Optimizing the Muffler of a Portable Lawn Mower Engine to reduce Noise Pollution Levels

ماشین های کشاورزی

Article 17, Volume 11, Issue 2 - Serial Number 22, 2021, Pages 359-369   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jam.v11i2.84829

Authors

Sh. Sedighi¹; D. Kalantari^{* 1}; J. Rédl²

¹Department of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University (SANRU), Iran

²Department of Machine Design, Faculty of Engineering, SAU in Nitra, Slovak Republic

Abstract

Introduction
The most important adverse effects of noise on humans have reduced work efficiency and physiological damaging effects such as increased heart rate, high blood pressure, permanent and temporary hearing loss, impaired vision, disrupting the body's balance system, causing nervous disorders and even nervous disorders. Much of the occupational disturbance is due to acoustic vibrations in agricultural mechanization, which is affecting a large number of farmers. In this regard, most of the noise and vibration come from two-stroke or four-stroke engines that are used in lawn mowers, sprayers, pits and more. These high-vibration equipment causes a great deal of damage to their operators. Portable lawn mowers are popular for working in urban and rural areas due to their low cost, low maintenance cost, high maneuverability and affordability. Therefore, the possibility of optimizing the muffler of a small combustion engine for a lawn mower was investigated and studied in the present stud.
Materials and Methods
To optimize the existing muffler, geometry of the factory muffler was first redesigned in solidworks 2014 software. Then the optimized muffler, along with the factory muffler exported into ANSYS CFX software and simulated in terms of velocity and pressure distributions. To evaluate the built muffler and compare its performance with the factory standard muffler, the mufflers were then mounted on a DOMA’s lawnmower model WPGD501 with a 42 cm³ engine volume and tested outdoors in a radius of 5 m. All sound recording tests were performed in steady state at a distance of 1m with a 45° angle and position along the exhaust outlet to reconstruct the user's ear position. A digital thermometer TEM-8820 and a PSA-V01 digital barometer were used to measure the sound pressure and an environment temperature.
Results and Discussion
The results showed that at 3000 rpm, the sound pressure level of the modified muffler decreased by 6.4% compared to the modified muffler. The same decrease in sound pressure level was achieved at 5000 rpm, equal to 4.5%. The results of this study showed that with increasing engine speed, pressure changes in the muffler had an upward trend. These changes in the modified muffler increased by 0.02 kPa at 3000 rpm and by 0.07 kPa at 5000 rpm. According to the outputs of the FFT diagrams, the intensity and amplitude of the output frequencies from the modified muffler significantly decreased almost at most frequencies. Therefore, effective pressure difference (ΔPrms) was used for the further investigations. The results of this study showed that the pressure changes in the muffler had an upward trend with increasing the engine speed. These changes in the modified muffler increased by 0.02 kPa at 3000 rpm and by 0.07 kPa at 5000 rpm.
Conclusion
According to the results of the present study, by optimizing the internal muffler geometry of the lawn-mowers by installing internal blades and neutralizing the sound intensity inside the muffler, it is possible to reduce the sound pressure level by 4% to about 7% over the original muffler. It is a very simple and inexpensive method for the manufacturers of such engines.

Keywords

Ergonomics; Lawn mower; Muffler; Noise pollution; sound pressure level

References

1. Anonymous. 2007. Acoustic Test Regulations for Measuring Airborne Noise Released by Power Lawnmowers, Lawn Tractors, Lawn and Horticultural Tractors, Professional Lawnmowers and Lawn and Horticultural Tractors with Lawn Mowers. Iranian Institute of Standards and Industrial Research. No. 10549, (In Farsi).

2. Anonymous. 2009. Acoustic noise emitted by machinery and equipment measurement of emission sound pressure levels at a work station and at other specified positions-survey method in situ. ISO 11202. Switzerland. 26 p.

3. Aybek, A., H. Atil Kamer, and S. Arslan. 2010. Personal noise exposures of operators of agricultural tractors. Applied Ergonomics 41: 274-281.

4. Behroozi Lar, M., Z. Khodarahm Pour, M. Mehrzad Payandeh, and J. Jahangir Bagheri. 2011. Noise level of two types of tractor and health effect on drivers. Journal of American Science 7: 382-387.

5. Cho, P., and A. Karavadi, 1999. Sound Quality Target Development Process for Agricultural and Construction Machinery. SAE Technical Paper No. 1999-01-2820.

6. Ghafouri, S. 2014. Investigation of noise reduction due to the use of tubing and wires in the inner wall of motorcycle exhaust. Trabiat Modares University, MSc Thesis. (In Farsi).

7. Golmohammadi, R. 2007. Sound and vibration engineering. Third Edition. Daneshjoo Publications, Hamedan. Page. 534. (In Farsi).

8. Hassan Beigi Bidgoli, R., B. Ghobadian, P. Nasiri, and N. Kamalian. 2005. Investigation and noise analysis of a two-wheel tractor pulling a trailer on a rural asphalt road. Journal of Sciences and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources 8: 225-240. (In Farsi).

9. Jahanbakhshi, A., B. Ghamari, and K. Heidarbeigi. 2017. Assessing acoustic emission in 1055I John Deere combine harvester using statistical and artificial intelligence methods. International Journal of Vehicle Noise and Vibration 13: 105-117.

10. Jahanbakhshi, A. 2016. Study of vibration and acoustic emission in john Deere 1055I combine. M.Sc. dissertation, Ilam University, Iran. (In Farsi).

11. Karamat Siavash, N., Gh. Najafi, S. R. Hasan Beigi Bidgoli, and B. Ghobadian. 2014. Noise Analysis of Two Wheel Tractor Using Mixed Diesel and Biodiesel Fuels. Journal of Agricultural Machinery 5: 481-490. (In Farsi).

12. Lashgari, M. 2016. Acoustic annoyance analysis using sound quality criteria. Journal of sound and Vibration 5: 107-116. (In Farsi).

13. Maleki, A., and M. Lashgari. 2013. Study of noise level emitted by motorized mower. Journal of Agricultural Machinery 2: 29-35. (In Farsi).

14. Meyer, R. E., C. V. Schwab, and C. J. Bern. 1993. Tractor noise exposure for bean bar riders. Journal of Transaction of ASAE 36: 1049-1056.

15. Mohammadi Gahrouyi, R., A. Maleki, and M. Lashgari. 2020. Effect of Material Composition type and Audio Frequency factors on Absorption Coefficient and the Sound Level Variation. Modares Mechanical Engineering, 20: 649-658. (In Farsi).

16. Nor, M. J. M., M. H. Fouladi, H. Nahvi, and A. K. Ariffin. 2008. Index for vehicle acoustical comfort inside a passenger car. Journal of Applied Acoustics 69: 343-353.

17. Pruvost, L., Q. Leclere, and E. Parizet. 2009. Diesel engine combustion and mechanical noise separation using an improved spectrofilter. Journal of Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 23: 2072 2087.

18. Sabanci, A., F. Özgüven, C. Özşahinoğlu, and F. Özsoy. 1985. Noise analysis on agricultural tractors and its effects to hearing ability. In 8th Joint Ergonomics Symposium, Silsoe, Bedforshire, UK.‏

19. Solecki, L. 2000. Duration of exposure to noise among farmers as an important factor of occupational risk. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine 7: 89-93.