Response of yield and yield components of six genotypes of Pinto beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) inoculation with Rhizobium phaseoli Khavari *, H. & Shakarami2, Gh.

پژوهش‌های حبوبات ایران

Article 10, Volume 10, Issue 2, December 2020, Pages 132-148   

Document Type: Original Articles

DOI: 10.22067/ijpr.v10i2.70590

Authors

Hadi khavari^{* 1}; Ghodratolah Shakarami²

¹Young Researchers and Elite Club, Khorramabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khorramabad, Iran

²Department of Agronomy, Khorramabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khorramabad, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Increasing the production of crops to meet the food needs of a growing population of the world is a great necessity. Intensive farming is an agricultural system that uses more than necessary and unbalanced inputs (fertilizers and pesticides), causing major of pressure on the environment. Today, in conventional farming systems, due to the limited amount of agricultural land, as well as the growing need for crops produced in indigenous agriculture, they have led to unbalanced consumption without the management of chemical fertilizers in the production of these products. The use of chemical fertilizer: nitrogen (N), phosphate (P₂O₅), potassium (K₂O) in 2014-year ad around the world to 85.5, 32.2 and 20.4 (Kg of nutrients per ha) respectively. In comparison with year 2000 (Within 14 years), 64.9, 25.9 and 18.2 (Kg of nutrients per ha) respectively: 31.7, 28.1 and 12 percent it has increased. This undesirable agricultural management can change species composition or reduce biodiversity in farmland, and thus affect their natural capabilities in terms of crop production. On the other hand, increasing the health and security of food products produced in agricultural systems to maintain the dynamism of soil and water resources in these canopy systems is important on the basis of ecological principles. On the other hand, unbalanced consumption without management of chemical inputs has led to instability in agricultural ecosystems and the irreparable economic and environmental consequences of their consumption in agriculture are known throughout the world.
 
Materials & Methods
An experiment was conducted as factorial based on a randomized complete block design with three replications during growing season of 2017 at the experimental field of Beiranshahr city of Khorramabad in Lorestan Province, Iran (42° 79' E, 36° 70' N and 1669m above the sea level). To determine the physical and chemical properties of soil samples were collected from 0-30 cm depth of soil. During the experiment effects of two factors were studied: 1. Inoculation with Rhizobium bacteria Rb (Rhizobium Phaseoli Rb-133) in tow levels (Rb₁= inoculation, Rb₂= non-inoculation), and 2. different genotypes of pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in six levels (C₁: Gafar, C₂: Sadri, C_3: Talash, C₄: cos16 line, C₅: Khomein Landrace and C₆: Kosha genotypes). The seeds were inoculated with Rhizobium phaseoli Rb-133 before culturing. Traits such as: number of pods per plant, seeds per pod, number of seeds per plant, 100 seed weight, seed yield, biological yield and harvest index were measured.
 
Results & Discussion
The results showed the effect of rhizobium and genotype, number of seeds per pod, as well as the effect of two interactions rhizobium and genotype, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per plant, 100 seed weight, grain yield, biological yield and harvest index of pinto bean genotypes significantly increased. The effect of rhizobium and genotype had significant effects on number of seeds per pod (p≤0.01); effect of rhizobium and genotypeon number of pod per plant (p≤0.05), number of seed per plant (p≤0.01), 100 seed weight (p≤0.01), grain yield (p≤0.01), biological yield and harvest index (p≤0.01) had significant effects on pinto bean genotypes. Inoculation with Rhizobium seed yields of Ghafar, Sadri, Talash, Cos16 line, Khomein and Kosha 13.7, 37.2, 23, 20.9, 55.3 and 31.4 % increased, respectively. The highest grain yield (3485 Kg. ha^-1) was obtained in the interaction between rhizobium and Sadri genotype.
 
Conclusion
Generally, results showed that the yield and yield components of pinto bean genotypes were influenced by Rhizobium bacteria (Rhizobium phaseoli Rb-133) inoculation. The inoculation of seeds with rhizobium bacteria, coexistence of beans along with the nutritional elements during growth stages of Pinto bean genotypes, could improve growth indices, increase yield and yield components. Inoculation with rhizobium has an increased effect on yield and yield components of pinto bean genotypes and can increase the grain yield to a favorable level in order to produce a stable product.

