Ergonomic Evaluation Posture of Sugarcane Workers using REBA Method

ماشین های کشاورزی

Article 26, Volume 11, Issue 2 - Serial Number 22, 2021, Pages 477-489   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jam.v11i2.78574

Author

N. Monjezi^*

Biosystems Engineering Dept., Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
One of the most important risk factors for developing musculoskeletal disorders is the inappropriate work of postures and since maintaining the health of the workforce promotes community development. Therefore, the workforce should be in an appropriate working environment without any harmful factors to ensure its physical and mental well-being. Among the various problem found in agriculture mentioned above, a problem commonly reported in agricultural workers in particular farmers in a rural area is work-musculoskeletal symptoms (MSS) in a different part of the body. In the process of producing sugarcane, a significant part of the stage of cuttings, planting, and harvesting is done manually. A low level of knowledge about the correct condition of the body during work is one of the problems of farmers. Therefore, body status assessment methods are considered as the basis and the basis for assessing the risk of musculoskeletal disorders associated with work. We decided to do a posture assessment in these persons while working to determine the posture hazard level. The purpose of this study was to identify inappropriate working conditions in sugarcane fields at the cutting, planting and harvesting manual stages.
Materials and Methods
This study was a descriptive-analytical approach performed on 300 workers by using the REBA method. The Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) method was used to determine the risk of MSDs. The REBA posture-targeting method is probably the most well-known method for rapid assessment of risks. The REBA method is ideal for rapid assessment of standing work. In order to collect the required data, each part of the body was scored and work frequency, load/force, coupling were considered to achieve a REBA score. The REBA provides a quantitative value to the evaluation that indicates the level of severity of each task. The calculation was made by using the REBA Employee Assessment Worksheet that has been divided into two groups; Group A (Trunk, Neck, and Legs) postures and Group B (Upper Arms, Lower Arms, and Wrists) postures for left and right. A summary of the procedure for the REBA score and the degree of risk is found in the REBA decision table. The risk score of this approach should be in the range of one of fifteen, where the higher scores signify greater levels of apparent risk. An analysis of scores represents the work’s risks and indicates possible actions to avoid or minimize the risks. The method of work was to photograph workers in sugar cane fields of Khuzestan province during the activity and analysis of photographs using modeling the body of workers with REBA 6 software and analyzing different situations using REBA method.
Results and Discussion
By cutting stage, a total of 6.6% of evaluating postures by REBA technique obtained scores of 8-10 (very high risk level) and 93.4% had scores of 11-15 (very high risk level) that correspond to the action level 3 and 4, respectively. In planting stage, a total of 12.10% of evaluating postures by REBA technique obtained scores of 8-10 (very high risk level) and 87.90% had scores of 11-15 (very high risk level) that correspond to the action level 3 and 4, respectively. In the harvesting stage, a total of 15.30% of evaluating postures by REBA technique obtained scores of 8-10 (very high-risk level) and 84.70% had scores of 11-15 (very high risk level) that correspond to the action level 3 and 4, respectively. The results showed that according to the REBA method, in preparation cuttings, planting and harvesting sugarcane manually, respectively, 93.48, 90.87 and 84.77% of the workers' posture are in the most critical group that should be avoided. Risk level should be reduced, especially in sugarcane fields. More training and instructions are needed to have a good working position in sugarcane procedures. Improvement of working posture need to be done by improving all aspects that related to physical workload such as by reducing the workload on the back, neck, shoulder/arm, and also hand/wrist.
Conclusion
A high percentage of musculoskeletal disorders in workplaces occur due to awkward posture and non-ergonomic design of the workstations for lifting and carrying of materials. To avoid these injuries, jobs should be designed in a way that ergonomics risk factors are controlled properly. The results of this study can be used to develop WMSDs preventive strategies in the workplace and improve workers’ health. Educational intervention can be an appropriate way to improve the physical condition and ultimately reduce musculoskeletal disorders. Some proposed corrective actions include: standardizing the design and construction of the work tool used by the user's anthropometric study (especially sharp sickle), establishing suitable work-resting cycles and conducting periodic examinations for the early detection of musculoskeletal disorders. Of course, given the high percentage of damage to sugarcane production during manual operation, it's definitely a move to mechanized operations in sugarcane crops.

Keywords

Body posture; Cutting; Harvesting; Musculoskeletal disorders; Planting

References

1. Albaji, A., M. J. Shaeikhdavoodi, and A. Mostaan. 2014. Evaluation of ergonomic postures of date palm workers in Ahwaz Township by REBA method. Eighth national congress of agricultural machinery engineering (Biomass) and mechanization of Iran. February 9-11. Mashhad Ferdowsi University. (In Farsi).

