Geology, mineralogy and geochemistry of Koodakan 2 prospecting area, South of Birjand, East of Lut Block

زمین شناسی اقتصادی

Article 8, Volume 11, Issue 2 - Serial Number 21, 2019, Pages 339-355   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/econg.v11i2.66238

Authors

somayeh Samiee; Sedigheh Zirjanizadeh^*

University of Gonabad

Abstract

Introduction
The study area is located in 180 kilometers at the South of the city of Birjand and at 4 kilometers North of the Qhaleh-Zari mine, within the Central Lut Block. According to Stocklin and Nabavi (1973), the Lut Block (Eastern Iran) extends over 900 km in a north-south trend and is 200 km wide in an East-West direction. It is confined by the Nayband fault and the Tabas Block on the west, Nehbandan Fault in the east, Doruneh Fault in the north, and the Jaz- Morian Basin in the south.
The sixty- five percent of the exposed rocks within the Lut Block consist of volcanic and plutonic rocks (Karimpour et al., 2011). The extensive magmatism of the area has resulted from the west-dipping subduction of the Lut Block zone (Karimpour et. al., 2005). The Koodakan area is located in the north of the Qhaleh-Zari mine, and in fact, it is comprised of the continuation of Qhaleh-Zari mineralization type. In the study area, rock units include Tertiary volcanic, intrusive, subvolcanic, and pyroclastic rocks.
 
Analytical techniques
The samples were collected from the study area focusing on the vein mineralization for preparing geology, mineralization and geochemistry maps. In addition, the dip and direction of the faults were measured for preparing structural map.
Ten samples were analyzed for thirty six elements using Inductively- Coupled Plasma-Mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) in the Zar- Azma Laboratory, Mashhad, Iran.
Results
Petrographically, the rocks in the area consist of granodiorite, dioritic dikes, andesite and andesite- basalt. The volcanic rocks have extended throughout the study area and are mainly affected by various intensities of propylitic and/or carbonate alterations. The volcanic rocks are mainly andesitic in composition. Based on field observations and microscopic evidence, volcanic rocks can be subdivided into andesite, hornblende andesite, andesite- basalt and pyroxene andesite. Diorite porphyrtic dikes swarms are the youngest units in the area, and are not related to mineralization.
Propylitic alteration comprises dominant alteration in the Koodakan 2 area and is characterized by epidote, chlorite and calcite mineral assemblages. Argillic alteration is locally present within the surface outcrops. Silicification is mainly cropped out in both adjacent to mineralized veins, and to a lesser amount, as pervasive silica.
Mineralization is mainly controlled by a system of faults and joints. Three trends of faults are identified in the area including the a) NW-SE. b) NE-SW. c) E-W. The NE-SW trending mineralized veins represent a northeast dip ranging from 60- 70, and a width between 5 cm to 3 meters. In most cases, mineralization is hosted by pyroclastic units (especially agglomerate) or in the contact between agglomerate and andesitic rocks.
At least three styles of veins were identified in the area. These are 1) quartz+ specularite+ chalcopyrite ± galena ± pyrite veins. The thickness of these veins varies from 2 cm to >1 m. The type 1 displays a dominant NW-SE strike. Quartz comprises of the most common mineral assemblage within the three types of veins forming uhedral to subhedral crystals with 1-10 cm long. Sulfide mineral dominantly includes chalcopyrite which is weathered to chalcocite at margins- together with galena, and pyrite. 2) quartz+ Fe oxides (limonite) veins range in thickness between 20 cm-1 m, and their ore mineral contents are not as important as types. 3) The NW-SE trending late carbonate veins mainly occurred in northern parts of the study area. These veins do not contain any ore minerals.
Based on lithogeochemical studies, the concentration of Cu in mineralized veins ranges from 75-9928 ppm. The highest grade of Cu is related to quartz + malachite ± Fe oxide veins, and the lowest grade is related to silicified- Fe oxide veins. The geochemical abundances of Pb are similar to that of Cu and mainly vary from 7ppm to >3%.Highest concentrations of Zn are consistent with type 1 veins, and range from 25- 109285 ppm. Arsenic represents a widespread distribution of halos in the studied veins and its content varies between 5 and 424 ppm. Based on geology, mineralization, and geochemistry data, mineralization of the Koodakan 2 area is comparable with the veins in the Qaleh- Zari deposit and can be classified as IOCG deposit type. Detailed studies including the fluid inclusion, electron microprobe, and stable isotopic investigations can be further applied to examine the type of mineralization in the Koodakan 2 area.
 
