Designing and Constructing an Active Boom Balancing System using a New Technique Variable Fulcrum Method and Comparing It with a Conventional Sprayer

ماشین های کشاورزی

Article 2, Volume 11, Issue 2 - Serial Number 22, 2021, Pages 145-159   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jam.v11i2.79786

Authors

P. Pashaee^* ; H. R. Ghasemzadeh; H. Behfar

Department of Biosystems Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
According to reports on trends in the agricultural industry, demand for more precise and affordable machinery is rising and precision farming methods used by farmers are expanding. Damping vibration of the boom sprayer is one of the challenges for researchers when crossing the surface roughness. The lack of uniformity of the nozzle spray pattern and the reduction of the precision and quality is the result of an uncontrolled vibration of the boom sprayer. So far, many efforts have been made to decrease the vibration of the long sprayer boom. Using active and passive methods, researchers have achieved great success in reducing the spray boom vibration. Many of these methods are based on the use of external force as a controlling force. Expensive equipment, the use of tractor hydraulic power, and high energy costs are the main disadvantages of these methods. In the present work, a new system called "variable support" was designed and built. The boom rests on a round bar at its midpoint; as the boom tends to oscillate, a minute amount of rotation of the bar activated by a servomotor in an appropriate direction, alters the position of the resting point of the boom on the supporting bar, bringing the boom back to its initial balanced position as a result.

Materials and Methods
To carry out experiments, the universal tractor U650 and a mounted tractor sprayer model tms500 with 8 m boom and a 500-liter tank, was used in this research by making changes to the design of the simple tractor sprayer a new active sprayer designed and built with intelligent online balancing system that in addition to balancing the boom angle, it reduced the fluctuations that occur during work. Electronic control was used to control the position of the boom. The microcontroller programming codes were developed and uploaded in the microprocessor to execute instantaneous commands to the mounted activator due to the need for boom positional data for analyzing experiments, a data logger was also designed in conjunction with the controller circuit and the algorithm was loaded after coding with C++. To compare the new sprayer with the conventional, a field test was conducted. Tests were carried out according to manufacturer's instructions at three-speed levels of 3 (low), 5 (medium), and 8 km h^-1 (high), with three bumps heights of 10, 15, and 20 cm with three replications. For the acquisition of vertical acceleration as well as axial rotation data in the conventional sprayer, a data logger with an accelerometer and gyroscope was used. The data logging rate and the accuracy of the accelerometer and gyroscope measurement were set to 50 Hz, 0.1 m s^-2 and 0.1°, respectively.

Results and Discussion
To compare the behavior of the active and the conventional spray booms in terms of vibrations, the univariate analysis was used. The results showed that there was a significant difference between the performances of two sprayers at 5% probability level with the sig. number of 0.000.
To compare the behavior of the active and the conventional spray booms in terms of axial rotation, also the Univariate analysis was used. The results showed that there was significant difference between the performances of two sprayers at 5% probability level with the sig. number of 0.000. Also, comparing the marginal mean values of the data obtained from the data logger showed that the active boom compared with the conventional boom had less axial rotation and less vertical acceleration.

Conclusion
Results of experiments showed that the new sprayer with variable support system, relative to the conventional sprayer in terms of controlling boom acceleration and the angular balance of the boom with a significant difference had relative superiority and can be considered as an appropriate alternative to increase the accuracy of spraying, although more research on large scale booms are necessary before coming to final conclusion.

Keywords

Active force control; Balanced long boom sprayer; Precision farming; Variable support

References

1. Rohani, A., and H. Makarian. 2012. Making weed management maps by artificial neural networks for using in precision agriculture. Journal of Agricultural Machinery 1: 74-83. (In Farsi).

2. Atreya, K., F. Johnsen, and B. Sitaula. 2012. Health and environmental costs of pesticide use in vegetable farming in Nepal. Environment, Development and Sustainability 14: 477-493.

3. Chaplin, J., and C. Wu. 1990. Dynamic modeling of field sprayers. Transactions of the ASAE 32: 1857-1863.

4. Clijmans, L., J. Swevers, J. De Baerdemaeker, and H. Ramon. 1999. Experimental design for vibration analysis on agricultural spraying machines. Proceedings of the International Seminar on Modal Analysis 3: 1517-1522.

5. Clijmans, L., H. Ramon, P. Sas, and J. Swevers. 2000a. Sprayer boom motion, part 2: validation of the model and effect of boom vibration on spray liquid deposition. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 76: 121-128.

6. Clijmans, L., J. Swevers, J. De Baerdemaeker, and H. Ramon. 2000b. Sprayer boom motion, part 1: derivation of the mathematical model using experimental system identification theory. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 76: 61-69.

7. Deprez, K., M. Lannoije, J. Anthonis, H. Ramon, and H. Van Brussel. 2000. Development of a slow active suspension for stabilizing the roll of spray booms. Proceedings of the UKACC International Conference on Control 81: 185-191.