2. Azizpour, Y., A. Delpisheh, and R. Maghsoodi Moghadam. 2015. Ergonomic evaluation of job performance within the staff of the nursing and the operating room by REBA technique. Journal of Urmia Nursing and Midwifery Faculty 13 (1): 75-83. (In Farsi).

3. Eydizadeh, M., M. J. Shaeikhdavoodi, and A. Salehi Sahl Abadi. 2014. Ergonomic evaluation of date’s packinghouse workers by REBA method. Journal of Agricultural Engineering 37 (1): 13-22. (In Farsi).

4. Fathi, S., A. Marzban, and M. Ghasemi Nejad. 2015. Evaluation of ergonomic cotton harvester drivers using REBA method and Nordic questionnaire. International Conference on Sustainable Development With a focus on Agriculture, Environment and Tourism, 16-17 September, Tabriz, Iran. (In Farsi).

5. Gholami, H., D. Kalantari, and M. Rajabi Vandechli. 2017. Ergonomic evaluation of vibrations of a rototiller with new blade. Journal of Agricultural Machinery 7 (2): 491-502. (In Farsi).

6. Hignett, S., and L. McAtamney. 2000. Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA). Applied Ergonomics 31: 201-205.

7. Houshyar, A., and I. J. Kim. 2018. Understanding musculoskeletal disorders among Iranian apple harvesting laborers: Ergonomic and stop watch time studies. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 67: 32-40.

8. Javidi, M., and M. Kasraei. 2012. Evaluation of inadequate posture of rice farms workers. National Congress on Agricultural Machinery and Mechanization. University Shiraz. (In Farsi).

9. Javidi Gharacheh, M., and M. Khojastehpour. 2016. Ergonomic evaluation of tea farmers in north of Iran during plucking using body modeling. Journal of Agricultural Machinery 6 (2): 488-498. (In Farsi).

10. Karami Matin, B., A. Mehrabi Matin, M. Ziaei, Z. Nazari, H. Yarmohammadi, and F. Gharagozlou. 2013. Risk assessment of cumulative trauma disorders in Quarry and Stone Industries workers Kermanshah in 2013. Journal Ergonomy 1 (2): 28-35. (In Farsi).

11. Mansouri, N., H. Zaki dizaji, M. J. Sheikhdavoodi, and A. Asakereh. 2018. Evaluation of Different planting method for sugarcane for Khuzestan region. Agricultural Mechanization and Systems Research, Available online from 03 March 2018, DOI: 10.22092/erams.2017.112997. (In Farsi).

12. Mendonça, M. L. 2006. The WTO and the destructive effects of the sugarcane industry in Brazil. Accessible via: http://www.social.org.br/cartilhas/cartilha_rede_em_ingles.pdf. pp 250.

13. Mirbod, S. M., R. Inaba, and H. Iwata. 2005. Low back pain among different groups of subjects exposed to hand-arm transmitted vibration. Industrial Health 35 (2): 212-21.

14. Motamedzade, M., Z. Moradpour, H. Gorjizadeh, G. Hesam, and A. Moghim Beigi. 2015. Design and fabrication of a personal digital assistant (PDA) prototype for postural assessment using the RULA, REBA and QEC techniques. Journal of Ergonomics 2 (4): 32-40. (In Farsi).

15. Qutubuddin, S. H. S., and A. Kumar. 2013. An ergonomic study of work related musculoskeletal disorder risks in Indian saw mills. Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering 7 (5): 07-13.

16. Sadeghi, N., A. Delshad, and M. J. Fani. 2010. REBA Method Posture Analysis in Saffron Pickers in Gonabad. Horizon of Medical Sciences 15 (4): 47-53. (In Farsi).

17. Sahu, S., and M. Sett. 2010. Ergonomic evaluation of tasks performed by female workers in the unorganized sectors of the manual brick manufacturing units in India. Journal of the Entomological Society of South Africa 22 (1): 2-16.

18. Sloon, G. I., and A. Rhodes. 2001. A comparison of the processing of burned and unburned Sugar cane. Biosystem Engineering 89 (1): 1-13.

19. Torres, Y., and S. Vina. 2012. Evaluation and redesign of manual material handling in a vaccine production Centre’s warehouse. Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation 41: 2487-91.

20. Widyanti, A. 2018. Ergonomic checkpoint in agriculture, postural analysis, and prevalence of work musculoskeletal symptoms among Indonesian farmers: Road to safety and health in agriculture. Journal Teknik Industry 20 (1): 1-10.