Farmers' Satisfaction from Installing Intelligent Flowmeter on Underground Water Wells (The Case of Mahidasht County, Kermanshah Province)

مجله اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی

Article 3, Volume 32, Issue 1 - Serial Number 39, April 2018, Pages 43-55   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jead2.v32i1.66512

Authors

R. Qobadpour; F. Eskandari^* ; M. Jalali

University of Kurdistan

Abstract

Introduction: Agriculture sector is the main consumer of water in Iran. According to statistics, global dependency of agriculture sector to underground water is 37.5% while in the Middle East the rate is 46.2% but in Iran, this amount exceeds 62%. This statistic indicates that underground water consumption by agriculture sector in Iran is much higher in comparison with other parts of the world bringing up more challenges to the country. As a result, the Iranian government has long tried to apply diverse strategies to conserve agricultural water by the sector. One of these strategies which has recently been executed by the government, is installing intelligent flowmeter on agricultural wells. Accordingly, farmers are forced to use this strategy to consume less water, thereby, managing underground water more efficiently. Notwithstanding the different extension programs applied by the government to encourage farmers to accept this new strategy more satisfactorily, farmers are not satisfied by the strategy causing them to resist against installation of flowmeter on their agricultural wells. Although compulsory, if government could encourage farmers to use this strategy more willingly, they will conduct a better behavior towards water conservation. Therefore, studying why farmers are not satisfied by this strategy of water management is of critical importance to policy makers and practitioners. To that end, the main purpose of this research was to investigate factors affecting farmers’ satisfaction from installing intelligent flowmeter on their agricultural well applying theory of Values, Beliefs, and Norms. The theory has been applied by many scholars to investigate environmental conservation behaviors but all of them have addressed voluntary behaviors. We wanted to know whether it could be applied to study compulsory behaviors as well.
Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional survey research was conducted in Mahidasht county, Kermanshah province, Iran. According to the statistics, there are currently 352 intelligent flowmeters installed on the agricultural wells in the region irrigating more than 8000 hectares of agricultural lands. Using stratified random sampling technique, 120 farmers were chosen. Data were gathered during spring and summer of 2016 through a questionnaire validity of which was confirmed by faculty members and experts of agricultural extension and irrigation. The reliability of the questionnaire was confirmed applying Cronbach’s alpha coefficient analysis. Data were analyzed applying AMOS software. We used path analysis technique to address research objectives.
Results and Discussion: Main results indicated that farmers are satisfied with an average level from installing the intelligent flowmeter on their wells. Most farmers have not been trained by the government on how to use the intelligent flowmeter efficiently. Furthermore, farmers mentioned that they have not been supported by the government after installation of the flowmeter. Most respondents mentioned that it is not fair to force farmers to install flowmeter on their wells as they cannot afford it. Also, they believed that this strategy does not decrease water consumption by farmers and considered the strategy as an insufficient solution for water management. Path analysis applying AMOS software showed that attitude towards water conservation, water conservation value, attitude towards installation fairness, attitude towards installation usefulness, income, subjective behavioral control, access to resources, education, and extension training afterward the installation, have significant positive effect on farmers’ satisfaction. A surprising finding was the insignificant influence of personal and social norms on farmers satisfaction which was against the theory of Values, Beliefs, Norms. The main reason behind this finding was that the sample was almost homogenous in terms of their norms regarding water conservation behavior. Therefore, this research cannot address whether farmers norms is influencing their satisfaction of installing flowmeter on their wells.
Conclusion: theory of Values, Beliefs, and Norms could be applied to address compulsory water management behaviors by farmers. In fact, government could persuade farmers to accept compulsory water management strategies more willingly if it can change farmers’ attitudes and beliefs concerning environmental crisis. According to the result, farmers’ attitude towards water conservation has the highest effect on satisfaction followed by contextual factors of income and education. The findings revealed that lack of extension training on how to manage water more efficiently in the region is obvious. The findings of this study reveal that if government and policymakers prefer that farmers install flowmeter on their wells voluntarily even though it is compulsory, then they should invest more on changing farmers’ attitudes and beliefs towards water and environmental crisis through developing more extensive training programs in this regard. The results indicated that extension programs could have significant direct and indirect effect on farmers satisfaction and behavior. Therefore, it is suggested that different extension programs to be developed to affect farmers’ attitudes and beliefs regarding water conservation as the result shows the importance of attitude on farmers’ behavior towards water management.

Keywords

Environmental behavior; Farmers satisfaction; Intelligent flow meter; Theory of Values Beliefs Norms; Underground water conservation

References

1- Aazami A., Zarafshani k., Dehghani H., and Gorji A. 2011. Analyzing farmers’ satisfaction from utilization of pipe irrigation system in Kermanshah province. Journal of Water and Soil, 25 (4): 845-853. (In Persian with English abstract)

2- Afshar N., and Zarafshani K. 2010. Tendency towards participation in irrigation management: the case of Sefidbarg and Sarabbas water cooperatives in Kermanshah province. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Extension and Education, 6 (2): 99-114. (In Persian with English abstract)

3- Bahrami N., and Nourmohammadi A. 2014. Factors affecting participation in irrigation management through water flowmeters: the case of Takestani farmers, Qazvin. P. 241-249. Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Development: Solutions and Challenges. Tabriz, Iran. (In Persian)

4- Balali H., Khalilian S., and Ahmadian M. 2010. The role of water pricing in agriculture on underground water equilibrium. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 24 (2): 185-194. (In Persian with English abstract)

5- Bamberg S., and Möser G. 2007. Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: a new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27: 14-25.

6- Battershill M.R., and Gilg A. 1997. Socio-economic constraints and environmentally friendly farming in the southwest of England. Journal of Rural Studies, 13: 213-228.

