Determination of Consumers'Preferences for Conventional, Healthy and Organic Cucumbers in Isfahan City Using Choice Experiment Method

مجله اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی

Article 4, Volume 29, Issue 2, July 2015, Pages 139-149   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jead2.v0i0.35158

Authors

A. Sandoghi¹; A.M. Amini¹; A. Yousefi^{* 2}

¹Isfahan University of Technology

²Department of Rural Development, Faculty of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology

Abstract

Introduction: Continuing growth in human population and consumptionmeans that the global demand for food will increase for at least another 40 years and that the world needs 70-100% more food by 2050. Environmental issues such as climate change, depletion of naturalresources and biodiversity loss increasingly threaten the welfare ofhuman civilization. Confronting these threats requires, among otherthings, behavioral changes in citizens, governments and companies.Farmers and other producers are responding to consumer concerns about pesticides by creating new marketing opportunities for products grown with environmentally sound practices. Environmental economists are increasingly interested in better understanding of how people cognitively organize their beliefs and attitudes towards environmental change in order to identify key motives and barriers that stimulate or prevent action.The purpose of the presentinvestigation is to evaluate the consumers’ preferences and factors affecting their choice for conventional, healthy and organic cucumbers in Isfahan, Iran.
Materials and Methods: Data were collected on a sample of 230consumers in 2013 by using the proportionate stratification samplingmethod through face-to-face interviews based on a comprehensive structured questionnaire. Before the survey, the reliability and validity of the questionnaire were initially evaluated in a pre-test study, respectively, by using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) criteria. Individual preferences were uncovered in choice experiment method (CEM) by a contingent ranking experiment. In a contingent ranking experiment, respondents are required to rank a set of alternative options, characterized by a number of attributes, which are offered at different levels across the options.Data were analyzed by multinomial logit models. The approach consists of modeling utility, that isto say the net benefit a consumer obtains from selecting a specificproduct in a choice situation.Determining and arranging selected sets based on a review of studies and theoretical basis design scenarios of the experiment method, includes environmental characteristics, taste, appearance, price, duration of storage, the disease and the long-term complications.
Results and Discussion: Most of the respondents were female, with average age of 41.6 years, academic education level (39.5%) and the average monthly income of 9,760 thousand Rials. The results show that 77.1%, 12.4% and 10.1% of consumers, respectively selected the healthy, organic and conventional crops as a first choice. Moreover, the consumer's awareness towards healthy food products is low. According to the logistic regression results, the most important factors affecting the consumers' healthier choices are income, consumer knowledge about the characteristics of healthy and organic crops, the level of consumer’s attitudes toward the importance of environmental protection and human health and having an elderly or sick member in the household. On the other hand, healthy shopping concern, age, gender, employment status and education have no significant impact on the consumer’s selection. In other words, the likelihood of choosing healthy and organic products is more in people who care about their health and nutritional status, as well as with more health consciousness, environmental concerns and knowledge regarding the risks of pesticides and characteristics of free of pesticide fruit and vegetables.
Conclusion: There is no difference between academic and non-academic respondent’s preferences for healthy crops, because of no general academic courses on the importance of environmental protection, healthy shopping, production and consumption of healthy and organic products in Iran'seducationalsystem.Moreover, attitude and awareness play fundamental rolesin consumers' preferences.Willingness to pay for healthy food products in women is observed to be more than men. This could be due to the fact that housewives have more leisure time than men to make themselves aware.Also in most families buying and cooking raw materials is one of women's responsibilities which enables them to be more cautious in selecting foods. Knowing the characteristics of healthy and organic cropsis one of the most important factors in choosing and purchasing these products. Since the elderly and ill people need more feeding care and have less resistance to harmful additives and preservatives in food products, their families are more willing to buy free of chemicals fruits and vegetables. Promoting the consumers awareness toward the benefits of healthy products could change their attitude about the importance of maintaining health and subsequently improve public health and the environment.Furthermore, it is necessary to adopt thestandardsin the process of healthy crop production and to monitor andto strengthenthe marketing system of healthy products such as guaranteeing labeling and appropriatepackaging.

Keywords

Consumer Preferences; Multinomial logit; Contingent ranking; Healthy and organic crops; Isfahan

References

1- Almli V. L., Ovrum A., Hersleth M., Almoy T., and Nas T. 2015. Investigation individual preference in rating and ranking conjoint experiment: a case study on semi-hard cheese. Food Quality and Preference, 39: 28-39.

2- Berimnezhad V., and Hoshmandan A. 2013. Determine the willingness to pay to buy healthy vegetables by the citizens of Tehran. Journal of Agricultural Economic Researches, 18(5):131-150. (in Persian with English abstract)

3- BeedellJ., and Rehman T. 2000. Using social-psychology models to understand farmers’ conservation behavior. Journal of Rural Studies, 16: 117-127.

4- BoccalettiS., and Nardella M. 2000. Consumer willingness to pay for pesticide-free fresh fruit and vegetables in Italy. International Food and Agribusiness Management, 3: 297-310.

