پاسخ عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد شش ژنوتیپ‌ لوبیاچیتی (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) به مایه‌زنی با ریزوبیوم

پژوهش‌های حبوبات ایران

مقاله 10، دوره 10، شماره 2، دی 1398، صفحه 132-148   

نوع مقاله: مقالات پژوهشی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/ijpr.v10i2.70590

نویسندگان

هادی خاوری^{* 1}؛ قدرت اله شاکرمی²

¹باشگاه پژوهشگران جوان و نخبگان، واحد خرم‌آباد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، خرم‌آباد، ایران

²گروه زراعت، واحد خرم‌آباد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، خرم‌آباد، ایران

چکیده

کاربرد کودهای زیستی در جهت بهینه­سازی مصرف کودهای شیمیایی، مدیریت عناصر غذایی خاک و تولید پایدار محصولات در نظام­های زراعی، اهمیت ویژه­ای دارد. در این راستا آزمایشی با هدف بررسی اثر ریزوبیوم بر عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد ژنوتیپ‌های لوبیاچیتی، به‌صورت فاکتوریل در قالب طرح بلوک کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار در سال زراعی1396 در منطقه بیران­شهر لرستان اجرا شد. عوامل شامل مایه­زنی با باکتری همزیست لوبیا (Rhizobium phaseoli Rb-133) در دو سطح (مایه­زنی و عدم مایه­زنی) و ژنوتیپ­های لوبیاچیتی شامل (غفار، صدری، تلاش، لاینcos16، محلی­ خمین و کوشا) بودند. نتایج نشان داد که اثر ریزوبیوم و ژنوتیپ، تعداد دانه در غلاف را و برهمکنش ریزوبیوم و ژنوتیپ، تعداد غلاف در بوته، تعداد دانه در بوته، وزن100دانه، عملکرد دانه، عملکرد زیست­توده و شاخص برداشت ژنوتیپ­های لوبیاچیتی را به­طور معنی­داری افزایش داد. مایه­زنی با ریزوبیوم عملکرد دانه ژنوتیپ­های غفار، صدری، تلاش، لاینcos16، محلی‌خمین و کوشا را به‌ترتیب 7/13، 2/37، 0/23، 9/20، 3/55 و 4/31 درصد نسبت به شاهد افزایش داد. بیشترین عملکرد دانه در تیمار اثر توأم مایه­زنی با ریزوبیوم در رقم صدری (3485‌کیلوگرم در هکتار) به­دست آمد. این تیمار نسبت به تیمار توأم مایه­زنی در رقم غفار، تلاش، لاینcos16، محلی­خمین و کوشا به‌ترتیب 4/87، 6/14، 6/21، 8/27 و 7/22 درصد برتری داشت. یافته­ها نشان داد که مایه­زنی با ریزوبیوم، دارای اثر افزایشی بر عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد ژنوتیپ­های لوبیاچیتی است و می­توان در جهت تولید پایدار این محصول، عملکرد دانه را تا حد مطلوبی افزایش داد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

