تعیین مؤلفه‌های حکمرانی در حوزه‌های اقتصادی، سیاسی، اجتماعی و محیط‌زیست در بخش کشاورزی ایران

مجله اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی

مقاله 2، دوره 33، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 44، تیر 1398، صفحه 125-149   

نوع مقاله: مقالات پژوهشی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/jead2.v0i0.78364

نویسندگان

مرضیه رونقی؛ محمدرضا کهنسال^* ؛ محمد قربانی

دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

چکیده

حکمرانی خوب مجموعه‌ای از هنجارها و ارزش‌هاست و این یک عامل مهم برای توسعه کشور محسوب می‌شود. با توجه به آن که بخش کشاورزی نقش مهمی را در زندگی مردم دارد اما سهم آن در توسعه کاهش یافته است. در این تحقیق ابتدا از روش فرا ترکیب4 برای یافتن عوامل مهم حکمرانی کشاورزی در سطح جهانی استفاده شد. از کارشناسان متخصص کشاورزی برای رتبه‌بندی متغیرها در سطح جهانی با استفاده از روش آنتروپی شانون استفاده شد. همچنین برای یافتن مؤلفه‌های حکمرانی کشاورزی در ایران از تکنیک دلفی برای پر کردن پرسشنامه‌ها و ماتریس مقایسه دوجانبه در بین خبرگان ایرانی استفاده شد و در انتها روش فازی برای وزن‌دهی و مقایسه متغیرها در سطح جهانی و ایران بکار گرفته شد. مطابق با یافته‌های مدل فرا ترکیب متغیرهای (سیاست بین‌المللی، مشارکت گروهی و شرکت‌های تعاونی، رعایت استانداردها) بیشترین اهمیت و رتبه را دارند. در حالی‌که، با استفاده از تجزیه و تحلیل فازی متغیرهای (اشتغال کشاورزی، مشارکت گروهی و شرکت‌های تعاونی) بیشترین اهمیت را در حوزه سیاسی، اجتماعی و محیطی و متغیرهای (افزایش تولید و بازارهای مالی و سرمایه) بیشترین اهمیت را در حوزه اقتصادی در کشاورزی ایران دارند. متغیر (مشارکت گروهی و شرکت‌های تعاونی) در هر دو روش مشترک می‌باشد. مهم‌ترین پیشنهاد این پژوهش آن است که اجرای حکمرانی کشاورزی باید در آینده ادامه یابد، و با رویکردی وسیع‌تر، با استفاده از روش‌ها و مدل‌های ویژه، کل بخش کشاورزی را در بر گیرد. همچنین مطابق با یافته‌های پژوهش، مشارکت گروهی در کل فرایند تخصیص، صرف هزینه و نظارت بر منابع عمومی می‌تواند به تولید نتایج قابل توجه عملیاتی (بهبود عملکرد، معرفی اقدامات اصلاحی) و نتایج فرآیندی (تغییرات سازمانی، رفتاری و ارتباطی) کمک کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

حکمرانی کشاورزی؛ مشارکت گروهی؛ فراترکیب؛ فازی

مراجع

1- Alizadeh A., Amadeh A., and Baqaian M. 2014. Impact of Economic Sanctions on Employment Level in Iran. Ministry of Science, Research and Technology - Allameh Tabatabai University, Department of Economics. (In Persian)

2- Antle J. 1983. Infrastructure and aggregate agricultural productivity: international evidence. Economic Development and Cultural Change 31: 609–619.

3- Asgharpur M. 2004. Multi-criteria decision making. Tehran, Tehran University Press. (In Persian)

4- Artstein S., Ball K.M., Barthe F., and Naor A. 2004. Solution of Shannon’s Problem on the Monotonicity of Entropy. Math. Soc, 17: 975–982.

5- Atanassov K.T. 1999. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Springer.

6- Bard J.F., and Sousk S.F. 1990. A Trade Analysis for Rough Terrain Cargo Handlers Using the AHP: An Example of Group Decision Making. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 37: 222-228.

7- Barnett E., and Thomas J. 2009. Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods NCRM Working Paper Series. Homepage: www.ncrm.ac.uk.

8- Benson A., and Jafry T. 2013. The State of Agricultural Extension: An Overview and New Caveats for the Future. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 19: 381-393.

9- Bijman J., Sanjen G., and Hanisch M. 2014. Shifting control? Thte changes of internal governance agricultural cooperatives in the EU. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 85: 641–661.

10- Bitzar V., Bertus W., and de Steenhuijsen P. 2016. The governance of agricultural extension systems. Kit working papers.

11- Booth A., Papaoianno D., and Sutton A. 2012. Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. London: Sage.

12- CAPMAS. 2006. Final Results of the General Population Survey and Housing Conditions. Central Agency for Public Mobilization and Statistics (CAPMAS), Cairo, Egypt, 3–7.