References
Karimpour, M.H., Large, R.R, Razmara, M. and Pattrick R.A.D., 2005. Bi- sulfosat mineral series and their paragenetic associations in specularite- rich Cu- Ag- Au deposits, Qaleh- Zari mine, Iran. Iranian Journal of Crystallography and Mineralogy, 13(2): 417–432.
Karimpour, M.H., Stern, C.R., Farmer, L., Saadat, S. and Malekzadeh, A., 2011. Review of age Rb-Sr geochemistry and petrogenesis of Jurassic to Quaternary igneous rocks in Lute Block, Eastern Iran. Geopersia, 1(1): 19–54.
Stocklin, J. and Nabavi, M.H., 1973. Tectonic map of Iran. Geological Survey of Iran.

Keywords

87Sr/86Sri; Geochemistry; Volcanic rocks; Lut block; Eastern Iran

References

Abdi, M. and Karimpour, M.H., 2012. Geology, alteration, mineralization, petrogenesis, geochronology, geochemistry and airborne geophysics of Kuh Shah prospecting area, SW Birjand. Journal of Economic Geology, 4‌(1): 77–107. (in Persian with English abstract)

Aghanabati, A., 2004. Geology of Iran. Geological Survey of Iran, Tehran. 586 pp.

Barton, M.D., Johnson, D.A. and Zurcher, L., 2000. Phanerozoic iron- Oxide (REE –Cu- Au- U) system in Southwestern North American and their origins. Geological Society of Nevada Symposium 2000, University of Arizona, Arizona, United State.

Bolourian, Gh., 2010. Descriptions of the geological map of 1: 100000 Koodakan. Geological Survey and Mineral Exploration of Iran.

Corriveau, L., 2007. Iron oxide copper-gold (±Ag Nb ±P ±REE ±U) deposits: a Canadian perspective, In: W.D., Goodfellow, (Editor), Mineral Deposits of Canada: A Synthesis of Major Deposit-Types, District Metallogeny, the Evolution of Geological Provinces, and Exploration Method. Geological Survey of Canada, Quebec, pp. 256–278.

Dimevar, M., 1995. Geology, mineralogy, geochemistry and genesis of Qaleh Zari Copper Deposit, Birjand. M.Sc. thesis, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran, 133 pp.

Gemmell, J.B., 2004. Low-and intermediate-sulfidation epithermal deposits, Centre for Ore Deposit Research. 24th Au Workshop University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia.

Groves, D.I., Bierlein, F.P., Meinert, L.D. and Hitzman, N.W., 2010. Definition of iron oxide-copper-gold (IOCG) deposits and proposed associated ore types and their distribution through earth history. Economic Geology, 105(3): 641–654.

Hedenquist, J.W., Sillitoe, R.H. and Arribas, A., 2004. Characteristics of and exploration for high-sulfidation epithermal gold-copper deposit, Centre for Ore Deposit Research. 24th Au Workshop. University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia.

Hitzman, M.W., 2000. Iron oxides Cu-Au Deposits: What, Where, When and Why. In: T. Michael, (Editor), Hydrothermal Iron oxide copper-gold and related deposits: A Global perspective. Australian mineral foundation, Adelaide, pp. 9–25.

Hitzman, M.W., Oreskes, N. and Einaudi, M.T., 1992. Geological characteristics and tectonic setting of Proterozoic iron oxides (Cu- U- Au- REE) deposits. Precambrian Research, 58(1–4): 241–287.

