بررسی تأثیر کاربرد زئولیت و پتاسیم بر برخی از صفات و عملکرد نخود(Cicer arietinum L.) در مدیریت‌های مختلف آبیاری

پژوهش‌های حبوبات ایران

مقاله 8، دوره 9، شماره 2، خرداد 1397، صفحه 114-125   

نوع مقاله: مقالات پژوهشی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/ijpr.v9i2.61250

نویسندگان

سوده ملکی^{* 1}؛ علی نخ‌زری ‌مقدم¹؛ سید حسین صباغ‌پور²؛ عباسعلی نوری‌نیا³؛ حسین صبوری¹

¹دانشگاه گنبد کاووس

²مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی همدان

³مرکز تحقیقات کشاورزی گرگان

چکیده

به‌منظور بررسی اثر سطوح مختلف آبیاری و مصرف مقادیر مختلف زئولیت و پتاسیم بر عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد نخود رقم آزاد، آزمایشی در سال زراعی 94-1393 در ایستگاه تحقیقات کشاورزی همدان به‌صورت اسپلیت ‌فاکتوریل در قالب بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار انجام شد. تیمارهای آزمایش شامل رژیم رطوبتی در چهار سطح (شرایط دیم (بدون آبیاری)، آبیاری در مرحله گل‌دهی، آبیاری در مرحله غلاف­دهی و آبیاری هم در مرحله گل­دهی و هم غلاف­دهی) به‌عنوان عامل اصلی و ترکیب تیماری مقدار زئولیت در سه سطح شامل 0، 15 و 30 تن در هکتار و مقدار پتاسیم در سه سطح شامل 0، 100 و 200کیلوگرم در هکتار (از منبع سولفات ‌پتاسیم) به‌عنوان عامل فرعی بود. نتایج نشان داد که سطوح مختلف آبیاری، زئولیت و پتاسیم تأثیر معنی‌داری بر پرولین، غلظت پتاسیم دانه، پروتئین، میزان کلروفیل در زمان گلدهی و پرشدن دانه، عملکرد دانه، وزن بوته داشتند. اثر متقابل آبیاری و زئولیت در تمامی صفات به‌جز بر میزان کلروفیل در زمان پرشدن دانه معنی‌دار بود. در این بررسی بالاترین عملکرد دانه از آبیاری در مرحله گل‌دهی و غلاف‌دهی و مصرف 30 تن زئولیت در هکتار به‌دست آمد. با مصرف پتاسیم عملکرد دانه از 8 تا 13درصد افزایش یافت، به‌طوری که با مصرف 200کیلوگرم پتاسیم عملکرد دانه به 1243کیلوگرم در هکتار رسید. نتایج بررسی نشان داد که مرحله گل‌دهی حساس‌ترین مرحله به کمبود آب است و مصرف زئولیت و پتاسیم در شرایط تنش می‌تواند با تعدیل خسارات ناشی از تنش خشکی، اثر مثبتی بر عملکرد دانه داشته باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

پتاسیم؛ رژیم‌های آبیاری؛ زئولیت؛ صفات کیفی

مراجع

1. Ahmadi, A., and Bikr, D.A. 2000. Stomatal and nonstomatal militants of photosynthesis under water stress conditions in wheat plant. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science 31: 813-826. (In Persian with English Summary).

2. Ahmadi Mousavi, A., Manouchehri Kalantari, Kh., and Torkzade, M .2005. Effect a kind of berasinoestroeed on Malondealdeid, proline, chlorophyll in drought stress. Biology Journal 4: 259-267. (In Persian with English Summary).

3. Alexieva, V., Sergiev, I., Mapelli, S., and Karanove, E. 2001. The effect of drought and ultraviolet radiation on growth and stress markers in pea and wheat. Journal of Plant Cell Environment 24: 1337-1344.

4. Almodares, A., Hadi, M.R., Ranjbar, M., and Taheri, R. 2007. The effect of nitrogen treatments, cultivars and harvest stages on stalk yield and sugar content in sweet sorghum: Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 6 (2): 423-426.

5. Amiri Dehahmadi, S.R., Parsa, M., and Ganjali, A. 2010. The effect of drought stress at different phonological stages on morphological traits and yield components of chickpea under greenhouse conditions. Bimonthly Iranian Journal of Field Crop Research 8(1): 157-166. (In Persian with English Summary).

6. Asilan, K. 2016. Effect of water deficit stress on soluble sugars, proline, protein and chlorophyll content in Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) hybrids. Iranian Journal of Filed Crop Science 47(2): 175-184. (In Persian with English Summary).

7. Bahador, M., Ebdali Mashhadi, A., Siadat, A., Fathi, G., and Lotfi Jalalabadi, A. 2016. Effect of zeolite and seed priming on nitrogen, chlorophyll and seed yield of grass pea. Journal of Plant Process and Function 4(11): 137-147. (In Persian).

8. Bates, I., Waldern, R.P., and Teare, I.D. 1973. Rapid determination of free Proline for water stress studies. Journal of Plant and Soil 39: 205-207.

