The effect of ultrasonic waves and seed priming in conjunction with weed management on yield and yield components of cowpea (Vigna sinensis L.)

پژوهش‌های حبوبات ایران

Article 6, Volume 8, Issue 2, December 2017, Pages 126-140   

Document Type: Original Articles

DOI: 10.22067/ijpr.v8i2.53957

Authors

Abbas Nasiri Dehsorkhi¹; hassan makarian^{* 2}; Manouchehr Gholipoor¹; Hamid Abbasdokht¹

¹Shahrood University of Technology

², Shahrood University of Technology

Abstract

Introduction
The mechanism of seed priming is to initiate the repairing system for membrane and the metabolic preparation for germination through controlling water absorption rate of seed. As a result, the germination capability and resistance to unfavorable conditions of seed can be promoted obviously. Ultrasound is defined as acoustic waves at frequencies greater than 20 kHz that can be an effective method of improve germination and growth characteristics of plants. Mirshekari et al. (2013) found that treating common narrow seeds with ultrasonic irradiation increases its germination and primary growth. There is no knowledge about the effect of ultrasonic waves and seed priming on plant competition with weeds. Thus, the objective of this research was to study the effect of ultrasonic waves and seed priming on yield and yield components of cowpea (Vigna sinensis L.) in competition with weeds.
Materials and Methods
Experiment was conducted at the research field of Shahrood University of Technology (latitude of 36° 25 'N and longitude of 54° 57' E with an elevation of 1345 m) as randomized complete block design with four replications in during the growing season of 2013-2014. Treatments included; ultrasonic waves (ultrasound) + no weeding, ultrasonic waves + weeding (all season), ultrasonic waves + reduced herbicide dose (trifluralin 1 L.ha-1), ultrasonic waves + the recommended herbicide dose (2 L.ha-1), hydro-priming + no weeding, hydro-priming + weeding, hydro-priming + reduced herbicide dose, hydro-priming + recommended herbicide dose, no weeding, weeding (all season), recommended herbicide dose, and reduced herbicide dose. In hydro-priming treatment, seeds were treated with water before sowing for 7 hours. Also for ultrasonic treatment, the seeds before sonication (for 6 minutes) treated with water for 7 hour. Trifluralin used in recommended dose (2 L.ha-1) and reduced herbicide dose (1 L.ha-1), therefore immediate mixed with soil before planting. Statistical analyses of data were performed with statistical software MSTATC. Significant differences between means refer to the probability level of 0.05 by LSD test.

Results and Discussion
The results showed that all treatments decreased significantly biomass and density of weeds in comparison to control (no weeding). No significant difference was observed in density and shoot biomass of weeds between the application of hydro-priming + trifluralin 1 L.ha-1 and ultrasonic waves + trifluralin 1 L.ha-1 with trifluralin 2 L.ha-1 treatment. Hydro-priming + reduced herbicide dose and ultrasonic waves + reduced herbicide dose treatments decreased total weed biomass by 61 and 46.5% in comparison to using reduced herbicide dose treatment. In this regard Abbasdokht et al (2012) reported that density and shoot biomass of weeds was similar between reduced herbicide dose (Nicosulfuron 40 g.a.i. ha-1) + hydro priming and recommended herbicide dose (Nicosulfuron 80 g.a.i. ha-1). During priming, seeds are partially hydrated so that pre-germinative metabolic activities proceed, while radicle protrusion is prevented, then are dried back to the original moisture level (McDonald, 2000). Ghassemi-Golezani et al, (2008) suggested hydropriming as a simple and effective method for improving seed germination and seedling emergence of lentil in the field. Also the results indicated that the combined use of ultrasonic waves + weeding (all season) treatment increased grain and biological yield by 62 and 52.3 percent in comparison to control (no weeding) treatment respectively. Rajabian (2013) reported that seed pretreatment of corn by ultrasonic waves increased the grain and biologic yield in comparison to control significantly. The results indicated that no significant difference was observed in grain yield between the application of hydro-priming + trifluralin 1 L.ha-1 and ultrasonic waves + trifluralin 1 L.ha-1 in comparison to trifluralin 2 L.ha-1 and weeding (all season) treatments. Whereas, sowing pretreated seeds by ultrasonic waves and hydro-priming in soil containing recommended trifluralin dose decreased the investigated traits in comparison to application of pre-treatments alone and recommended herbicide dose. In this regard, Moradbeygi and Khara (2011) observed a significant reduction due to increased trifluralin concentrations on root and shoot length and dry weight of sunflower plants. Based on Yaldagard et al, (2008), one of the possible explanations could be that the mechanical effects of ultra-sonication produced numerous small holes in the coating and after steeping in the water a significant rise in seedling moisture resulted. It has been suggested that the sonication process accelerates the imbibition of water through the pericarp. Sonication may create or enlarge fissures in the protective coating surrounding the seed and pericarp. The superiority of sonication may be due to a higher holding capacity and higher porosity, which increase oxygen availability. Generally it seems that pre-treatment of cowpea seeds by hydro-priming and ultrasonic waves can increase competitiveness of bean plant with weeds through increasing crop growth rate. The results showed that proper combination of trifluralin herbicide along with seed priming could be used to control the weeds in the bean and obtain seed yield comparable with weed-free conditions.
Conclusion
Both hydro-priming and ultrasonic waves had the effects on accelerating germination and improving competitive ability of bean plant. Hydro- or ultrasonic waves priming showed better plant growth than that without priming treatment when exposed to competition conditions. Pretreated seeds in combination to low herbicide dose had the best effects on the weed suppression and increasing crop yield. Based on our results, priming and sonication of seeds in combination with reduced dose of herbicide can be an effective method of weeds control and increase crop yield and also reduce herbicide consumption.

