Identifying and Ranking Strategies for Empowering the Poultry Cooperatives in Hamedan Province by Using MCDM Techniques

مجله اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی

Article 2, Volume 30, Issue 3, October 2016, Pages 160-172   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jead2.v30i3.46259

Authors

S. Latifi^{* 1}; A. Yaghoubi Farani²

¹University of Tabriz

²Bu-Ali Sina University

Abstract

Introduction: Today the consumption of animal protein has been allocated a special place in human nutrition. Poultry cooperatives have an important role in protein production. Given the significance of producing animal products and the capabilities that the poultry cooperatives possess in this regard as well as considering the macroeconomic policies of governments respecting developing the cooperative sector, it is necessary to identify the strategies that empower cooperatives. So the objective of this study was to identify strategies for empowering the poultry cooperatives by using the Delphi technique and ranking them by using the TOPSIS and SAW techniques in Hamedan province.
Materials and Methods: The present study is application oriented and in terms of methodology, it is deemed a descriptive survey. The statistical population consists of experts of cooperative, Labor and Social Welfare offices, experts of Animal Affairs in Agriculture of Jihad organization and managing directors of the poultry cooperatives in Hamedan province that through a purposive sampling sample size of 20 was selected to respond to the main question of research. To ranking the identified strategies, MCDM techniques of TOPSIS and SAW were applied.
Results and Discussion: In the first step of the Delphi technique, some open-ended questionnaires were distributed among experts to identify the strategies for empowering the poultry cooperatives. In this step, 22 strategies were identified. In the second stage, there was a strong consensus among experts on 15 of the 22 identified strategies. In the third step, after determining the percentage of agreement among experts regarding each of the identified strategies, they were divided into two groups of internal and external organizational strategies. According to the results of ranking the internal organizational strategies for empowering the poultry cooperatives by using TOPSIS technique, planning to production commensurate with market demand (CL+ =0.655), employing experienced and educated persons in cooperatives (CL+ =0.566) and creating credit cooperatives for the poultry industry with the participation of poultry cooperatives (CL+ =0.564) held the first, second and third ranks in terms of significance. The results attained from ranking the internal organizational strategies by SAW technique showed that the strategy of employing experienced and educated persons in cooperatives (A*=1.60) and the attending of cooperatives in the livestock products exhibitions (A*=1.144) held the first and last ranks. The relevance of the degree of the executive director to the subject of cooperative activities (A*=1.57) and planning, to production commensurate with market demand (A*=1.56), held the second and third ranks. Based on the results of ranking the external organizational factors for empowering the poultry cooperatives by using TOPSIS technique, planning to avoid from input prices fluctuations (CL+=0.681), elimination of bureaucracy and cooperate governmental agencies in providing services to cooperatives (CL+=0.649) and paying subsidies to production of inputs such as medicines and vaccines by the government (CL+=0.646) held the first, second and third ranks. The results attained from ranking the external organizational strategies by using SAW technique showed that the strategy of planning to avoid from input prices fluctuations entities with the highest score (A*=1.60), monitoring on cooperatives performance and activities by the cooperatives, Labor, and Social Welfare offices (A*=1.26) held the first and last ranks. Additionally, such strategies as strengthening of the union of poultry cooperatives and transmit part of special authorities to them (A*=1.59) and import of inputs by the union of poultry cooperatives and government financial support of them (A*=1.58) held the second and third ranks.
Conclusion: According to results of ranking the identified strategies by using TOPSIS and SAW techniques, in internal organizational strategies “Employing experienced and educated persons in cooperatives”, “Planning to production commensurate with market demand” and “The relevance of the degree of the executive director to the subject of cooperative activities” was placed at the first to the third rank. In external organizational strategies “Planning to avoid from input prices fluctuations”, “Elimination of bureaucracy and cooperate governmental agencies in providing services to cooperatives”, “Strengthening of union of poultry cooperatives and transmit part of special authorities to them” and “Import of inputs by the union of poultry cooperatives and government financial support of them” were placed at the first to third rank.

Keywords

Empowering; DELPHI technique; Hamedan province; Poultry cooperatives; SAW technique; TOPSIS technique

References

1- Abbasi K. 2007. Strategies for empowerment of cooperatives (case study: East Azarbaijan province). Taavon (Socio-Economic & Cultural Journal), 189-190:35-50. (in Persian)

2- Agahi H., Binaeiyan A., and Eghtedari N. 2013. Factors affecting the advancement of policies on the principle 44 in agricultural production cooperatives of Kermanshah County. Journal of Rural Development Studies, 12(2): 1-16. (in Persian with English abstract)

3- Aghajani Varzanh M. 2001. Studying and evaluating the activities of rural productive cooperatives in Isfahan province (1972-92). Ms thesis, College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology. (in Persian)

4- Amini A.M., and Ramezani M. 2006. Study of effective factors on success of poultry-farm cooperatives in Isfahan province. Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Water and Soil Science, 10 (1): 121-135. (in Persian with English abstract)

5- Azadi H.; Hosseininia G.H.; Zarafshani K.; Heydari A., and Witlox F. 2010. Factors influencing the success of animal husbandary cooperatives: A case study in Southwest of Iran. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics, 111(2): 89-99.

