هر دو شرایط آبی و دیم بهترین تاریخ کاشت بود. میزان عملکرد دانه در شرایط آبی در تاریخ کاشت 15‌تیر 2900‌کیلوگرم در هکتار و در شرایط دیم 1636‌کیلوگرم در هکتار بود. همچنین در شرایط آبی، آبیاری در دو مرحله شروع گلدهی و شروع غلاف‌بندی باعث شد میزان عملکرد دانه و ماده خشک افزایش قابل‌توجهی داشته باشد. در کشت دیر، گیاه سریع‌تر وارد مرحله زایشی شد و در نتیجه موجب کاهش تعداد غلاف در بوته و تعداد دانه در غلاف شد که کاهش عملکرد دانه را به‌دنبال داشت. نتایج نشان داد گیاه ماش پتانسیل تولید بالایی در شرایط آب‌و‌هوایی منطقه دارد و تحت هر دو شرایط دیم و آبی، تاریخ کاشت 15‌تیر و تراکم 25‌بوته در متر‌مربع می‌تواند برای زراعت ماش در منطقه توصیه شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

تنش خشکی؛ عملکرد دانه؛ گرگان؛ ماده خشک؛ ماش

مراجع

1. Ahmadi, A. 2008. Effect of sowing date and planting rows on yield, quality and other characteristics of Mung bean area Rey.college of Agriculture. Islamic Azad University, Varamin Branch. (In Persian).

2. Akinola, J.D. 1988. Effects of sowing date on forage and seed production varieties of cowpea. Experimental Agriculture 14: 197-203.

3. Anderson, L.R., and Vasilas, B.L. 1985. Effects of planting date on two soybean cultivars: seasonal dry matter accumulation and seed yield. Crop Science 25: 999-1004.

4. Aradatmand Asli, D., and Baer, N. 2007. Agricultural sustainability and growth performance of Mung bean in different planting densities. Abstract Proceedings of the National Conference Grains, Iran. P:4. (In Persian with English Summary).

5. Afsharmanesh, GH. 1998. Comparison of the Degree of Product CompatibilityVetch Cultivars in Jiroft. The Final Report of the Research Project Agricultural. Research and Education Organization Seed and Plant Improvement Institute. (In Persian).

6. Barlis, E.C. 2005. Response of Mung bean planted at varying population density and levels of NPK. CLSU. Scientific Journal (Philippines) p:128-138.

7. Daneshmand Khosravi, K., and Sabaghpour, H. 1992. Effect of planting density and sowing date crop Mung bean (cultivar 16-61-1) yield in the Gonbad. Seed and Plant Improvement Institute Preparation.

8. Dhingra, K.K., and Sekhon, H.S. 1988. Agronomic management for high productivity of Mung bean in different seasons, Punjab, India Pp: 376-385.

9. Ghanjali, A., and Malakzadeh, S. 2003. Effect of planting date and row spacing on yield and yield components of Mung bean. In: Proc. Abstract of the 8th Iranian Crop Protection and Breeding Congress. Iran, Gilan University. p: 38. (In Persian with English Summary).

10. Ghafarikhaligh, H., and Molaii, A. 2005. Compare Performance and Compatibility Setting Bean Cultivar. Final Report of the Research Project Ministry of Agriculture. Agricultural Research and Education Organization. (In Persian).

11. Ghavami, F. 1997. Explore the Diversity of Morphological Traits, Phonological and Mung Bean Seed Protein Electrophoresis Pattern. Isfahan University. (In Persian).

12. George, D.L., and Barrens, M. 2000. Row spacing effects on two cultivars of Mung bean (Vigana radiate (L.) Wilczek) at gatten. School of Land and Food Gatton College, university of Queensland, p: 25-32

13. Hattami, A., and Lakzadeh, A. 1993. Effects of Sowing Date and Plant Density on Yield and Mung Bean in Ahvaz. Report of the Ministry of Agricultur. Agricultural Research and Education Organization. (In Persian).

14. Hassanzadeh, A. 1991. Effects of Sowing Date and Planting Density Effects on Protein Content, Yield and Yield Components of Mungbean in Isfahan Region Isfahan University. (In Persian).