بهینه‌سازی؛ تولید پایدار؛ شاخص برداشت؛ کودهای زیستی؛ کودهای شیمیایی

مراجع

1. Abbott, L.K., and Murphy, D.V. 2007. Soil Biological Fertility; A Key to Sustainable Land Use in A Springer International Publishing.
2. Amirabadi, M., Rejali, F., Ardakani, M., and Borji, M. 2009. Effect of Azotobacter and Mycorrhizal fungi inoculants on the uptake of some nutrients in corn (SC 704 cultivar) at different levels of phosphorus. Iranian Journal of Soil Research (Soil & Water Science) 23(1): 107-115. (In Persian).
3. Ansari, M.H., Asadi-Rahmani, H., Mazaheri, R., and Rezazadeh, B. 2017. The Effect of combined use of chemical fertilizer, Azetobacter, Azospirillum and compost on seed yield and nutrient uptake of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris ). Applied Research in Field Crops 30(3): 1-12. (In Persian).
4. Azarmi, F., Malakouti, M.J., and Khavazi, K. 2014. Effect of phosphate solubilizing microorganisms on increasing the efficiency and recovery percent of phosphate fertilizers in canola. Iranian Journal of Soil Research (formerly Soil & Water Science) 24(4): 499-507. (In Persian with English Summary).
5. Barea, J.M. 2015. Future challenges and perspectives for applying microbial biotechnology in sustainable agriculture based on a better understanding of plant-microbiome interactions. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 15(2): 261-282.
6. Bildirici, N., and Yilmaz, N. 2005. The effect and different nitrogen and phosphorus doses and bacteria inoculation (Rhizobium phaseoli) on the yield and yield component of field bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Journal of Agronomy 4(3): 207-215.
7. Das, I., Pradhan, A.K., and Singh, A.P. 2014. Yield and yield attributing parameters of organically cultivated mung bean as influenced by PGPR and organic manures. Journal of Crop and Weed 10(1): 172-174.
8. Faryabi, E., Abdossi, V., Sibi, M., and Marzban, Z. 2015. Effects of dual inoculation of Mycorrhizal Arbuscular fungi and Rhizobium bacteria on yield and potassium content of corn grains and green bean under Intercropping. Journal of Novel Applied Sciences 4(6): 703-708.
9. Feizian, M., Hemmati, A., Asadi Rahmani, H., and Azizi, Kh. 2017. Effects of Rhizobium bacteria strains on yield components of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) in drought stress condition. Journal of Soil Biology 4(2): 165-176. (In Persian).
10. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 2015. Statistical Pocketbook World Food and A Available at Web site http://www.fao.org/Statistics (verified 31 Aug 2016).
11. Ghasemi Pir Balooti, A., Elah Dadi, I., Akbari, Gh.A., and Gol Paravar, A. 2004. Effects of inoculation of bean cultivars with Rhizobium legominosarum biovar phaseoli on yield and nitrogen fixation in Shahrekord condition. Journal of Agroecology 2(1): 55-66. (In Persian with English Summary).
12. Glick, B.R. 2014. Bacteria with ACC deaminase can promote plant growth and help to feed the world. Microbiological Research 169(1): 30-
13. Han, H.S., and Lee, K.D. 2005. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria effect on antioxidant status, photosynthesis, mineral uptake and growth of lettuce under soil salinity. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences 1(3): 210-215.
14. Hungria, M., De, S., Andrade, L.M., De O. Chueire, A., Probanza, F.J., and M., Guttierrez-Manero, Megias. 2000. Isolation and characterization of new efficient and competitive bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) rhizobia from Brazil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 32: 1515-1528.
15. Hungria, M., Andrade, D.S., Colozzi-Filho, A., and Balota, L. 1997a. Interacao entre microrganismos do solo, feijoeiro e milho em monocultura consorcio. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira 32: 807-818.
16. Jafari, M., Moosavi, S.S., Chaichi, M., Ahmadvand, Q., and Abdollahi, M. 2015. Evaluation of variability and heritability of effective traits on yield in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) under non-stress and moisture stress conditions before pod formation. Agronomy Journal (Pajouhesh & Sazandegi) 108: 59-66. (In Persian with English Summary).
17. Jahanara, F., Sadeghi, S.M., and Ashouri, M. 2013. The effect of nanocomposites of iron spraying on yield and yield components of wax bean genotypes inoculated with Rhizobium bacteria (Rhizobium leguminosarum) in the farm conditions of Gilan. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research 4(2): 111-120. (In Persian with English Summary).
18. Kizilkaya, R. 2008. Yield response and nitrogen concentrations of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) inoculated with Azotobacter chroococcum Ecological Engineering 33(2): 150-156.
19. Koocheki, A., Bakhshaie, S., Khorramdel, S., Mokhtari, V., and Taher Abadi, Sh. 2015. Effect of mycorrhiza symbiosis on yield, yield components and water use efficiency of sesame (Sesamum indicum) affected by different irrigation regimes in mashhad condition. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 13(3): 448-460. (In Persian with English Summary).
