The Effect of Private Ownership on the Efficiency of the Country's Food and Beverage (Dynamic Panel Data Approach)

اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی

Article 2, Volume 31, Issue 1 - Serial Number 35, March 2017, Pages 36-49   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jead2.v31i1.58567

Authors

H. Matrodi¹; M. Aghapour sabbaghi^{* 2}

¹shooshtar

²Azad university shooshta branch

Abstract

Introduction The agro-processing industry in agriculture sector because of in the global context, participation in regional and international markets and joining the WTO, has particular importance. With increasing demand for production and resource constraints in this subsection, The importance of efficient use of resources and improve the efficiency of production is determined more than ever before. In these situations, optimal use of resources can be a necessary condition for the development of various agricultural sectors such as food and beverage be considered so that section, in addition means to responding to the increasing needs of food products to do well its duties in the economic development. On the one hand In recent years the privatization of state-owned companies not only as a means of economic restructuring, and competition is increasing, but the necessary infrastructure to increase efficiency and is to promote economic efficiency. Therefore, at Present study With Emphasis on kind of ownership survey of efficiency and and factors affecting that in Food & Beverage sector be considered.
Materials and Methods At present Study 19 subsection of Food & Beverage at 2009-2014 considered as Statistics Society. In order to calculate the efficiency of the review of data envelopment analysis (DEA) is used. Capital, labor and energy are the inputs and outputs is the output. In order to estimate the econometric model dynamic panel data approach used. The information for this research, from statistics of 10 person and more in ministry industry collected.
Results and Discussion The results showed that the rise of private property in the subdivision and the move towards privatization can be a factor considered in order to increase the efficiency of this subsection.
The average efficiency for about 70 percent of the country's food and drink industry is showing that it is possible to increase efficiency and achieve optimum output rate until 30%. 4 sector involve producing animal and herbal oil and fat, slaughter livestock and poultry, dairy produce and tea have the perfect performance. Another important point of this research is the more distinction between efficiency in the subsectors . Achieved 0.95 for average returns to scale industries show the decreasing returns to scale in the food and beverage sub-sector. The results showed a positive and significant effect of human capital, exports, innovation and business cycles on the efficiency. In contrast, variables, index and energy intensity and commercial focus are significant and negative effect on the efficiency of the food and beverage sectors.
Conclusion
Due to the positive impact of privatization on performance, it is recommended that this policy is actually a competition policy in order to increase the efficiency of the subdivision food and beverage countries to be accelerated. Supporting of the private sector by means of fiscal and monetary management, pay more attention to assignment state-owned company, as well as monitoring after the privatization, the continuation of the implementation of the policy basis of 44 law of the competitive conditions and legislative transparency are the this study recommends .Motivate and suit conditions for continuing education of industry employees, implementation of scientific and practical training for them, enhancing the quality of education given to the students associated with this industry and created needed fit with market needs to an increase in human capital will increase the sector efficiency. Due to decreasing returns to scale in the industry, support of small businesses in the sector and lending to micro producer recommend to increase the efficiency. Due to the export positive effect on the performance proposed by encouraging exports, facilitate the export process, provide advice to exporters or identify new markets and new comparative advantages in the production of Food and Beverage higher level of interaction with the global economy design for rising industry performance is under consideration. Use of a new technology on the world in terms of production, delivery and in-service training in order to increase the level of production technique as well as increasing the share of spending on research and development in order to increase the level of staff's technical knowledge can suggestions in order to increase the efficiency of the industry. The results show that with the moving food and beverage industry toward monopoly space, reduced efficiency in the industry.Therefore, it is suggested that industrial policy be developed in order to increase competition. Physical preparation and presentation facilities in order to increase the possibility of free entry to the industry in order to reduce among other recommendations of this study in order to increase the efficiency of this unit. Industry restructuring and the establishment of a factory for optimum use of energy resources in order to save energy, new manufacturing techniques to reduce energy intensity and use international experiences in the energy efficiency to increase efficiency in the food and beverage industry are ways to increase efficiency.

Keywords

Data Envelopment Analysis; Privatization; Return to scale; Panel Data

References

1. Alipor M., Hejhbarkyani A. and Sheydaei Z. 2012. Assessment and analysis malemquist index for main metal industry, Journal of quantity economy,6(20):127-146.(In Persian)

2. Alizadehkhosroabadi A.2009. Assessment and analysis of meat aviculture productivity in Boyerahmad city, Theses for MSC degree in agricultural engering, Khozestan Knowledge of Research University. 23-45. (In Persian)

3. Amini R. 2004. The insurance and risk management role on agricultural economic, Quarterly insurance and development, 5(32):19-21.