Keywords

Biological fertilizers; Chemical fertilizers; Harvest index; Optimization; Sustainable production

References

1. Abbott, L.K., and Murphy, D.V. 2007. Soil Biological Fertility; A Key to Sustainable Land Use in A Springer International Publishing.
2. Amirabadi, M., Rejali, F., Ardakani, M., and Borji, M. 2009. Effect of Azotobacter and Mycorrhizal fungi inoculants on the uptake of some nutrients in corn (SC 704 cultivar) at different levels of phosphorus. Iranian Journal of Soil Research (Soil & Water Science) 23(1): 107-115. (In Persian).
3. Ansari, M.H., Asadi-Rahmani, H., Mazaheri, R., and Rezazadeh, B. 2017. The Effect of combined use of chemical fertilizer, Azetobacter, Azospirillum and compost on seed yield and nutrient uptake of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris ). Applied Research in Field Crops 30(3): 1-12. (In Persian).
4. Azarmi, F., Malakouti, M.J., and Khavazi, K. 2014. Effect of phosphate solubilizing microorganisms on increasing the efficiency and recovery percent of phosphate fertilizers in canola. Iranian Journal of Soil Research (formerly Soil & Water Science) 24(4): 499-507. (In Persian with English Summary).
5. Barea, J.M. 2015. Future challenges and perspectives for applying microbial biotechnology in sustainable agriculture based on a better understanding of plant-microbiome interactions. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 15(2): 261-282.
6. Bildirici, N., and Yilmaz, N. 2005. The effect and different nitrogen and phosphorus doses and bacteria inoculation (Rhizobium phaseoli) on the yield and yield component of field bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Journal of Agronomy 4(3): 207-215.
7. Das, I., Pradhan, A.K., and Singh, A.P. 2014. Yield and yield attributing parameters of organically cultivated mung bean as influenced by PGPR and organic manures. Journal of Crop and Weed 10(1): 172-174.
8. Faryabi, E., Abdossi, V., Sibi, M., and Marzban, Z. 2015. Effects of dual inoculation of Mycorrhizal Arbuscular fungi and Rhizobium bacteria on yield and potassium content of corn grains and green bean under Intercropping. Journal of Novel Applied Sciences 4(6): 703-708.
9. Feizian, M., Hemmati, A., Asadi Rahmani, H., and Azizi, Kh. 2017. Effects of Rhizobium bacteria strains on yield components of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) in drought stress condition. Journal of Soil Biology 4(2): 165-176. (In Persian).
10. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 2015. Statistical Pocketbook World Food and A Available at Web site http://www.fao.org/Statistics (verified 31 Aug 2016).
11. Ghasemi Pir Balooti, A., Elah Dadi, I., Akbari, Gh.A., and Gol Paravar, A. 2004. Effects of inoculation of bean cultivars with Rhizobium legominosarum biovar phaseoli on yield and nitrogen fixation in Shahrekord condition. Journal of Agroecology 2(1): 55-66. (In Persian with English Summary).
12. Glick, B.R. 2014. Bacteria with ACC deaminase can promote plant growth and help to feed the world. Microbiological Research 169(1): 30-
13. Han, H.S., and Lee, K.D. 2005. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria effect on antioxidant status, photosynthesis, mineral uptake and growth of lettuce under soil salinity. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences 1(3): 210-215.
14. Hungria, M., De, S., Andrade, L.M., De O. Chueire, A., Probanza, F.J., and M., Guttierrez-Manero, Megias. 2000. Isolation and characterization of new efficient and competitive bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) rhizobia from Brazil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 32: 1515-1528.
15. Hungria, M., Andrade, D.S., Colozzi-Filho, A., and Balota, L. 1997a. Interacao entre microrganismos do solo, feijoeiro e milho em monocultura consorcio. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira 32: 807-818.
16. Jafari, M., Moosavi, S.S., Chaichi, M., Ahmadvand, Q., and Abdollahi, M. 2015. Evaluation of variability and heritability of effective traits on yield in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) under non-stress and moisture stress conditions before pod formation. Agronomy Journal (Pajouhesh & Sazandegi) 108: 59-66. (In Persian with English Summary).
17. Jahanara, F., Sadeghi, S.M., and Ashouri, M. 2013. The effect of nanocomposites of iron spraying on yield and yield components of wax bean genotypes inoculated with Rhizobium bacteria (Rhizobium leguminosarum) in the farm conditions of Gilan. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research 4(2): 111-120. (In Persian with English Summary).
18. Kizilkaya, R. 2008. Yield response and nitrogen concentrations of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) inoculated with Azotobacter chroococcum Ecological Engineering 33(2): 150-156.
19. Koocheki, A., Bakhshaie, S., Khorramdel, S., Mokhtari, V., and Taher Abadi, Sh. 2015. Effect of mycorrhiza symbiosis on yield, yield components and water use efficiency of sesame (Sesamum indicum) affected by different irrigation regimes in mashhad condition. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 13(3): 448-460. (In Persian with English Summary).