13- Chakrabortty S., Pal M., and Nayak P.K. 2013. Intuitionistic fuzzy optimization technique for Pareto optimal solution of manufacturing inventory models with shortages. European Journal of Operational Research 228: 381–387.

14- Chinsinga B., and Cabral L. 2010. The limits of decentralized governance: the case of agriculture in Malawi. Policy Brief 33, Future Agricultures.

15- Ciolos D. 2012. International aspects of agricultural policy.” BACKGROUND DOCUMENT FOR THE ADVISORY GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL ASPECTS OF AGRICULTURE.

16- Dethier J., and Effenberger A. 2011. Food and agriculture challenges are examined in Evaluative Lessons for Agriculture and Agribusiness by the Evaluation Cooperation Group. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 5553.

17- Dekker R., and Bekkers V. 2015. The contingency of governments' responsiveness to the virtual public sphere: A systematic literature review and meta-synthesis. Government Information Quarterly 32: 496–505.

18- DFID UNDP, EC and WB. 2009. Analyzing Governance and Political Economy in Sectors. Joint Donor Workshop, London, UK, 2–6.

19- Division for democratic governance. 2002. The Political Institutions Participation in Democratic Governanc, Good Governance.

20- Donkor S., and Ohiokpehai O. 1998. The relationship between food security and good governance. In: Africa HUGG International Symposium: Food Security and Governance in Africa. <http://www.toda.org/Default.aspx?PageID=343>.

21- Elmenofi G., Bilali H., and Sinisa B. 2014. Governance of rural development in Egypt. Annals of Agricultural Science 59: 285–296.

22- Fan S., Jitsuchon S., and Methakunnavut N. 2004. The importance of public investment for reducing rural poverty in middle-income countries: the case of Thailand. DSGD Discussion.

23- Fink A. 2010. Conducting research literature reviews. From the internet to paper (3rd Edition). London: Sage.

24- Fulginiti L., and Perrin R. 1993. Prices and productivity in agriculture. Review of Economics and Statistics 75: 471–482.

25- Glasbergen P., and Schouten G. 2015. Transformative capacities of global private sustainability standards: a reflection on scenarios in the field of agricultural commodities. J. Corp. Citizsh 58: 85–101.

26- Globerman S., and Shapiro D. 2002. Global foreign direct investment flows: the role of governance infrastructure. World Development 11: 1899–1919.

27- Hall R., and Jones C. 1997. Levels of economic activity across countries. American Economic Review 87: 173–177.

28- Hayami Y., Ruttan V. 1985. Agricultural Development: An International Perspective. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

29- Hillborn R.C. 1994. Chaos and Nonlinear Dynamics. Oxford University Press, New York.

30- Hospes O. 2014. Marking the success or end of global multi-stakeholder governance the rise of national sustainability standards in Indonesia and Brazil for palm oil and soy. Agric. Hum. Values 31: 425–437.

31- Hughes A., McEwan C., and Bek D. 2013. Retailers, supply networks and changing articulations of ethicality: lessons from Flower Valley in South Africa. Econ. Geogr 13: 211–230.

32- Huo A., Dang J., Song J., Hong Chen X., and Mao H. 2016. Simulation modeling for water governance in basins based on surfacewater and groundwater. Agricultural Water Management.

33- International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). 2015. Agriculture and achieving the Millennium development goals. IFPRI, Washington, D.C., USA, [online] URL: http://www.ifpri.org/pub lication/agriculture-and-achieving-millenniumdevelopment-goals.

34- Janssen M., and Van der Voort H. 2016. Adaptive governance: Towards a stable, accountable and responsive government. Government Information Quarterly 33: 1-5.

35- Jayachandran J. 2015. The Roots of Gender Inequality in Developing Countries. Annu. Rev. Econ 7: 63–88.

36- Kawagoe T., Hayami Y., and Ruttan V. 1985. The inter-country agricultural production function and productivity differences among countries. Journal of Development Economics 19: 113–132.

37- Khosravipour B., Baradaran M., Ravahinezhad M., and Ghichani O. 2014. Investigate the Importance and Role of Companies Cooperatives in the agricultural sector. Social, Economic, Scientific and Cultural Monthly Work and Society, 175. (In Persian)

38- Kulak O., and Kahraman C. 2005. Fuzzy Multi-Criterion Selection Among Transportation Companies Using Axiomatic Design and Analytic Hierarchy Process. Information Sciences 170: 191-210.

39- Leung L.C., and Chao D. 2000. On Consistency and Ranking of Alternatives in Fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research 124: 102-113.

40- Liu M., and Lio M. 2008. Governance and agricultural productivity: A cross-national analysis. Food Policy 33: 504–512.

41- MALR. 2009. Sustainable Agricultural Development Strategy ‘SADS’’, towards 2030. Ministry of Agriculture and Land Reclamation (MALR), Cairo, Egypt, 20: 26, 32, 43.