4. Amini A., Neshat M. 2011. Estimation time series of capital stock in Iran, Journal of programming and budget, 90(1):53-83.(In Persian)

5. Arrelano M., Bond S. 1991. Some Tests of Specification in Panel data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations, Review of Economics and Statistics, 58(1): 277-297.

6. Asgarpour H., Falahi F. and Dehgani A. 2012. Innovation effect on market unsustainability share in Iran's` food and beverage industry, Journal of agricultural economic and development, 26(3):204-217. (In Persian)

7. Asgarpour H., Jahanghire KH. and Abdi H. 2014. Export effect on chemical and main metal sector efficiency, Journal of research and economic policy, 22(72): 23-48. (In Persian)

8. Baltagi B. 2005. Econometrics Analysis of Panel Data, Third Edition, John Wily and sons Ltd, USA.

9. Chu S. N. and Kalirajan K. 2010. Impact of Trade Liberalization on Technical Efficiency of Vietnamese Manufacturing Firms, Paper for Presentation at the Conference on Frontier Issues in Technology, Development and Environment organized by the Madras School of Economics and the Forum for Global Knowledge Sharing at the Madras School of Economics.12-44.

10. Claessens S., Djankov S., Fan J. and Lang L. 2002. Disentangling the Incentive and Entrenchment Effects of Large Shareholdings, Journal of Finance, 57(6): 2741- 2771.

11. Clerides S.K., Lach S., Tybout J.R.1998. Is Learning by Exporting Important Micro-Dynamic Evidence from Colombia, Mexico and Morocco, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(3): 903-948.

12. Davis CH. 2001. Privatization: common themes, similar outcomes.17-32.

13. Dehgani A., Ashrafie B., Nabishahjitash M. and Ameri M. 2013. The effect of degree of open economy on employment and real wage in Iran`s food and beverage industry, Journal of agricultural economic and development, 27(24):351-360. (In Persian)

14. Ejington A. and Oustapssidis K. 1998.Advertising, Concentration and Profitability in Greek Food Manufacturing Industries, Agricultural Economics, (18): 191-198.

15. Emamimybodi A., Krimyan Z. and Rahmani M. 2011.Mesuement efficiency and productivity of petrochemical complexes, journal of economic of energy, 8(29): 61-81. (In Persian)

16. Esfahani M. and Khazae J. 2010. Factor affecting aviculture efficiency in south Khorasan, Journal of economic of agricultural research, 2(4):165-180. (In Persian)

17. Fazelyazdi A. and Moinodin M. 2015. Assessment of efficiency and ranking of Iran`s insurance industry whit use of dynamic windows data analysis, Journal of productivity management, 9(35):131-149. (In Persian)

18. Feeny S. 2000. Determinants of profitability: An Empirial Investigation Using Australian Tax Entities, Australia: Melbourne Institute Working Paper No. 1:12-31.

19. Funakoshi M. and Motohashi K. 2009. A Quantitative Analysis of Market Competition and Productivity, The Japanese Economy, 36(1):17-31.

20. Gibbon, H. 2001. Guide boar directing government owned enterprises. 66-91.

21. Godarzvand Chegini M. and Mirzadzareh M. 2011. The effect of privatization on efficiency (The transmission company of Gilan province), Commercial survey, 40(1): 86-98.

22. Graner M. 2002. Export-Led Efficiency or Efficiency-led Exports: Evidence from the Chilean Manufacturing Sector, Essay II in Essays on Trade and Productivity: Case Studies of Manufacturing in Chile and Kenya, PhD thesis, Goteborg University.45-65.

23. Hanke H. 1987. Privatization and development an introduction, San Fransisco: institute for contemporary studies.

24. Hsiao Ch. 2003. Analysis of panel data. Cambridge University Quarterly, 12(1), pp. 53–72.

25. Hu A. G. and Lin Z. 2014. Trade Liberalization and Firm Productivity, Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Industries, Review of International Economics,9(2):24-34.

26. Ikhsan M. 2007. Total factor productivity growth in Indonesian manufacturing: A stochastic frontier approach, Global Economic Review, 36: 321–342.

27. Kay J.A. and Thampson D.J. 1996. Privatization: A policy in search of a rational, The economic journal, (69): 18-32.

28. Khodadakashi F., Zaranejad M. and Yosefi R. 2005.The mutual effects between centralization profit, development and advertising, Economical research, 15(3):175-194. (In Persian)

29. Khodadakashi F. and Hajyan M. 2012. Assesment of cost efficiency in Iran`s banking industry, Journal of programming and budget. 18(24)1-24. (In Persian)

30. Khodadakashi F., Khyabani N. and JaniS. 2012. Analysis and survey of market structure effect on Iran`s industry efficiency, Journal of research and economical policy,20(63):5-32. (In Persian)

31. Loecker J. 2011. Product Eventuation, Multiproduct Firms and Estimating the Impact of Trade Liberalization on Productivity, Econometrica, 79(5): 407-1451.

