Studying of Climatic Variables Effects on Land Allocation between Annual Crops Groups

مجله اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی

Article 2, Volume 30, Issue 4, January 2017, Pages 297-307   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jead2.v30i4.54521

Authors

Gh. Dashti^* ; Kh. Alefi; M. Ghahremanzadeh

University of Tabriz

Abstract

Introduction: The increasing global consensus built on empirical evidence, expresses that the world, is facing a threat from climate change. As a result, this can affect the agricultural sector through its productivity changes and so influence food security in the world. This can be more intuitive for countries that are dependent on agriculture. Agriculture is an important sector in Iran that provides 12 percent of gross domestic production (GDP) and 21.2 percent of employment. In this country, annual crops as an important agricultural production have 12.2 million hectare cultivation areas. They are grouped into vegetables, cereals, beans, industrials crops, forage crops and cucurbits. The shares of planted aria for these groups vary in different country's regions due to cultivation conditions differences including climatic variables. This indicates the importance of studying the climatic variable effects on these shares. Therefore, this study is aimed to assess the effect of climatic variables such as temperature, participation, humidity and wind speed on land allocation between annual crop groups in Iran's counties. This can provide useful information about the effects of climatic variable on crop shares. To achieve the purpose, using statistical methods and specifically the fractional multinomial logit model is considered. This study is benefited from advantages such as using of fractional multinomial logit model, comprehensiveness and choosing the whole country as a case study and the specific crops grouping way that distinguishes it's from the other related studies in the country.
Materials and Methods: Because the shares (fractions) of annual crop cultivation area for each county(observation) are limited values that vary between 0 and 1 and the sum of them is one, using of fractional models, is considered. In these models the dependant variables vary between 0 and 1, and each observation has several fractions that their summation is one. Papke and Wooldridge (1996) introduced the fractional logit and probit models that have a tow fraction for each observation. After them, Sivakumar & Bhat (2002) introduced the multinomial fractional logit model that can include more than two fractions for each observation. These models use quasi-likelihood methods for estimation of parameters and their standard errors. For estimation of the fractional multinomial logit model, this study uses Iran's 336 counties agricultural and weather information. Annual agricultural crops information is taken from the agricultural ministry and weather information is taken from the national meteorology organization. In this regard, the crops planted area shares and weather information in 1391 are used to explain the shares of annual crops planted area shares in 1392.
Results and Discussion: Since the weather information was on monthly scale, estimation of different models with annual crop shares variables and annualy and seasonally, Weather variables (their average, standard errors and coefficient of variation) was considered for choosing the best model based on Akaike information criterion and Bayesian information criterion. Comparing the models showed that the model with annual weather variables averages is the best. So in the next step, using the model, the marginal effects were estimated. According to the result, increasing temperature has created concerns in all fields, including the agricultural sector, affects cereals and beans productions as two important sources of food in the world. It increases the planted area share of cereals and decreases the cultivation area share of beans. The participation affects all groups' cultivation area shares except cucurbits. That is the effect of cereals planted area and its share is stronger, one centigrade degree increasing of temperature increase the share of cereals cultivation area 0.02 percent. Humidity percent influences vegetables and industrial crops planted area shares and increase them. Wind speed respectively decreases and increases industrial crops and cereals cultivation area shares. According to the results also, conventional farming patterns and other agricultural system’s rules such as crop rotation in each area has important effects on the farmers' decisions on land allocations.
Conclusion: Based on the above results we can conclude that along with the climate changing, the annuals crops cultivation area shares and thus the amount of their production will be affected in the future. This shows the importance of using accurate methods to predict the possible values of climate variables in country's regions under different scenarios for next years. Because in this way, we can predict potential changes in the future annual crops productions and compare potential production and population food needs. This can determine the gaps between potential production and potential consumption in the future. In this regard, decreasing of agricultural sector problems in the face of climate change in the next decades would be possible by providing appropriate policies and procedures. One appropriate procedure is producing of resistant varieties of climate change results such as rising temperatures. This can define as one of the objectives of agricultural research centers. Considering that this research has studied the land allocation between annual crops, it is suggested to researchers that consider studying of other agriculture's sectors productions such as livestock and Fruit in the next research.

Keywords

Annual crops; Climate change; Fractional multinomial logit model; Land allocation

References

1- Adams R. M., Hurd B. H., Lenhart S., and Leary N. 1998. Effects of global climate change on agriculture: An interpretative review. Climate Research, 11(1): 19-30.