6- Babaei Fini O., Rahmani B., and Hazrati M. 2012. Analysis effective factors on development of agricultural cooperatives in rural economy (case study: Khodabandeh). Arid Region Geographic Studies, 3(11): 113-132. (in Persian)

7- Baniasadi M., and Gholifar A. 2011. Ranking the effective factors on successful of agricultural cooperative of Zanjan province. Proceedings of the 2th National Conference on Sustainable Rural Development, 6-7 Jul. 2011. Bu-Ali University, Hamedan, Iran. (in Persian)

8- Benturaki J. 2000. Cooperatives and Poverty Allevation. England: IDS TEMA.

9- Biglari N., Pezeshki Rad Gh.R., and Zamani Mian Dashti N. 2013. Solutions to empowering production cooperatives as perceived by national provincial and specialists. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 45(1):109-119. (in Persian with English abstract)

10- Didi B. 2004. Short communication fishing cooperatives participation in managing nearshore resources: The case in Capiz, central Philippines. Fisheries Research, 67: 81-91.

11- Fathi Vajargah K. 2002. Needs assessment (models and techniques). Ayeg Publishing House, Tehran. (in Persian)

12- Gabriel S. J. 2002. Belize rural woman’s association revolving loan fund and women’s cooperatives. United Nations Development Programme Report. New York: United Nations.

13- Häder M., and Häder S. 1995. Delphi und Kognition spsychologie: Ein Zugang zur. Theoretischen Fundierung der Delphi- Methode. In: ZUMA-Nachrichten 37(19).

14- Hosseininia Gh. 2014. Poultry cooperatives have sufficient capacity for provide white meat and eggs. Islamic Republic News Agency (IRNA). (in Persian)

15- Keeney S., Hasson F., and McKenna HP. 2001. A critical review of the Delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing. Internatinal Journal of Nursing Study, 38(2): 195-200.

16- Kelsey K. D. 2008. Do workshops work for building evaluation capacity among cooperative extension service faculty? Journal of Extension, 46 (6).

17- Ludwig L. 2005. Library as place: results of a Delphi study J Med Assoc 93(3) July, [Online] Available: www. Pubmedcentral.nih.gov /articlerender.fcgi? artid= 1175798.

18- Moez Rahbr A. 2008. Review the status of active livestock and poultry cooperatives. Office of production cooperatives, Department of Agricultural Cooperatives. (in Persian)

19- Momeni J. 2007. Role of cooperation sector in achieve to objectives of Islamic Republic of Iran in 1404, Taavon (Socio-Economic & Cultural Journal), 189-190:63-70. (in Persian)

20- Nouri Zamanabadi H., and Amini Faskhoudi A. 2007. Agricultural development contribution torural development (Case study: Isfahan province rural areas).Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences (Journal of Agriculture): (Agricultural Economics and Development), 38-2 (2): 263-275. (in Persian with English abstract)

21- Nyoro J., and Isaac k. 2005. An analysis of success, failure and demand factors of agricultural cooperatives in Kenya. In: Strategies and Analysis for Growth and Access. A Project of Cornell and Clark-Atlanta Universities for Research and Technical Assistance. Ithaca: Cornell University.

22- Ohadi N., and Kurki Nejad J. 2015. Analyzing the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threatening agricultural production cooperatives in Sirjan city. Iranian Journal of agricultural Economics and Development Research, 46(3): 579-588.(in Persian)

23- Ostadi H., and Alizadeh A. 2009. Explore ways to support the formation and development of cooperatives through bank lending, case Study: Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad province. Taavon (Socio-Economic & Cultural Journal), 20(206-207): 47-58. (in Persian)

24- Reynolds A. 2011. An assessment of loan regulation for rural housing cooperatives. Journal of Cooperative Education and Internships, 2 (4): 15-27.

25- Salim zade P., Kalantari Kh., and Motiee N. 2012. Factors influencing the success of livestock cooperatives (case study: East Azarbaijan province). Co-operation and Agriculture Quarterly, 23 (10): 117-132. (in Persian)

26- Torkaman M., and Afshar M. 2010. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of managers and strategies to improve managerial skills in active employment cooperatives in Hamedan province. Taavon (Socio-Economic & Cultural Journal), 21 (2): 111-127. (in Persian)

27- Valkila J., and Nygren A. 2010. Impacts of fair trade certification on coffee farmer, cooperative and laborers in Nicaragua. Journal of Agriculture and Human Values, 27: 321-333.

28- Zarei Matin H., Fathi M. R., Karimi Zarchi M., and Azizollahi S. 2011. The application of Fuzzy TOPSIS approach to personnel selection for Padir Company: Iran. Journal of Management Research, 3(2): 1-14.

29- Zavadskas E. K., Vilutiene T., Turskis Z., and Tamosaitiene J. 2010. Contractor selection for construction works by applying SAW-G and TOPSIS Grey techniques. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11: 34-55.