15. Ismaeli, A. 2003. Compare Performance and Compatibility Setting Bean Cultivars. The Final Report of the Research Project. Ministry of Agriculture. Agricultural Research and Education Organization Seed and Plant Improvement Institute. (In Persian).

16. Khademhamzeh, H., Karimi, M., Rezaei, A., and Ahmadi, M. 2004. Effects of sowing date and plant density on yield and its components and their vertical di distribution in crop soybean. Journal of Agricultural Sciences Iran 35: 357-367. (In Persian).

17. Kane, A.Z., Shah, P.S., Khalil, K., and Ahmad, B. 2004. Yield of soybean cultivars as affected by planting date under Peshawar-vally conditions. The Neclieus 42: 93-95.

18. Koochaki, A., and Bonayan-Aval, M. 1994. Agricultural Crops (Third Edition). Mashhad University of Jihad publications. (In Persian).

19. Lawn, R.J. 2000. Response of four legumes to water stress in south easter Queensland. I. Physiological response mechanisms. Australian Journal of Agriculture 33: 481-496.

20. Littlejohns, G., Heule, L., Brinsmead, R., Holland, J., and Thompson, P. 1998. A Mung bean cultivar×population and row spacing study. Proceedings of the 8th Australian Agronomy Conference.

21. Mirzaei, A., and Modhej, A. 2005. Effects of plan spacing on grain yield and yield components of Vigna radiata L. (cv. Gohar) in Ilam condition. Abstract of the 1st Iranian Congress. Research Plant Science. Mashhad University College, Institute of Plant Science. 1: 78-80. (In Persian with English Summary).

22. Muchow, R.C., and Edwards, D.A.C. 1982. An analysis of the growth of Mung bean at a range of plant densities in tropical Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 33(1): 53-61.

23. Nanda R., and Saini, A.D. 1989. Solar radiation interception, green area and dry matter production in green gram [Vigna radiate (L.) Wilczk]. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 59: 305-311.

24. Pandey, R.K., Saxena, M.C., and Singh, V.B. 1978. Growth analysis of black gram genotypes. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 48: 466-473.

25. Purcell, L.C., Rosalind, A., Reaper, B.D.G., and Vories, E.D. 2002. Radiation use efficiency and biomass production in soybean at different plant population, densities. Crop Science 42: 172-177.

26. Rezaei, A., and Hassanzadeh, A. 2005. Effects of sowing date and plant density on yield and its components and their vertical distribution in there Mung bean cultivars. Irananian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 26: 19-26. (In Persian).

27. Sabaghpour, S.H. 2002. The appropriate plant density and date of sowing for Hashem improved chickpea variety. In: Proc. Abstract of the 7th Iranian Crop Protection and Breeding Congress, Sep, 2002, Karaj, Iran. Agricultural. Research and Education Organization Seed and Plant Improvement Institute. p. 206. (In Persian with iEnglish Summary).

28. Sadeghipour, A. 2001. Science, Crop Production. First Part: Legumes (translation). Publications Pizishkiyan, Tehran. (In Persian).

29. Sarparast, GH. 2004. Compatibility and Performance Comparison Mung bean Cultivars as Second Crop after Cereals. The Final Report of the Ministry of Agriculture. Agricultural Research and Education, Organization Seed and Plant Improvement Institute. (In Persian).

30. Shahsavari, M. 2006. Evaluation of Phenotypic Contribution of Yield Growth Parameters on the Formation and Characterization of Al-Brigade Ideas in Common Bean Faculty of Agriculture. College of Agriculture, Isfahan University. (In Persian).

31. Shahmoradi, SH. 2003. Effects of Drought Stress on Quantitative and Qualitative Traits of Soybean Varieties and Advanced Lines. College of Agriculture, Tehran University. (In Persian).

32. Singh, J., Mathur, N., Bohra, S., Bohra, A., and Vyas, A. 2006. Comparative performance of Mung bean (Vigna radiate L.) varieties under rainfed condition in Indian Thar Desert. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Science 1: 48-50.

33. Ktomar, S.S., and Tiwari, A.C. 1991. Effect of plant density on genotypes of green gram (Vigna radiate) and Black gram (Vigna Mungo). Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 61: 126-127.