Competitive Ability of Lentil (Lens culinaris L.) Cultivars to Weed Interference under Rain-fed Conditions

بوم شناسی کشاورزی

Article 7, Volume 8, Issue 1 - Serial Number 27, March 2016, Pages 82-94   

Document Type: Scientific - Research

DOI: 10.22067/jag.v8i1.34606

Authors

Javad Hamzei^* ; Mohsen Seyedi; Majid Babaei

Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
The lentil or masoor (Lens culinaris L.) is a brushy annual plant of the legume family, grown for its lens-shaped seeds. Lentil has been one of the first crops domesticated in the Near East. With 26% protein, lentil is the vegetable with the highest level of protein other than soybeans, and it is an important part of people’s diet in many parts of the world. It is reported that the average yield of lentil is considerably low compared to its potential yield of 1500-2000 kg ha-1, obtained in the research field. Such lower yield may be attributed to the poor management of the crop among which poor weed management is an important one. Lentil crop is not very competitive against weeds due to small and weak canopy. Weed reduces yield through competition with crop plants for space, moisture, light and plant nutrients. Generally 20 to 30% losses of grain yield are quite usual and may increase even 50%, if the crop management practices are not properly followed (Deihimfard et al., 2007). The modern lentil varieties give good yield if the land remains weed free for the first one month. However, most of the farmers are reluctant to control weeds in lentil field timely and finally, loses yield. Inadequate weed control was found to reduce the yield 40-66% in lentil (Erman et al., 2008; McDonald et al., 2007). A major component of integrated weed management is the use of more competitive crops, although the selection of better crop competitiveness is a difficult task. The use of competitive plants for weed control could be considered cost-effective and less labour-intensive, and thus reduces the amount of herbicides required. Therefore, the aim of this research was to evaluate lentil competitive ability and to compare the effects of cultivar selection.

Materials and methods
An experiment was carried out as a factorial based on a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with 10 treatments and three replications. Experimental treatments included hand weeding and weedy check and five lentil cultivars (Bilehsavar, Karalinta, Kimia, Seymareh and local). This experiment was studied at the Research Farm of Bu-Ali Sina University during the growing season of 2012-2013. Plots were not irrigated because lentil was grown under dry land conditions. Weeds were counted at their greatest intensity, and their identification was much easier. Three square meter samples were randomly collected from each sub-plot for evaluation the weed biomass. At harvest, two outer rows for each plot and 50 cm from each end of the plots were left as borders and the central rows were harvested. Yield and yield components of lentil were classified as biological yield, grain yield, 1000- seed weight, number of pods plant-1, number of seeds per pod and plant height.

Results and discussion
The results showed that the effects of weed control and cultivar was significant on all traits but plant height and chlorophyll meter reading was not affected by cultivar. Also, the effects of treatment interaction were significant on grain and biological yield. The highest grain and biological yield (110 and 338 g.m-2, respectively) was observed at local cultivar on hand weeding treatment. The lowest mean for these traits with a reduction of 82 and 70%, respectively, belonged to Karalinta cultivar on weedy control treatment. Weed interference decreased yield and yield component of all lentil cultivars significantly. Maximum and minimum weed dry matter and weed density belonged to Karalinta and local cultivars, respectively. The highest values for competition and ability of tolerance indices (2.02 and 52.82, respectively) belonged to Local cultivar and the lowest values of these indices (0.49 and 23.53, respectively) were achieved at Karalinta cultivar.

Conclusion
It can be concluded that local and Karalinta cultivars were the resistant and sensitive cultivars to weed presence, respectively.

Keywords

Biomass; Dryland farming; Integrated Weed Management; Sustainable agriculture

References

1- Aghaalikhani, M., Yadavi, A., and Modares Sanavi, S.M.A. 2006. Determination of critical period of weed control in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Lordegan. Journal of Agricultural Science 28: 118-124. (In Persian with English Summary)

2- Ahmad Khan, L., Gul, H., and Azim Khan, M. 2003. Effect of post-emergence herbicide for controlling weeds in canola. Asian Journal Plant Science 3: 294-296.

3- Auškalnienė, O., Pšibišauskienė, G., and Auškalnis, A. 2010. Cultivar and density influence on weediness in spring barley crops. Zemdirbyeste-Agriculture 97(2): 53-60.

4- Awal, M.A., and Ashotus, R. 2015. Effect of weeding on the growth and yield of three varieties of lentil (Lens culinaris L.). American Journal of Food Science and Nutrition Research 2(2): 26-31.

5- Baghestani, M.A., Lemieux, C., and Leroux, G. 2005a. Early root and shoot competition between spring cereal cultivars and wild mustard (Brassica kaber). Iranian Journal of Weed Science 1(1): 19- 40.

6- Baghestani, M.A., and Zand, E. 2004. Investigated morphophysiological characteristics of affecting the competitive power of wheat with weed pterygium (Goldbachia iaevigata L.) and wild oat (Avena fatua L.) In Karaj Region. Journal of Plant Pests and Diseases 72(1): 91-111. (In Persian with English Summary)

7- Crotser, P.M., and Wit, W.W. 2000. Effect of Glycine max L. canopy characteristics interference and weed free period on Solanum ptycuntum L. growth. Weed Science 48: 20-26.

8- Deihimfard, R., Hejazi, A., Zand, E., Baghestani, M.A., Akbari, G.A., and Soufizadeh, S. 2007. Evaluation of some characteristics affecting competitiveness of eight Iranian wheat cultivars with rocket weed. Weed Science 1: 59-78.