Keywords

Integrated Weed Management; Primary establishment; trifluralin

References

1. Abbasdokht, H., Makarian, H., Ahmadisharaf, H., Gholami, A., and Rahimi, M. 2012. The study of integrated weed management (IWM), emphasizing the effect of seed priming on yield and yield components of maize (Zea mayz L.). Weed Science Journal 2: 63-76. (In Persian with English Summary).

2. Abbassian, A., Rashed Mohassel, M.H., Nezami, A., and Izadi- Darbandi, E. 2013. Evaluating the effects of imazethapyr and trifuralin dosages on weed population composition and diversity in chickpea. 5th Iranian Weed Science Congress. 562-567. (In Persian with English Summary).

3. Afzal, I., Basra, S.M.A., Ahmad, R., and Iqbal, A. 2002. Effect of different seed vigour enhancement techniques on hybrid maize (Zea mays L.). Pakistan Journal Agriculture Science 39: 109-112.

4. Bagheri, A., Zand, A., and Parsa, M. 1998. Beans, the Bottlenecks and Strategies. Jahade Daneshgahi Mashhad Press. 96 pp. (In Persian).

5. Bagheri, A., Mahmudi, A., and Ghezeli, F. 2001. Common Beans, Research for Crop Improvement. Jahade Daneshgahi Mashhad Press. 556 pp. (In Persian).

6. Bayer, D.E., Foy, C.L., Mallory, T.E., and Cutter, E.G. 1967. Morphological and histological effects of trifluralin on root development. American Journal of Botany 54: 945-952.

7. Behran, S.H., Maftoun, M., Sheibany, B., and Hojatti, S.M. 1979. Effects of fertilizer -N and herbicides on the growth and N-content of soybeans and cowpeas. Agronomy Journal 71: 533-538.

8. Caamal-Maldonado, J.A., Jimenez-Osornio, J.J., Torres-Barragan, A., and Anaya, A. L. 2001. The use of allelopathic legume cover and mulch species for weed control in cropping systems. Journal of Agronomy 93: 27-36.

9. Carlson, D. 2013. Sonic bloom organic farming made easy! The best organic fertilizer in the world. [2013-3-6]. http://www.relfe.com/sonic_bloom.html

10. Duman, I. 2006. Effect of seed priming with PEG and K3PO4 on germination and seedling growth in Lettuce. Pakistan Journal of Biology Science 9(5): 923-928.

11. 11.Ebadi, Sh., Gholipoor, M., and Gholami, A. 2014. The effect of ultrasonic waves and nitroxin biological fertilizer on growth, yield and yield components of cowpea (Vigna sinensis). Second National Conference on Sustainable Agricultural Development and Healthy Environment. (In Persian).

12. Elkoca, E., Haliloglo, K., Esitken, A., and Ercisli, S. 2007. Hydro- and osmopriming improve chickpea germination. Soil and Plant Science 57: 193-200.

13. Eskandari, H. 2013. Effects of priming technique on seed germination properties, emergence and field performance of crops: A review. International journal of Agronomy and Plant Production 4(3): 454-458.

14. Farajee, H., and Amiri, Kh. 2010. Comparison of different chemical herbicides to control of broad leaf weeds of common bean in Yasouj, Kohgiloyeh and Boyerahmad province. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research 1(2): 123-130. (In Persian with English Summary).

15. Ghanbari, A., and Taheri Mazandarani, M. 2003. Investigation of planting pattern and weed control on yield and yield components of red bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Journal Seed Plant 19: 37-47.

