Evaluation of mulch combination with Trifluralin and Imazethapyr for chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) weed control

پژوهش‌های حبوبات ایران

Article 1, Volume 11, Issue 1 - Serial Number 21, June 2020, Pages 12-25   

Document Type: Original Articles

DOI: 10.22067/ijpr.v11i1.70011

Authors

Arash Maghsoudi; Ebrahim Izadi-Darbandi^* ; Ahmad Nezami

Department of Agrotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Chickpea is the second important legume crops and because of high protein level (18-30 percent), has a key role in human diet. Chickpea is a weak competitor with weeds because of its slow growth at the seedling stage, lower height and slow canopy closer. Growing chickpea in weedy condition can suffer yield reduction up to 40 to 90 percent and weed management is one of the most important management methods in chickpea farming. Like another legumes, chickpea is more tolerate to pre-emergence herbicides compare to post-emergence herbicides. Experiments indicated using of one weed control method, can not have a proper and sustainable control on weeds and for this purpose we should integrate weed control methods for sustainable weed management. Mulches is one of the effective weed control method and reduced weed damages. In many cases, pre-emergence herbicides are used in combination with different mulches provide longer duration of weed control and suppress a broad spectrum weed species. Pre-emergence herbicides uses for combining with mulches mostly members of dinitroanilines such a trifluralin and pendimethalin or another pre-emergence herbicides like isoxaben and dichlobenil. In this regard, the goal of this study is evaluating the application of mulch-herbicide combination as a method in chickpea weed control.
 
Materials & Methods
The experiment was conducted in completely randomized blocks design with three replications at research farm of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran, during 2015. Treatments were included the pre-emergence application of trifluralin, imazethapyr and wood shaving mulch and two ways of mulch-herbicide mixtures application (application of herbicide under the mulch and application of pre-mixed herbicide with mulch) with full season hand weeding and full season weed interference as control treatments. For making pre-mixed mulch and herbicide, mulch is sprayed with herbicide in another place on plastic foil and mixed together with rake completely then transported to the field experiment and was spread in field experiment. Studied mulch is a carpentry wood shaved mulch and was spread on the field experiment in 3 centimeter height with rake. For application of herbicides under the mulch, herbicides applied on the soil surface first, then mulch would be spread on the soil surface. The data statistical analysis were performed by Mini Tab Ver 17 and draw the figures with Excel 2013. Means were also compared by LSD (Last Significant Difference) test at 5% probability level.
 
Results & Discussion
Results indicated that, application of imazethapyr injured chickpea hardly and stopped chickpea growth. Application of trifluralin and wood shaving mulch alone, decreased weed density and weed biomass and increased chickpea yield significantly. Combination of wood shaving mulch and trifluralin indicated that two different results, trifluralin-mulch mixed had the higher chickpea seed yield (1450 Kg.ha-1) and biomass (3700 Kg.ha-1). Although application of mulch after trifluralin application as pre-emergence, controlled weeds significantly and provide the longer weed duration control in growing season, but also injured chickpea, and decreased it’s suitable density and indicated that the lowest chickpea seed yield and biomass. There was not significantly difference between the trifluralin application alone and trifluralin-mulch combination in three periods of sampling in weed density and biomass it seems the mulch prevent the trifluralin to achieve to the soil surface and decrease weed control efficacy but when trifluralin applied under mulch, weed control efficacy increased and controlled weeds during the growing season significantly. Trifluralin is decomposable when is applied in day light but when it is under mulch it be more stable and increase efficacy compare with application alone.
Conclusion
Through the experiment, mulch is suppress weeds and reduced weed density and biomass significantly and increased chickpea biomass and seed yield. Chickpea is very sensitive to pre-emergence application of imazethapyr and it caused chickpea injury, although this herbicide is labeled for chickpea in Turkey and controlled weeds significantly but in this experiment it caused chickpea injury. Chickpea is less sensitive to trifluralin and trifluralin application, increased chickpea yield significantly and decreased weed density and biomass. It seems that to be trifluralin-mulch combination, when trifluralin applied under the mulch, is suitable and increase the efficacy weed control and decrease the costs with this regard but it caused injury crop and decreased chickpea yield. Pre-mixed combination trifluralin with mulch decreased trifluralin efficacy compare to application Trifluralin under the mulch.

