Examination and Analysis of the Effects of Information and Communication Technology on Social Identity of the Youth Living in Meshgin Shahr City

جغرافیاوتوسعه ناحیه ای

Article 11, Volume 16, Issue 2 - Serial Number 31, March 2019, Pages 271-300   

Document Type: scientific-research article

DOI: 10.22067/geography.v16i2.75526

Author

Vakil Heidari Sarban^*

University of Mohaghegh Ardabili

Abstract

Extended Abstract

Introduction

Information and communication technology is not bound by geographical borders; it transforms and revolutionizes social constructs across human settlements such as cities and villages. This technology alters various lifestyles, and expands and deepens the effectiveness of social interactions in rural societies while replacing traditional identities with modern ones. Since a considerable number of rural residents, particularly the youth, use modern information and communication technologies for pastime, they are influenced by a set of values promoted through such technologies. In this study, the effects of information and communication technology on social identity of rural youth are discussed and examined.

Review of Literature

There are two perspectives employed in this study. I In the first view, information and communication technology is regarded as a process transforming mindsets and objectivity by embracing all aspects of life. By integrating the world organically and changing it to a larger, more unified collective (i.e. the bigger “us”), this technology results in various cultures to become more inclined towards being adapted to one another. Yet, according to the other perspective, there is a purpose behind the expansion of information and communication technology. Meanwhile, the West seeks to rule the information realm and dominate other countries by exploiting different technologies, especially digital and satellite communication technologies and offering them to other countries through cultural homogenization and value integration, the West is promoting its transcendental culture across countries. These two perspectives are employed in order to provide explanations for the research questions.

Method

The present inquiry is a descriptive-analytical survey study with development purposes. In this study, data collection was done using surveys (primary data) and library studies (secondary data). The instruments used were questionnaires and interviews. The total population of the study included the entire young residents of villages with ICT offices around Meshgin Shahr city. Of 49 villages with ICT offices, 14 were selected using random sampling. Accordingly, the total population of the study was 9942 individuals out of whom 370 were selected as the sample population using simple random sampling. On the other hand, 370 residents of rural areas with no ICT offices were also selected as the control group. Raw data were collected in order to measure the indices through interviews, observations, questionnaires, and library documents.

Results and Discussion

During the past decades, rural regions have been witnessing significant transformations by shifting to modernity which follows developments initiated by expanded social communications and increased interaction of rural residents with individuals outside rural societies. Therefore, it is the duty of authorities in the area of rural development to pay special attention to these social changes caused by the expansion of modern communication technologies in their planning.
In this study, social identity was examined according to the geographical aspects of villages with and without information and communication technologies. To this end, first the findings were described and then explained. To assess the significance of variables, Mann–Whitney U test was employed. According to the results of this test, the villages with ICT offices enjoyed more religious, national, collective, and gender identities as compared to the villages without ICT, except for family and individual identities.

Conclusion and Suggestions

The results of the study showed a positive relation between national identity and gender identity variables at 1% error. According to this relation, the more youngsters use such technologies, the more their social identities shift towards transformation and modernization. Moreover, a significant difference at 5% error was observed between the villages with and without ICT offices in terms of religious and collective identities. In addition, no significant difference was observed between these two types of villages in terms of family and individual identities. Ultimately, given the findings of this study, it is worth pointing out the necessity to take certain steps in line with enforcing the local culture and social empowerment of the youth living in Meshgin Shahr rural areas. It is also essential to enhance their cognitive capacities and utilize various sources of knowledge on culture so as to promote and protect positive elements of the rural culture, particularly for the youth living in the region of the study. This can prevent identity and the meaning crisis and enable identity restoration. It is essential that religious conventions as well as the traditions and customs of Meshgin Shahr rural youth be protected and that sufficient information should be offered so that these conventions can be internalized.

Keywords

information and communication technology (ICT); social identity; rural youth; Rural Development; Meshkinshar County

References

1. پیری، ر؛ نعمتی، ف؛ صیدی، م. (1389). نگرش و گرایش مردم ایلام به کارکرد برنامه‌های شبکه‌های ماهواره‌ای. نخستین کنگرة ملی فضای مجازی و آسیب‌های اجتماعی نوپدید.13 اردیبهشت. تهران، وزارت تعاون، کار و رفاه اجتماعی، صص. 152- 103.

2. تاجیک، م. (1382). روشنفکر ایرانی و معمای هویت ملی. مطالعات ملی،(5)، 176-159.

3. جنکینز، ر. (1381)، هویت اجتماعی. (ترجمه، ت. یاراحمدی). تهران: نشر و پژوهش شیرازه.