16. Ghassemi-Golezani, K., Chadordooz-Jeddi, A., Nasrollahzadeh, S., and Moghaddam, M. 2010. Effects of hydro-priming duration on seedling vigour and grain yield of pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars. Notylae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 38(1): 109-113.

17. Goodarzi, A.B., Fathi, G.H., and Golabi, M. 2006. Evaluation the effect of mixing double-purpose herbicides with surfactant in comparison with single-purpose herbicides on weed control in wheat. In: Proceedings of the 2nd National Weed Science, 29 & 30 January, Mashhad, Iran. 1: 348-353. (In Persian with English Summary).

18. Hansen, W.R., and Shibles, R.M. 1987. Seasonal log of flowering and podding activity of yield-grown soybean. Agronomy Journal 70: 47-50.

19. Harris, D., Rashid, A., Hollington, P.A., Jasi, L., and Riches, C. 2002. Prospects of improving maize yields with on-farm seed priming, p. 180-185. In: N.P. Rajbhandari, J.K. Ransom, K. Adikhari, R.A.F. and E. Palme (Eds.). Sustainable Maize Production Systems for Nepal: Proceedings of a Maize Symposium held, Kathmandu, Nepal, December 3-5, 2001. Narc and Cimmyt.

20. Harvey, R.G. 1973. Relative phytotoxicity of dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Science 21: 517-520.

21. Hartwig, N.L., and Ammon, H.U. 2002. 50th Anniversary-invited article cover crops and living mulches. Weed Science 50: 688-699.

22. Hassanien, R.H.E., Hou, T.Z., Li, Y.F., and Li, B.M. 2014. Advances in effects of sound waves on plants. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 13(2): 335-348.

23. Johnson, G., and Hoverstad, T.R. 2002. Effect of row spacing and herbicide application timing on weed control and grain yield in corn (Zea mays L.). Weed Technology 16: 548-553.

24. Kaur, S., Gupta, A.K., and Kaur, N. 2005. Seed priming increases crop yield possibly by modulating enzymes of sucrose metabolism in chickpea. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 191: 81-87.

25. Khan, R.U., and Mumtaz, N.A. 1995. Performance of Treflan, a pre-plant applied herbicide in rapeseed and mustard. Sarhad Journal Agriculture 11(5): 647-655.

26. Koocheki, A., and Banayan Aval, M. 1994. Crops Yield Physiology. Mashhad Jehad Daneshgahi Press. 497 pp. (Translated in Persian).

27. Lipiec, J., Janas, P., and Barabasz, W. 2004. Effect of oscillating magnetic field pulses on the survival of selected microorganisms. International Agrophysics 18(4): 325-328.

28. Liu, J., Liu, G.S., Qi, D.M., Li, F.F., and Wang, E.H. 2002. Effect of PEG on germination and active oxygen metabolism in wild rye (Leymus chinensis) seeds. Acta Pratacult Sin 11(1): 59-64.

29. Lund, Z.F., Pearson, R.W., and Buchanan, G.A. 1970. An implanted soil mass technique to study herbicide effects on root growth. Weed Science 18: 229-281.

30. Mahzari, S., Baghestani, M.A., Omrani, M., and Rostami, R. 2013. Effect of application of different herbicides on weeds in garlic (Allium sativum L.) fields. 5th Iranian Weed Science Congress. Tehran University. P: 662-666. (In Persian with English Summary).

31. Makarian, H. 2002. Planting date and population density influence on competitiveness of corn (Zea mayz L.) with redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.). MSc. Thesis, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. pp. 67-69. (In Persian with English Summary).

32. Maleki-Farahani, S., and Fahiminejad, H. 2011. The effect of seed germination in common caraway (Carum carvi L.) and cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) before treatment with ultrasonic sources. Paper Abstracts of the 2nd Conference on Seeds. P: 258-261.

33. Marghaeizadeh, Gh., Gharineh, M.H., Fathi, Gh., Abdali, A.R., and Farbod, M. 2014. Effect of ultrasound waves and magnetic field on germination, growth and yield of Carum copticum (L.) (C.B. Clarke) in lab and field conditions. Iranian Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants 30(4): 539-560. (In Persian with English Summary).

34. Miri, H., and Rahimi, Y., 2009. Effects of combined and separate herbicide application on rapeseed and its weeds in southern Iran. International Journal Agriculture Biol 11: 257-260.

35. Mirshekari, B., Farahvash, F., Siyami, R., Hosseinzadeh Moghbeli, A., and Sotudeh Khiabani, A. 2013. Ultrasonic irradiation could increase germination and seedling vigor of common yarrow (Achillea millefolium), as a medicinal plant. Life Science Journal 10(5s): 302-305.