Keywords

Integrated weed managment; Mulch; Mulch-herbicide combination; Rainfed farming

References

1. Al-Thahabi, S.A., Yasin, I.Z., Abu-Irmaileh, B.E., Haddad, N.I., and Saxena, M.C. 1994. Effect of weed removal on productivity of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) and lentil (Lens culinaris Med.) in a Mediterranean environment. Journal of Agronomy Crop Science 41(1): 60-65.
2. Bagheri, A., Nezami, A., and Parsa, M. 1997. Agronomy and Breeding of Chickpea. Jahad Daneshgahi Mashhad press. 444 pp. (in Persian).
3. Bruce, A.L., Brouder, S.M., and Hill, J.E. 2006. Winter straw and water management: effects on soil nitrogen dynamics in California rice systems. Journal of Agronomy 98(4): 1050-1059.
4. Buhler, D.D. 1992. Population dynamics and control of annual weeds in corn (Zea mays) as influenced by tillage systems. Journal of Weed Science 40(2): 241-248.
5. Chauhan, B.S., and Abugho, S.B. 2012. Interaction of rice residue and PRE herbicides on emergence and biomass of four weed species. Journal of Weed Technology 26(4): 627-632.
6. Chen, S.Y., Zhang, X.Y., Pei, D., Sun, H.Y., and Chen, S.L. 2007. Effects of straw mulching on soil temperature, evaporation and yield of winter wheat: field experiments on the North China Plain. Annals of Applied Biology 150(3): 261-268.
7. Chen, Y., Strahan, R.E., and Bracy, R.P. 2013. Effects of mulching and pre-emergence herbicide placement on yellow nutsedge control and ornamental plant quality in landscape beds. Journal of Horticulture Technology 23(5): 651-658.
8. Corp, M., Machado, S., Ball, D., Smiley, R., Petrie, S., Siemens, M., and Guy, S. 2004. Chickpea Production Guide. Oregon State University. Extension Service, EM 8791-E.
9. Crutchfield, D.A., Wicks, G.A., and Burnside, O.C. 1986. Effect of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) straw mulch level on weed control. Journal of Weed Science 34(1): 110-114.
10. Derr, J.F. 1994. Innovative herbicide application methods and their potential for use in the nursery and landscape industries. Journal of Horticulture Technology 4(4): 345-
11. Facelli, J.M., and Pickett, S.T. 1991. Plant litter: its dynamics and effects on plant community structure. Journal of Botanical Review 57(1): 1-32.
12. Fawcett, R.S., Christensen, B.R., and Tierney, D.P. 1994. The impact of conservation tillage on pesticide runoff into surface water: a review and analysis. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 49(2): 126-135.
13. Fetri, M., Ghobadi, M.E., Ghobadi, M., and Mohammadi, M. 2016. Effect of sowing depth and mulching types on soil water storage at different growth stages of chickpea under rainfed farming. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research 7(1): 135-144. (in Persian with English Summary).
14. Haghparast, R., and Moradi, N. 2012. Importance of Chickpea Trade and P In: Chickpea National Community Board Report. p. 5-8. (in Persian).
15. Izadi-Darbandi, E., and Akram, L. 2012. Investigate the of Pyridate, Bentazon and Imazethpyr herbicides on growth, nodulation and biological nitrogen fixation I chickpea. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research 3(1): 105-118. (in Persian with English Summary).
16. Jahad Keshavarzi S Information Technology Center. Ministry of Agriculture. Iran. 2015.
17. Kantar, F., and Elkoca, E. 1999. Chemical and agronomical weed control in chickpea (Cicer arietinum). Journal of Agriculture and Forest 23(6): 631-635.