9. Beiknejad, S., Azizi, M., Rameh, V., and Afzali, M. 2013. Effect of potassium and Mg on yield and yield component of soybean. (Abstract). In: Abstract Book of the 11th Iranian Crop Science Congress. September 2013. Shahid Beheshti Agricultural Organization. p. 3035. (In Persian).

10. Chehelgerdi, A., Saffari, M., and Abdolshahi, R. 2015. Effect of super absorbent polymer, potassium sulphate and farmyard manure on physiological characteristics of millet (Setaria italic L.) under optimum irrigation and drought stress conditions. Journal of Crop Production 7(2): 43-60. (In Persian with English Summary).

11. Daneshian, J., Majidi Hrvan, A., and Jonoubi, P. 2002. The effect of drought stress and different amounts of potassium on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of soybean. Journal of Agriculture Sciences 8(1): 108-95. (In Persian).

12. Dogounchi, A., Biabani, A., Sabouri, H., Gholizadeh, A., Esmaeeli, M., Romani, A., and Jaafarzadeh, M. 2016. Effect of zeolite and urea manure with azospirillum on yield on yield and yield of components of wheat. Journal of Agricultural Research, Education and Extension organization 1(1): 41-53. (In Persian).

13. Domadar Reddy, D., Subba, A., and Rupa, T. R. 2000. Effect of continuous use of cattle manure and fertilizer phosphorus on crop yield and soil organic in a vertical. Journal of Bioresearch Technology 75: 113-118.

14. Fanaee, H.R., Galavi, M., Kafi, M., Ghanbari, A., and Shirani Rad, A. 2010. Effect of potassium fertilization and irrigation on yield and water use efficiency of canola and Indian mustard species (B. napus. L. and B. juncea L.). Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science 11(3): 273-291. (In Persian with English Summary).

15. Ganjeali, A., and Nezami, A. 2008. Ecophysiology and Yield Barriers in Pulse Crops. In: M. Parsa and Bagheri A. (Eds.). Pulses. Jehad Daneshgahi Mashhad Publisher. (In Persian).

16. Ghazavi, R. 2015. The application effects of natural zeolite on soil runoff, soil drainage and some chemical soil properties in arid land area. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies 13(1): 172-177.

17. Ghorbanli, M., and Niyakan, M. 2005. Effect of drought stress on protein, proline, phenol and nitrate redoctas anzyme in soybean (gorgane 3). Oloom Journal of Tarbiat Moalem University 1: 537-551. (In Persian with English Summary).

18. Hayati, A., Ramroudi, M., and Galavi, M. 2012. Effect of timing of potassium application on Millet (Setaria italica L.) yield and grain protein content in different irrigation regimes. Journal of Crop Production and Processing 1(2): 35-44. (In Persian with English Summary).

19. Heidari, M., and Asgharipour, M.R. 2012. Effect of potassium sulphate on yield and component yield of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) under drought stress. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 10(2): 374-381. (In Persian).

20. Imanzadeh, B., Yarnia, M., and RahimzadehKhoiy, F. 2014. Effect of soil use and spraying of potassium sulfate and different irrigation intervals on grain related trains in maize 704 in Khoda Afarin. Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences 4(3): 92-100.

21. Kafi, M., Borzouei, A., Salehi, M., Kamandi, A., Masoomi, A., and Nabati, J. 2009. Physiology of environmental stresses in plants. Jihad Daneshgahi of Mashhad Publishers. 504 pp.

22. Khodami, S., Shirani Rad, A.H., Delkhosh, B., and NoorMohamadi, Gh. 2013. Effect of different potassium levels and different humidity conditions, in the use of zeolite and disuse zeolite in safflower. Annals of Biological Research 4(8): 56-60.

23. Krouma, A. 2010. Plant water relations and photosynthetic activity in three Tunisian chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotype subjected to drought. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 34 (3): 257-264.

24. Malakouti, M.J., and Homaee, M. 2005. Soil Fertility of Arid and Semi-Arid Regions "Difficulties and Solutions". 2nd, ed. Tarbiat Modarres University Publishers. 435 pp.

25. Mirzaee, M.R., and Rezvani, M. 2006. Effect of water deficit on quality of sugar beet at different growth stages. Agronomy Journal (Pajouhesh & Sazandegi) 23(1): 29-42. (In Persian(.

26. Mirzakhani, M., Hemmati, Z., Sajedi, A. 2015. Response agronomic and physiologic wheat traits to drought stress and application of zeolite. Journal of Agronomy Research in Iran 13(1): 173-183. (In Persian with English Summary).

27. Mollavaly, M., Bolandnazar, S., and Tabatabai, S.J. 2009. The effect of different amounts of ammonium nitrate and potassium sulfate growth characteristics and yield of onion. Journal of Agriculture Science 19(2): 227-239. (In Persian with English Summary).

28. Momeni, F., Ghobadi, M., Jalali, S., and Shekari, P. 2015. Response of physiolgical characteristics of chickpea to Zinc and Potassium in irrigation and rainfed condition. Journal of Plant Physiology. 3(9): 71-83. (In Persian with English Summary).