36. Moradbeygi, H., and Khara, J. 2011. The toxicity effects of Trifluralin on some of growth parameters and root colonization in mycorrhizal sunflower plants. National Conference on Climate Change and its Impact on Agriculture and the Environment. p: 1323-1328. (In Persian).

37. Moradi Dezfuli, P., Sharifzadeh, F., Bankesaz, A., and Janmohammadi, M. 2009. Effect of priming treatment and sowing date on synchronization of developmental stages and yield of maize inbred lines for hybrid seed production. Journal of Field Crop Production 1(4): 79-98. (In Persian with English Summary).

38. Nasiri Dehsorkhi, A., Makarian, H., and Neisi, A. 2015. The effect of seed priming and ultrasonic waves on germination and growth of cowpea (Vigna sinensis) under soil use of trifluralin herbicide. Novel Findings in Bio and Agricultural Sciences (NFBAS2015). Shahid Beheshi University, Tehran. P: 1-9. (In Persian).

39. Neisi, A., Gholami, A., and Nasiri Dehsorkhi, A. 2015. The effect of seed pre-treatment by salicylic acid on germination and seedling growth characteristics of maize (Zea mayz L.). Novel Findings in Bio and Agricultural Sciences (NFBAS2015). Shahid Beheshi University, Tehran. P: 1-6. (In Persian).

40. Neisi, A. 2015. The effects of tillage management and salicylic acid on agronomic characters and yield corn at mycorrhizal symbiosis condition. MSc. Thesis, University of Shahrood, pp. 64-68. (In Persian with English Summary).

41. Norsworthy, J.K., and Frederick, J.R. 2005. Integrated weed management strategies for maize production on the southeastern coastal of North America. Crop Protection 24: 119-126.

42. Pakmehr, A., Rastgoo, M., Shekari, F., Saba, J., Vazayefi, M., and Zangani, A. 2011. Effect of Salicylic acid priming on yield and yield components of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) under water deficit at reproductive stage. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research 2(1): 53-64. (In Persian).

43. Rajabian, S. 2013. Effect of ultrasonic waves and Pseudomonas bacteria on growth and yield of corn (Zea maize L.). MSc. Thesis, University of Shahrood, pp. 82-93. (In Persian with English Summary).

44. Ramezani, M.K., Sadri, A., and Ghanbari, A.A. 2002. Effect of row spacing and herbicides on weed control of bean. 15th Iranian Plant Protection Congress. p. 171. (In Persian).

45. Sabet Zangeneh, H., Alebrahim, M.T., Motie, B., and Mehdizadeh, M. 2014. Efficacy of pre-emergence herbicides and integrate them with hand weeding on weed control, yield and yield components of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.). Research in Crop Ecosystems 1(4): 95-103. (In Persian with English Summary).

46. Sadeghipour, O., and Ghaffari Khaligh, H. 2005. Effect of weeding and different herbicides on weed control in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). The 1st Iranian Pulses Symposium. 552-554. (In Persian).

47. Shakh, M.A., Ahmad, S., and Malin, N.A. 2006. Integrated weed management and its effect on the seed cotton yield in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) crops. Weed Science 12: 111-117.

48. Talbert, R.E. 1965. Effects of trifluralin on soybean root development. Proc. 18th Southern Weed Control Conference. p. 652.

49. Tewari, A.N., Tiwari, S.N., Rathi, J.P.S., Verama, R.N., and Tripathi, A.K. 2001. Crop weed competition studies in chickpea having Asphodelus tenuifolius-dominated weed community under rainfed condition. Indian Journal Weed Science 33:198-199.

50. Woolley, B.L., Michaels, T.E., Hall, M.R., and Swanton, C.J. 1993. The critical period of weed control in white bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Weed Science 41: 180-184.

51. Yadavi, A.R., Agha Alikhani, M., Ghalavand, A., and Zand, E. 2006. Effect of plant density and planting arrangement on grain yield and growth indices of corn under redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retoflexus L.) competition. Agriculture Research 6(3): 31-46. (In Persian with English Summary).

52. Yaldagard, M., Mortazavi, S.A., and Tabatabaie, F. 2008. Application of ultrasonic waves as a priming technique for accelerating and enhancing the germination of barley seed: optimization of method by the taguchi approach. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 114(1): 14-21.

53. Zand, E., Baghestani, M.A., Bitarafan, M., and Shimi, P. 2007. Guide of Herbicides In Iran & Management of Weed Resistance to Heabicides. Jahade Daneshgahi Mashhad Publishers. 66 pp. (In Persian).