9- Fakhari, R., Didehbaz, G., Nobahar, A., and Bahrampour, T. 2013. Optimal conditions cover crops for weed suppression: A review. International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production 4(5): 1092-1097.

10- Farbodnia, A., Baghastani, M.A., Zand, E., and Noor Mohammadi, G.H. 2009. Evaluation of competitive ability of wheat cultivars against weeds Daphnia. Journal of Plant Protection 2(23): 47-81. (In Persian with English Summary)

11- Ghamari, H., and Ahmadvand, G. 2012. Effects of different period of interference and weed control on height, yield and yield components of bean. Journal of Crop Production and Processing 9: 70-79. (In Persian with English Summary)

12- Hamzei, J., Mohammady Nasab, A.D., Khoie, F.R., Javanshir, A., and Moghaddam, M. 2007. Critical period of weed control in three winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) cultivars. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Forestry 31: 83-90.

13- Hamzei, J., Seyedi, M., Ahmadvand, G., and Abutalebian, M.A. 2012. Effect of additive intercropping on suppressed weeds, yield and yield components of chickpea and barley. Journal of Crop Production and Processing 3: 43-55. (In Persian with English Summary)

14- Hussain, A., Nadeem, A., Ashraf, I., and Awan, M. 2009. Effect of weed competition periods on the growth and yield of black seed (Nigella sativa L.). Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research 15(1): 71-81.

15- Kavurmaci, Z., Karadavut, U., Kokten, K., and Bakoglu, A. 2010. Determining critical period of weed-crop competition in faba bean (Vicia faba L.). International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 12: 318-320.

16- Lance, R.G., and Liebman, M. 2003. A laboratory exercise for teaching critical period for weed control concepts. Weed Technology 17: 403-411.

17- Malek Maleki, F., Majnonhoseini, N., and Alizade, H. 2013. A survey on the effects of weed control treatments and plant density on lentil growth and yield. Electronic Journal of Crop Production 6(2): 135-148. (In Persian with English Summary)

18- Mazaheri, D., Movahedi Dehnavi, M., Seyed Hadi, M.R., and Darzi, M.T. 2006. Plant Ecology. Publications by Tehran University, Iran.

19- Mirshekari, B., Javanshir, A., and Firozi, H. 2008. Response of morphological characteristics, yield and harvest index at three varieties of oilseed rape to weeds control. New Findings in Agriculture 4: 400-411. (In Persian with English Summary)

20- Mohammad Dost Chamanabad, H.R., and Asghari, A. 2009. The effect of crop rotation, mineral fertilizer application and herbicide on weed control in winter rye. Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources 13(47): 601-610 (In Persian with English Summary)

21- Mohammadi, G., Javanshir, A., Khooie, F.R., Mohammadi, S.A., and Zehtab Salmasi, S. 2005. Critical period of weed interference in chickpea. Weed Research 45: 57-63. (In Persian with English Summary)

22- Mousavi, S.K., and Ahmadi, A. 2007. Effect of sowing data and weed interference on the yield of dry land of three lentil cultivars in Khoramabad. Agricultural Research 8 (1): 13-26.

23- Parsa, M., and Bagheri, A. 2008. Pulses. Publications by Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran.

24- Pour-Taheri, S.N., Rahimi, M.M., Vaezi, B., and Ahmadikhah, A. 2012. Effect of seed density and weed control on yield and yield components of two lentil dry land-specific cultivars in subtropical conditions. Electronic Journal of Crop Production 4(5): 135-149. (In Persian with English Summary)

25- Rahimzadeh, F., Norouzinia, F., Taghizadeh, R., and Tobeh, A. 2013. Effect of competition of weeds on yield of lentil (Lens culinaris L.). International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production 4(8): 1737-1741.

26- Rohrig, M., and Stutzel, H. 2001. Canopy development of Chenopodium album in pure and mixed stands. Weed Research 41: 111-228.

27- Sadeghi, H. 2001. Identifying traits affecting the competitiveness of soybean (Glycine max L.) with weed for use in breeding programs. MSc Thesis, Higher Education Complex Aboureyhan. University, Tehran, Iran. (In Persian with English Summary)

28- Santos, B.M., Dusky, J.A., Stall, W.M., and Gilreath, J.P. 2004. Influence of common lambsquarter (Chenopodium album L.) densities and phosphorus fertilization on sugar beet. Crop Protection 23: 173-176.

29- Shafagh-Kolvanagh, J., Zehtab Salmasi, S., Javanshir, A., Moghaddam, M., and Dabbagh Mohammadinasab, A. 2009. Influence of nitrogen and weed interference on grain yield, yield components and leaf chlorophyll value of Soybean. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 1: 1-23. (In Persian with English Summary)

30- Walley, F.L., Clayton, G.W., Miller, P.R., Carr, P.M., and Lafond, G. 2007. Nitrogen economy of pulse crop production in the northern Great Plains. Agronomy Journal 99: 1710-1718.

31- Watson, P.R., Derksen, D.A., Van Acker, R.C., and Blrvine, M.C. 2002. The contribution of seed, seedling, and mature plant traits to barley cultivar competitiveness against weeds. Proceedings of the 2002 National Meeting-Canadian Weed Science Society p. 49-57.

32- Williams, M., and Lindquist, J.L. 2007. Influence of planting date and weed interference on sweet corn growth and development. Agronomy Journal 99: 1066-1072.