Identifying and Explaining Functional Implications of Agricultural Technological Innovation System

مجله اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی

Article 2, Volume 31, Issue 3 - Serial Number 37, October 2017, Pages 196-206   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jead2.v31i3.52453

Authors

R. Maghabl^{* 1}; K. Naderi Mahdei¹; A. Yaghoubi Farani¹; M. Mohammadi²

¹Buali-Sina Hamadan

²Department of Technology Management, University of Tehran

Abstract

Introduction: There is a strong need to influence both speed and direction of innovation and technological change in agriculture. An Agricultural Technological Innovation System (ATIS) is a collaborative arrangement bringing together several organizations working toward innovational-technological, managerial, organizational, and institutional change in agriculture. The purpose of this study was to identify and explain functional implicationsaffecting the development of the agricultural technological innovation system.
Materials and Methods: This research paradigm was in the form of exploratory phase mixed method with qualitative to quantitative data connection approach. The statistical sample of the qualitative section, consists key members of the nanotechnology and biotechnology committees of Ministry of Agriculture-jihad (35 people) which 12 persons were interviewed by using purposive sampling technique, and quantitative section of research consists the members of nanotechnology and biotechnology of agricultural sector committees (117 people), which were all enumerated. To achieve the reliability and validity of the qualitative section of research three-dimensional vision technique wasused. And at the quantitative section, Cronbach's alpha test and opinions of subject experts were used. Cronbach’s alpha and ordinal theta were 0.78 and 0.89, respectively.
Results and Discussion: After the discovery of 30 subsidiary elements in form of 7 main factors achieved from a qualitative section of research using Atlas.ti5.2 software (research-development implications, Institutional-Structural implications, Legal-policy implications, business-marketing implications, innovational-technological implications, credit- financial implications, extensional - educational implications), finally, at the quantitative section of research using SPSS, the total variance explaining by the identified factors, measured. According to the results of exploratory factor analysis, research – developmentimplications, explained the 17.23% of the total variance the functional implications of agricultural technological innovation system development. This research finding was consistent with researchers results of Abdi and Hassanzadeh (2), Farshad et al. (10) and Sharifzadeh et al. (24). Legal - policy implicationswas the second factor with 15.58% of the explained variance the implications of the development of agricultural technological innovation system. This research finding was consistent with the results of researches were carried out by Temel et al.(25), Bergek et al. (4), Hekkert and Negro (12), Abdi and Hasanzadeh (2), Meigounpoory et al. (19), Farshadet al. (10) and Sharifzadeh et al. (24).Business -marketing implicationsis composed of variables likerisk decrease on investment in agricultural businesses, Price balance of agricultural products (increase or decrease cost of production because of the lack of proper cultivation, increase cost of production inputs and tensions in the global rate of products) and scientific management in the agricultural production farmlands with 12.32 percent of explained variance the implications of agricultural technological innovation development as the third important factor was classified. This section of findings was in agreement with research’s results of Temel et al. (25), Cristina and Patarapong (8), Negro et al. (21), Momeni and Alizadeh (20), Abdi and Hasanzadeh (2) and Meigounpoory et al. (19). Institutional - structural implications werethe fourth factor of the implications of development of agricultural technological innovation, which explained 10.68 percent of total variance. This finding of the study was consistent with the results of research Cristina and Patarapong (8), Negro et al. (21), Momeni and Alizadeh (20), Meigounpoory et al. (19), Farshad et al. (10), Sharifzadeh et al.(24 ). Innovative - technical implications as the fifth factor of the implications of agricultural technological innovation development with important variables like proportionment between technological innovation and the needs of farmers demand and the predicate the impact of events on technological innovations such as climate change explained 8.21% of the total variance that this finding was consistent with research results of Farshad et al. (10), Sharifzadeh et al. (24).Extensional - educational implicationswereclassified as the last of the implications to technological innovation system for agricultural development that this finding matches with the results of Hekkert and Negro (21) and Momeni and Alizadeh (20).
Conclusions: The results showed that 7 of the mentioned factors, explained at about 78.35% of the total variance of functional implications affecting the development of agricultural technological innovation system. To verify the structure validity of a questionnaire and fitness of model to measurement the functional implicationsimportance of agricultural technological innovation system development, collected data analyzed by the software of LISRELwin8.8 through confirmatory factor analysis that the results of various fitness indicators showed that the model is based on an acceptable level (df/x2=1.785, Goodness of Fit Index=0.93, Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index=0.96, Comparative Fit Index=0.93, Incremental Fit Index=0.95, Root Mean square Residual=0.06, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation=0.056).