5- Boxall P., Cash S.,WismerW.,Muralidharan V.,and Annett L. 2007. The role of sensory experiences and information on willingness to pay for organic wheat bread. No. 7712. Consumer and Market Demand Network Papers, Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology,University of Alberta.

6- CranfieldJ.,andMagusson E. 2003. Consumer demand for pesticide-free food produces in Canada: A probit analysis. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 53: 67-81.

7- Carlsson F., andMartinsson P.2001. Do Hypothetical and Actual Marginal Willingness to Pay Differ in Choice Experiments? Application to the Valuation of the Environment. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2: 179–192.

8- Dipeolu A., Philip B., Aiyelaagbe I., Akinbode S., and Adedokun T. 2009. Consumer awareness and willingness to pay for organic vegetables in S.W. Nigeria. Asian. The Journal of Agriculture and Environment, 2: 57-65

9- Garsia J. 2015. Willingness to pay for organic and fairtrad certified yellow chili peppers. British Food Journal, 117: 929-942.

10- Hanley N., Wright R.E., and Adamowicz V. 1998. Using choice experiments to value the environment. Environmental Resources and Economics, 11: 413-428.

11- Haghjou M., Hayati B., and Pishbahar A. 2012. Factors Effecting Consumers’ Knowledge about Safe Food Products in Tabriz City. P. 1375-1387. Proceedings of the 8th Biennial Conference on Iranian Agricultural Economics, 9-10 May. 2012. Shiraz, Iran. (in Persian with English abstract)

12- Hanley N., Mourato S., and Wright R.E. 2001. Choice Modeling Approaches: A Superior Alternative for Environmental Valuation. Journal of Economic Surveys, 3: 435-462.

13- Hayati B., Pishbahar A., and Haghjou M. 2011. Analysis of the determinants of consumers willing to pay extra for fruit and vegetables free of pesticides in the city of Marand. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 25 (4): 469-479.(in Persian)

14- Kamphuis C.B., Bekker-Grob E.W., and Lenthe F.J. 2015. Factors affecting food choices of older adults from high and low socioeconomic groups: a discrete choice experiment. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 4:768-774.

15- Kochaki A., Mansouri H., Ghorbani M., and Rajabzadeh M. 2013. Factors affecting willingness to consume organic products in city Mashhad. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 27(3): 188-194. .(in Persian)

16- Louviere J.J., Hensher D.A., and SwaitJ. D. 2000. Stated choice methods: analysis and applications. University Press,Cambridge.

17- Loureiro M., Jill J., and Mccluskey R. 2002. Will consumers pay a premium for eco-labeled apples?. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 36: 20–21.

18- Long J.S.,andFreese J.2006. Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata.Stata Press, USA.

19- Mahdavi D. A., Mahmoudi H., Liyaghati H., and Kochaki A. 2008. Introduction to Organic Farming (Bio). Publications SID, Mashhad.

20- MahmoudiH., and Mahdavi D.A. 2009. Organic agriculture in Iran, Environmental Science Research Institute (ESRI),Shahid-Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

21- Mazzanti M. 2003. Discrete choice models and valuation experiments. Journal of Economic Studies, 6: 584-604.

22- Merino A. 2005. Eliciting consumers preferences using stated preference discrete choice models: contingent ranking versus choice experiment.Working Papers, Research Center on Health and Economics705, Department of Economics and Business, UniversitatPompeuFabra.

23- Ngigi M. W., Okello J.J., Lagerkvist C.J., Karanja N., and Mburu J.G. 2010. Assessment of developing-country urban consumers’ willingness to pay for quality of leafy vegetables: The case of middle and high income consumers in Nairobi, Kenya. Proceedings of the 3rd African Association of Agricultural Economics, AAEA/ AEASA Conference, 19-23 September. 2010.Cape Town, South Africa.

24- Rodriguez E., Lacaze V., and Lupin B. 2007. Willingness to pay for organic food in Argentina: Evidence from a consumer survey. Proceeding ofthe 105th EAAE Seminar, 8–10 Jul. 2007. Bologna, Italy.

25- Sharma A. 2005. A Handbook of Organic Farming. Agrobios,India.

26- Schobesberger R.B., Darnhofer I., Suthichai S., and Vogl C. 2007. Consumer perception of organic foods in Bangkok, Thiland, Journal of Food Policy, 33: 112-121.

27- WangQ. and Sun J. 2003. Consumer preference and demand for organic food: Evidence from a Vermont survey. American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Montreal, Canada.

28- Wu L., Yin S., Xu Y., and Zhu D. 2014. Effectiveness of china's organic food certification policy: consumer preferences for infant milk formula with different organic certification labels. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 4: 545-568.

29- Yahaya I. 2011. Measuring consumers’ willingness to pay for safer vegetables in urban and peri-urban Ghana. PhD dissertation. Department of Agricultural Economics, Agribusiness and Extension, Kwame Nkrumah University.

30- Yiridoe E. K., Bonti-Ankomah S., and Martin R.C. 2005. Comparison of consumer perceptions and preference toward organic versus conventionally produced foods: a review and update of the literature. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 20: 193-205.