Karimpour, M.H., 2004. Iron oxides Cu-Au deposit and examples of Iran. The 9th conference of the Geological Society of Iran. Tarbiat Moallem University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. (in Persian with English abstract)

Karimpour, M.H., 2005. Comparison of QalehZari Cu-Au-Ag deposit with other Iron Oxides Cu-Au )IOCG-Type) deposits and new classification. Iranian Journal of Crystallography and Mineralogy, 13(1): 165–184. (in Persian with English abstract)

Karimpour, M.H., Large, R.R, Razmara, M. and Pattrick R.A.D., 2005. Bi- sulfosat mineral series and their paragenetic associations in specularite- rich Cu- Ag- Au deposits, Qaleh- Zari mine, Iran. Iranian Journal of Crystallography and Mineralogy, 13(2): 417–432.

Karimpour, M.H., Malekzadeh Shafaroudi, A., Esfandiarpour, A. and Mohammadnezhad, H., 2012. Neyshabour turquoise mine: the first Iron Oxide Cu-Au-U-LREE (IOCG) mineralized system in Iran. Journal of Economic Geology, 3(2): 193–216. (in Persian with English abstract)

Karimpour, M.H., Malekzadeh Shafaroudi, A., Hidarian, M.R. and Askari, A., 2007. Mineralization, alteration and geochemistry of Hired tin gold prospecting area, South Khorasan province. Iranian Journal of Crystallography and Mineralogy, 15(1): 67–90. (in Persian with English abstract)

Karimpour, M.H., Stern, C.R., Farmer, L., Saadat, S. and Malekzadeh, A., 2011. Review of age Rb-Sr geochemistry and petrogenesis of Jurassic to Quaternary igneous rocks in Lute Block, Eastern Iran. Geopersia, 1(1): 19–54.

Karimpour, M.H., Zaw, Kh. and Huston, D.L., 2005. S-C-O Isotopes, Fluid Inclusion Microthermometry, and the Genesis of Ore Bearing Fluids at Qaleh-Zari Fe-Oxide Cu-Au-Ag Mine, Iran. Journal of Sciences, Islamic Republic of Iran, 16(2): 153–168.

Khatib, M.H., 1999. Relation between shear deformations of veins in Qualeh-Zari mine, Conference of the Eastern Mineral Resources of Eastern Iran. Birjand University of Technology, Birjand, Iran. (in Persian with English abstract)

Kluyver, H.M., Griffits, R.J., Tirrul, R., Chance, P.N. and Meixner, H.M., 1978. Exploratory text of the Lakar Kuh Quandrangle 1:250000. Geologycal Survey of Iran.

Marschik, R. and Fontbote, L., 2001. The Candelaria- Punta del Cobre iron oxide Cu-Au (-Zn-Ag) deposits. Economic Geology, 96(8): 1799–1826.

Marschik, R., Leveille, R.A. and Martin, W., 2000. La Candelaria and the Punta del Cobre district, Chile, Early Cretaceous iron oxide Cu-Au (-Zn-Ag) mineralization. In: T. Michael (Editor), Hydrothermal iron oxide copper-gold and related deposits, a global perspective. Australian Mineral Foundation, Adelaide, pp.163–175.

Omaraeei, S. Niroumand, Sh., 2014. Geochemistry, mineralogy, alteration and fluid inclusion studies in copper gold vein system Koodakan prospecting area, South Khorasan province. Journal of Advanced Applied Geology, 19(6): 34–47. (in Persian with English abstract)

Sillitoe, R.H. and Hedenquist, J.W., 2003. Linkages between volcanotectonic settings, ore-fluid compositions, and epithermal precious metal deposits. In: S.F. Simmons and I. Graham (Editors), Volcanic, geothermal and ore forming processes: Rulers and witnesses of processes within the Earth. Society of Economic Geologists, Special Publication 10, Littleton, pp. 315–343.

Stocklin, J. and Nabavi, M.H., 1973. Tectonic map of Iran. Geological Survey of Iran.

Tarkian, M., Lotfi, M. and Bauman, A., 1983. Tectonic, magmatism and the formation of mineral deposit in central Lut, East of Iran. Geological Survey of Iran, Tehran, Report 51, 26 pp.

Whitney, D.L. and Evans, B.W., 2010. Abbreviations for names of rock-forming minerals. American Mineralogist, 95(1): 185–187.

Vidal, C.E., Injoque-Espinoza, J., Sidder, G.B. and Mukasa, S.B., 1990. Amphibolitic Cu-Fe skarn deposits in the central coast of Peru. Economic Geology, 85(5): 1447–1461.