Application of One and One-half Bound (oohd) Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation for estimating the Recreational Value of Ghaleh- Roodkhan Forest Park

اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی

Article 7, Volume 33, Issue 3 - Serial Number 45, September 2019, Pages 313-327   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jead2.v33i3.81000

Authors

A. Mahmoodi^{* 1}; M. Jamaati Gashti²; Gh.R. Yavary³; M. Mehrara⁴; S. Yazdani⁴

¹Payame Noor

²Payam Noor University

³Payame Noor University

⁴Tehran

Abstract

Estimating the Recreational Value of Rudkhan Castel Forest Park: Application of One and One-half Bound (OOHD) Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation

Keywords

One and one-half bound (OOHD) approach; Recreational value; Rudkhan castel forest park

References

1- Abdelmoneim H.E., and Jeffrey J.L. 1995. Comparing three approaches that generate bids for the referendum contingent valuation method. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29(1): 92-104.

2- Ahmadpour A., Heshmati Gh., and Joolaie R. 2019. Economic Valuation of Recreational Function in Sohan Degraded Rangelands. Agricultural Economics Research 10(4): 39-58. (In Persian with English abstract)

3- Amirnejad H. 2007. Natural Resources Economics. Javedaneh Pulbishing, Jungle. Tehran.

4- Bishop Richard C., and Thomas A. 1979. Heberlein. "Measuring Values of Extra-Market Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased? Amer. J. Agri. Econ. 6: 926-30.

5- Boyle K.J., Welsh M.P., and Bishop R.C. 1988. Validation of empirical measurement of welfare change: comment. Land Economics 64(1): 94-98.

6- Buckley C., Van-Rensburg T., and Hynes S. 2011. Recreational Demand for Farm Commonage in Ireland: A Contingent Valuation Assessment. Land Use Policy 26: 846-854.

7- Cooper J.C., and Loomis J.1992. Sensitivity of Willingness-to-Pay Estimates to Bid Design in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Models, Land Economics 68(2): 211-224.

8- Cooper J.C., Hanemann M., and Signorello G. 2002. One-and-One-Half-Bound Dichotomous-Choice Contingent Valuation. The Review of Economics and Statistics 84(4): 742-750.

9- Copper J.C., and Signorello G. 2008. Farmer Premiums for the Voluntary Adoption of Conservation Plans. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 51(1): 1–14.

10- Copper J.C. 1993. Optimal bid selection for dichotomous choice contingent valuation surveys. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 24: 25-40.

11- Farajzadeh Z., Soltani G., and Roustaei M. 2010. Estimating Visitors’ Willingness to Pay for the Pasargad Historical Palaces: Using Contingent Valuation Method. QJER.; 9(4). (In Persian with English abstract)

12- Hanemann M. 1984. Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66(3): 332-341.

13- Howarth B.R., and Farber S. 2002. Accounting for the value of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 41: 421-429.

14- Kanninen B.J. 1993. Optimal experimental design Double-Bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. Land Economics 69(2): 138-146.

15- Khaksar Astaneh H., Kalate Arabi V., and Sardar Shahraki A. 2013. Estimating the Willingness to Pay of Visitors of Shahre Sukhte Historical Collection, Using Conditional Valuation Method (CVM). Tourism Management Studies 7(20): 167-184. (In Persian with English abstract)

16- Loomis J., Kent P., Strange L., Fausch K., and Covlch A. 2000. Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: results from a contingent valuation survey. Ecological Economics 33(1): 103-117.

17- Mitchell R., and Carson R. 1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Johns Hopkins University Press for Resources for the Future, Washington DC.

18- Molaei M. 2013. Comparison of Optimal Bid Design in Single Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Method. Quarterly Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development 21(81): 131-152. (In Persian with English abstract)

19- Pandi K. 2005. Foumanat and its People (The history of Fouman, Soumesara and Shaft). Haghshenas Publication. Rasht.

20- Reynisdottir M., Song H., and Agrusa J. 2008. Willingness to Pay Entrance Fees to Natural Attractions: An Icelandic Case Study. Tourism Management 29: 1076-1083.

21- Sabouhy M., and Ataie Solout K. 2014. The Application of One and One-Half Bound (OOHB) Choices in the Contingent Valuation to Determine Tourists Consumer Surplus of Sisangan Forest Park. Journal of Environmental Studies 40(2): 439-450. (In Persian with English abstract)

22- Samdeliri A., and Shahbazi H. 2017. Valuing recreational benefits in an aquatic ecosystem area with contingent valuation method: case of ShirinSou wetland, Iran. International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development 7(1): 133-140.

23- Schuhmann P.W., Skeet R., Waite R., Lorde T., Bangwayo-Skeete P., Oxenford H.A., Gill D., Moore W., and Spencer F. 2019. Visitors’ willingness to pay marine conservation fees in Barbados. Tourism Management 71: 315–326.

24- Sumedaliry A., Amirnejad H., and Mortazavi S.A. 2014. Residents' Willingness-to-Pay (WTP) for Preservation of Valasht Lake of Chalous City by Using One-and-One-Half-Bound Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Method. ijae. 2(5):1-13. (In Persian with English abstract)

25- White P.C.L., and Lovett J.C. 1998. Revealed preference and willingness to pay for preservation of Northern Marirak Park in Ireland. Environmental Management 55: 1-13.