29. Mottaghi, M., Najafiyan, G., and Bihamta, M.R. 2009. Effect of terminal drought stress on grain yield and baking quality of hexapoloid wheat genotype. Iranian Journal of Crop Science 11(3): 290-306. (In Persian with English Summary).

30. Naseri, R., Siyadat, S.A., Soleymanifard, A., Soleymani, R., and Khosh Khabar, H. 2011. Effect of planting date and density on yield, yield components and protein content of three chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars under rainfed conditions in Ilam province. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research 2(2): 7-18. (In Persian with English Summary).

31. Naseri, R., Rahimi, M.J., Siyadat, S.A., and Mirzaei, A. 2015. The effects of supplementary irrigation and different plant densities on morphological traits, yield and its components and protein content of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in Sirvan region in Ilam province. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research 6(1): 78-91. (In Persian with English Summary).

32. Nasri, M. 2015. Effect of zinc foliar, potassium elements and irrigation terms of concentrations of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in grain and some quantitative characteristics of corn (KSC704). International Journal of Biosciences 6(2): 15-23. (In Persian with English Summary).

33. Nayyar, H., and Gupta, D. 2006. Differential sensitivity of C3 and C4 plants to water deficit stress: association with oxidative stress and antioxidants. Environmental and Experimental Botany 58: 106-113.

34. Nazarli, H., Zardashti, M.R., Darvishzadeh, R., and Najafi, S. 2010. The effect of water stress and polymer on water use efficiency, yield and several morphological traits of sunflower under greenhouse condition. Notulace Scientia Biologicae 2(4): 53-58. (In Persian).

35. NiariKhamssi, N., Ghassemi Golezani, K., ZehtabSalmasi, S., and Najaphy, A. 2010. Effect of water deficit stress on field performance of chickpea cultivars. African Journal of Agriculture Research 5(15): 1973-1977.

36. Oneill, P.M., Shanahan, J.F., and Schepers, J.S. 2006. Use chlorophyll florescence assessments to differentiate corn hybrid respond to variable water conditions Journal of Crop Science 46(2): 681-687.

37. Pirdashti, H., Tahmasebi-Sarvestani, Z., and Bahmanyar, A. 2009. Comparison of physiological responses among four contrast rice cultivars under drought stress conditions. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 49: 52-54.

38. Pirzad, A., Shakiba, M.R., Zehtab-Salmasi, S., Mohammadi, S.A., Darvishzadeh, R., and Samadi, A. 2011. Effect of water stress on leaf relative water content, chlorophyll, proline and soluble carbohydrates in (Matricaria chamomilla L.). Journal of Medicinal Plants Research 5(12): 2483-2488.

39. Prez-Cabalero, R., Gill, J., Benitez, C., and Gonzalez, J.L. 2008. The effect of adding zeolite to soils in order to improve the N-K nutrition of olive trees. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science 2(1): 321-324.

40. Rabbani, J., and Emam, Y. 2011. Yield response of maiz hybrids to drought stress at different growth stages. Journal of Crop Production and Processing 1(2): 65-78. (In Persian with English Summary).

41. Sabaghpour, S.H., Sadeghi. E., and Malhotra, R.S. 2003. Present status and future prospects of chickpea cultivation in Iran. (Abstract). In: Abstract Book of the International Chickpea Conference January 20-22, 2003. Indira Gandhi Agicultural University, Raipur Chhattisgarh, India.p. 436-443.

42. Sabaghpour, S.H. 2015. Strategic Framework for Food Legume Research. Nashar and Entesharat Organization. 417pp.

43. Sanchez, F.J., Manzanares, M., Andres, E.F., Tenorio, J.L., and Ayerbe, L. 1998. Turgor maintenance, osmotic adjustment and soluble sugar and proline accumulation in 49 pea cultivars in response to water stress. Journal of Field Crop Research 59: 225-235.

44. Serraj, R., and Sinclair, T.R. 2002. Osmolyte accumulation: can it really help increase crop yield under drought conditions? Plant Cell Environment 25: 333-341.

45. Siva Nageswara Rao, D., Naidu, D., and Ashoka Rani, Y. 2015. Effect of foliar nutrition on antioxident enzymes, photosynthetic rate, dry matter production and yield of Mung Bean under receding soil moisture condition. International Journal of Pure & Applied Bioscience 3(1): 115-123.

46. Thalooth, A.T., Tawfik, M.M., and Magda Mohamed, H. 2006. A comparative study on the effect of foliar application of zinc, potassium and magnesium on growth, yield and some chemical constituents of Mung Bean plants grown under water stress conditions. World Journal of Agriculture Sciences 2(1): 37-46.

47. Valadabadi, S.A.R., Aliabadi Farahani, H., and Khalvati, M.A. 2009. Evaluation of grain growth of corn and sorghum under K2O application and irrigation according. Asian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 1: 19-24.

48. Zaferanieh, M., Nezami, A., Parsa, M., Porsa, H., and Bagheri A. 2010. Evaluation of fall sowing of cold tolerant chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) germplasms under complementary irrigation in Mashhad condition: 2- Yield and yield components. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Research 7(2): 483-492. (In Persian with English Summary).