7- Becerra S., Saqalli M., Gangneron F., and Hamath A. 2012: Ordinary vulnerabilities, coping strategies and future adaptability to water crises in the Sahelian Mali (Gourma). Journal of Hydrology, 34: 27-47.

8- Calorine N.B., Charles H.N., and Robert A. 2009. An Evaluation of the Missouri Master naturalist program and implications for program expansion. Journal of Extension, 47(3): 1-15.

9- Clark J., and Lowe P. 1992. Cleaning up agriculture: environment, technology and social science, Sociologia Ruralis, 32: 11-29.

10- Clark W.A., and Finley J.C. 2008. Determinants of water conservation intention in Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria, Society and Natural Resources, 20 (7): 613-627.

11- Fatemi M., and Karami E. 2010. Analyzing reasons and consequences of drought. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Extension and Education, 6 (2): 77-97. (In Persian with English abstract)

12- Heidarizadeh M., and Karimi Z. 2009. Investigating critical and unsustainable conditions of ground and underground waters in Kermanshah province applying Salas and Modfolow models. P. 233-241. Proceedings of 10th National Seminar on Irrigation and Reduction of Evaporation, University of Shahid-bahonar, Kerman, Iran. (In Persian)

13- Hosseinzadeh J. 2004. An appropriate method of water pricing in agriculture sector: the case of Alavian dam, unpublished dissertation, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran. (In Persian with English abstract)

14- Hurliman A., Dolnicar S., and Meye P. 2009. Understanding behavior to inform water supply management in developed nations- A review of literature, conceptual model and research agenda, Environmental Management, 91 (1): 47-56.

15- Jorgensen B. S., and Martin J. F. 2015. Understanding farmer intentions to connect to a modernised delivery system in an Australian irrigation district: a reasoned action approach. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58 (3): 513-536.

16- Keshavarz M., Karami E., and Zamani GH. 2010. Vulnerability of farm households against drought, Iranian Journal of Agricultural Extension and Education, 6 (2): 15-32. (In Persian with English abstract)

17- Mohammadjani A., and Yazdanian N. 2014. Analyzing water crisis in Iran and requirements for its management, Journal of Trend, 21 (65, 66): 117-144.

18- Molle F., Venot J.P., and Hassan Y. 2008. Irrigation in the Jordan Valley: Are water pricing policies overly optimistic? Agricultural water Management, 95: 427- 438.

19- Monostori K., and Horich B. 2008. Studies environmental awareness: Attitude or action? Journal of Review of Sociology, 14(2): 5-31.

20- Ortega J.F., de Juan J.A., and tarjuelo J.M. 2005. Improving water management: The irrigation advisory service of castilla- La Mancha (Spain). Agricultural water management, 77: 37- 58.

21- Prasad B., K., Tanguchi K., and Sharma R. 2006. Irrigation and drainage systems, springer Netherlands, Earth and Environmental Science, 20(2- 3): 114-126.

22- Price J.C., and Leviston Z. 2014. Predicting pro-environmental agricultural practices: The social, psychological and contextual influences on land management. Journal of Rural Studies, 34: 65-78.

23- Regner J.H., Salman A.Z., Wolff H.P., and A1-Karablieh E. 2006. Approaches and impacts of participatory irrigation systems-experiences and results from the Jordan valley, P. 1-9. Proceedings of the Conference on Interactional Agricultural Research for Development, University of Bonn, Germany, October 11-13, 2006.

24- Saleh A., and Mokhtari D. 2007. Socio-economic consequences of drought on rural households in Sistan region. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Extension and Education, 3 (1): 99-114. (In Persian with English abstract)

25- Sattler C., and Nagel U.J. 2010. Factors affecting farmers’ acceptance of conservation measures: A case study from north-eastern Germany. Land Use Policy, 27: 70–77.

26- Seymour E., Curtis A., Pannell D., Allan C., and Roberts A. 2010. Understanding the role of assigned values in natural resource management. Australian Journal of Environment Management, 17: 142- 153.

27- Shajari Sh., and Torkamani J. 2007. Relevancy of multicriteria decision making simulations to analyze irrigation water demand: the case of Dorodzan watershed in Fars province, P.17-37. Proceedings of 6th Iranian conference of Agricultural Economics, University of Ferdousi, Mashhad, Iran. (In Persian)

28- Sharifzadeh M., Kamkarhaghighi A., Ahmadvand M., Roudari A., and Amiri Z. 2010. Farmers and managerial styles of water distribution: the case of Droudzan watershed in Fars province. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 41 (2): 181-191. (In Persian with English abstract)

29- Stern P.C. 2000. Towards a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56: 407-424.

30- Trumbo C.W., and O’Keefe G.J., 2005. Intention to conserve water: environmental values, reasoned action, and information effects across time. Society and Natural Resources, 18 (6): 573-585.

31- Verma S., and namara R.E. 2006. Promoting micro irrigation technologies that reduce poverty. Water Policy Briefing, 24: 22-32.

32- Yazdanpanah M., Hayati D., Hochrainer-Stigler S., and Zamani GH. 2014. Understanding farmers’ intention and behavior regarding water conservation in the Middle-East and North Africa: A case study in Iran. Journal of Environmental Management, 135: 63-72.

33- Yazdanpanh M., Hayati D., and Zamani G.H. 2011. Application of cultural theory in the analysis of attitudes and activities in water resources protection, Case Study: Employees of Jehad-Agriculture Organization of Bushehr province. Journal of Iran's agriculture extension and education sciences, 7(2): 1-18. (In Persian with English abstract)

34- Zarafshani K., Alibagi A.H., and Afshar N. 2008. The utility of discriminate analysis for predicting farmers intensions to participate in farmer- managed in Iran. Journal of applied science, 8 (4): 697- 701.