8. Ebrahimi, R., and M. Ghayour. 2015. Simulation and control of rotational vibration of sprayer boom using a novel suspension system. Journal of Simulation and Analysis of Novel Technologies in Mechanical Engineering 8: 163-173.

9. Engelen, K., H. Ramon, and J. Anthonis. 2006. Load spectrum estimation from output-only measurements applied to a spray boom model. International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering 5: 2949-2959.

10. Frost, A. 1984. Simulation of an active spray boom suspension. Journal of agricultural engineering research 30: 313-325.

11. He, Y. J., B. J. Qiu, and Y. F. Yang. 2014. Modal testing and parameters' identification of spray boom. Applied Mechanics and Materials 532: 324-327.

12. Herbst, A., H. Osteroth, W. Fleer, and H. Stendel. 2015. A method for testing automatic spray boom height control systems. ASABE Annual International Meeting: 1-7.

13. Hicks, B. 2005. Effect of tilt actuator manipulation on suspended boom sprayer roll. University of Saskatchewan, Canada.

14. Ito, T., T. Inada, T. Yoshida, T. Mizukami, A. Oota, D. Shibasaki, M. Akashi, and Y. Tanaka. 2014. Boom sprayer and boom vibration control device. Pages 24. US Patent App: Kayaba industry co. ltd.

15. Jeon, H. 2003. Instrumented self-propelled sprayer to determine dynamic boom effects on droplet application uniformity. University of tennessee, Knoxville.

16. Jeon, H., A. Womac, and J. Gunn. 2003a. Influence of 27-m sprayer boom dynamics on precision chemical application. ASAE Annual Meeting: 1-28.

17. Jeon, H., A. Womac, and J. Gunn. 2004. Sprayer boom dynamic effects on application uniformity. Transactions of the ASAE 47: 647-658.

18. Jeon, H., A. Womac, J. Wilkerson, and W. Hart. 2003b. Instrument system to monitor the dynamic behavior of a 27-m sprayer boom. ASAE Annual Meeting: 1-17.

19. Lebeau, F., and M. Destain. 1998. Measurement of the sprayer boom displacements with a laser sensor displacement. Proceedings of the AgEng, Oslo, Paper: 004.

20. Mohamad, M., M. Mailah, and A. Muhaimin. 2006. Vibration control of mechanical suspension system using active force control. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

21. Nation, H. J. 1982. The dynamic behaviour of field sprayer booms. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 27: 61-70.

22. O’Sullivan, J. 1986. Simulation of the behaviour of a spray boom with an active and passive pendulum suspension. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 35: 157-173.

23. Parloo, E., P. Guillaume, J. Anthonis, W. Heylen, and J. Swevers. 2003. Modelling of sprayer boom dynamics by means of maximum likelihood identification techniques, Part 2: Sensitivity-based mode shape normalisation. Biosystems engineering 85: 291-298.

24. Pochi, D., and D. Vannucci. 2001. Laboratory evaluation of linear and angular potentiometers for measuring spray boom movements. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 80: 153-161.

25. Ramon, H., J. De Baerdemaeker, and H. Van Brussel. 1996. Design of a cascade controller for a flexible spray boom. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 10: 197-210.

26. Sartori, S., E. Domingues, J. Kimura, and S. Garrito. 2002. Automatic control of boom height and positioning on a self propelled sprayer. World Congress of Computers in Agriculture and Natural Resources, Proceedings of the 2002 Conference: 421.

27. Sigrimis, N., K. Arvanitis, and G. Pasgianos. 2002. A comparison of optimal control algorithms for vibration attenuation of agricultural spray booms. ASAE Annual Meeting: 1-14.

28. Sinfort, C., A. Miralles, F. Sevila, and G. Maniere. 1994. Study and development of a test method for spray boom suspensions. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 59: 245-252.

29. Sun, J., and Y. Miao. 2011. Modeling and simulation of the agricultural sprayer boom leveling system. Third International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation 2: 613-618.

30. Tahmasebi, M., R. Rahman, M. Mailah, and M. Gohari. 2012. Sprayer boom active suspension using intelligent active force control. Journal of World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 68: 1277-1281.

31. Tahmasebi, M., R. Rahman, M. Mailah, and M. Gohari. 2013. Active force control applied to spray boom structure. Applied Mechanics and Materials 315: 616-620.

32. Wang, X., D. Wang, S. Li, and X. Li. 2018. Design of position balance controller for the sprayer boom. 3rd International Conference on Mechanical, Control and Computer Engineering (ICMCCE): 304-307.

33. Weidong, J., Z. Leijiang, and Y. Mingde. 2013. Current situation and development trend of boom sprayer. Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization 34: 19-22.

34. Wu, J., and Y. Miao. 2012. Dynamic characteristic analysis of boom for wide sprayer with different exciting sources. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering 28: 39-44.

35. Yuki, S., H. Yasuda, T. Matsubayashi, and H. Ishizuka. 2013. Development of tractor automatic controlled boom sprayer using CAN-BUS. IFAC Proceedings Volumes 46: 264-269.