20. Kucuk, C. 2011. Inoculation with Rhizobium in kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties. Zemdirbyste Agriculture 98(1): 49-56.
21. Kumar, P., Pandey, P., Chandra Dubey, R., and Kumar Maheshwari, D. 2016. Bacteria consortium optimization improves nutrient uptake, nodulation, disease suppression and growth of the common bean Phaesolus vulgaris in both pot and field studies. Rhizosphere 2: 13-23.
22. Mcclean, P., Kamir, J., and Gepts, P. 2004. Genomic and Genetic Diversity in Common B In: R.F. Wilson, H.T. Stalker and E.C. Brummer (Eds.). Legume Crop Genomics. AOCS Press. Champaign, Illinois. p. 60-82.
23. Mehrpouyan, M., Noormohammadi, Gh., Mirhadi, M.J., Heidari Sharifabade, H., and Shirani Rad, A.H. 2011. Effect of some inoculants containing Rhizobium legominosarum; bv. Phaseoli on nutrients elements uptake in three cultivars of common bean. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research 1(2): 1-10. (In Persian with English Summary).
24. Mhamdi, R., Laguerre, G., Aouani, M., Mars, M., and Amarger, N. 2002. Different species and symbiotic genotypes of field rhizobia can nodulate Phaseolus vulgaris in Tunisian soils. FEMS. Microbiology Ecology 41: 77-84.
25. Nazeri, P., Kashani, A., Khavazi, K., Ardakani, M.R., Mirakhori, M., and Pour Siah Bidi, M. 2010. The effect of biofertilizer and phosphorus fertilizer banding with Zinc on white bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Agroecology 2(1): 175-185. (In Persian with English Summary).
26. Parvizi, K., Dashti, F., Esna Ashari, M., Rejali, F., and Chiechi, M. 2014. Effect of two mycorrhizal fungi species (Glomus mosseae and etunicatum) on mineral nutrients uptake and mini tuber production in potato plantlets. Journal of Soil Biology 1(1): 61-69. (In Persian with English Summary).
27. Peralta, H., Aguilar, A., Díaz, R., Mora, Y., Martínez-Batallar, G., Salazar, E., and Mora, J. 2016. Genomic studies of nitrogen-fixing rhizobial strains from Phaseolus vulgaris seeds and nodules. BMC Genomics 17(1): 711-718.
28. Safapour, M., Ardakani, M.R., Khaghani, Sh., Rejali, F., Zargari, K., Changizi, M., and Teimuri, M. 2011. Response of yield and yield components of three red bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes to co-inoculation with Glomus intraradices and Rhizobium phaseoli. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences 11 (3): 398-405.
29. Safapour, M., Ardakani, M.R., Rejali, F., Khaghani, SH., and Teimouri, M. 2010. Effect of co-inoculation of Mycorrhiza and Rhizobium on common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Science-Research Quarterly Journal New Finding in Agriculture 5(1): 21-35. (In Persian).
30. Scotti, R., Bonanomi, G., Scelza, R., Zoina, A., and Rao, M.A. 2015. Organic amendments as sustainable tool to recovery fertility in intensive agricultural systems. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 15(2): 333-352.
31. Shahsavani, Sh., Gharanjik, Sh., and Jadidoleslam, N. 2017. Effect of Mycorrhiza, Pseudomonas bacteria and humic acid on growth indices of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris ). Iranian Journal of Pulses Research 8(1): 97-112. (In Persian with English Summary).
32. Soheili Movahed, S., Esmaeili, M.A., Jabbari, F., and Fooladi, A. 2017. Evaluation of yield and yield components of some pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris ) genotypes under late season water deficit conditions. Journal of Agroecology 9(2): 433-444. (In Persian with English Summary).
33. Soleimani, R., and Asgharzadeh, A. 2010. Effects of Mesorhizobium inoculation and fertilizer application on yield and yield components of rainfed chickpea. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research 1(1): 1-8. (In Persian with English Summary).
34. Taherkhani, M., Normohammadi, Gh., Mirhadi, M.J., Haydari Sharif Abad, H., and Shirani Rad, A.M. 2009. Evaluation of different strains of Rhizobium leguminosarum phaseoli inoculation on ecophysiological nitrogen fixation ability of common bean, Phaseolus vulgaris L., cultivars. Agroecology Journal 5(1): 23-36. (In Persian with English Summary).
35. Tajini, F., Trabelsi, M., and Drevon, J.J. 2012. Combined inoculation with Glomus intraradices and Rhizobium tropici CIAT899 increases phosphorus use efficiency for symbiotic nitrogen fixation in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 19: 157-163.
36. Uyanoz, R. 2007. The effect of different bio-organic, chemical fertilizer and their combination on yield, macro and micro nutrient content of dry bean (phaseolus vulgaris). International Journal of Agriculture Research 2(2): 115-125.
37. Yadegari, M., Normohammadi, Gh., and Asadi Rahmani, H. 2009. inoculated with Rhizobium leguminosarum bv phaseoli and plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR). Agroecology Journal 5(2): 153-163. (In Persian with English Summary).
38. Zaidi, A., Khan, M.S., Saif, S., Rizvi, A., Ahmed, B., and Shahid, M. 2017. Role of Nitrogen-Fixing Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria in Sustainable Production of Vegetables: Current Perspective. In: Microbial Strategies for Vegetable Production. Springer International Publishing. (p. 49-79).