32. Martin A. and Jaumandreu J. 2004. Entry, Exit and Productivity Growth: Spanish Manufacturing During, The Eighties, Span, Econ. Rev, 6(1): 211-226.

33. Mclean D., Gustafson T. and Thomas F. 2002. Privatization and its effect on public golf employees, Lndiana University, 2: 43-61.

34. Melitz M. J. 2003.The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity, journal of Econometrical, 71(6): 1695-1725.

35. Memarnejad A. and Babazadeh M. 2013. The effect of privatization on Iran's GDP and selected country, Journal of research and economic policy, 21(66):187-208.

36. Mitra A., Sharma C. and Veganzonès-Varoudakis M. A. 2014. Trade Liberalization, Technology Transfer, and Firms Productive Performance: The Case of Indian Manufacturing, Journal of Asian Economics, 33(1): 1-15.

37. Mok V., Godfrey Y., Zhaozhou H. and Zongzhang L. 2010. Export Orientation and Technical Efficiency: Clothing Firms in China, Managerial and Decision Economics, 31(7): 453-463.

38. Motavaseli M. 2008. Privatization or market and government optimum combination, Commercial research and studies institute press. 1-32.

39. Nori H. and Niliportabatabaee SH.2004. Prioritize of agricultural conversion industry development with use of Delfi approach in Felaverjan city, Journal of geographical research,61(1):161-178. (In Persian)

40. Rahmani N., Keshavarz A., Tabatabaei S. and Kalhor R. 2012. Assessment of ownership role on productivity change with use of malemquist index and DEA in Gazvin`s hospitals, Journal of paramedical college in Tehran,6(4): 300-310. (In Persian)

41. Resend R.T. 2005. The Relationships between Market Structure and Price-Cost Margins in US Food Manufacturing, 1954 to 977, Agribusiness, 3(2): 241-252.

42. Rowthorn B. and Chang A. 1993. Public ownership and the theory of the state, in The Political Economy of Privatization Clarke, Managerial and Decision Economics, 23(1): 99-123.

43. Sadraeejavaheri A. and Behzadi Z. 2012. Survey of relationship between size and growth in food and beverage units, Journal of economic research, 47(4):61-78. (In Persian)

44. Sami M. and Abderrazak Z. 2011. Banking Industry, Market Structure and Efficiency Revisited Model to Intermediary Hypotheses, International Journal of economic research, 2(1): 23-36.

45. Sekkat K. 2009. Does Competition Improve Productivity in Developing Countries? Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 12(2): 145-162.

46. Setiawan M., Emvalomatis G. and Lansink A.O. 2012. Industrial concentration and price-cost margin of the Indonesian food and beverages sector, Applied Economics, 44: 3805–3814.

47. Shahikishtash M. and Shivai A. 2012. Measurement of production factor productivity growth and scale effect based on dissoluble frontier function, Journal of economical policy, 4(7):127-144. (In Persian)

48. Soheili K., Fatahi SH., Zabihi S. and Haduzadegan M. 2014. Survey of relationship between efficiency and industry centralization in Iran`s food and beverage sector, Journal og quantity economy,8(3):37-51. (In Persian)

49. Sokhanvar M., Sadegi A., Yavari K. and Mehregan N. 2012. Determin efficiency of Iran`s electric distribution company and facto affecting that, Journal of economical research, 47(2):21-39. (In Persian)

50. Sori A. and Mehregan N. 2007.The role of social capital in human capital, Journal of commercial bulletin, 42(1): 209-214. (In Persian)

51. Tari F. and Hanifezadeh L. 2013. The role of privatizations and ownership change on insurance company efficiency, Journal of council and strategy, 20(2):5-24. (In Persian)

52. Tayebi K., Emadzadeh M. and Shykhbahaee A. 2008. The effect of industrial export and human capital on production factor productivity and economic growth in OPIC country, Journal of quantity economy, 5(6):85-106. (In Persian)

53. Torkamani J. and Zogipor M. 2005. Factors affecting dairy supply in Iran, Journal of agricultural economics, 2(1):23-33. (In Persian)

54. Vickers J. and Yarrow G. 1998. Privatization: An Economic Analysis (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

55. Walujadi D. 2004. Age, Export Orientation and Technical Efficiency: Evidence from Garment Firms in DKI Jakarta, Makara, Sosial Humaniora, 8(3): 97-104.

56. Willner J. 2003. Privatization: a skeptical analysis, International Handbook on Privatization, Cheltenham: Edward.

57. Zaranejad M., Khodadakashi F. and yousefihajeabad R. 2012. Assessment of Iran`s factory efficiency. Journal of quantity economy, 9(2):31-48. (In Persian)