4. جونز، ا. (1391). نظریه‌ پردازان بزرگ جهانی شدن. ( ترجمه، م. کرباسیان و ه. هاودیس یانس). تهران: نشر چشمه.

5. حسین زاده، ع. ح؛ شجراوی، م.(1392). بررسی تأثیر میزان و نوع استفاده از ماهواره بر هویت اجتماعی، ملی و دینی جوانان. فصل‌نامة دانش انتظامی استان خوزستان، 5، 32- 13.

6. حیدری ساربان، و. (1392). بررسی رابطة گردشگری با هویت اجتماعی جوانان روستایی شهرستان اردبیل، مطالعة موردی: دهستان سردابه. برنامه‌ریزی و توسعه گردشگری، 5 (19)، 152-‌130.

7. حیدری ساربان، و. (1394). نقش فن‌آوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات در توسعة اجتماعی مناطق روستایی (مطالعة موردی: شهرستان مشگین شهر). فصل‌نامة مطالعات توسعة اجتماعی- فرهنگی، (2)4، 101-85.

8. رابرتسون، ی. (1372). درآمدی بر جامعه. ( ترجمه، ح. بهروان( . مشهد: آستان قدس رضوی.

9. رفعت جاه، م؛ شکوری، ع. (1388). اینترنت و هویت اجتماعی. مجلة جهانی رسانه، (5)، 65-55.

10. سوزانی، ف؛ کلانتری، خ؛ اسدی، ع. (1391). بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر استفادة روستاییان از خدمات فن‌آوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات (مطالعة موردی: روستاییان بخش مرکزی شهرستان نجف آباد). فصل‌نامة پژوهش‌های روستایی، (3)2، 49-21.

11. کاستلز، م. (1382). عصر اطلاعات: اقتصاد، جهان و فرهنگ (قدرت هویت). جلد دوم. (ترجمه، ح. چاووشیان). تهران: طرح نو.

12. گل محمدی، ا. (1393). جهانی شدن فرهنگ، هویت. تهران: انتشارات نشر نی.

13. گیدنز، آ. (1384). چشم‌اندازهای جهانی. (ترجمه، م. ر، جلایی‌پور). تهران: انتشارات طرح نو.

14. محسنی، ع؛ جوانمردی، ع. (1390). بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر شکل‌گیری هویت اجتماعی-فرهنگی (مورد مطالعه: دانش آموزان شهرستان جوانمرد). فصل‌نامة تحقیقات سیاسی و بین المللی، (1)9، 91-83.

15. محمدبخش، ب؛ حبی، ا؛ قریشی، ف. (1390). جهانی شدن و هویت ملی دانشجویان دانشگاه تبریز. فصل‌نامة رفاه اجتماعی، (43)11، 34-7 .

16. مصطفوی، ش. ا. (1382). مبانی فلسفی جهانی شدن. رسالة دکتری چاپ‌نشدة فلسفه. دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران. ایران.

17. مقدس، ع. ا؛ و خواجه نوری، ب. (1384). جهانی شدن و تغییر هویت اجتماعی زنان (بررسی موردی دو شهر شیراز و استهبان). مطالعات زنان، (7)، 32-5.

18. مولایی هشتجین، ن؛ مرادی، و؛ محمدی، م. (1391). نقش فن آوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات (ICT) در توسعة پایدار روستایی، شهرستان مشگین شهر. فصل‌نامة پژوهش‌های جغرافیای انسانی، (4)4، 168-147.

19. هابرماس، ی. (1389). جهانی‌شدن و آیندة دموکراسی: منظومة پساملی. (ترجمه، ک. پولادی). تهران: نشر مرکز.

20. وودز، م. (1990). جغرافیای روستایی؛ فرایندها، واکنش‌ها و تجربه‌های بازساخت روستایی. (ترجمه، م. ر، رضوانی و ف. صامت). تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.

21. Alberto, C. (2013). The secret adventures of order: Globalization, education and transformative social justice learning. New York: Routledge.

22. Alston, M. (2007). Globalization, rural restructuring and health service delivery in Australia: Policy failure and the role of social work? Health and Social Care in the Community, 15(3), 195-202.

23. Amin, S. (1996). The challenge of globalization. Review of International Political Economy, 3(2), 216-219.

24. Bauman, Z. (2000). From pilgrim to tourist or a short history of identity. In S. Hall & P. Du Gay (Eds.), Questions of cultural identity (pp. 1-17). London: Sage Publications.