20. Kucuk, C. 2011. Inoculation with Rhizobium in kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties. Zemdirbyste Agriculture 98(1): 49-56.
21. Kumar, P., Pandey, P., Chandra Dubey, R., and Kumar Maheshwari, D. 2016. Bacteria consortium optimization improves nutrient uptake, nodulation, disease suppression and growth of the common bean Phaesolus vulgaris in both pot and field studies. Rhizosphere 2: 13-23.
22. Mcclean, P., Kamir, J., and Gepts, P. 2004. Genomic and Genetic Diversity in Common B In: R.F. Wilson, H.T. Stalker and E.C. Brummer (Eds.). Legume Crop Genomics. AOCS Press. Champaign, Illinois. p. 60-82.
23. Mehrpouyan, M., Noormohammadi, Gh., Mirhadi, M.J., Heidari Sharifabade, H., and Shirani Rad, A.H. 2011. Effect of some inoculants containing Rhizobium legominosarum; bv. Phaseoli on nutrients elements uptake in three cultivars of common bean. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research 1(2): 1-10. (In Persian with English Summary).
24. Mhamdi, R., Laguerre, G., Aouani, M., Mars, M., and Amarger, N. 2002. Different species and symbiotic genotypes of field rhizobia can nodulate Phaseolus vulgaris in Tunisian soils. FEMS. Microbiology Ecology 41: 77-84.
25. Nazeri, P., Kashani, A., Khavazi, K., Ardakani, M.R., Mirakhori, M., and Pour Siah Bidi, M. 2010. The effect of biofertilizer and phosphorus fertilizer banding with Zinc on white bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Agroecology 2(1): 175-185. (In Persian with English Summary).
26. Parvizi, K., Dashti, F., Esna Ashari, M., Rejali, F., and Chiechi, M. 2014. Effect of two mycorrhizal fungi species (Glomus mosseae and etunicatum) on mineral nutrients uptake and mini tuber production in potato plantlets. Journal of Soil Biology 1(1): 61-69. (In Persian with English Summary).
27. Peralta, H., Aguilar, A., Díaz, R., Mora, Y., Martínez-Batallar, G., Salazar, E., and Mora, J. 2016. Genomic studies of nitrogen-fixing rhizobial strains from Phaseolus vulgaris seeds and nodules. BMC Genomics 17(1): 711-718.
28. Safapour, M., Ardakani, M.R., Khaghani, Sh., Rejali, F., Zargari, K., Changizi, M., and Teimuri, M. 2011. Response of yield and yield components of three red bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes to co-inoculation with Glomus intraradices and Rhizobium phaseoli. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences 11 (3): 398-405.
29. Safapour, M., Ardakani, M.R., Rejali, F., Khaghani, SH., and Teimouri, M. 2010. Effect of co-inoculation of Mycorrhiza and Rhizobium on common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Science-Research Quarterly Journal New Finding in Agriculture 5(1): 21-35. (In Persian).
30. Scotti, R., Bonanomi, G., Scelza, R., Zoina, A., and Rao, M.A. 2015. Organic amendments as sustainable tool to recovery fertility in intensive agricultural systems. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 15(2): 333-352.
31. Shahsavani, Sh., Gharanjik, Sh., and Jadidoleslam, N. 2017. Effect of Mycorrhiza, Pseudomonas bacteria and humic acid on growth indices of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris ). Iranian Journal of Pulses Research 8(1): 97-112. (In Persian with English Summary).
32. Soheili Movahed, S., Esmaeili, M.A., Jabbari, F., and Fooladi, A. 2017. Evaluation of yield and yield components of some pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris ) genotypes under late season water deficit conditions. Journal of Agroecology 9(2): 433-444. (In Persian with English Summary).
33. Soleimani, R., and Asgharzadeh, A. 2010. Effects of Mesorhizobium inoculation and fertilizer application on yield and yield components of rainfed chickpea. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research 1(1): 1-8. (In Persian with English Summary).
34. Taherkhani, M., Normohammadi, Gh., Mirhadi, M.J., Haydari Sharif Abad, H., and Shirani Rad, A.M. 2009. Evaluation of different strains of Rhizobium leguminosarum phaseoli inoculation on ecophysiological nitrogen fixation ability of common bean, Phaseolus vulgaris L., cultivars. Agroecology Journal 5(1): 23-36. (In Persian with English Summary).
35. Tajini, F., Trabelsi, M., and Drevon, J.J. 2012. Combined inoculation with Glomus intraradices and Rhizobium tropici CIAT899 increases phosphorus use efficiency for symbiotic nitrogen fixation in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 19: 157-163.
36. Uyanoz, R. 2007. The effect of different bio-organic, chemical fertilizer and their combination on yield, macro and micro nutrient content of dry bean (phaseolus vulgaris). International Journal of Agriculture Research 2(2): 115-125.
37. Yadegari, M., Normohammadi, Gh., and Asadi Rahmani, H. 2009. inoculated with Rhizobium leguminosarum bv phaseoli and plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR). Agroecology Journal 5(2): 153-163. (In Persian with English Summary).
38. Zaidi, A., Khan, M.S., Saif, S., Rizvi, A., Ahmed, B., and Shahid, M. 2017. Role of Nitrogen-Fixing Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria in Sustainable Production of Vegetables: Current Perspective. In: Microbial Strategies for Vegetable Production. Springer International Publishing. (p. 49-79).