2- Akaike H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on, 19(6): 716-723.

3- Allen IV J. E. 2012. Determinants of land allocation in a multi-crop farming system: An application of the fractional multinomial logit model to agricultural households in Mali (Doctoral dissertation), Michigan State University.

4- Cho S. J., McCarl B. A. and Wu X. 2014. Climate change adaptation and shifts in land use for major crops in the USA. In 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, Minneapolis, Minnesota (No. 170015). Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

5- Chou C., and Lan C. W. 2012. Changes in the annual range of precipitation under global warming. Journal of Climate, 25(1): 222-235.

6- Darwin R., Tsigas M. E., Lewandrowski J. and Raneses A. 1995. World agriculture and climate change: Economic adaptations (No. 33933). United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

7- Di Falco S. 2014. Adaptation to climate change in Sub-Saharan agriculture: Assessing the evidence and rethinking the drivers. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 41(3): 405-430.

8- Ghambarali R., papzan A. and Afsharzadeh N. 2012. Assessing of farmers' viewpoints on climate change and adaptation strategies (a case study ofkermanshah). Journal of RuralResearch, 11(3):187-207.(in Persian)

9- Jones C. A., and Dyke P. T. 1986. CERES-maize: a simulation model of maize growth and development. Texas AandM University Press.

10- Jones C. A., Dyke P. T., Williams J. R., Kiniry J. R., Benson V. W., and Griggs R. H. 1991. EPIC: An operational model for evaluation of agricultural sustainability. Agricultural Systems, 37(4): 341-350.

11- Kaminski J., Kan I., and Fleischer A. 2013. A structural land-use analysis of agricultural adaptation to climate change: a proactive approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 95(1): 70-93.

12- Lobell D. B., Burke M. B., Tebaldi C., Mastrandrea M. D., Falcon W. P. and Naylor R. L. 2008. Prioritizing climate change adaptation needs for food security in 2030. Science, 319(5863): 607-610.

13- Mendelsohn R. and Dinar A. 1999. Climate change, agriculture, and developing countries: Does adaptation matter?. The World Bank Research Observer, 14(2): 277-293.

14- Mendelsohn R., Nordhaus W. D., and Shaw D. 1994. The impact of global warming on agriculture: A Ricardian analysis. The American economic review: 753-771.

15- Ministry of Agriculture jihad. 2015. Available at http://www.maj.ir/Portal/Home.

16- Mu J. H. and McCarl B. A. 2011. Adaptation to climate change: land use and livestock management change in the USA. Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University.

17- Mudzonga E. 2011. Farmers’ adaptation to climate change in Chivi district of Zimbabwe. International Food Policy Research Institute Zimbabwe.

18- Mwaura, F. M. and Adong, A. 2016. Determinants of households’ land allocation for crop production in Uganda. Journal of Sustainable Development, 9(5): 229-246.

19- Niles M. T., Lubell M. and Brown M. 2015. How limiting factors drive agricultural adaptation to climate change. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 200: 178-185.

20- Papke L. E. and Wooldridge J. M. 1996. Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401 (k) plan participation rates. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11(6): 619-632.

21- Reidsma P., Ewert F., Lansink A. O. and Leemans R. 2010. Adaptation to climate change and climate variability in European agriculture: The importance of farm level responses. European journal of agronomy, 32(1): 1391-102.

22- Schlenker W. and Roberts M. J. 2006. Nonlinear effects of weather on corn yields. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 28(3): 31391-398.

23- Schlenker W., Hanemann W. M. and Fisher A. C. 2006. The impact of global warming on USA agriculture: An econometric analysis of optimal growing conditions. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(1): 113-125.

24- Schwarz G. 1978. Estimating the dimension of a model. The annals of statistics, 6(2): 461-464.

25- Sivakumar A. and Bhat C. 2002. Fractional split-distribution model for statewide commodity-flow analysis. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (1790): 80-88.

26- Statistical Center of Iran. 2015. Available at http://www.amar.org.ir.

27- Turner, E. C. 2014. Determinants of crop diversification among Mozambican smallholders: Evidence from household panel data (Doctoral dissertation), Michigan State University.

28- Yang L. 2010. Acreage allocation in the presence of various commodity and conservation programs: The case of conservation reserve program and crop production in the Midwest. (Master of science dissertation), Iowa State University.