18. Knight, P.R., Gilliam, C.H., File, S.L., and Reynolds, D. 2001. Mulches reduce herbicide loss in the landscape. Proceeding South Nursery Research Conference 46: 461-463.
19. Lanphear, F.O. 1968. Incorporation of dichlobenil in mulches. Journal of Weed Science 16(2): 230-
20. Locke, M.A., and Bryson, C.T. 1997. Herbicide-soil interactions in reduced tillage and plant residue management systems. Journal of Weed Science 45(2): 307-320.
21. Lyon, D.J., and Wilson, R.G. 2005. Chemical weed control in dryland and irrigated chickpea. Journal of Weed Technology 19(4): 959-965.
22. Marble, S.C. 2015. Herbicide and mulch interactions: A review of the literature and implications for the landscape maintenance industry. Journal of Weed Technology 29(3): 341-349.
23. Mathers, H.M. 2003. Novel methods of weed control in containers. Journal of Horticulure Technology 13(1): 28-34.
24. Modhej, A., and Bedarvandi, B. 2006. Integrated weeds management in canola. In: Proceedings of 1^st Asian Pacific Weed Science Society Conference, Colombo, Srilanka.
25. Moradi, A. 2010. The Efficiency of Pendimethaline, Oxyflourfen, Trifluralin, Imazethapyr Herbicides and Hand Weeding Controls on Chickpea in M MSc. Thesis. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. (in Persian with English Summary).
26. Mousavi, S.K., Pezeshkpour, P., and Shahroudi, M. 2007. Weed community response to chickpea cultivars and planting date in rainfed condition. Journal of Agricultural and Natural Resources Science 4(1):167-176. (in Persian with English Summary).
27. Mousavi, S.K., Sabeti, P., Jafarzadeh, N., and Bazzazi, D. 2010. Evaluation of some herbicides efficacy for weed control in chickpea. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research 1(1):19-31. (in Persian with English Summary).
28. Obiefuna, J.C. 1986. effect of sawdust mulch and increasing levels of nitrogen on the weed growth and yield of false horn plantains. Journal of Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 3(4): 353-359.
29. Oliviera, S.C., Pereira, F.M., Ferraz, A., Silva, F.T., and Goncalves, A.R. 2000. Mathematical modeling of controlled-release systems of herbicides using lignins as matrices-A review.Journal of Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 84(86): 595-615.
30. Paolini, R., Faustini, F., Saccardo, F., and Crino, P. 2006. Competitive interactions between chickpea genotypes and weeds. Journal of Weed Research 46(4): 335-
31. Parsa, M., and Bagheri, A. 2008. Pulses. Jahad Daneshgahi Mashhad P 524 pp. (in Persian).
32. Rashed Mohassel, M.H., and Nassiri Mahallati, M. 1993. Herbicide Physiology (Translated). Jahad Daneshgahi Mashhad P 589 pp. (in Persian).
33. Samtani, J.B., Kling, G.J., Mathers, H.M., and Case, L. 2007. Rice hulls, leaf-waste pellets, and pine bark as herbicide carriers for container-grown woody ornamentals. Journal of Horticulture Technology 17(3): 289-295.
34. Solh, M.B., and Pala, M. 1990. Weed Control in Cp. 93-99. In: Proceedings of the Seminar on Present Status and Future Prospects of Chickpea Crop Production and Improvement in Resistance to Imidazolinone in Chickpea 127:1583-1591.
35. Vaishya, R.D., Rai, O.P., and Singh, R.K. 1999. Weed control in field pea with pre and post emergence herbicides. Indian Journal of Pulses Research 12(2): 201-205.
36. Wells, D.W., Constantin, R.J., and Brown, W.L. 1987. Weed control innovations for large, container grown ornamentals. In: Proceedings South Weed Science Society 40: 137.