Keywords

development; policy; Agriculture; Institution

References

1. Abbaszadeh M. 2012. Reflectionson thereliability and validityinqualitative research. Applied Sociology, 23(1): 19-34. (in Persian with English abstract)

2. Abdi M., and Hasanzadeh A. R. 2013. Systematic approach in mining innovation system's problems, the Third International Conference and the Seventh National Conference on Management of Technology, Kish. (in Persian with English abstract)

3. Asare R., and David S. 2011. Planting, replanting and tree diversification in cocoa systems: Manual no. 1: Planting, replanting and tree diversification in cocoa systems. Forest & Landscape, University of Copenhagen.

4. Bergek A., Jacobsson S., Carlsson B., Linmark S., and Rickne A. 2008. Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy, 37: 407-429.

5. Bowman M. S., and Zilberman D. 2013. Economic factors affecting diversified farming systems. Ecology and Society, 18(1): 33-45.

6. Cervantes-Godoy D., and Dewbre J. 2010. Economic Importance of Agriculture for Poverty Reduction. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Working Papers, No. 23.

7. Cleaver K. 2013. The importance of scaling up for agricultural and rural development. Programs International Fund for Agricultural Development Rome, Italy.

8. Cristina C., and Patarapong I. 2009. Innovation System Policies in Less Successful Developing Countries: The case of Thailand. Papers in Innovation Studies 2007/9, Lund University, and CIRCLE - Center for Innovation, Research and Competences in the Learning Economy.

9. Dadashpoor A. A. 2012. The role of agriculture in economic strength. National Conference to Examine and Explain the strength of the economy. (in Persian with English abstract)

10. Farshad H., Bagherinezad J., and Kasraei A. R. 2014.Identify and analyzesystemic problemsinNational Innovation System, the University ofEconomic Sciences, Faculty of Managementeconomic institutions, MSgraduatein MBA, Technology Management. (in Persian with English abstract)

11. Hailk Y., and Shahin T. M. M. 2011. Engineering Design Process, Second Edition. Cengage Learning, USA.

12. Hekkert M. P., and Negro S. 2010. Functions of innovation systems as a framework to understand sustainable technological change: Empirical evidence for earlier claims. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76:584-594.

13. Hojjati M. 2013. Pro-government approach to agriculture in order to increase political self. News Analytical Ecosystem. Available at: http://www.zistboom.com/fa/news/22263/. (in Persian with English abstract)

14. Guisepi R. 2012. Agriculture and the origins of civilization: The Neolithic revolution. Available at: http://www.history-world.org/agriculture.htm

15. Karimi A., Malekmohamadi I., Daryani M., and Rezvanfar A. 2011. A Conceptual Model of Intrapreneurship in the Iranian Agricultural Extension Organization: Implications for HRD. Journal of European Industrial Training, 35 (7): 632-657. (in Persian with English abstract)

16. Malekifar A., and Boshehri A. R. 2004. Technology management. Malek AshtarUniversity Press, first edition. (in Persian with English abstract)

17. Malekifar S. 2014. The need for technological innovation in the economy. No. 2055, East newspaper. (in Persian)

18. Mehnatfar Y., and Zarei M. 2013. Prioritize the development of the agricultural sector using Multi Criteria Decision Making: A Case Study of Kermanshah. Conference on Agricultural and Environmental Sciences. (in Persian with English abstract)

19. Meigounpoory M. R., Motavasseli M., and Meigounpoory A. 2013. Identifying the Factors Influencing Technological Innovation System in the Field of Renewable Energy. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 6(4): 169-184. (in Persian with English abstract)

20. Momeni F., and Alizadeh P. 2013.Analysis the results of the policy of innovation in terms of institutional barriers. Journal of Applied Economic Research, 2 (8): 89-73. (in Persian with English abstract)

21. Negro S., Hekkert M. P., and Smits R. 2008. Stimulating renewable energy technologies by innovation policy. Science and Public Policy, 35(6):403-416.

22. Rajalahti R., Woelcke J., and Pehu E. 2005. Development of Research Systems to Support the Changing Agricultural Sector. Agriculture and Rural Development Discussion Paper 14. World Bank, Washington, DC.

23. Rezaeian Fartoei S., Fallah H., Ghazinoori S. S., and Aliahmadi, A.R. 2014. Modeling the relationship between knowledge management functions and performance indicators of the national innovation system. Strategy, 71: 195-167. (in Persian with English abstract)

24. Shrifzadeh A., Abdollahzadeh Gh., and Sharifi M. 2014. Diagnosing Management of Agricultural Research and Technology Development under the Agricultural Innovation Framework.Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 28(1):71-82. (in Persian with English abstract)

25. Temel T., Janssen W. and Karimov, F. 2002. The Agricultural Innovation System of Azerbaijan: An Assessment of Institutional Linkages. ISNAR country report R64.