42- Mizan news. 2017. The Impact of Negotiations with Developing Countries on Agricultural Development. http://www.mizanonline.com/fa/news

43- Mohammadzadeh Y., Hekmati S., and Sharifi A. 2016. The Effect of Government Size on Good Governance and Economic Performance in Selected Countries. Research Papers on Economic Growth and Development 7(26): 7-112. (In Persian)

44- Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., and Altman D. 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine 6: 2642–69.

45- Mosaddegh F., Kazemi F., and Yelfani A. 2016. Investigating the effects and consequences of sanctions on foreign investment in Iran and the relationship between resistance economy and decreasing negative effects of sanctions. Research Papers on Economic Growth and Development 2: 1-10. (In Persian)

46- Nawar M.H. 2006. Rural development policies in Egypt: historical background and devolution of the institutional framework. In: Chassany, J.P., Pellissier, J.-P. (Eds.), Politiques de de´veloppement rural durable en Me´diterrane´e dans le cadre de la politique de voisinage de l’Union Europe´enne. Montpellier, CIHEAM, 45– 54. (Options diterrane´ennes: Se´ rie A. Se´min aires Me´diterrane´ens; n.71) <http://om.ciheam.org/article.php?ID> PD F=6400056, France.

47- Neal P., Marian J., Greco F., Connell D., and Conrad J. 2016. The social-environmental justice of groundwater governance. Integrated Groundwater Management Journal 25: 253-272.

48- Odularu G., and Tambi E. 2011. Establishment of standards for international agricultural trade: Promoting Africa’s participation. Trade Negitiations Insights, 10.

49- OECD Work on Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, 2017. TOWARDS BETTER FOOD POLICIES.

50- Petticrew M., and Roberts H. 2006. Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

51- Ping Wan SH., Li Qin Y., and Ying Dong J. 2017. A hesitant fuzzy mathematical programming method for hybrid multi-criteria group decision making with hesitant fuzzy truth degrees. Knowledge-Based Systems 138: 232-248.

52- Pohekar S.D., and Ramachandran M. 2004. Application of Multi-Criteria Decision Making to Sustainable Energy Planning. A Review Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 8: 365-381.

53- Poulton C. 2010. Agricultural Services and Decentralisation in Kenya. Policy Brief 035, Future Agricultures.

54- Rongbao G. 2017. Multiscale Shannon entropy and its application in the stock market. Contents lists available at ScienceDirect. Physica A, 484: 215–224. Saaty T.L. 1994. Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytical Hierarchy Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh.

55- Saaty T.L. 2001. Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh.

56- Sarkis J., and Talluri S. 2004. Evaluating and Selecting e-Commerce Software and Communication Systems for a Supply Chain. European Journal of Operational Research 159: 318-329.

57- Schouten G., and Bitzer V. 2015. The emergence of Southern standards in agricultural value chains: A new trend in sustainability governance. Ecological Economics 120: 175–184.

58- Shannon C.E. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 27: 379–423.

59- Sheng Y. 2015. What is Good Governance?” United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific.

60- Social Development Department Demand for Good Governance Team, August 2010.

61- Stead D. 2015. What does the quality of governance imply for urban prosperity? Habitat International 45: 64-69.

62- Taha H.A. 2003. Operations Research, Pearson Education Inc. Fayetteville. (In Persian)

63- Taylor B.W. 2004. Introduction to Management Science. Pearson Education Inc., New Jersey.

64- Thirtle C., and Piesse J. 2013. Governance, agricultural productivity and poverty reduction in Africa, Asia and Latin America.” Irrigation and Drainage 56: 165-177.

65- Tomich T., Kilby P., and Johnston B. 1995. Transforming Agrarian Economies: Opportunities Seized, Opportunities Missed. Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

66- Triantaphyllou E., and Mann S.H. 1995. Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decision Making in Engineering Applications: Some Challenges. International Journal of Industrial Engineering: Applications and Practice 2: 35-44.

67- US Agency for International Development (USAID). 2002. Foreign Aid in the National Interest.

68- US Agency for International Development (USAID). 2017. Investing in Agricultural Research and Development.

69- Vermont B., and De Cara S. 2010. How costly is mitigation of non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture? A meta-analysis. Ecological Economics 69: 1373–1386.

70- Yahyapour Sh., Shamizanjani M., and Mosakhani M. A. 2016. Conceptual breakdown structure for knowledge management benefits using meta-synthesis method. Journal of Knowledge Management 19: 1295–1309. Permanent link to this document: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2015-0166.

71- Wabalickis R.N. 1988. Justification of FMS with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 17: 175-182.

72- World Bank. 2015. Africa development indicators. World Bank, Washington, D.C., USA. [online] URL:http://siteresources.worldbank.org/AFRICAEXT/ Resources/english_essay_adi2010.pdf.

73- World Bank and IFPRI. 2010. Gender and governance in rural services: Insights from India, Ghana, and Ethiopia. Agriculture and Rural Development. Washington, DC, USA: The World Bank.

74- World Bank. 2018. Agriculture Finance & Agriculture Insurance.