25. Berman, S. L., You, Y., Schwartz, S., Teo, G., & Mochizuki, K. (2014), Identity exploration, commitment, and distress: A cross national investigation in China, Taiwan, Japan, and the United States. Child Youth Care Forum, 40(8), 65-75.

26. Berry, J. W. (2008). ICT and acculturation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32(8), 328-336.

27. Bhat, M. A., & Rather, T. A. (2012). Socio-economic factors and mental health of young people in India and China: An elusive link with globalization. Asian Social Work and Policy Review, 6(11), 1-22.

28. Castells, M. (1996). The rise of network the society. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

29. Cheng, M., Briones, E., Caycedo, C., & Berman, S. (2012, May). ICT and identity among Chinese, Colombian, and American college students. Poster session presented at the 12th biennial meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence (SRA), Chicago, IL.

30. Coposescu, S. (2012). Defining identity in the context of globalization. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov, 2(51), 112-123.

31. Cupples, J. (2013). Rethinking electoral geography: Spaces and practices of democracy in Nicaragua. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 34(1), 110-124.

32. Deng, N. (2010). On the national literature’s tactics in the globalization’s language environment. Journal of Human Institute of Humanities, Science and Technology, 1(5), 39-41.

33. Dicken, P. (2011). Global shift mapping the changing contours of the world economy (5th ed.). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

34. Dunn, R.G. (1998). Identity crises, a social critique of post modernity, Minneapolis. London: University of Minnesota Press.

35. Edensor, T. (2002). National identity, popular culture and everyday life. Oxford: Berg.

36. Friedman, T. L. (2000). The Lexus and the olive tree. New York: Farrar.

37. Giddens, A. (1991). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press

38. Held, D. (2000). Global transformation. London/New York: Open University Rutledge Press.

39. Howes, D. (2000). Cross-cultural consumption: Global markets, local realities. London: Rutledge.

40. Huntingtion, S. (1992). The clash of civilization. Foreign Affairs, 32(3), 22-79.

41. Jensen, L. A., Arnett, J. J., & McKenzie, J. (2011). ICT and cultural identity. In S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, & V. L. Vignoles (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 285-301). New York, NY: Springer.

42. Kroger Kroger, J., Martinussen, M., & Marcia, J. E. (2010). Identity status change during adolescence and young adulthood: A meta-analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 33(5), 683-698

43. Legrain, P. (2002). Open world: The truth about globalization, economies. New York: Diane Publishing Company.

44. Levitt, T. (1983). The globalization of markets. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 92-102.

45. Livesey, C. (2008). Culture and identity: Sociological pathways. Journal of Sociology. http://www.sociology.org.uk/pathway2.htm

46. Marsden, T. (1999). Rural futures: The consumption countryside and its regulation, European Society for Rural Sociology, 4(39), 1-50.

47. Pieterse, J. (2005). Globalization and culture: Global melange. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

48. Rafatjah, M., & Shakori, A. (2010). Internet and social identity. Global Media Journal, 5(1), 55-65.

49. Robertson, R. (1998). Globalization and ICT: Social theory and global culture. London: Sage Publications.

50. Sasaki, M. (2004). Globalization and national identity in Japan. International Journal of Japanese Sociology, 13(8), 69-87.

51. Schaeffer, R. K. (2003). Understanding globalization: The social consequences of political, economic, and environmental change. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

52. Scholte, J. (2005). Globalisation: A critical introduction. Basingstoke / New York, NY: Sage Publication

53. Smith, C. (2009). A developmental achievement and behavior in African American children. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 15(2), 145-157.

54. Smith, P. (2010, March). Globalization, citizenship and technology: The MAI meets the Internet. Paper presented at the 41st annual convention of the international studies association Los Angeles, USA.

55. Souday, G., & Kunda, G. (2005). The Local selves of global workers: The social construction of national identity in the face of organizational globalization, in “organization studies”. American Journal of industrial and Business Management, 21(6), 1073-1096.

56. Tomlinson, J. (2000). Globalization and culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

57. Veltmeyer, H. (2010). Development and globalization as imperialism. Canadian Journal of Development Studies, 26(1), 89-106.

58. Verstappen, H. T. (2011). Geography, sustainability and the concept of globalization. Investigations Geograficas, Boletin del Instituto de Geografia, UNAM, Num, 5(70), 106-113.

59. Woods, M. (1990). Rural geography, process, reactions, and the experience of rural reconstruction (M. R. Rezvani & F. Samet, Trans.). Tehran: Tehran University Press.